MILITARY AND RELIGIOUS LIFE THE MIDDLE AGES, AN' I) AT THE PERIOD OF THE RENAISSANCE. MILITARY AND RELIGIOUS LIFE IN THE MIDDLE AGES AND AT THE PERIOD OF THE RENAISSANCE BY PAUL LACROIX (Bibliophile Jacob) CURATOR OF THE IMPERIAL LIBRARY OF THE ARSENAL, PARIS £Utt*tinttefc toith UPWARDS OF FOUR HUNDRED ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD LONDON BICKERS & SON, LEICESTER SQUARE D YD:] LQ-53 PREFACE. ATELY we published the " Manners, Customs, and Dress during the Middle Ages," a necessary sequel to "The Arts of the Middle Ages." To understand this im- portant period of our history, we must, as was pointed out at the time, go back to the very source of art, and study society itself — the life of our forefathers. The volume of "Manners and Customs" initiated our readers into all the secrets of Civil Life; the present work treats of the Military and Religious Life of the same period. The subject is not wanting in grandeur, and we shall endeavour to throw into relief the two parallel forces — namely, the military and the religious life — which shaped the habits of the nation in the epoch of which our work treats. The influence of these forces was immense. Society was made up of bar- barous nations and of the corrupt remnants of the heathen world. Conquerors and conquered had nothing to put in common, with a view to forming a new society, beyond their ruins and their vices. How was a state of things, higher and better than that which had gone before, to be created out of this shapeless mass? What principle of life was there powerful 6 \ vi PREFACE. enough to evoke from amid this chaos modern Europe, with all its variety of forces and of glory, its influence and authority over the rest of the world ? Religious life, aided by military power, has brought about such a creation, after all the misery and suffering preceding its birth. Gradually gaining a hold upon society, and elevating its ideas as the tie became closer, religious life endowed it with new manners, a new social life, a set of institutions of which it before knew nothing, and a character which raised it to a degree of moral grandeur which humanity had never as yet attained. Christianity civilised the barbarians ; by unity of faith, it established political unity amongst peoples who were split up into hostile races — a result which would only have been arrived at in former days by the annihilation of nationalities, the dominion of the sword, and the force of oppression. History presents no spectacle more worthy of our attention than the steady and deep operation of this new principle of life infused into a society in a state of decay. This principle could only succeed in remoulding and directing the world by first assimilating men as indi- viduals, and that amidst the excesses, the violence, and the disorders of a barbarism which, even after the lapse of centuries, would not allow itself to be crushed. But it was endowed with a persevering and indomitable energy. Consider how it affected everything, how it enlisted into its service all the forces which society from time to time placed at its disposal, or, to speak more correctly, permitted it to create ! By means of the monastic orders, how many necessary works did it not accomplish ? The soil was transformed by cultivation ; bridges, dykes, and aqueducts were constructed in every direction ; manuscripts were preserved in the monasteries ; educa- tion was given in numberless schools, where the poor were taught gra- tuitously ; the universities were made learned and prosperous ; architecture was raised into a science ; beneficent institutions were established and liber- ally endowed. "Christianity was the greatest benefactor of the Middle Ages," said M. Benjamin Gue>ard ; "and what is most striking in the revolutions which took place in these semi- barbarous times, is the action of the Church and of religion. The dogma of a common origin and destiny for all me PREFACE. alike, was an unceasing argument for the emancipation of the people; it brought together men of all stations, and opened the way for modern civilisation. MeD, though they did not cease to oppress one another, began to recognise the fact that they were all members of the same family, and were led, through religious equality, up to civil and political equality ; being brothers in the sight of God, they became equal before the law, the Christian became the citizen. " This transformation took place gradually and slowly, as being necessary and inevitable, by the continued and simultaneous enfranchisement of men and of land. The slave whom paganism, as it disappeared, handed over to the Christian religion, passed first from a state of servitude to a state of bondage, from bondage he rose to mortmain, and from mortmain to liberty." Under the influence of the bishops, legislation was formed upon the principles of Christian morality. In the great councils of the nation, and in the royal councils, they gave a Christian direction to the government of the country, and more than once preserved national unity from being broken up. "The bishops," says Gibbon, "constructed the French monarchy just as the bees construct the hive." At the same time the popes were incessant in their efforts to convert all the Christian peoples into one vast republic ; and they attained their pur- pose in a great measure. The idea was a sublime one, springing so naturally from the unity of the doctrines which all were required to profess. As early as the twelfth century the idea was thus enunciated by Tertullian in his " Apologetica " — "We remain strangers to your factions and to your parties. . . . The republic of the human race is what we demand." Such was the work of Christianity in that society of the Middle Ages of which it was the life and soul. It is necessary to follow it in the accomplishment of this varied task, and, if we would thoroughly understand it, we must consider it in itself, in its inward life, in its form of worship and liturgy, in its monasteries, in its clergy, and in its different institutions, for I herein lay its means of action. c The military power placed itself, as a general rule, at the service of the viii PREFACE. Church, and it was thus that Christianity was enabled to complete its work. Clovis, the conqueror of the Romans, the Germans, the Burgundians, and the Visigoths, was baptized at Rheims, and brought France within the fold of the Church, just when a great number of the barbarians, the new masters of the Roman empire, were embracing Arianism. In after- days the Church, represented by the sword of Joan of Arc, was instrumental in saving France and restoring her to herself. Between these two extreme points of the history of the Middle Ages, Charlemagne, Godefroi de Bouillon, St. Louis, the age of chivalry and the Crusades, prove to us that this com- bined action of military and religious life is a true exponent of the character of France. But when we come to consider the ordinary condition of things as they absolutely existed, we find it to be full of evils. Military life amongst the German people had produced feudalism, and with it a terrible anarchy. Royalty was powerless. Authority had not, so to speak, any centre; it was cut up and subdivided throughout the nation. Private or civil warfare became, by the mere force of things, legal for several cen- turies ; and disorder, violence, oppression, and tyranny followed as a natural consequence. Military life, in all its manifestations, hampered and counteracted the beneficent influence of Christianity, and served as the last refuge of barbarism. The Church, however, managed to make the principle of feudalism exercise a moderating influence upon its very excesses, by the creation of chivalry, the noblest military institution which the world has ever known. Chivalry represented the Christian form of the profession of arms. The first duty was " to defend in this world the weakness of all, but especially the weakness of the Church, of justice, and of right." " Fais ce que dois, adviegne que peut, C'hest commande au chevalier." Ordinances of Chivalry. It was, in fact, an armed force in the service of truth and justice, themselves defenceless. It was at the same time a bright example, the influence of which extended beyond the most brilliant of its exploits. Even this, however, was not sufficient to check the evil and insatiable desire for fighting. Under the PREFACE. IX powerful impulse of the popes, the Crusaders served to utilise this warlike spirit, and acted as a diversion which saved Europe from the fury of its own inhabitants and from the dominion of the Koran. Internal discords were brought to an end, the Communes were enfranchised, feudal power decreased, and the royal influence gained in strength, diminishing again during the lono- crisis of the hundred years' war, and being once more reinstated by Joan of Arc. Such was the part played by " Military Life in the Middle Ages." The development of modern habits, however, is gradually to be traced. The feudal army was replaced by mercenary troops. As military power became concentrated within the hands of the sovereign, monarchy, in the true sense of the term, succeeded to feudalism. At the same time another and deeper movement was taking place in the moral and i-eligious order of things. A new spirit was convulsing the world. The ideas and manners established in society by Christianity were destined to undergo a change. After the capture of Constantinople, the Grecian savants who had found a refuge in the courts of Italy inspired their Western confreres with such an affection for ancient literature, that everything which was old came to be regarded with enthusiasm, while, as a natural consequence, every- thing which Christianity had produced was looked upon with contempt. The faith in and the influence of the Church diminished, and individual reason was tempted to throw off the yoke of all teaching authority. Printing, then just invented, served to accelerate this mental revolution. The principle of free examination was proclaimed by Luther, and one-half of Western Europe became Protestant. The tie, at once religious and political, which held Christian nationalities together, was thus broken, and unity amongst people who were divided in their religious doctrine became impossible. At the same period the discovery of America and of a new route to the Indies lent immense force to the development of material interests. Thus we had the commencement of a complete revolution. The world entered upon new paths, along which it has continued to advance without interruption to our own day. This work derives a special interest from the circumstances amidst which it is published. Ancient Europe has reached one of those solemn epochs PR K FACE. of its history when, divided within itself and uncertain of the turn which events may take, it finds itself face to face with the problem of its future destiny, demanding an immediate solution. What will that solution be? The emotions of the present may incline us to look back regretfully upon that past which reminds us of so much that is great and noble, in spite of its many and inevitable drawbacks, and which, by showing us the origin of modern society, by revealing to us the manner of its birth and its onward progress, may give us the key to its present critical condition when a pro- found and universal transformation seems about to take place. It is superfluous to say anything about the engravings contained in this volume. They have been selected with the same view that dictated the publication of those appearing in the two previous volumes — a desire to produce a living image of the past. Each volume forms a collection of archseological treasures got together after the most laborious research ; they are attractive to the eye, full of interest and instruction, and we feel that our readers will have in them a complete museum such as has not hitherto been within their reach. PAUL LACROIX. TABLE OF CONTENTS. FEUDALISM . .......... 1 Origin. — Barbaric Laws. — Enfeoffment. — Charlemagne and the Church. — First Con- ^Sfruction of Strongholds. — Vassal and Suzerain. — Feudal Rights. — The Truce of God.— Feudal Churches and Abbeys.— Communal Principles.— New Townships. — Origin of the French Bourgeoisie. — The English Magna Charta. — Alienation of Fiefs. — Liberation of the Serfs. — Imperial Cities. — Feudal Rights of the Bishops. — St. Louis. — Wars between France and England. — La Bulk d'Or. — The States- General.— Origin of the Third Estate. WAR AND ARMIES . ....... 38 The Invasions of the Barbarians. — Attila. — Theodoric seizes Italy. — Organizations of Military Fiefs. — Defences of Towns. — Totila and his Tactics. — The Military Genius of Charlemagne. — Military Vassalage. — Communal Militia. — Earliest Standing Armies. — Loss of Technical Tradition. — The Condottieri. — The Gendarmerie. — The Lances Fournies. — Weakening of Feudal Military Obligations. — The French Army in the Time of Louis XL and his Successors. — Absence of Administrative Arrangement. — Reforms. — Mercenary Troops. — Siege Operations and Engines. NAVAL MATTERS . . . ...... . .74 Old Traditions : Long Vessels and Broad Vessels. — The Dromon. — The Galeasse. — The Coque. — Caracks and Galleons. — Francis I.'s Great Carack. — Caravelles. — The Im- portance of a Fleet. — Hired Fleets. — Poop Guards. — Naval Laws.— Seaport Tribunals. — Navigation in the open Seas. — The Boussole. — Armament of Men-of-war. — Towers and Ballistic Engines. —Artillery. — Naval Strategy. — Decorations and Magnificent Appointments of Vessels.— Sails and Flags.— The Galley of Don Juan of Austria.— Sailors' Rnpm-af.it.imia — Th'amp^jflP and Punishments. THE CRUSADES . . . . . ..... .104 Arab Conquest of the Holy Land.— Swarm of Pilgrims in the Year 1 000.— Turkish In- vasion of Judea. — Persecution of the Christians. — Pope Silvester II.— Expedition of the Pisans and the Genoese.— Peter the Hermit. — Letter from Simeon the Patriarch to Pope Urban II.— First Crusade.— Expedition of " Gautier sans Avoir."— Godefroi de Bouillon.— The Kingdom of Jerusalem.— Second Crusade.— St. Bernard.— Third Crusade : Philip Augustus and Richard Coeur-de-Lion.— Fourth Crusade. -Fifth and Sixth Crusades.— Louis IX. turns Crusader.— Seventh Crusade.— St. Louis taken Prisoner. — Eighth and last Crusade.— Death of St. Louis.— Results of the Crusades. xii TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page CHIVALRY (DUELS AND TOURNAMENTS) . . . , . . .136 Origin of Chivalry. — Its different Characteristics. — Chivalric Gallantry. — Chivalry and I Nobility. — Its Relations with the Church. — Education of the Children of the Nobility. — Squires. — Chivalric Exercises. — Pursuivants at Arms. — Courts and Tribunals of ' Love. — Creation of Knights. — Degradation of Knights. — JudicialTPuels. —Trials by Ordeal.— Feudal Champions. — Gages of Battle. — The Churcn*ti5?b"ias DuelsT — TThir- naments invented Dy the^Sire de Preuilly in the Tenth Century. — Arms used in a Tournament. — Tilt. — Lists. — The part taken by Ladies. — King Rene's Book. MILITARY ORDERS 172 Pierre Gerard founds the Order of St. John of Jerusalem ; History of that Order. — The Siege of Rhodes. — History of the Order of the Knights Templars.— Order of the Knights of Calatrava. — Order of the Teuton Knights. — Order of the Knights of the Golden Fleece.— Order of St. Maurice and St. Lazarus. — Orders of the Star, of the Cosse de Geneste, of the Ship, of St. Michael, and of the Holy Ghost. LITURGY AND CEREMONIES . . . ' . . . . .203 Prayer. — Liturgy of St. James, of St. Basil, and of St. John Chrysostom. — Apostolical Constitutions. — The Sacrifice of the Mass. — Administration of Baptism. — Canonical Penances. — Plan and Arrangement of Churches. — Ecclesiastical Hierarchy. — The Ceremony of Ordination.— Church Bells. — The Tocsin.— The Poetry of Gothic Churches. — Breviary and Missal of Pius V. — Ceremonies used at the Seven Sacra- ments.— Excommunication. — The Bull In Ccenu Domini. — Processions and Mystery Plays at the Easter Solemnities. — Instrument of Peace. — Consecrated Bread. — The Pyx.— The Dove. THE POPES 245 Influence of the Papacy in the Reformation of Early Society. — St. Leo the Great. — Origin of the Temporal Power of the Popes.— Gregory the Great. — The Iconoclastic Emperors.— Stephen III. delivered by France.— Charlemagne crowned Emperor of the West.— Photius.— The Diet of Worms.— Gregory VII. ; his Plan for a Christian Republic.— Urban II.— The Crusades.— Calixtus II. ; Termination of the Dispute as to Investiture.— Innocent III.— Struggle of Boniface VIII. against Philippe le Bel.— The Great Western Schism. — Council of Florence.— Battle of Lepanto. — Council of Trent. THE SECULAR CLERGY . The Minor and the Major Orders in the Early Centuries of the Church.— Establishment ' of Tithes originally voluntary, and afterwards obligatory.— Influence of the Bishops. . -Supremacy of the See of Rome.— Form of Episcopal Oath in the Early Centuries.— Reform of Abuses by the Councils.— Remarkable sayings of Charlemagne and Hinc- mar.- Public Education created by the Church.— The Establishment of the Communes favoured by the Bishops.— Tj^J3eaumont Law.— Struggle with the Bourgeoisie in the Fifteenth Century.— The Council oTfr'Snt. -Institution of Seminaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS. xiii Page THE EELIGIOUS ORDERS 299 The First Monks. — St. Anthony and his Disciples. — St. Pachomius and St. Athanasius. St. Eusebius and St. Basilius.— Cenobitism in the East and in the West. — St. Benedict and the Benedictine Code. — Monkish Dress.— St. Columba. — List of the Monasteries in Charlemagne's Time. — Services rendered by the Monks to Civilisation, Arts, and Letters. — Eefonn of the Eeligious Orders in the Twelfth Century. — St. Norbert. — St. Bernard.— St. Dominic.— St. Francis of Assisi. — The Carmelites. — The Bernar- dines. — The Barnabites. — The Jesuits. CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS 339 Christian Charity in the First Centuries of the Church. — The Eastern Empresses.— The Holy Roman Ladies. — Olympiade, Melanie, Marcella, and Paula. — Charity at the Court of the Franks. — St. Margaret of Scotland and Matilda of England. — Hedwige of Poland. — Origin of the Lazar-houses. — The Lazarists in France and in England. — Progress and Vicissitudes of the Order of St. Lazarus. — The Foundations of St. Louis. — The Order of Mercy founded by St. Nolasque. — St. Catherine of Sienna and St. Francis. — Bernardin Obregon. — Jean de Dieu. — Philippe deNe'ri. — AntoineYvan. PILGRIMAGES 362 The first Pilgrimages to Jerusalem and Rome. — The Worship of the Martyrs. — Pilgrims' Hospitals. — Images of the Virgin Mary. — Relics brought from the East by the Crusaders. — Celebrated Pilgrimages of Early Days. — The Eoman Basilicas. — St. Nicholas de Bari.: — Notre-Dame de Tersatz. — St. Jacques de Compostella. — Notre-Dame du Puy, de Liesse, de Chartres, de Rocamadour. — Pilgrimages in France, Germany, Poland, Russia, and Switzerland. HERESIES 394 The real Meaning of the word Heresy. — The Heretics of the Apostolic Days. — Simon the Magician.— Cerinthus. — The Nicolaitans.— The Gnostics. — The Schools of Philosophy of Byzantium, Antioch, and Alexandria. — Julian the Apostate. — The Pelagians and the semi-Pelagians. — Nestorius.— Eutyches. — The Iconoclasts. — Amaury.— Gilbert de la Porree.— Abelard.— Arnold of Brescia.— The Albigenses.— The Waldenses.— The Flagellants. — Wickliff. — John Huss.— Jerome of Prague. — Luther. — Henry VIII. and the Anglican Church. — Calvin. THE INQUISITION . .423 General Principles of the Inquisition; its Existence amongst the Greeks and Romans. — The Papal Inquisition.— The Inquisition in France.— The Albigenses.— The Royal Spanish Inquisition ; its Political Purposes ; it is opposed by the Popes. — Inquisitors of Toledo excommunicated by Leo X. — The Holy Hermandad. — The Spies of the Inquisition. — The Holy Office and the Supreme. — The Prisons of the Inquisition. — The Auto-da-fe.— The Inquisition in the Netherlands.— The Protestant Inquisition in Holland, Germany, France, England, and Switzerland. xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS. BURIALS AND FUNERAL CEREMONIES ... . 447 Embalming and Incineration of Bodies amongst the Ancients. — Interment brought into practice by Christianity. — The Wrapping of the Dead in Shrouds. — The Direction in which the Bodies were laid. — Absolution Crosses. — Funeral Furniture. — Coffins and Sarcophagi in the Middle Ages. — Funereal Sculpture and Architecture, from the Twelfth to the Sixteenth Century. — The Catacombs at Eome. — Charnel- houses in the Churches. — Public Cemeteries. — The Cemetery of the Innocents, Paris. — Lanterns for the Dead.— Funerals of the Kings and Queens of France. — The Rolls of the Dead. — Consoling Thought of the Resurrection and of Eternal Life. TABLE OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Page Page Abbatial Ring and Cross of St. Waudru . . 312 j Absolution Crosses of the Eleventh Century 453 Abbey of Saint-Germain des Pres, View of the, in 1 36 1 13 Abbey of Saint- Germain des Pres, North View of the, Seventeenth Century 320 Abbey of St. Kiquier, The, near Abbeville 31 1 Abbey- Church of the Magdalen, at Vezelai 1'JO Act of Faith and Homage, Thirteenth Cen- tury 8 Adoration of the Lamb, The 502 „ ,. Magi, The 241 Altar of the Cathedral of Arras, Thirteenth Century 243 XIV ENGRA VINGS. Tape Altar-piece at Mareuil-cn-Brie 218, 219 Amaury's Disciples burnt by order of Philip Augustus 404 Angles praying over a Skull, Fourteenth Century 298 Anne of Brittany, Funeral Service of 495 Antilles, Discovery of the, by Columbus . . 92 Antioch, Plan of, in the Thirteenth Century 130 Antwerp, View of the Port of 87 Arming a Knight 143 Armogencs, the Magician 383 Arquebusier of the Sixteenth Century 61 Artois, The Count of, presenting himself at the Castle of the Count of Boulogne .... 149 Artus, King, fighting a Giant 137 Assault on a Fortified Place 135 •' Au juste poids veritable balance " 391 Auto-da-fe Procession, in Spain 436 Babylon the Great 396 Ballista - 73 Banner of St. Denis, Representations of the , 60 Banner of the City of Strasburg, Thirteenth Century 386 Banner of a Flemish Lazaretto 353 Baptism of the Saxons conquered by Charle- magne 213 Barbarian (Mounted) in the Roman Service 4 Basilius the Great, Dream of 400 Battering-ram 71 Battle of Auray, The 54 „ Dreux, The 62 „ Lepanto, Plan of the 96 Tolbiac, The 2 Beacon in the Cemetery of Antigny, Fif- teenth Century 486 Beacon in the Cemetery of Ciron, Twelfth Century 486 Beacon in the Cemetery of Feniou, Eleventh Century 486 Beatrix Cornel, Tomb of 1 82 Beguin 329 „ Convent at Ghent, the Great 328 Beheaded Knight holding his Head in his Hands 467 Bucentaure, The 77 Bull with which Boniface VIII. sealed his Letters 273 Burial among the Franks, Mode of 451 Caltrop, or Crow's-foot 66 Calvin, John 419 Caricature of the Third Century 206 Castle of Angouleme, Thirteenth Century . . 6 „ Loches, Doorw;,ys of the Old 37 „ Pierrefonds, View overlooking the 11 Catapult 72 Page Celebration of Mass, The, in an Oratory, Ninth Century 277 Celtic Burial 451 Champion of the Tournament, The 166 Chandelier of the Virgin 217 Chanter or Psalmist, The, Minor Order. . . . 274 Chapel of Pilgrimage, Thanksgiving in a . . 384 Chaplet of Beads in Carved Ivory, and Girdle, Sixteenth Century 330 Charlemagne, Statue of, Eleventh Century 5 Charles the Bold, Great Seal of, Fifteenth Century 55 Charles VI. fulfilling his Vow to Our Lady of Hope 388 Charter of William the White-handed, Commencement of the 295 Chasuble, Mitre, and Stole of St. Thomas a Becket, Cloth and Embroidery of the Twelfth Century 225 Chateau de la Panouze (Aveyron), Feudal Castle of the Twelfth Century 10 Chivalry, Allegorical Figures representing 140 Choir Candelabrum, Foot of a largp, Thir- teenth Century 216 Christ descending into Hell 498 „ risen from the Dead 504 ,, victorious after Death, Eighth or Ninth Century 449 Christian Professor on his Death-bed, The 497 „ Religion, The, assisting at the Death of Christ 247 Church of St. Antony, Padua 216 ,, the Holy Sepulchre, Fa9ade of the 106 Clergy going in Procession before the Emperor, Fourth Century 313 Cloister of the Chartreuse, at Pa via 322 Clovis, Baptism of 2 Coffer containing the Hair-cloths of St. Louis, Thirteenth Century 371 Concordat of Cambric, Title of the (1466) 296 Conferring Knighthood on the Field of Battle 141 Consecration of St. Remigius, Bishop of Rheims ; 283 Constantinople, Second taking of, in 1204 . . 123 . Coque, The 79 Coronation of an Emperor by the Pope, Sixteenth Century 256 Cosmas and Damianus relieving a Sick Man 343 Council held to commemorate the Second Council of Nice, Tenth Century 249 Council of Vienne 199 Cross of the Bureau Family 475 Crown of Thorns, The, brought into France 375 » » 9, worn by Jesus Christ Cruelties committed by the Gueux Cruet, silver-gilt. First or Second Centurv 20* ENGRA VINGS. xvn Page Crusaders at Damietta, Disembarkation of the 126 Crypt of the Chapel of St. Agnes, in the Catacombs at Kome 474 Daggers with Moorish Blades and Flemish Handles 45 Dalmatic said to have belonged to Leo III. 255 Dance of Death, The 478—483 Death of St. Benedict 496 „ Mahomet II 178 Dedication of the Church of the Monastery of St. Martin des Champs, Paris 321 Degradation of a Knight 154 Designs of Armour 170 Distribution of Banners and Helmets .... 164 Diver, The 91 Don Juan of Austria 133 Doorkeeper, The, Minor Order 275 Doria, Andrew 88 Dove suspended above the Altar, Thirteenth Century 244 Dresses worn by Prisoners of the Inquisition 437 Duel concerning the Honour of Ladies .... 157 Earthen Vases found at Florence in 1863 . . 187 Ecclesiastical Tonsure, The 279 Edward the Confessor, Funeral of 490 Entry of Louis VIII. and the Pope's Legate into Avignon 406 Eudes, Bishop, from the Bayeux Tapestry 47 Excesses committed by the Huguenots, Allegorical Picture of the 415 Exorcism of a Catechumen, Fourth or Fifth Century 212 Exorcism of a Person possessed with a Demon 4 14 Exorcist, The, Minor Order 275 Farel, William 420 Ferrand of Portugal, Count of Flanders, being taken to Paris 22 Fight between Eaymbault de Morueil and Guyon de Losenne 156 Flemish Warrior, from the Ruins of St. Bavon, Ghent 26 Fortified Bridge of Lemantano, near Rome, Twelfth Century 33 Fortified Bridge from Valentre to Cahors. . 18 Fortified City of Carcassonne, Plan of the, Thirteenth Century 18 Fortress of the Knights Hospitallers, in Syria 174 French Caravel, Sixteenth Century 84 „ Priory at Rhodes, Fifteenth Century 181 Fresco in the Cemetery of St. Pretextat . . 475 Funeral Service, Fourteenth Century 453 Funereal Lamps found in the Catacombs, Third Century , 276, 424 Page GaUey of the Sixteenth Century 78 „ Slave 90 „ Soldier 90 Gallic or Gallo-Roman Pottery 455 Gallo-Roman Lords of the Fourth Century 3 Gate of the Town of Aigues-Mortes 17 Gautier-sans-Avoir, Reception of, by the King of Hungary 115 German Foot-soldiers fighting, Sixteenth Century 57 German and Gallic Auxiliaries, Second Century 40 German Knight, Fifteenth Century 147 Godefroy de Bouillon, crowned with the In- struments of our Lord's Passion 117 Godefroy de Bouillon, Tomb of 118 Golden Fleece, Chapter of the Order of the 197 Great Hospital at Milan 357 Greek Panagia 370 Gregory IX. handing the Decretals to an Advocate of the Consistory (1227—1241) 266 Handbell, Romanesque perforated, Twelfth Century 227 Harold, King, Finding the Body of 48 Harvest of Souls, The, Twelfth Century . . 450 Henry of Anjou, Coronation of, as King of Poland 291 Henry I., Emperor of Germany, and one of his Generals 368 Henry II. wounded by Montgomery in a Tournament 169 Herald holding the Banners of the Referees 164 Heresy of the Flagellants 407 Hincmar, Bas-relief on the Tomb of . . 289 Holy Bit of Carpentras 376 Hospitality, Fifteenth Century 340 Huguenots against the Catholics, Violence of the 421 Huss, John 412 Italian Warriors of the Fifteenth Century 58 Jerome of Prague 412 Jewish Religion, The, assisting at the Death of Christ 246 King-at-arms proclaiming a Tournament. . 163 Knife for cutting Consecrated Bread 242 Knight in Complete Armour, Sixteenth Century 61 Knight setting out for the War 150 Knight of Death, The 476 Malta 185 the Order of the Holy Sepulchre 173 „ Rhodes 173 Knights of the Order of the Holy Ghost from Pure Intent 358 XV111 ENGRAVINGS. Page Knights awaiting from the Marshal the Signal to commence the Fight 159 Knights of Rhodes, Barracks of the 180 Knox, John 416 Last Supper, The, Eleventh Century 209 Legend of Christmas, Fifteenth Century . . 221 „ St. Martin, The, Tapestry of the Thirteenth Century 281 Legend of the Passage of the Viaticum across a Bridge at Utrecht 235 Luther, Martin 418 Machine to break the Eanks of the Enemy 70 „ shoot Arrows 70 Man-at-arms, The 51, 91 Man-of-War, Henry VIII.'s tune 80 „ of the Sixteenth Century 101 Margaret of York, wife of Charles the Bold ". 359 Maria de Molina, Queen of Castille, handing to the Cistercian Nuns the Charter of Foundation for their Convent 332 Mary Magdalene, Removal of the Body of, to the Church of St. Vezelay (Yonne), Fifteenth Century 387 Massacre of St. Bartholomew, The 416 Maximilian of Austria, with his Wife and Son '. 36 Members of the Dominican Order, The most famous 331 Messenger bringing a Letter to the King's Army 52 Messengers of the Sultan discussing with Christian Prisoners 129 Military Costumes from the Sixth to the Tenth Centuries 42 Miraculous Mass of St. Gregory the Great, Sixth Century 210 Monograms of Christ 205 Mons, Mauberge, and Nivelles, Foundation of the Abbeys of 316 Montefrio, Surrender of the Town of 193 Moorish Arms (Armeria Real, Madrid) .... 44 Mortara or Movable Carriages 65 Mortuary Cloth from the Church of Folle- ville (Somme) 491 Mortuary RoU of Vital, Founder of the Abbey of Savigny 499 Mosque of Cordova, Interior of the, Eighth •Century 434 Mourning Costumes , 493 Mystic Fountain, The, Eighth Century .... 223 Nail used in the Crucifixion of Our Lord . . 376 Nangasaki, The Great Martyrdom of (1622) 336 Nicsea, Taking of, by the Crusaders 116 Norman Vessel, Eleventh Century 76 Offering a Child to an Abbot, Thirteenth Century 313 Orphan of the Venice Hospitals, Sixteenth Century 356 Orthodoxy surroundedby the Snares of Heresy 398 Our Lady of Boulogne 390 „ Grace, Miraculous Image of, at Cambria 389 Our Lady of Grace sheltering the Grand Masters of the Order of Montessa 192 Our Lady of Mountserrat, Sixteenth Century 381 „ Vladimir, Miraculous Image of 370 Painting symbolical of the Catacombs of Rome, First or Second Century 207 Pentecost 240 Peter the Hermit delivering a Message to Pope Urban II 112 Philip Augustus, Consecration of 290 Philip the Bold in Royal Costume 24 Philip II., King of Spain 439 „ „ „ Mausoleum of .... 470 Pilgrims of Emmaus, The 374 Plaintiff and Defendant taking Oath before the Judge, Fifteenth Century 158 Pontifical Galley 98 Poop of an Ancient Galley 75 Portrait of Countess Matilda 260 Prester-John and his Page 109 Priory of the Benedictines, Canterbury, Twelfth Century 314 Prize of the Tournament, The 168 Procession of the Host 238 „ Knights of the Order of the Holy Ghost 200 Prows of Galleys armed with the Spur .... 95 Punishments decreed by Henry VIII. against the Catholics 443 Quintain, The Game of 145 Raised Stone, near Poitiers Reapers of Death, The Reception of a Knight of the Order of St. Michael Refectory in the Priory of St. Martin des Champs, Thirteenth Century Relics of St. Philip, Touching the Reliquary in chased Copper, Thirteenth Century Reliquary of the Holy Thorn, Thirteenth Century Render, Count, bearing the Body of St. Veronica to the Church of St. Waudru, in Mons Rhodes, Plan of, Fifteenth Century Richard Coeur- de-Lion mortally wounded while besieging the Castle of Chalus .... 459 62 199 326 378 372 325 366 176 ENGRA VINGS. xix Robert I., Duke of Normandy, on his Pil- grimage to Jerusalem 373 Robing a Bishop, The Ceremony of, Four- teenth Century 285 Rodolph of Hapsburg, Emperor of Germany, Equestrian Statue of 35 Rolling Tower for scaling the walls of towns 66 Sabbat, The 410 Sacrament of the Eucharist, The 234 Sacramental Cup, Twelfth Century 233 Sancha de Roxas 195 Seal of the Abbey of St. Denis 317 „ „ Commune of Soissons 15 „ Conon de Bethune, Twelfth Century 7 „ Edward, Count of Rutland 99 „ Gerard de Saint-Amand, Twelfth Century 9 Seal of an Imaginary Bull of Lucifer, Fif- teenth Century 422 Seal of John, Bishop of Puy and Count of Velay (1305) 28 Seal of John sans Peur, Duke of Burgundy 31 „ the Knights of Christ, Thirteenth Century 189 Seal of La RocheUe 103 „ the Lord of Corbeil (1196) 20 „ the Monastery of St. Louis of Poissy 338 „ the Town of Boston 94 Dover 85 Poole 93 „ „ Sandwich 89 ,, „ Yarmouth 86 Servetus, Michael 445 Seven Christian Virtues, The, with their Symbols 355 Shield presented to Don Juan of Austria by PiusV 271 Ship of Baptism, The, Sixteenth Century. . 232 Siege of Toulouse, Episode in the 404 „ a Town : Summons to surrender.. 67 Single Combat to be decided by the Judg- ment of God 161 Sitting of the Council of Trent, 1555 270 Sixtus II. handing to St. Laurentius the Treasures of the Church to be distributed among the Poor 341 Soldier of the Time of Philippe le Bel 51 Soldiers of the German Bands 64 Solemn Entry of the Emperor Charles V. and Pope Clement VII. into Bologna, in 1529 268, 269 Solemn Procession for the Relief of the Town of Dijon 239 Solemn Reception of a Bishop, Fifteenth Century 286 Sovereign Pontiff, Public and Solemn Func- tions of the, Seventeenth Century 264 Page Spanish Caravel in which Columbus dis- covered America 83 Spanish Ship, Fifteenth Century 81 Spiritual and Temporal Powers, The, de- pendent upon Christ 248 St. Anthony of Padua commanding a Mule to adore the Eucharist 334 St. Anthony, a Statuette of the Third Cen- tury 301 St. Barbara 364 St. Benedict, History of 305, 307 „ reproaching Totila, Fresco of the Thirteenth Century 43 St. Bernard taking possession of the Abbey of Clairvaux 327 St. Cecilia, and Valerian, her Spouse .... 425 St. Cesarius, Obsequies of 489 St. Denis carrying his head to the place of burial 362 St. Dominic and the Albigenses 429 St. Elizabeth of Hungary, Fifteenth Cen- tury 348 St. George and the Dragon 202 St. Jean des Vignes, Abbey of Regular Canons at Soissons (1076) 323 St. Jerome in the Desert 302 St. John of Capistran 132 St. Louis and his Brothers made Prisoners by the Saracens 128 St. Louis at Carthage, Disembarkation of . . 131 „ serving a Repast to the Poor .... 351 St. Michael the Archangel offering the Symbol of the Imperial Power to a Byzan- tine Emperor 251 St. Peter 248 St. Radegonde receiving the Religious Garb from the Bishop of Noyon 309 St. Savin and St. Cyprian before Maximus 426 „ „ Martyrdom of.. 427 St. Theresa 336 St. Thomas defending the Monastic Orders, Fourteenth Century 332 St. Vincent de Paul 360 St. Wulfram, Bishop of Sens 287 State Gloves formerly in the possession of Louis XIII 201 Stone Coffins 457 Sufferers from St. Vitus' Dance going on a Pilgrimage 392 Superscription upon Our Lord's Cross .... 377 Surrender of the Garrison of a Town .... 68 Sword of Isabella the Catholic 139 Symbols of the Trinity 204 Synagogue of Toledo, the Great, Third Century 432 Templar in Travelling Dress . , 185 Teutonic Knight , 196 XX ENGRA VINGS. Page Thomas of Savoy granting a Charter to the Town of Cambrai 16 Three-masted Galley, Sixteenth Century . . 82 Three Sacraments : Baptism, Confirmation, and Penance 231 Three Sacraments : Marriage, Orders, and Extreme Unction 236 Tomb, Gallo-Koman 452 „ of Adelaide or Alice, Countess of Hainault 462 Tomb of Alexander de Berneval, Architect of the Church of St. Ouen, at Eouen 472 Tomb of Du Guesclin 464 „ St. Elizabeth of Hungary 461 „ Louis, Duke of Orleans, and Valen- tine of Milan, his Wife 468 Tomb of Philip Pot, Grand Seneschal of Burgundy 466 Tomb of St. Remigius 469 „ Sibylle, Wife of Guy de Lusignan 471 Torments of Hell, The 485 Tortures inflicted by the Catholics upon the Huguenots in the South of France 442 Tour du Telegraphe, Narbonne, Fourteenth Century 6 Tower of Beaucaire, Thirteenth Century . . 6 „ the Castle of Fougeres, Twelfth Century 6 Tower of the Castle of Loches, Twelfth Century 6 Tower of Notre-Dame des Bois, Eleventh Century Tower of the Wall of Provins, Twelfth Century Treaty of Arras, Conclusion of the, in 1191 Tree of Battles, The Triumph of Christ, The, Seventeenth Century „ the Lamb, The, Twelfth Century Triumphal Vessel drawn in a Car at the Funeral Ceremony of the Emperor Charles V Turreted Vessel that protected the Port of Venice Tympan in the Portico of the Church of Semur, Eleventh Century Urban II. presiding over the Council of Clermont, in 1095 Virgin of St. Luke, The so-caUed . . . War Trophy of Barbarian Prisoners, Second Century Watch-tower, Fifteenth Century Wickliff, John Works of Charity, Fifteenth Century .... Zizim transferred to Charles VTII. Zwingle, Ulrich Page 487 6 293 29 272 229 492 77 345 262 369 39 69 409 346 178 416 MILITARY AND RELIGIOUS LIFE THE MIDDLE AGES, AND AT THE PERIOD OF THE RENAISSANCE FEUDALISM. Origin. — Barbaric Laws.— Enfeoffment. — Charlemagne and the Church.— First Construction of Strongholds.— Vassal and Suzerain.— Feudal Rights.— The Truce of God.— Feudal Churches and Abbeys. — Communal Principles.— New Townships. — Origin of the French Bourgeoisie. — The English Magna Charta.— Alienation of Fiefs.— Liberation of the Serfs.— Imperial Cities.— Feudal Rights of the Bishops. — St. Louis. — Wars between France and England.— The Butte d'Or. — The States-General.— Origin of the Third Estate. EFORE presenting any manifestation of its exis- tence, feudalism had long been gradually developing, and seemed to be moving forward invisibly at the head of the barbarian con- querors of Roman Graul. From the day that their great leader, Clovis, shared amongst his leudes, or companions-in-arms, the lands that they had won at the price of their blood while fighting under his orders — from the day when, by his miraculous baptism after the victory of Tolbiac (Fig. 1), he himself a proud Sicamber, submitted himself to and became a vassal of the Christian Church, simultaneously sprang into existence a theocratic and a martial aristocracy. In this simultaneous double origin might have already been perceived the hidden cause of the future inevitable antagonism between the modern influence of the cross and the material power FEUDALISM. ivers of the sword. Conspiracies, bloodthirsty executions, continual revolts, di plots, in which were concerned at one time the king's leudes, at another the principal clergy ; ecclesiastical censures, ceaselessly threatening these blind and savage tyrants, who, while bending to the reproof, at the same time panted for Fig. 1.— Battle of Tolbiac and Baptism of King Clovis. — Fac-simile of a Woodcut in the " Mirouer Historial de France," in folio, printed in Paris by Galliot du Pre in 1516. revenge ; curbless ambitions, terrible hatreds, the continued strife of opposing races ; on one side the Gallo- Romanic (Figs. 2 and 3) and its heir the Gothic, on the other the barbarous Germanic and Slavonian, more or less christianized ; all these were the endless signs by which the coming reign of feudalism, at each successive stage of modern civilisation, marked its advent. The political FEUDALISM. system which a barbarous legal code had inaugurated for the benefit of the leudes, was entirely opposed to the system sanctioned by the Koman law. It was the desire of the leudes that a seignior, the owner of the land and of the men who cultivated it, should possess the right of infeudalising, that is to say, of ceding, as an inferior freehold, a certain portion of his own estate, abandoning in so doing to the concessionary or vassal not only the rights of the soil, but the sovereignty over those who occupied it. For a vassal to forfeit his rights, he must first have failed to fulfil the engagements he. undertook when he huYOi . ; Fig. 2.— Gallo-Roman Lords of the Fourth Century.— Sculpture from the Tomb of the Gallic Consul Jovinus, General under the Emperor Julian, at Rheims. received the investiture of the fief. The cession of lands and the rights attached to it, which were the foundation of dawning feudalism, remained for more than a century in that state of oscillation which precedes a stable equilibrium. Master of France, of Germany, and of Italy, and protector of the Church, Charlemagne (Fig. 4) enjoyed all the prerogatives of the Western emperors: On two occasions he delivered the Holy Seat from its enemies, and in Ger- many as well as in Italy he placed his sword at the service of the Christian faith. One of the popes, Adrian, bestowed upon him the dignity of patron ; FEUDALISM. another, Adrian's successor, Leo III., placed, in the year 800, the imperial crown upon his head. Then might have been seen, better than in the days of the Roman and Greek Emperors, the spectacle of the Church protected by the head of the State, to whom the seignorial aristocracy paid feudal obedience, and who controlled with an iron hand their tendencies to schism, 'eudalism, which was gathering strength, and which already knew its own >wer, never retrograded ; it sometimes halted and was at rest, but it was only waiting a more propitious season to continue its path. Charlemagne's successors were, in fact, neither the kings of France nor the emperors of Germany, but the feudal lords, the great landowners ; and their power waxed all the greater from the fact that, in 853, an edict of Charles the Bald ordered Fig. 3. — Mounted Barbarian in the Roman Service. — From an Antique Monument. the reconstruction of the ancient manors, the repair of their fortifications, and the construction of new ones, so as to arrest the devastating invasions of the Normans, of the Saracens, of the Hungarians, and of the Danes. Thus Europe became dotted with fortresses, behind which both nobles and villains found a refuge against the new flood of barbarians. There was soon scarcely a stream, a mountain pass, or an important road which was left undefended either by military posts or by strong walls (Figs. 5 to 10). The invaders, formerly rendered so bold and indomitable by the fear they had succeeded in inspiring, now ceased their raids, or at most ventured no farther than the shores on which they had disembarked. Little by little a sense of security returned to the inhabitants, and the welfare of the civilised world was assured. A service of this importance, rendered by the nobles and seigniors FEUDALISM. to society at large, naturally gave them legitimate claims to tlie exclusive guardianship of the frontiers which they protected from the common enemy. Towards the tenth century, every noble who desired to obtain from another noble, richer or more power- ful than himself, a portion of land to be held as a fief, and who consented thus to become his vassal, personally declared in the chief's presence that for the future he wished to be his faithful, devoted servant and his defender until death ; with his sword girded to his side and his spurs on his heels, he solemnly swore this on the Holy Writ. In the subsequent ceremony of hommage-lige the vassal, bareheaded, knelt on one knee, and, placing his hands within those of his seignior, swore fealty to him, and undertook to follow him to the wars (Figs. 11 and 12), an obli- gation not entailed by the first act of homage, namely, that of hommage- simple. Thenceforward the seignior ceded to him the land or the feudal domain, by investiture or by seizin, a ceremony often accompanied by the giving of a symbolical sign, such as a clod of earth, a little stick, or a stone, according to the custom of the soil. The investiture of kingdoms Was COn- Fig. 4.— Statue of Charlemagne (formerly in n -i',!,! i .-i f» • the Church of Saint- Julien-le-Pauvre, Paris). terred with the sword, that of provinces — Eleventh to Twelfth Century. with a standard. The reciprocal obligations of the vassal and his suzerain were numerous, some moral, some material. The vassal was bound to loyally preserve the secrets confided to him by his suzerain (Fig. 13), to prevent and frustrate any treachery on the part of his enemies, to defend him at the risk of his own life, FEUDALISM. Fig. 5.— Tower of the Walls of Fig. 6.— Tower of the Castle of Fig. 7.— Tower of the Castle of Provins, Twelfth Century. Fougeres, Twelfth Century. Loches, Twelfth Century. to resign his own horse on the battle-field should his lord have lost his, to go as a prisoner in his stead, to cause his honour to be respected, and to assist him Fig. 8.-Tower of Beaucaire, Fig. 9.-Tour du Telegraphe, Fig. lO.-Old Castle of Angou- Thirteenth Century. Narhonne, Fourteenth Century. l£me, Thirteenth Century. with his advice. At the simple request of the suzerain, the vassal was bound to follow him to the field, either alone or accompanied with a specified number Q\ FEUDALISM. armed men, according to the importance of the fief. The duration of this military service varied, in like manner, in proportion to the fief, from twenty to sixty days — a period that did not admit of very distant expeditions. The feudal seignior stood in place of the sovereign, and being invested with execu- tive authority, had necessarily, in order to exercise it, recourse to the latent force distributed amongst his vassals, and he naturally did so in accordance with his own convenience. Justice, administered in this manner, was termed fiance, that is to say, public security. The seignior was wont to summon the men of his fief or fiefs to his plaids, or assizes, either for the purpose of assist- Fig. 11.— Act of Faith and Homage, Twelfth Century.— Seal of Conon de Bethune, preserved in the National Archives of France. ing him with their advice, to act with him as judges, or to carry out the sentences he pronounced. He had a right to two kinds of assistance — obligatory, or legal aids, and voluntary, or gracious aids. Legal aids were due from the vassal under three sets of circumstances : when the seignior was taken prisoner and had to pay a ransom, when his eldest son was about to be made a knight, and when he gave away his eldest daughter in marriage. In feudal society these aids stood in the place of the public taxes, which in ancient times, as in our own days, were collected by the State alone ; they differed, however, in this respect, that they were not due at any stated periods, nor perhaps could they ever be absolutely enforced, they were a kind of voluntary gift— from the bestowal of which, however, few vassals dared to free themselves. FEUDALISM. \ /"^ The seignior, who never abdicated his sovereignty over his vassal, some- / times interfered in certain essential modifications necessary to the fief — modifications that the vassal was incompetent to undertake. These gave rise \ to new rights, and became a fresh source of revenue to the seignior. For J instance, the seignior was entitled — first, to the right of relief, a sum of j money payable by every person of full age who succeeded to the possession / of a fief, which sum became larger as the line of succession became less direct ; secondly, to the right of alienation, payable by those who sold or alienated the fief in any way; thirdly, to the rights of escheat and Fig. 12.— Act of Faith and Homage, Thirteenth Century.— Seal representing Raimond de Mont- Dragon kneeling before the Archbishop of Aries, his Suzerain, in the National Archives of France. of confiscation, in accordance with which the fief reverted to the suzerain when the vassal died without leaving an heir, or when, from some act of his own, he had incurred the penalty .of being deprived of his feudatory rights ; fourthly, to the right of guardianship, in virtue of which the seignior, during the minority of his vassals, held the ward and administration of the fief besides enjoying its revenues ; fifthly, to the right of marriage, which con- sisted in finding a husband for the female inheritor of a fief; this right gave the seignior the privilege of forcing her to select one of the suitors that he chose to present to her. FEUDALISM. As long as a vassal scrupulously fulfilled his numerous and delicate obligations he might consider himself as the absolute master of his fief, he might partially or entirely sub-feudalise it, and become in his own turn the suzerain of vassals of an inferior order termed vavasseurs, who were bound to render to him the same obligations that he himself paid to his own seignior. On the other hand, the suzerain was bound to respect his contract, not to dispossess his vassal without a legitimate motive, but to protect him, and to render him on all occasions substantial justice. It was, moreover, to his interest to do this, for the prosperity of the fief depended upon the security and welfare of the vassal. Vassals of the same suzerain, residing in the same territory, and possess- ing fiefs of a similar value, were termed pairs (pares), or equals. Suzerains Fig. 13. — Act of Faith and Homage, with the Legend, Secretum meum mid ("My Secret is to myself ").— Seal of Gerard de Saint-Amand, 1199, National Archives of France. of every rank, the king included, had their pairs, and all could claim the privilege of being tried by these pairs in the presence of his immediate seignior. If the seignior refused to act justly, and the vassal considered him- self unrighteously condemned, he had the right of making an appeal in default of justice to the suzerain of his own seignior. Another right of appeal, that of arms, prevailed also in feudal society. The nobles, as a rule, preferred to carry out their own justice rather than await from others a slow and uncertain decision. This was the cause of there being so many little wars and so many desperate and bloody struggles between different seigniorships. Might made right ; but custom, nevertheless, to some extent regulated the formalities that preceded these internecine conflicts, so that the seignior or the vassal who was to be attacked might be forearmed, and might put himself upon his guard (Figs. 14 and 15). Further, to remedy as much as possible the calamities c 10 FEUDALISM. sus- ensuing from these per^etuaLcoM-leiiiLiuiiH, the (Jiiurcli ha"ch&e^power of pending and preventing them, under pain of excommunication, from sunset on Wednesday to sunrise on Monday during the festivals of Lent and Advent, and at all periods of high religious solemnity. This was the Peace or the Truce of God. The seigniors possessed no right of uniform justice. In France, a Fig. 14.— Chateau de la Panouze (Aveyron), type of a French Feudal Castle of the Fourteenth Century, of which remains still exist.— From a Miniature in a Manuscript in the National Lihrary of Paris. superior, a middle, and an inferior judicial court were recognised. The f alone possessed the power of life and death. The more considerable fiefs hi ^ usually attached to them the right to exercise the highest justice, but the were exceptions to this rule. A mvasseur, for instance, might sometin appeal against this highest justice, while a seignior, who wasonl^ entitled exercise e in iyjjgj^^ his lands. FEUDALISM. 1 1 Fig. 15.— View overlooking the Castle of Pierrefonds (beginning of the Fifteenth Century), as restored by M. Viollet-le-Duc, in his " Dictionnaire d' Architecture." The privilege of coining money, always a sure index of sovereignty, together with the exclusion of all foreign jurisdiction and of all external 12 FEUDALISM. authority from the area of each fief, also constituted two important p-us- >gatives. Finally, the fief, with its privileges, always remained intact ; passed invariably to the eldest of the family, on the sole condition of h\1 paying homage to the suzerain. Most of the churches and abbeys, such as those of Saint-Denis, of Saint- Martin des Champs, and of Saint- Germain des Pres (Fig. 16), which proudl; reared their towers and spires opposite the Louvre of the kings of France, exercised on their own account all the feudal rights which they had [acquired by reason of the territorial possessions as well as by the concessions lavishly ceded to them by their sovereigns. The archbishops, the bishops, id the abbots thus became temporal lords, and were consequently forced [to have vassals for military service, to keep up a court of justice, and support a mint, thus uniting — in the case of bishops who enjoyed the temporal rank of count — spiritual with political authority. This twofold power made the prelate the suzerain of all the seigniors in his diocese. Towards the end of the tenth century the feudal ecclesiastics, by reason of the permission granted to laymen to bequeath their property to the Church, as well as of the strictness of the laws which forbade the alienation of ecclesiastical property, possessed a fifth part of all French and English soil, and nearly a third of Germany ; whilst the last surviving Carlovingian could only claim the town of Laon, where he resided, to such an extent had his predecessors despoiled themselves of their lands in favour of their great vassals, who still, however, recognised him as their suzerain. In the eleventh century Europe was divided into a multitude of fiefs, each having its own mode of life, its own laws, its own customs, and its ecclesias- tical or lay head, who was as independent as he well could be. Around these, but under certain conditions of dependence and of subordination, was developed the much more numerous class of freedmen. Gradually manual labour and the efforts of a growing intelligence led to the political existence of the bourgeois, those worthy representatives of the labouring portion of society. The part which was taken by the latter was not always of a passive character. As early as the year 987 the villains of Normandy rebelled and leagued themselves against their feudal lords, claiming the right of fishing and of the chase, and the privilege of having an administration and a magistracy of their own ; it was thus that the innate power of the people revealed itself: the towns and the boroughs were peopled with inhabitants Flu-. 16.— View of the Abbey of Saint-Germain des Pres, from the East, as it stood in 1361.— Fac- simile of an Engraving in the " Histoire de Saint-Germain des Pres," by Dom Bouillard : in folio. A, Road leading to the River Seine ; B, St. Peter's Chapel ; C, the Close ; D, Road leading to the Pre"-aux Clercs; E, Place of the Breach; F, Ditch; G, the Pope's Gate; H, Cloister; I, Refectory; K, Dormitory; L, the Church; M, Chapel of the Virgin; N, Road between the Ditch and the Pre-aux-Clercs ; O, space between the Barrier to the Rue des Ciseaux ; P, Great Gate of the Monastery ;' Q, Road to the River ; R, Barrier close to the Ditch ; S, the Inn called the Chapeau Rouge ; T, the Pillory. FEUDALISM. who held their homes in tenure from the seigniors — who were the proprietors of the soil — under certain servile obligations as to the payment of taxes. As soon as the establishment of the hierarchy of fiefs had put an end to discord and anarchy, the germs of the Great Revolution — destined to restore civil liberty to the heirs of the countless inhabitants whom the misfortunes of Gaul and the tyranny of the emperors had reduced to servitude — began to show themselves. It was in this wise that the communal movement originated, and the town of Mans is generally credited with having been the first to set the example of having, through the agency of the working classes, conspired against the seignior. We find in the annals of Metz, about the year 1098, record of the election for life of a maitre-echevin (high-sheriff), named Millon, in place of one, by name Hennolu-Bertin, who had been elected for one year, but who, doubtless, was not the first in his office. And we find an echevinal council, termed the council of the twelve, enjoying functions at once magisterial, administrative, and military. Metz possessed at the same time, by the side of their communal organization, a count of the name of Gerald, who was succeeded in 1063 by another count named Folmar. It had also a bishop, rich, powerful, firm, full of learning, named Adalberon, a favourite both with the Pope and with the Emperor, influential enough to obtain any- thing, but never asking anything but what was just. It was, therefore, under the protection of the sword of the count and of the crozier of the bishop that the municipal liberties of Metz began to grow — liberties that became within a single century so developed and powerful that Bertram, another bishop of Saxon origin, undertook the task of restricting them, and endeavoured to regulate them by a charter which restored to the Church its electoral but not its governmental influence. This first communal organization, a type of many other municipalities in France and in Germany, was inaugurated withoul bloodshed. But this was not everywhere the case ; at Cambrai, for instance, the commune was only established after a century of open warfare betweei the inhabitants and the bishop, their suzerain. At Laon — that ancient feudal city where the nobility and the burgesses engaged in all kinds of brigandage, where the bishop, who was a famous warrior and huntsman, was in the habil of sharing with the dignitaries of his cathedral and with the aristocracy 01 the town the fruit of his exactions-^-thecommune inaugurated itself with th< their bishop, who was assassinated in Hie" midst of a terrible insur- on, of Saint-Quentin. rection. FEUDALISM. of Sens, of Soissons (Fig. 17), and of Vezelay, underwent nearly the same vicissitudes that Cambrai and Laon had experienced, and finally attained, after similar trials, a similar position. Perhaps Cambrai, of all the French communes, was the most exacting towards the feudal power that it was trampling under foot. " Ni 1'eveque, ni 1'Empereur, ne peuvent mia asseoir ne taxe, ne tribut, et n'en peult issir la malice, for s que pour la bonne garde et defense de la ville, et ce depuis coq chantant jusques a la nuit." No Fig 17 -Seal of the Commune of Soissons, representing the Mayor of Soissons, armed at all points, in the midst of the Sheriffs of the Town (1228) .-National Archives o: vassal had ever claimed or obtained more in the exercise of his feudal rights (Fig. 18). The inauguration of the communal system had taken place without a struggle, and almost without opposition, as a useful and necessary reform at Metz, at Rheims, in a few midland towns, such a, Bourges, Moulins, Lyons, from cockcrow to nightfall." i6 FEUDALISM. Perigeux, and in most of the southern cities, such as Aries, Aigues-Mortes (Fig. 19), Marseilles, Narbonne, Cahors (Fig. 20), Carcassonne (Fig. 21), Nimes, and Bordeaux. This was explained by the fact that this indepen- dent action of the people had been prepared by the system adopted by the Franks, who allowed no difference to exist between the condition of the con- quered and of the conquerors. The rights they might enjoy and the duties Fig. 18.— Thomas of Savoy, Count of Flanders, and Joan his Wife, grant to the Town of CamLrai the Charter of Peace made between the Counts of Hainaut and the Chapter of Cambrai in 1240.— Miniature from the "Chroniques de Hainaut," Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century (Burgundian Library, Brussels). they were to perform had been equally shared amongst all the freedmen of the monarchy without any distinction as to nationality ; the Franks would have feared, had they acted differently, that they were reserving for the sovereign the possibility of using the oppressed nations as a weapon to overcome the conquerors themselves, and that in this way they might be leaving a loophole through which the monarchy might degenerate into despotism. FEUDALISM. Beyond the Alps, particularly in Lombardy, under the fostering action of liberal institutions, commerce and manufactures developed themselves, particularly at Milan, Pavia, Verona, and Florence ; and in a still higher degree, owing to their position on the sea -board, at Venice and Genoa. In these rich and prosperous cities the seignorial nobility and the Church reigned side by side, enjoying a nearly equal and parallel influence, and when feudalism attempted to absorb them by its inflexible despotism, the manufacturing and the commercial classes, selecting as their leaders a few more prominent of the artisans and some of the most respected of the clergy, Fig. 19.— Fortified Gate of the Town of Aigues-Mortes, which. Town obtained in 1246 a Communal Charter (Military Architecture of the Thirteenth Century). allied themselves with the lesser rural nobles, and, with the assistance of the latter's vassals, succeeded in repulsing its crushing yoke. This, however, was not accomplished without tremendous struggles, nor without painful trials and heavy sacrifices. In the Low Countries, which had always so highly exalted the sentiment of local patriotism, the struggle of the villains against the nobles, whether lay or ecclesiastic, differed but little from the struggle of the towns in the north of France against the seigniors, but it assumed larger proportions in accordance with the immense resources of every kind which they had at their disposal. The feudal lord had his drawbridge, his battlements, and his men-at-arms i8 FEUDALISM. cased in iron ; but his rebellious vassal could boast on his side, besides lithe narrow and winding streets of his stronghold and the number of | his fellow-combatants, many warlike engines and well-made weapons I which he himself had manufactured. When feudalism, in order to /'crush what it then termed the populace, summoned to its banner hordes / of adventurers recruited from all parts of the world, it was encountered / by undisciplined levies of armed mechanics and artisans, who issued forth / from Ghent, from Bruges, and from Liege, and not unfrequently returned victorious. Fig. 20.— Fortified Bridge, from Valentre to Cahors (1308). Fig. 21.— Plan of the Fortified City of Carcas- sonne (Thirteenth Century). Beyond the Meuse, the Moselle, and the Ehine, feudalism flourish* Lofty fortresses, surrounded with a triple moat, everywhere cast theii shadows athwart the land, though the towns enjoyed a full share o! municipal liberty, and were not unfrequently the disinterested spectators of the terrible struggles that the feudal nobility carried on between them- selves. Nowhere did feudalism display more arrogance or more barbarit1 than in Germany, which resembled some vast camp to which the noble flocked to meet face to face in desperate combat. When it came to pass that the industrial and populous towns of German; FEUDALISM. cried out for municipal liberties similar to those enjoyed by the towns of France, Italy, and the Low Countries, the emperor hastened to grant and confirm their desires. He did more, he gave them the right of immediate appeal against the princes of the empire — that is to say, any towns situated in the territory of any prince were responsible, not to the latter, but directly and immediately to the emperor himself, who thus laid for himself the foundations of strong natural supports in the very heart of the larger fiefs. The towns of Germany, already rich and flourishing, increased their commerce and their wealth, thanks to the new position they thus acquired. The Emperor Henry Y. greatly assisted this pacific revolution by granting privileges to the lower class of citizens and to the artisans, who up to that time had, according to the spirit of the Roman law, lived apart from the freedmen and remained at the lowest degree of the social scale. He relieved, them, in particular, from the bondage of a custom by virtue of which the seignior at their deaths became entitled to all their personal property, or, at least, enjoyed the power of claiming everything worth having which they i had left behind them. In many towns Henry V. deprived the bishop of his temporal authority, and formed the burgesses into companies or guilds according to the nature of their manual occupation, a custom that was immediately imitated and adopted in other commercial countries. The bourgeoisie, organized in this manner into distinct groups, soon elected councils among themselves, the members of which, under the rule of senators, prud'hommes, bonshommes, ec/ievins, and jurymen, began by assisting the representative of the imperial authority, whether duke, count, judge, or bishop, and ended by exercising a special and independent authority of their own, not over the vassals, but over citizens and commoners. It will be asked, what then was the commune which had established itself with more or less effort and sacrifice in the principal parts of Europe ? and further, as the commune had succeeded in one way or another in establishing itself, what privileges or immunities remained to the feudal lord, whether clerical or lay ? Gruilbert de Nogent, the open adversary of communal institutions, will perhaps give the best answer to these inquiries : " Those who pay taxes now pay only once a year the rent they owe to their seignior. If they commit some misdemeanour they have at the most 20 FEUDALISM. to pay a fine, the amount of which is legally fixed ; as for the moneys that were wont to be levied from the serfs, they are now quite exempt from them." Guilbert de Nogent might have indicated other victories obtained by the bourgeois, victories that were still more important in their moral influence, and which sooner or later were destined to change the face of society. As for the more intelligent seigniors who better understood their own personal interest, as well as the logical results of a paternal administration, they attempted to favour the instinctive movement of the rural populations, who, to shield themselves from the tyranny, the exactions, and the bad treatment Fig. 22.— Seal of the Lord of Corbeil (1196).— National Archives of France. of their feudal masters, were in the habit of seeking shelter and protection from some lord more humane or more politic than the rest, and who used, on the faith of a communal charter, to settle beside the ramparts of some seignorial manor (Fig. 22), around some loopholed church, or in the shade of some fortified monastery. The seignior in these cases was the gainer of so many able-bodied men, either artisans or agriculturists, but soldiers in case of need ; and he was the gainer, moreover, in matters of revenue and influence. It can easily be understood that in those times many charters were drawn up similar to the following, which is worth quoting as a type : " I, Henry, FEUDALISM. 2, Count of Troyes, make known to all present and to come, that I have esta- blished the undermentioned rules for the inhabitants of my new town (in the neighbourhood of Pont-sur-Seine) between the bridges of Pugny. Every man inhabiting the said town shall pay every year twelve deniers and a measure of oats as the price of his dwelling, and if he desires to hold a portion of land or meadow, he must pay four deniers yearly for every acre. The houses, vines, and fields may be sold or alienated at the pleasure of the holder. The men who reside in the said town shall go neither to the ost (an army in the field), nor shall they join any expedition unless I myself am at their head. I hereby allow them, moreover, to have six aldermen to administer the ordinary business of the town and to assist my provost in his duties. I have decreed that no seignior, be he knight or other, shall be allowed to withdraw from the town any of the men inhabitants for any reason what- soever, unless such be his own men, or unless he owe the seignior any arrears of taxes. — Given at Provins, in the year of the Incarnation, 1175." This name of Vilk-neuve, which is so often found repeated in the charters and deeds of the Middle Ages, as, for example, Ville-neuve-l'Etang, Ville- neuve-Saint- George, Ville-neuve-le-Roi, Ville-neuve-lez- Avignon, &c., is evidence of what was an ordinary event in the twelfth century, namely, the creation of a free town, enfranchised from its birth, and subject to some small and insignificant payments to the seignior, and whose inhabitants, but yesterday serfs or villains, were now proprietors of portions of the soil, which they might dispose of or bequeath, either by gift or by testamentary disposition, under the immediate protection of their nominal seignior. Some ancient towns of the royal domains of France, such as Paris, Orleans, Meaux, Senlis, and others, which do not seem to have preserved the least trace of Roman institutions, always excepting the company of the Nantes Parisiennes, who were the true founders of the ancient municipality of Paris, were each governed by a provost, who was the officer and lieutenant of the king, their seignior, and they further enjoyed certain special liberties and privileges. In 1137, Louis VII., at the suggestion of his minister, Suger, forbade his provost and officers to annoy the burgesses in any manner what- soever, and fixed the amount of their taxation himself. Ten years later, the same sovereign abolished the right of mortmain, repressed the abuses of the fiscal taxes, instituted a judicial system, and greatly encouraged commerce. It was not as king, but as seignior suzerain, that Louis VII. acted in this manner. 22 FEUDALISM. The French bourgeoisie was at this time of but recent origin ; it had sprung from a triumphant villanage, and was beginning to form a new branch, from which was to issue, a few centuries later, the third estate. Legal jurisdiction and the right of coinage, feudal privileges of which the royal suzerain had Fig. 23.— Ferrand of Portugal, Count of Flanders, made Prisoner at the Battle of Bouvines, and taken to Paris : " The Clergy and Laity singing Hymns and Songs."— Fac-simile of a Minia- ture in the " Chroniques de Hainaut," Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century (Burgundian Library, Brussels). always been very jealous, were favours it then but seldom enjoyed. Philip- Augustus understood better than his predecessors the interests of the royal power, for he graciously granted seventy-eight communal charters ; he was rewarded by the effectual assistance the communal levies afforded him at the battle of Bouvines (1214), when he was fortunate enough to overthrow the FEUDALISM. 2j coalition that foreign feudalism had formed with his rebellious great vassals. He forced the latter to return to their duty, and one of them, the Count of Flanders, remained twelve years a prisoner in the principal tower of the Louvre (Fig. 23). Philip- Augustus had not shrunk from granting a legal constitution to the bourgeoisie of Paris and the principal towns, in opposition to the feudal nobility. The communal movement, a natural development of the legal rights introduced by the Franks, was scarcely felt in England. Already, long before the Norman Conquest, under the Anglo-Saxon rule, many busy towns, wealthy and populous, such as Canterbury, London, Oxford, and York, took a share in public affairs, a limited share, it is true, but one sufficient for their wellbeing and prosperity. The victorious invasion of William of Normandy, so fatal to the whole country, was still more so to the large towns, which were compelled to behold their own material ruin, the sequestration and confisca- tion of their property, the dispersion and infeudation of their inhabitants, their agriculturists and their farmers. Unable any longer to invoke the protection of an easy-natured sovereign, they were forced to bow their heads beneath the sway of strangers, lucky adventurers, bold, exacting, despotic, and cruel men, believing in no faith and obeying no law, the very dregs of French feudalism. King Henry I., the third son of "William theT Uonqueror, after" many sang'uinary struggles, in which his barons were not found wanting in fealty to him, granted them the celebrated charter called Magna Charta — usually, though erroneously, considered the fundamental origin of English liberties, which, however, really dated from a prior period ; at the same time (1132) he released the burgesses of London from the lament- able state of degradation in which they had existed since the Conquest. In the reign of Henry II. — an administrative and judicial reformer — not in England alone, but in those parts of Scotland and Ireland which he had conquered (1154-1182), the inhabitants of many towns acquired the right to purchase the freehold of the soil they occupied, and to free themselves from several special taxes by paying a fixed sum to the feudal lord. Thence- forward arose that haughty bourgeoisie, with which the barons had soon to reckon, a class which John Lackland favoured proportionately as he dreaded the continual rebellions of the feudal seigniors. Twice was Prince Louis, the son of Philip-Augustus, summoned by the Anglo-Norman barons to cross the channel with an army to force the English king to fulfil the FEUDALISM. clauses of the charters lie had granted to his great vassals (1215-1216) ; on the other hand, the towns and communes, grown rich and powerful, thanks to the privileges which had been granted to them as well as to the intelli- gent activity of their manufactures, forced the nobles to respect them. The latter no longer attempted to compel assistance, but solicited it, often even humbly, so that the com- munes and the landed aristocracy held an equal position in the feudal hierarchy. The title of noble and baron, bestowed on the leading citizens of London and the Cinque Ports, raised the middle- class to a higher position. Indeed, to enable it, already powerful by its wealth and by its alliances, to become a political body, it only needed the privilege of sending represen- tatives to parliament, a privilege which was granted in 1264 to the principal towns of the kingdom. In France, about the same period, the industrial and trading bour- geoisie had seats in the privy council of St. Louis, and, advancing in letters and science, it gradually obtained possession of all the chairs at the university. As early as the reign of Philip the Bold (Fig. 24), it Fig. 24.— Philip in., called " the Bold," in Royal occupied all the higher positions in Costume. — From a Miniature in a Manuscript of ' i -u the Fourteenth Century (Burgundian Library, the judicature, and hence it assumed a place in the great bailiwicks and parliaments, from which the feudal nobility did not condescend to oust it, and which, after a time, enabled it to offer a successful resistance to the FEUDALISM. 25 abuse of power on the part of this same nobility, whose authority steadily diminished. Admitted by Philippe-le-Bel to the general assemblies of the nation and to the sessions of the states-general, the bourgeoisie became one of the states, an order of the kingdom, that is, the tiers-etat. It absorbed the offices pertaining to the general administration and to finance, it furnished the lower orders of the clergy with most of their distinguished representa- tiveSj and the municipalities with the most gifted of their magistrates ; it acquired the right of purchasing offices which carried nobility with them, of possessing seignorial domains with high and petty justice, and thus it forced its way like ivy into the crevices of the feudal edifice, which stone by stone crumbled to pieces. Philippe-le-Bel, surnamed the King of the Laivyers — who helped him in a material degree to carry out his designs — showed himself, as a natural consequence, the King of the Commons (tiers-etat}, and the secret enemy of the Church and the nobility. The latter, valiant and chivalrous, but devoid of forethought, rushing headlong into every kind of adventure, and caring only for deeds of daring and warlike achievements, regardless of their material interests, gradually allowed themselves to be divested of a con- siderable part of their domains by the bourgeoisie, who lent them money upon mortgage, and by the voues or procureurs, who ruined them. The decadence of their wealth dated from the First Crusade, when they encumbered their estates to pay the expenses of distant expeditions, which they undertook almost entirely at their own cost ; and when they wished to recover possession of the properties which they had handed over to some third party, they found them loaded with fresh debts, which had been contracted during their absence, and producing but nominal revenues for want of hands to cultivate the soil. They then were obliged to sell a portion of the property, and that at a great loss. The only resource remaining was the concession of their feudal privileges, and in this way the nobility lost the right of coining money and of exercising justice, while the sovereigns— Philippe-le-Bel in particular — seconded by the bourgeoisie, increased their absolute power. The massacre of more than six thousand chevaliers at Courtray (1302), by the Flemish militia (Fig. 25), was a heavy blow to the pride of the gene- rous but reckless nobility of France. It was humiliating to these lords to find that the villains knew how to wield the arms which they had been in the habit of making for others ; they saw that they possessed the courage and skill needed to win battles, and that henceforward they must be reckoned 26 FEUDALISM. upon as a force able to take the field as well as formidable when engaged in street riots. In Germany, the fall of the Hohenstaufen family, formerly Dukes of Swabia and Franconia, favoured the enfranchisement of towns ; all the cities in these two principalities, hitherto subject to the mediatised lords, reverted to the emperor, who, without any real power over them, left them free to establish the fran- chise and immunities of a republic. In order to increase their populations, they followed the ex- ample of the sovereigns and feudal lords- of France and Lombardy in regard to the formation of new towns, establishing around their walls, as feudalism had done outside its donjons, fields of refuge. These were occupied by a host of strangers, who received the designation of Pfahlburger — citizens of the palisades, or faubourgians, originally sheltered and protected by a wooden barrier. These receded in proportion as the number of inhabitants increased, and according as their trade developed. Many serfs deserted the neigh- bouring fiefs to seek in these free towns the independence, position, success, and all the advan- tages which they could not enjoy under the feudal regime. Their lords demanded their extradition ky virtue of their feudal rights, accompanying Fig. 25.— Flemish Warrior in the the demand with threats, which were sometimes Uniform of the , v«n Arterdde effectual; but the free towns, not less interested Militia: Stone Statue formerly in one of the niches in the *n keeping the fugitive than the latter was Belfry at Ghent, now in the in remaining with them, endeavoured to gain Ruins of St. Bavon of Ghent ,• (Fourteenth Century). tim6 and t0 faVOUr hlS retreat until after the expiration of three hundred and sixty-five days, when the right of the lord to his liegeman or vassal ceased. The imperial towns— which, from the twelfth to the fourteenth century, after having freed themselves from the fetters of feudalism, had risen to such a height of independence that the emperor himself had but a nominal supremacy over them— were Ratisbon, in Bavaria; Augsburg and Ulm, in FEUDALISM. Swabia; Nuremberg, Spiers, Worms, and Frankfort- on- the -Main, inFranconia; Magdeburg, in Saxony; Hamburg, Bremen, and Lubeck, in the Hanseatic League ; Aix-la-Chapelle, Bonn, Cologne, Coblentz, Mayence, Strasburg, and Metz, in the Rhenish and Lotharingian provinces. These towns, essen- tially industrial and commercial,' in which the middle-classes were for the most part supreme, formed vast emporiums, teeming with the products of the north, the south, and the east. They were looked upon as the store- houses and arsenals of Europe. Feudalism, unable to produce anything for itself, was always replenishing from these depots the resources neces- sary for equipping and revictualling its armies. From them came the arms and the engines of warfare, as well as the special workmen, the cross- bowmen, the carpenters, the founders, and the artillerymen, who composed the personnel of the artillery at this period. If the free towns had arrived at a common understanding, and formed a pacific league between themselves, they would have presented a serious obstacle to the struggles of the suzerain lords; but their distance from each other, especially those in the centre of Germany, prevented them from coming to such an arrangement. Nor could they, as in England, form an alliance with the feudal nobility, nor, as in France, make common cause with the suzerain. As the emperor left them to act independently, they were obliged to organize their own defence, to contract alliances with some powerful neighbour, and weaken, by dividing them, those enemies whom they deemed stronger than them- selves. Thus these free towns never constituted a homogeneous body ; they were isolated and spread over a vast extent of territory, being only brought together by feelings of interest and sympathy, but without any mutual tie or political cohesion. The lord with whom they were at war to-day, would enter their service and pay the next, with the title of soldarien; and at times a single town would have as many as two or three hundred of these allies, who were always followed by a swarm of marauders, and who spread desolation throughout the land. The lords who were without fortune, who represented the petty feudalism of the country districts, finding in the service of these towns a means for keeping up their state and paying their followers, passed from one to the other, and only enlisted under the standard of a sovereign prince for want of better employment, for the latter did not as a rule pay so well as these free towns. From the eleventh to the fourteenth century, the position of the bishop, 28 FEUDALISM. in point of political influence, did not improve in these free or republican towns, either in England, France, or Germany. Suzerain lord by moral authority, he was only so to a very limited degree (Fig. 26) in respect to his temporal power. He only exercised justice over his vassals, or at most over the members of the secular and inferior clergy, for the canons, the incum- bents, and even the deacons, enjoying as they did special immunities, would hpe appealed, in the event of a dispute or of censure, to their metro- Dlitan archbishop, or even to Home. It is true that the lay depositaries of mnicipal authority did not, on their side, take any judicial steps against fhe ecclesiastics, except in case of conspiracy against the State, which alone rendered them answerable to secular justice. Outside the subordinates of the Fig. 26.— Seal of John, Bishop of Puy and Count of Velay (1305), holding in his right hand a naked sword as a token of secular jurisdiction. bishop and the chapter, the episcopal court or tribunal took cognizance of the crimes, the offences, and misdemeanours against religion of which any citizen might be guilty, and also of the heresies, blasphemies, breaking of images, glaring infractions of the commandments of God and of the Church, insults and assaults of the priests, &c. And even in these cases, where the delin- quent could plead nobility, and especially when he belonged to the higher classes of feudalism, the jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical tribunals, could not reach him. As the nobility could always claim to be judged by their peers, there was rarely any infraction of this feudal principle, and then only where some diocesan bishop or metropolitan was powerful enough to substitute his own will for the customary right. In nearly all the episcopal towns, the judgment of the prelate or of his FEUDALISM. 29 Fig. 27.— The Tree of Battles : Allegorical Figures representing the discord which exists between the various classes of society.— Reproduced from a Miniature of "The Tree of Battles" of Honore Bouet, Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century (Burgundian Library, Brussels). delegates was delivered from the square in front of the cathedral, or from the doorway of some exterior and adjacent chapel. This practice, maintained 3o FEUDALISM. during the first centuries of the Church's existence, ceased when another form of justice, namely, civil justice, took its place. In order to avoid the conflicts which must have ensued, and to furnish no pretext for popular disturbance, the ecclesiastical justice took refuge in some special place, generally called the Cour I'evcsque, till at last the diocesan power, deprived of its temporal prerogatives within the boundary of the free towns, found itself obliged to transfer somewhere else the seat of its jurisdiction and of those feudal rights which it still retained. The mint of the prelate was established there ; but so wide was the disagreement between the ecclesiastical and the civil authorities, and so sustained the struggle between the feudal and the middle-class interests, that it often happened that the episcopal money was not accepted as current coin, even in the town where the bishop was spiritually supreme, nor in the territory annexed to the free town and enjoying equal prerogatives. In Germany and in Italy the emperor, in France and England the king, as the highest representatives of feudalism, possessed in every large city — notably in the cities termed imperial or royal — an official delegate, called burgrave, count, or viscount, who, originally at the head of the army, the magistracy, and the finances, gradually lost his prerogatives till, in the thirteenth century, he was scarcely more than a mere dignitary, without either power or credit. Many bishops, authorised by the lay sovereign, took the title of count, without, however, adding in any material degree to their influence. Besides, whatever may have been the nature and extent of the functions of a count, it does not appear that the free towns paid any more heed to them than to the pre-eminence of the bishop in all that appertained to the administration and government of the commune. In many places, especially in Italy and upon the banks of the Moselle and the Rhine, the bourgeoisie possessed councils invested both with the judicial and executive power, also a senate and a parliament, which was summoned the ringing of a bell, and to which the lords inhabiting the adjacent castles were admitted, but only as ordinary citizens ; without, however, losing any of their domainial privileges. Though feudalism possessed nearly the same generic type in all European countries, it presented here and there varying shades of nationality, due to the dissimilarity of race, to the habits of the .people, to the different mode* in which it had been introduced, and to the diverse phases of its struggle and growth. FEUDALISM. The illustrious house of Franconia, alarmed at the incessant progress of high German feudalism, and anxious to check it, created, in the midst of the duchies by which it was threatened, a number of immediate lordships, owing fealty only to the emperor, and having an hereditary right over the fiefs of clikalry. This step met with an obstinate resistance from the great vassals who possessed this hereditary right, which the elected monarch did not enjoy of himself. On the other hand, the palatine lords, agents of the emperor, Fig. 28.— Seal of John, Duke of Burgundy, Count of Nevers and Baron of Donzy, surnamed Jean sans Peur (1371— 1419).— National Archives of Paris. and empowered to represent him in the great fiefs or in his domains, and the burgraves of the towns, impatient to free themselves from the imperial suzerainty, displayed at the same time the insubordination which the leudes had practised in the Carlovingian epoch, and endeavoured to establish for themselves an independence transmissible to their heirs. While this move- ment was going on, the Pope was lowering the status of the empire ; Inno- cent II. compelled the Emperor Lothair II. to receive in fee from him 32 FEUDALISM. Tuscany, the Duchy of Spoleta, the Marches of Ancona, Bologna, Parma, Placenza, &c., forming part of the legacy bequeathed to the Holy See by the Countess Matilda. From this flagrant humiliation, submitted to by Conrad of Hohenstaufen, the successor of Lothair, and haughtily rejected by Henry the Haughty when he refused to render feudal homage to the Pope, arose the celebrated quarrel of the Guelphs and the Ghibellines, which, from the banks of the Rhine, spread beyond the Alps, and implanted itself in the very heart of Italy. Henry the Haughty, chief of the Guelphs, independent and royal, was proscribed and stripped of his duchies, while Conrad, chief of the Ghibellines, inaugurated the brilliant dynasty of the Hohenstaufens. Thirty years of bitter warfare, during which the alliance of the papacy with the national party was cemented, seconded by the efforts of petty feudalism, led up to the treaty of Constance, which brought to a definite close the struggle of the feudal ^empire against the popular independence of the cities of Italy. The Pope had recovered the freeholds left him by the Countess Matilda ; the towns preserved their regal prerogatives, entire liberty to raise armies, to surround themselves with walls (Fig. 29), to exercise criminal and civil jurisdiction, and to form confederations with other towns, &c. The emperor was left with no other privileges than those of confirming, through his ambassadors, the consular elections, and of appoint- ing in each town a judge of appeal in his name. It was in vain that the Emperor Henry VI. endeavoured to re-establish high feudalism ; he died in the attempt (1199), and Innocent III., who considered himself to be the natural defender of all the rights and the supreme judge in all the monarchies in Europe, resisted every effort made by Henry VI. Several Crusades, moreover, which occurred at about this period, created a modificj tion in the warlike sentiments of the feudal nobility, until, thanks to tl policy of the illustrious pontiffs who had occupied the chair of St. Pet< and to the efforts of the Italian free towns, backed up by the petty feu< nobility, the independence of Italy rose triumphant from the tomb whic opened for the Emperor Frederick II. on December 13th, 1250. In England, John Lackland had, by the Magna Charta of 1215 — 121' promised the clergy to respect the liberties of the Church, and notably tl freedom of election; to the feudal lords he had promised to observe feudal conditions of release, of ward, and of marriage ; to the bourgeois, that no new tax should be levied without the consent of the common council ; FEUDALISM. 33 and to all his subjects lie accorded tlie habeas corpus — that is to say, the liberty of the person, with trial by jury, by constituting the court of common pleas at a certain fixed place. A second charter, called the Forest Charter, mitigated the extreme severity of the penalties for infraction of the laws appertaining to the chase, and guaranteed the whole of the liberties which had been extracted from him by creating a tribunal of twenty-five barons, entrusted with the function of seeing that this charter was carried out, and, further, of keeping watch over the action of the crown. This was submitting the Government to a regular course of discipline. Just as the feudal nobility had been kept under and oppressed by the sovereign power, so was the latter now hedged in, thwarted, and hampered in its despotic tendencies. •Bh Fig*. 29. — The fortified Bridge of Lamentano, near Koine, theatre of the wars between the Guelphs and the Ghibellines, in the Twelfth Century. St. Louis, following in the footsteps of Philip Augustus, laboured to suppress the abuses of the feudal regime ; he compelled his barons to choose between the fiefs which they held from him and those which they had received from the kings of England ; he rooted out the old feudal stocks, created a new feudalism, not less valiant but more moral than the old, and never lost sight of the formidable opposition which the old nobility had ventured to set up against the Queen-Regent, Blanche of Castile, when it declared that the young King Louis should not be consecrated until the suzerain aristocracy was restored to the plenitude of its privileges. After Louis IX., French feudalism, transformed by the saint-king, was neither less haughty, less trivial, nor less insolent than before, but it was more favourable to the crown and less hostile to the Church. It formed a brilliant array of chivalry, full of enthusiasm and impetuosity, commencing a battle FEUDALISM. well, always winning it at the very beginning of the action, but losing it after- wards for want of being supported by a national body of infantry, whose help it despised ; it made up a body of cavalry admirably adapted for tourna- ments and feats of arms, but incapable of carrying on a regular warfare, or even of ensuring success in a great battle. The victories of Mons-en- Puelle, under Philip IY., and of Cassel, under Philip of Yalois (1328), increased to the utmost the blind confidence of the French nobility, and brought about, by absolutely identical means, the disasters of Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt (1346, 1356, 1415). From the events which took place during the space of a century, from the accession to the imperial throne of the Emperor Louis V. (1313) to the Peace of Bretigny (1360), it was made manifest that the destinies of the feudal world rested henceforth upon France and England, those two rival powers, both of which were acquisitive and inflexible; that the Emperor and the Pope occupied but the second place in this latest evolution of feudalism ; that Borne, compelled to bend towards France, gave the latter a considerable preponderance, and that the force of equilibrium must inevi- tably bring together the King of England and the Emperor of Germany. The French royalty, despite the vicissitudes caused by an incessant struggle against the English, despite the ravages of the plague, which had depopulated two-thirds of the kingdom, despite its financial burdens and the pre- carious position of the monarchy, continued its work of assimilation and feudal incorporation ; the suzerainty attaching to the great fiefs gradually fell under the jurisdiction of the sovereign, while, upon the right bank of the Bhine, the great barons remained almost as omnipotent as ever they had been. There existed in Germany at that time two kinds of leagues between the nobility, the one offensive and the other defensive; that of the Gauerbi- nate or Gauerbschaften, by virtue of which the petty nobility formed family pacts for transmitting their fiefs by indirect line when the direct line should fail, and for reconstructing or repairing their castles out of a common fund ; and that of the Teutonic Hanse^fhe league of the prince-archbishops and electors with sixty towns upon the Ehine. Eodolph of Hapsburg (Fig. 30), a monarch as resolute as he was able, put a stop to proceedings which were full of danger to the imperial authority, compelled his vassals to do him homage, and razed to the ground seventy fortresses whose feudal brigandage FEUDALISM. 35 had scattered desolation and ruin ; but, after his death, the usurpation of the suzerain lords began afresh, and the Bulk d' Or, which was the basis of public right in Germany, confirmed the downfall of the imperial suzerainty (1378). In France, on the other hand, as each convocation of the States- General was attended with the creation or levying of some new tax, the third estate Fig. 30.— Equestrian Stone Statue of Rodolph of Hapsburg, Emperor of Germany, by Erwin de Steinbach, placed above the Grand Portal of Strasburg Cathedral (Thirteenth Century). attempted to exact all the more from royalty in proportion as it gratified the latter's pecuniary demands, claiming to have a voice in the question of peace or war, to direct the financial affairs of the kingdom, to be convoked every year, and to share, with the two other orders, the weight of the charges the profit of which ought to be shared by all. The feudal nobility resisted the exorbitant pretensions of the third estate, but when they saw this class forming a secret alliance with the clergy, and setting on foot a formidable FEUDALISM. Fig. 31. — Maximilian of Austria, with Mary of Burgundy, his wife, only daughter of Charles the Bold, and their young son Philip, afterwards King of Castile. — "Abridged Chronicles of Burgundy," Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century, in the Library of M. Ambroise-Firmin Didot. league, the password of which was the destruction of the castles and the annihilation of the nobles, they hesitated, and did nothing until the horribl< FEUDALISM. excesses committed by the league in the country districts had given the feudal reaction a character of legality. In 1383, after the battle of Bose- becque, which inflicted a heavy blow upon the communal cause in' Flanders and in France, it seemed as if the power of suzerainty was about to revive once more. Froissart, in his Chronicles, rejoiced at this fact, because he believed that social order was threatened with utter ruin (see his Chronicles, year 1383) ; but French chivalry succumbed in its turn at Agincourt beneath the onslaught of the English archers. This was the final condemnation of feudal armies, as well as of the system which these armies represented, and which they had failed in sustaining. French feudalism had already ceased to be anything more than a storehouse of traditions which were still held in respect, and of old customs which had fallen into disuse among the ancient nobility. In England, Scotland, and Ireland, high feudalism was rapidly in course of decay, before Henry VIII. dealt it its death-blow; in Germany it struggled for existence during the reign of Maximilian (Fig. 31) ; in France it was crushed by Louis XI. with the help of the third estate. Beyond the Alps, in Italy, its existence was prolonged for a short period, partly under a clerical disguise, partly by the hired help of the condottieri, and in some places by the support of the urban democracy, that is the industrial and trading part of the population. Everywhere, however, it disappeared with the Middle Ages, of which, both in its acts and in its first principles, it bore the ineffaceable imprint (Fig. 32). Fig. 32.— Doorways of the Old Castle of Loches, in Touraine, a favourite Manor of Louis XI. (Fifteenth Century). WAK AND AEMIES. The Invasions of the Barbarians.— Attila.— Theodoric seizes Italy.— Organization of Military Fiefs.— Defences of Towns.— Totila and his Tactics.— The Military Genius of Charlemagne. - Military Vassalage.— Communal Militia.— Earliest Standing Armies.— Loss of Technical Tradition. — The Condottieri.— The Gendarmerie.— The Lances Fournies.— Weakening of Feudal Military Obligations.— The French Army in the Time of Louis XI. and his Suc- cessors.—Ahsence of Administrative Arrangement.— Reforms.— Mercenary Troops.— Siege Operations and Engines. HE art of war had attained its highest degree of perfection among the Romans, when the successive invasions of the barbarians began to burst like an overflowing river over the richest of the Homan colonies These barbarians, most of whom were natives of the Caucasian mountains were the Iberians, who never halted till they had reached Spain ; the Celts or Cimbrians, who installed themselves among the Gauls ; and the Sarmatians and the Scythians, who inhabited the vast forests of Germany before the great wars of Julius Caesar (Fig. 33). Suddenly, in the fourth century of the Christian era, a movemem which commenced in the centre of Asia caused an irruption of a race hitherto unknown upon the Caucasian races. These were the Huns, before whom the terrified Goths retreated, but who at first made but a brief apparition in Europe ; for if Rome at that time was wanting in seasoned legions, she could rely, at least in the provinces of her empire, upon many numerous and power- ful auxiliaries who were accustomed to fight under her standard (Fig. 34), some for the sake of pay, others to defend their own hearths. In 451, in the reign of the Emperor Yalentinian III., who had bribed the barbarians instead of repulsing them with the sword, Attila, the King of WAR AND ARMIES. 39 the Huns, bore down upon Europe at the head of seven hundred thousand fighting men of various races. In less than three months he had overrun and laid waste Moravia, Bohemia, Hesse, and Wurtemburg, crossed the Rhine helow Strasburg, the Moselle at Treves and at Metz, the Meuse at Fig. 33.— War Trophy and Barbarian Prisoners.— From Sculptures on the Triumphal Arch of Orange (Second Century). Tongres, the Scheldt at Tournay; and after two sanguinary raids into Burgundy and the country around Orleans, pitched his tents in the plains of Champagne. The tactics of Attila were to avoid pitched battles, to give a wide berth to the fortresses, contenting himself with sacking and plunder- 4o WAR AND ARMIES. ing their outskirts. He laid waste the open country, burnt villages, put their inoffensive inhabitants to the sword, and making it his chief object to divide and isolate the Roman legions, finally crushed them by the weight of numbers. The whole "West was stirred up at the tidings of this terrible invasion. ,2Etius, the Eoman leader among the Gauls, had called to his aid the con- federates of Amorica, the Frank-Salians, whose leader was Merovius, the Burgundians, the Saxons, and the southern Yisigoths, whose king was Fig. 34. — German and Gallic Auxiliaries, one wearing Trousers (Braccce], and the other a Tunic. — From a Roman Monument of the Second Centurv. Theodoric. This numerous army, composed of excellent troops under the orders of ^Etius, marched to meet the barbarians, and encountered them in the neighbourhood of Chalons-sur-Marne. The battle lasted three days, and the defeat of the Huns was complete. The ferocious Attila, who had called himself the Scourge of God, and who had run his course like some fatal meteor, leaving in his track nothing but conflagrations and ruins, expired in the midst of an orgie in 455. A truce- less, unceasing war was still being waged all over Europe, a sanguinary and WAR AND ARMIES. 41 implacable war of race and of party. Political chaos, a chaos that Christianity alone was destined to regenerate, was at its height in the old world, when, towards the close of the sixth century, Theodoric, King of the Eastern Goths, who had protected Byzantium when threatened by the Bulgarians, and who had remained in the pay of the Emperor Zeno, deter- mined to find occupation for his warlike and restless subjects by leading them against Odoacer, the sovereign of the Herulians, who at that time united under his sway Sicily and the Italian peninsula, but whose subjects were at best but a ferocious and turbulent mob. The young King of the Goths (he was only thirty- four years of age) started from the depths of Mocsia (now Servia), with the consent of the chief of the empire, at the head of an entire warlike population, to whom he promised the conquest of Italy. He easily overcame the King of the Herulians ; and, having conquered Italy, he posted his soldiers in the various provinces of the peninsula, in such a manner that their pay and their rations might continue to be supplied to them as regularly in peace as in war. The system of government and administration established by Theodoric had the advantage of distributing two hundred thousand excellent troops in the midst of a population which, glad to find itself uncalled upon for military service, and but little taxed, allowed the work of the conquest to be consoli- dated. The millenaires (soldiers of a battalion numbering a thousand men) occupied with their families distinct portions of territory, and were bound to hold themselves under arms, and ready to march, whenever the defence of the country required it (Fig. 35). Theodoric had already recognised the utility of urban garrisons. The flower of the country's youth, organized in a military manner, flocked to the gymnasium of Ravenna, and the king himself presided over their exercises. His levies, as regards their discipline, their instruction, and their equipment, resembled the ancient legions of Rome. The iron cap, the shield, the broadsword, and the arrow of the Goths had been replaced by the spear, the javelin, the helmet, and the cuirass of the Romans. The old soldiers received from the royal treasury for their services as in- structors a particular grant, which was annually paid to them till they retired altogether from the profession of arms. "When the troops were about to take the field, the intendants, under the orders of the counts, superintended the commissariat and the gathering and the march of the different army corps. The provincial officers had to distribute arms, food, and hay on the different WAR AND ARMIES. points of the road that the troops were expected to follow, and the inha- bitants had to provide lodgings — this was the only military service expected of them, but none could escape it. The towns were at this time almost always fortified, and entrenched camps covered nearly the whole of Italy. The castles in the rural districts, constructed to protect the frontiers, were usually full of troops, whose support Fig. 35.— Military Costume from the Sixth to the Tenth Centuries.— From a Miniature in the "Dialogues de Saint Gregoire," Manuscript of the Eleventh Century (National Library of Paris). was part of the duty of the pretorial prefect, and whose insubordination often necessitated severe measures of repression. " Keep up a spirit of military discipline ; it is often difficult to enforce it under civil rule," said Theodoric to Servatus, one of his generals. If it is a matter of surprise to meet with such a right moral feeling in the sovereign of reputed barbarians, barbarians half civilised, however, by their WAR AND ARMIES. obligation of personal service, the hierarchic subor- dination of vassalage, were the necessary consequence of feudal institutions. In all probability the establishment of the arriere-ban, or the ban-fieffe, dates from the sixth JIBl •§ century. It was a call to arms of the vassals that the suzerain alone had a right to command. A century later, feudalism, which was beginning to JjjjL CjBSffiH ~ establish itself in Gaul as in Italy, as a consequence o of the successful invasion of the Franks, was nearly stamped out by the Mahometan invasion of the Spanish Moors, who had been led by their chief, Abderamus, as far as the banks of the Loire, where they were stopped by Charles Martel, who routed them with great slaughter. After the brilliant victory of Poitiers (732), where the repulse of Arab civilisation left the field open to the defenders of the Christian faith, and to the originators of the feudal regime, the victorious army underwent a sudden change. The Frankish . knights adopted as an inheritance of conquest the rich Saracen armour (Figs. 37, 38, 39, 40) ; the feudal troopers donned a coat of mail, and, hence- forward, a full suit of armour became a necessary accessory to a warrior of high rank. The bow, which llSSlll J had long been thrown aside, was once more taken into favour, and became the special arm of the foot- men. But we have exhaustively treated of the armament and equipment of the soldiery of the ( period (see the chapter on Armoury in " Art in the Middle Ages"), and we can only here deal with military tactics and organization ; in a word, with the theoretical part of the art of war. The reign of Charlemagne, which was one long series of expeditions and conquests, was naturally favourable to the progress and development of this art. The Emperor of the Franks, like a man of genius , o 46 WAR AND ARMIES. understood how to profit by the inventions and creations of his predecessors. To the warlike traditions of Greece and Rome he added, step by step, the improvements that were rendered necessary by the nature of the enemies with whom he had to contend, namely, the Lombards, the Saxons, &c. He kept up the feudal service of the ban ; he established permanent orders of militia, composed of his own serfs and vassals ; but, as soon as he undertook a distant expedition, his auxiliaries, ten times as numerous as his vassals, rendered his army rather a German than a French one. He caused a number of fortresses to be constructed everywhere throughout his vast empire, but he never allowed his subjects to build any on their own account. Yet he never seems to have attached any importance, as a protection to his territory, to the larger enclosed towns, in which he might have held in reserve considerable depots of troops. He himself usually resided in rural residences and in open and unprotected villages, barely guarded by a few military pickets. At the slightest signal, it is true, a whole army of fideles and servitors would have arisen as one man to defend him ; but under no circumstances would he have consented to await his enemy under the shelter of fortifications ; he was always the true primeval German, seeking for his field of battle the open plain rather than the hillside, preferring cavalry to infantry, and a direct struggle, a hand- to-hand fight, to encounters at a distance, waged and won by the missiles of the slinger and the shafts of the bowmen. His principal victories were gairied in the open country, where he was enabled to deploy his masses of mailed horsemen; he never willingly sat down before a stronghold, a circumstance which shows that he was aware of his want of skill in the conduct of a siege ; and he was never fortunate in mountain warfare, as was evidenced in the disastrous day of Eoncevaux (778), which cast a shadow over the last years of his life. Thirty years after the death of the great emperor, the treaty of Mersei (847) freed the great vassals from the obligation of answering the sum- monses of the sovereign, and of rushing to arms at his appeal, unless for th( purpose of defending the State, and substituted the practice of furnishin| armed contingents, whose services were to be rendered for a fixed period, settled beforehand. Infeudation — a kind of political and pecuniary contract, in virtue of which a fief was subdivided into several smaller ones — perpetuated the feudal regime, each man becoming the man of another man, bound to place himself at his disposal in time of war, and to be ready to start on any WAR AND ARMIES. 47 expedition at his command, and according to the wishes of his immediate seignior. During the tenth century this regime grew stronger and stronger. The oath of infeudation, or the act of homage, remained a sacred tie between the seignior and the vassal. This homage involved the rendering of numerous HICODOVEPS'-BACYL Fig. 41.-Bishop Eudes, holding his baton of office, encouraging the young soldiers of the Duke of Normandy at the Battle of Hastings. -Military Costumes of the Eleventh Century, fr the Bayeux Tapestry. feudal services, such as those of the ban, and of the arriere-ban, those rendered by the servitors of different ranks, known as bachelors, clients, esquires, bannerets, men-at-arms, barons, &c., names already ancient, but whose rank and place in battle were only determined on the day when they were all grouped and posted, each under his special banner or gonfanon, a distinction that implied a separate kind of equipment for each. Thus the vassals were in the power of the seignior, who, having the WAR AND ARMIES. right to dispose of their military services, enjoyed the right of rase— a right that gave him the power of assembling and leading to battle a certain number of feudal groups. " Obey my summons, or I will burn you ! were the words of the seignior in the ban published by the crier, and, at the second summons, the sound of the trumpet rang out in the cross roads, in the streets, and in the country places, calling the men to arms. To fail Fig. 42.— After the Battle of Hastings (Htti October, 1066), the relatives of the vanquished came to carry away their dead. The body of the Saxon King, Harold, is taken to Waltham by the monks of that monastery. In the background is seen Battle Abbey, founded by Duke William on the site of the battle.— Fac-simile of a Miniature in the " Chroniques de Nor- mandie." Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century, in the possession of M. Ambroise Firmin- Didot. to answer the call of the ban was to commit a crime of the worst character. In the great expedition of William, Duke of Normandy, against the Anglo-Saxons (1066), he had no other auxiliaries than his Norman vassals and subjects. He conquered Harold and took possession of England with a numerous and trained army, furnished with terrible warlike machines and engines (Figs. 41 and 42). The Norman Conquest was, to a certain extent, * " Arrivez, ou je vous brulerai ! " WAR AND ARMIES. 49 a prelude to the Crusades, for those raids across the seas, repeated from time to time for more than two centuries, bore no resemblance to the barbarian invasions, either Saracen or Norman, which had been previously recorded in history. New measures, inspired by the circumstances of the times, were the consequence of the general crumbling to pieces of all the Eastern nations ; among these may be mentioned the establishment of the communal militia, which set out for a campaign accompanied by its spiritual pastors, and received the last offices of religion at their hands on the field of battle ; the regular pay allowed to those who were destitute of private resources (a knight received at first ten sous a day — equivalent to ten francs of modern money — and a squire received five) ; the chartering of ships intended for the transport of troops ; the system of commissariat for armies in the field ; and the supply of military equipments, arms, &c. This communal militia, sprung from the freeing of the communes, and detachments of soudoyers, or paid troops, soon grew into a standing army, which was formally incorporated for the first time by Louis le Jeune about 1140, and increased by Philip Augustus, who added to it the affiliated knights. Under the latter sovereign, an army in the field presented three ranks of combatants — bannerets, knights, and squires, to whom were added the men-at-arms. A motley crew of varlets on foot, without officers or dis- cipline, followed the troops, and hovered about them during an engagement, picking up the spoil of the conquered, and killing the wounded with clubs or battle-axes, called glaives de mercy. The disasters of the Crusaders in the East, after two centuries of useless heroism and tremendous efforts, were principally due to the defects in their military administration, which foresaw nothing, and was incapable of adjust- ing itself to the difficulties inherent to a war in a distant and almost unknown land whither the enthusiastic crowds who wore the cross bent their adventurous steps. Famine, plague, leprosy, and fever destroyed the Christian armies on their journey to Palestine, and during their stay there ; and these evils would have been greater still had it not been for the creation of the different military orders which sprang into existence under the pressure of these almost inevitable calamities, and which supplied hospital attendants, chaplains, and soldiers. The continuation of the feudal wars (Fig. 43) in Europe gave the last blow to the disorganization of the armies of Christ. While Philippe le Bel was destroying the Knights Templars, whom he held H WAR AND ARMIES. to be obstacles to his political plans, he was at the same time seeking in every way the means of restraining a haughty aristocracy, always under arms, whose systematic want of discipline was a danger both to the throne and to the country. As soon as he had obtained from the representatives of the nation, assembled together in States-General, the right to impose taxes according to Fig. 43. — Bichard Coeur-de-Lion, King of England and Duke of Normandy, mortally wounded an arrow 'shot by Bertrand de Gourdon, at the Siege of the Castle of Chalus, in Limousii (1199). — "Chroniques de Normandie," Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century (Library M. Ambroise Firmin-Didot). the requirements of the sovereign, he set to work on the definitive organiza- tion of a permanent paid army (Fig. 44). He fixed the age of military service at eighteen, and decreed that none of his subjects, except the old and the sick, should be exempt from it, unless they paid a certain sum to the royal treasury, and supplied, according to their rank and means, one or more sub- j statutes (decree of 1302, 1303, 1306) to serve under the flag of the ost of the WAR AND ARMIES. king (Fig. 46). Till that time, military service had only been obligatory for forty consecutive days, or, at the most, for three months. This service was, indeed, often of less duration, according to the different degree of infeudation of any particular fief, and was hedged about, besides, with so many privi- leges and with so many exemptions, that if a feudal army did not succeed in Fig. 44.— Soldier of the Time of Philippe le Bel.— Miniature in a Manuscript of the Period (National Library of Paris). ig< 45.— Man-at-arms with a pot dc for with nose-piece, a coat of mail over his leather tunic, and armed with a short broadsword. —From a Miniature in the "Dialogues de Saint Gregoire," a Manuscript of the Eleventh Century, in the Natiorial Library of Paris. bringing a short campaign to a prosperous issue, it generally met with a fatal collapse. In accordance with this design, Philippe le Bel, at the opening of the Flemish campaign, summoned "for four months to his standards, archbishops, bishops, abbots, dukes, counts, barons, and other nobles, all liable 'to the ban," each of whom could claim pay at the rate of twelve WAR AND ARMIES. deniers (about four francs) a day, besides a sum of thirty sous (about thirty francs) for their equipment. Philippe le Long (1314) and Philippe de Yalois 1337 — 1340) continued and improved the work of Philippe le Bel. Thenceforward, the ost or army of the king was regularly established ; the cross-bowmen and the men-at-arms were the first corps who received a permanent organization and a fixed rate of pay. In the fourteenth century, the French infantry, composed merely of more or less badly-armed archers, inspired its leaders with no great confidence. Its want of skill and its cowardice too often compromised the issue of an Fig. 46. — Messenger bringing a Letter to the King's Army. — From a Manuscript in the National Library of Paris (Thirteenth Century). engagement. It was necessary, in order to support those combatants always ready to take to flight, to employ foreign mercenaries, English, Italian, or German, who fought well when they were liberally paid. These mercenaries, more practised in war and more courageous than the soldiers of the were entrusted with the management of the cannon, which at this time wei first employed, and which were carried by the camp followers. We may hei repeat what we have spoken of elsewhere, viz., that the imperfections of tl earliest cannons, the difficulty which attended their use, and the dan| incurred by those who discharged them, caused the old arms to be long pi ferred to these new ones. In fact, long after the new artillery had mad( considerable progress, it was employed simultaneously with the ancient sty] of projectiles. WAR AND ARMIES. 53 The long period during which this important transition in projectile weapons was slowly taking place, was one of the most wretched in the annals of military art. All the great battles of the fourteenth century present us with striking examples of an entire absence of skill in tactics. Mons-en- Puelle (1304), where King Philippe leBel was all but surprised in his camp ; Cassel (1328), where Philippe de Valois escaped half naked from his enemies' hands; Crecy (1346), where the English used cannon for the first time; Poitiers (1356), where King John was taken prisoner on the battlefield ; Mcopolis (1393), where knighthood covered itself with disgrace ; Agincourt, where the flower of the French nobility perished — are all examples of the most shameful confusion during the struggle, of the most disgraceful butchery after the defeat. It is not too much to say, that during the whole of this long epoch of bloody contests, true knights and staunch soldiers were very rare, and that good leaders were even rarer still. In Italy, the condottieri, whose principal commander was the Englishman, John Hawkwood, and in France, the free companies, commanded by the renowned Armand de Cervoles, and even those bands of rentiers, Brabangona, and tard-venm, who pillaged and plundered the realm to such an extent, says an old chronicler, "that not even a cock was heard to crow in it," were the only troops who showed any acquaintance with the resources of military war- fare or the slightest knowledge of strategic science. It was amongst the ranks of these indefatigable soldiers that the celebrated Bertrand du Guesclin made his first campaign (Fig. 47). The paid gendarmery, a mixture of heavy and light cavalry, committed, in the reign of Charles VI., many breaches of discipline, without atoning for them by lending any really efficacious aid to French chivalry, which was almost entirely cut to pieces in the bloody disaster of Agincourt (October 25th, 1415). Charles VII., replaced on the throne of his ancestors by his nobles after he had driven out the English, " by the help of God and Joan the Virgin," determined therefore to disband the gendarmery. From the picked men of the body he formed the framework of fifteen new companies of artillery, numbering nine thousand combatants, amongst whom were incorporated all the regular cavalry of the kingdom. Each gendarme, thoroughly equipped, was attended by two archers and two followers on horseback ; this group of five mounted men was called a lance fully equipped. In 1447, a sixth man and horse were added to it. A little later, Charles VII. 54 WAR AND ARMIES, Fig. 47.— Battle of Auray (Sept. 29, 1364), between John de Montford and Charles de Blois, in which Bertrand du Guesclin was made prisoner by Chandos.— Fac-simile of a Woodcut in the " Chroniques de Bretagne," by Alain Bouchard : 4to, Galliot du Pre, 1514. raised several paid bands, recruited by voluntary enlistment and commanded by responsible captains, who were paid by the war treasurers, according to the number of men on the monthly muster-roll. This creation of mer- WAR AND ARMIES. 55 cenary troops diminished still further the importance of the ban, which was no longer anything but a badly- equipped secondary militia, though still armed with bows and pikes, and still obliged to wear a uniform. On the actual field of battle the pikemen were always posted in the van ; behind them came the foot archers, wearing salaries, or helmets without vizors, the brigandine or short coat of mail, and armed with cross-bows. But this reorganization of the troops had no invigorating effect on the infantry Fig. 48.— Great Seal of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. The Legend, in Latin, enumerates his titles and feudal possessions.— National Archives of France (Fifteenth Century). of the communes, and the franc-archer remained the type of the cowardly soldier. The death of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, slain in the battle of Nancy (1477), completed the downfall of the feudal chivalry, whose last and most martial representative he was (Fig. 48). Louis XL, who had gathered around him a devoted army, composed of mercenaries from all countries, and who could entirely rely upon the fidelity of his Scottish guard, began attacking the great fiefs, which were in reality the rivals of his throne, and succeeded in destroying them, having no further need of them and their haughty vassalage. Little by little the seigniorial standards disappeared, and 56 WAR AND ARMIES. their war-cries ceased to resound; & fief held under the obligation to carry arms no longer forced the vassal, its occupier, under the pain of felony and bodily confiscation, to equip and arm himself at the first appeal of his suzerain, and to follow the royal ost with a definite number of fighting men. The principle of purchasing exemption from military service being henceforward admitted, all, whether nobles or villains, were at liberty either to serve or to purchase their exemption. Some few feudal gendarmes still remained, but most were free. Of the sguires-at-arms, some were feudal, others free or even plain varlets. Canons, abbots, and prelates whom feudal laws had forced to contribute their personal military service, had long since found substitutes in the persons of the attorneys or bailiffs, who superintended the ban and arriere-ban of the land- owning nobles. Some of the clergy, however, preferred to be individually pre- sent with the armies of their sovereign ; many a prelate or abbot was delighted to add to his coat-of-arms a cuirass, a sword, a helmet, or some other warlike emblem. In 1356, the bishops of Chalons, of Sens, and of Melun distinguished themselves by feats of personal bravery at the bloody engagement of Poitiers ; in 1359, the Bishop of Eheims, by a few vigorous sorties, was the means of saving that city when the English were besieging it ; the Archbishop of Sens, William of Montaigu, fell sword in hand on the field of Agincourt ; in 1455, a simple monk successfully defended Belgrade ; while at the siege of Plai- sance, Philip of Savoy, Bishop of Yalence, was knighted for his prowess in the breach itself. It is true that many of these ecclesiastical dignitaries had never been solemnly invested ; but the example they followed was a lofty one, for several popes, John X., Leo IX., Urban II., Innocent II., and Julius II. (who had first distinguished himself as an able leader under the name of Julien de la Kovere) had personally commanded the troops of the Holy See. The fire-sticky that is to say the arquebuse, which was then called hequebutte, with difficulty took the place of the bow, and with still greater difficulty that of the crossbow. In 1481, Louis XI. deprived his sergeants-at-arms of both the latter weapons, not to arm them with fire-sticks, but in order to give them the pike, the halbert, and the broadsword, of which the Swiss in the recent wars had made such formidable use. Louis XL, however, increased the number of his mounted archers, and placed them later under the orders of the colonel of a company of free-lances known as Albanais or Scouts. These combined bodies formed the French national light cavalry till WAR AND ARMIES. 57 Francis I. replaced them by the light horse, a body chiefly composed of mercenaries of different nations. In England, ever since the thirteenth century, the mounted archers formed a considerable portion of the national forces. An army of fifteen hundred complete lances, which represented a total of six or seven thousand horsemen, required a complement of at least five thousand mounted archers, who were all skilful marksmen. In the time of Henry VIII., an English bowman could discharge as many as twelve arrows in a minute, and he would have considered himself disgraced if he had let fly a single shaft which failed to kill, wound, or at least strike an enemy. Fig. 49. — German Foot-soldiers fighting. — From a Drawing by Holbein preserved in the Museum at Basle (Sixteenth Century).' The desperate melee of Fornoue (July 6th, 1495), which forced Charles VIII. to retrace his steps after his successful Italian expedition, was nearly the last of the confused and sanguinary struggles of the Middle Ages. The sword and the bow contributed more than the cannon and the fire- stick to the terrible result of the day. From that time the infantry regained its old pre-eminence over the cavalry, and cannon were employed preferably to all other projectile weapons. A complete revolution was also about to ensue, as well in the tactics of an army in the field as in Hhe attack and defence of fortresses. Louis XII. and Francis I., in their Italian cam- WAR AND ARMIES. paigns, in which they wasted so much of the resources and treasures of France, had to contend with German and Spanish mercenaries, at that time the best soldiers in the world ; they opposed to them bodies of foreign infantry, sometimes lansquenets (Fig. 49), sometimes Swiss, who made a trade of war, and who, to earn their pay, did not hesitate to fight against Fig. 50.— Italian Warriors of tbo Fifteenth Century.— From a Bas-relief on the Triumphal Arch of Castel Nuovo, Naples, erected in 1470 by Ferdinand of Aragon, to celebrate his Victorie over John of Calabria, Son of Kene d'Anjou. ] their own countrymen. There was one drawback, however, to the acceptance of their services, and that was that they frequently changed sides on the eve of an engagement, or refused to fight on the slightest pretext. More than once the knights of France saw themselves suddenly abandoned by the infantry WAR AND ARMIES. 59 whose duty it was to support them, and who allowed them to be cut to pieces before their eyes without stirring to assist them (Fig. 50). This happened at the fatal battle of Pavia, when the king and his nobles struggled on foot in hand-to-hand desperation till they fell or were taken prisoners. In the ordinary arrangement, at this period, of any army giving battle in the open field, the free archers, the men-at-arms, and the knights were posted either in the centre or at the wings, while the infantry, properly so called, divided into little groups of five, termed cinquains, was either thrown forward to skirmish, or sent behind to cover the rearguard, or detached at intervals on the flanks in order to harass the enemy and to protect the baggage. During the engagement, all the knights, clad entirely in armour, dismounted in order to fight, and left their horses to the care of the infantry. In these days horses were only used to carry their riders on the march, which the weight of their armour would not have allowed them to perform on foot. A horseman, when disabled by long service or by age, was no longer employed in the cavalry, but retired into the infantry, where he enjoyed, under the title of anspcssade (from the Italian spezzate, broken), the privileges that were at a later period granted to veterans. No troops, until the time of the Crusades, had any distinguishing mark among themselves, except the difference of their arms, and the idea of a military uniform had not then arisen. But with the emblazoned arms, the standards, and the pennants, there came into use scarves, worn as baldricks or sashes, over the cuirass, and of which the colour, which generally matched that of the standard of the feudal seignior of the wearer, became as much a rallying signal as the standards themselves (Fig. 51). The necessity of distinguishing friends from foes at a distance naturally also brought about more or less marked distinctions of dress. The administration and inner regulation of an army, which had been one of the principal cares of the Gothic and earlier Frankish kings, were entirely neglected, like everything pertaining to the art of war, for many centuries. For instance, at the beginning of the fourteenth century, the captains of the different companies were allowed to distribute the pay to their men as they pleased after each muster, and were solely and entirely entrusted with the administration of their companies. They were thus entirely irresponsible, and did not concern themselves to see that the regu- lations, prescribed by superior authority, concerning the general discipline 6o WAR AND ARMIES. of the army, were carried into effect. In 1355, during the captivity of King John in England, special commissioners were appointed, with the title of controllers, whose duty it was to superintend the internal economy of the army generally, with a view to put a stop to the numerous abuses that existed; but the disturbed and unfortunate period at which this attempt was made rendered it almost necessarily a barren one. When the dauphin came to the throne as Charles V., he returned to this project, which he had indeed himself originated, but at his death anarchy again reigned for more than a century. Fig. 51.— Representations of the Banner of St. Denis: No. 1, the oldest, is from a window in the Cathedral of Chartres ; No. 3, the latest, is from a Manuscript of Froissart, No. 2644, in the National Library (the original which it represents was carried at the defeat of Artevelde at Rosebecque) ; No. 2, Drawing from the Library of the Celestins, preserved by Montfaucon. — From " Paris and its Historians," by MM. Leroux de Lincy and L. Tisserand. Civil and foreign wars laid waste and exhausted France, without bringing to the surface one single creative mind, with the exception perhaps of Jean Bureau, the grand master of artillery under Charles VIII. It is by no means going beyond the mark to state that the reverses sustained in Italy, in the reigns of Charles VIII. and Louis XII., were owing less to the chivalrous reck- lessness of the nobility and their ignorance of the first principles of warfare, than to the gross faults of the military administration of the country. Even in Francis I.'s time, the public service was in such a miserable condition that he was never really properly informed of the actual effective strength of his army, WAR AND ARMIES. 61 for his captains, whose interest it was to exaggerate the number of the rank and file imder their standards (Figs. 52 and 53), habitually deceived the generals and their superiors. To such a degree was this carried that, on the eve of the battle of Pavia, Francis I. was led to believe that his army was a Fig. 52.— Knight in complete Armour. Fig. 53.— Arquebusier of the Sixteenth Century. After Cesare Vecellio, "Degli Habiti Antichi e Moderni : " 8vo, 1590. third stronger than it really was. At last, however, in 1517, there issued from this chaotic confusion the first germ of a proper system of supervision and control of all matters relating to war. If the tacticians of Italy were the first to fathom theoretically the science of war, it was the Swiss, under Marshal Trivulce, the Spaniards, 62 WAR AND ARMIES. under Gonzalvez of Cordova, and finally the Flemish, under the Duke of Alba, who successfully restored the military combinations of ancient Greece. They were the first to manoeuvre in dense masses and in battalions, and they were the first to successfully employ the column formation of troops. The pikemen of France followed their example, while the troops armed with projectile weapons fought as skirmishers in the van, or in lines two or three deep. It was not, however, till Henry IV.'s time that any considerable body Fig. 54. — The Reapers of Death, an Allegory of War, from an Engraving of Hans-Sebald Beham (Sixteenth Century). — Collection of M. Amhroiso Firmin-Didot. of troops was seen capable of advancing in close column without breaking its formation, and it was not till Louis XIII. 's time that the regiment, first introduced in the preceding reign, became a recognised permanent military unit. Towards the close of the fifteenth century the French native cavalry still consisted entirely of heavy troopers. The Albanians, the mercenaries of whom the French light cavalry were composed, sold their services, man and horse t as the Swiss sold theirs, man and halbert. .Charles VIII. enrolled d ^ M d 3 - 2 * PM g 3 rt * ^ .r o . 12 'g 60 s WAR AND ARMIES. 63 eight thousand Albanians for his Italian expedition ; but, fifty years later, this foreign element had disappeared from the French army, which had by that time, in addition to its heavy cavalry, a body of light cavalry of its own (Fig. 55). Until the reign of Henry IV., who was the first monarch to dispense with their dangerous and immoral assistance, free lances were universally employed even by those sovereigns who had promulgated the severest decrees against them, but who, for want of regular soldiers, found them- selves forced to accept their doubtful services. Brantome has thus por- trayed them : " Yestus a la pendarde, un haut de chausses bouffant ; monstrant la jambe nue, une ou deux, portant leurs bas dechausses pendant a la ceinture ; chantant en cheminant' pour soulager le travail de leur' chemin."* These scouts, who served on foot, were only allowed I'etape — that is to say, a daily allowance of food and forage ; but they enjoyed in war time the right of pillage in all towns and fortresses taken by assault (Fig. 56). This system of paying auxiliary troops d Vetape was first adopted in France in the fourteenth century, and had continued in use in a desultory manner till the reign of Henry II., under whose order a ration scale was drawn up, as well as a scale of provisions, cartage, and billeting due to the king's troops from the churches, monasteries, communes, nobles, and burgesses, through the possessions of which and in whose neighbourhood their road lay. The legal age at which the enlistment of soldiers could be made, the manner in which it was effected, and the length of service, varied con- siderably throughout the Middle Ages and the period of the Renaissance. In Henry II.'s time it was a custom to hire the soldier for three months ; Henry IV. increased this period, but not without difficulty, for, to quote the words of Sully, " Our soldiers can now only be enlisted by force, and can only be persuaded to march by the use of the stick and the threat of the gibbet." To this picture we must add the significant fact that the system of drill was a very insufficient one, and that it was by no means unusual to find soldiers, whose stay with the standards was after all but a * " Dressed like ragamuffins, with, puffed trunk hose ; some going barelegged with, their stockings hanging to their girdle ; singing as they trudge along to lighten the toil of the road." 64 WAR AND ARMIES. very temporary one, entirely incapable of handling the arms they were entrusted with, The urban militia were, however, far superior to these recruits, for, since the reign of Charles V., it was customary to drill the citizen every Sunday with pike, bow, and crossbow, particularly in the frontier towns. It is not till Coligny's time, in the middle of the sixteenth Fig. 56. — Soldiers of the German Bands.— From an Oil Painting'Jby Joachim Bueclear (Frankfort, 1548—1596), in the possession of M. Paul de Saint-Victor. century, that traces can be found of any regulations imposing on command- ing officers the duties of teaching and drilling their soldiers. We have attempted to outline the general military physiognomy of the Middle Ages; we will now rapidly examine the weapons and warlike engines that were invented for the attack and defence of fortified places. WAR AND ARMIES. Until the invention of gunpowder, or rather till that of artillery (Fig 57) the whole art of fortification, says the learned Prosper Merimee, consisted in following more or less exactly the traditions handed down by the Romans. The stronghold of the Middle Ages had precisely the same characteristic as the ancient casteUum. The methods of attack against which the engineers had to guard were the assault hy escalade, either by surprise or by force of numbers, and the breach, caused either by sapping, mining, or by the ig. 57.— Mortars on Movable Carriages.— From an Engraving in the " Kriegsbuch " of Fronsperger : in folio, Frankfort, 1575. battering-rams of the besiegers. The employment of machines or engines of this description was much less frequent after than before the fall of the Roman empire, when the art of war knew no higher flight than to lay siege to a place or sustain a siege. The first operation of the besiegers was to destroy the outworks of the besieged place, such as the posterns, the barbicans, the barriers, &c. As most of these outworks were built of wood, attempts were generally made to cut them to pieces with hatchets, or to set them on fire with arrows to K 66 WAR AND ARMIES. which were fastened pieces of burning tow steeped in sulphur, or some other incendiary composition. If the main body of the place were not so strongly fortified as to render a successful assault by force impossible, it was usual to attempt an escalade. Fig. 58. — Caltrop, or Crow's-foot (Fourteenth Century). With this end in view, the moat, which was generally literally strewn with caltrops (Fig. 58), was filled up with fascines, on which ladders were reared against the ramparts, while archers on the brink of the ditch, pro- Fig. 59. — Rolling Tower for scaling the "Walls of Towns. — Miniature from, the " Histoire du Monde," Manuscript of the Fourteenth Century (Library of M. Ambroise Firmin-Didot). tected by mantlets stuck in the ground, drove away with their arrows any of the defenders who attempted to show themselves above the parapets or at the loopholes. If the siege, in spite of the efforts of the besiegers, promised to be a long one, a blockade was the sole remaining means of reduction, though this was a WAR AND ARMIES. thing difficult to carry out with forces which were not permanent, and which were generally far from numerous. It therefore became necessary for the besieger to protect his approaches by wooden, earthen, or even stone works, constructed under cover of the night, and solid and lofty enough to enable his archers to aim right on to the battlements of the besieged place. Wooden towers, several stories high, were also frequently resorted to, put together piece by piece at the edge of the moat, or constructed out of bow- shot, and subsequently rolled on wheels to the foot of the walls (Fig. 59). Fig. 60. — Siege of a Town: Summons to lay down the arms and open iihe Copperplate in the " Kreigsbuch " of Fronsperger. . — From a At the siege of Toulouse, in 1218, a machine of this kind was built by the order of Simon de Montfort, capable of accommodating, according to the ballad of the " Albigeois," five hundred men. When the missiles hurled from the higher stories of these towers — termed chattes in the south, chats, chateaux, bretesches, in the north — had driven the besieged from their ramparts and battlements, a movable bridge was lowered across the moat, and a hand-to-hand struggle then took place (Fig. 59). The besieged, to prevent or retard the approach of these dreaded towers, were 68 WAR AND ARMIES. accustomed to hurl immense stones and lighted darts against them, or to undermine or inundate the ground on which they stood, so that their own weight might cause them to topple over. Besides the means we have just described, there still remained the sap and the mine. Miners, equipped with pickaxes, were sent into the ditch under the protection of a body of archers. A sloping roof, covered with mantlets, sheltered them from the missiles of the besieged. They then pierced the wall, stone by stone, till they had made a hole large enough to allow the Fig. 61.— Capture of a Town : The Garrison surrendering and throwing themselves on the mercy of the captors.— Miniature from the '-'Histoire du Monde," Manuscript of the Fourteenth Century (Library of M. Ambroise Firmin-Didot). passage of several soldiers at once, while the sappers put the finishing stroke to the aperture. The besieged, observing in what direction the enemy was pursuing his operations, strove to concentrate all his means of defence at this point. Sometimes he attempted to crush the miners with immense stones or pieces of wood, sometimes he poured molten lead or boiling oil over them, sometimes, by hastily constructing a fresh wall in rear of the one the miners were breaking through, he gave the latter the trouble of beginning their work all over again just as they thought it was complete. The mine had this advantage over the sap — that the besieger, being out of sight while engaged in the former method of subterranean work, had every WAR AND ARMIES. 69 chance of surprising the besieged. In order to effect this, an underground gallery was dug as noiselessly as possible, and carried beneath the founda- tions of the ramparts. When the mine had reached the walls, these were propped up with pieces of timber, and the earth was dug away until they were supported entirely by this artificial method. Dry vine wood and other inflammable materials were then piled round the props and set on fire, so Fig. 62. — Watch-tower, lighted up with beacons and protected by dogs. — Fac-simile of a Miniature of the Fifteenth Century, from a drawing by M. Prosper Merimee. that when the timber was consumed the walls crumbled down and opened a large breach to the besiegers. Nothing then was left to the garrison but to surrender, in order to avoid the horrors of an assault and the sack of the town (Figs. 60 and 61). The only remedy possessed by a garrison against this last method of attack was to keep a good watch and to endeavour to discover the where- 7° WAR AND ARMIES. abouts of the mine, and neutralise it by a countermine. At the siege of Rennes, in 1356, the governor of the town ordered basins of copper, each containing several globes of the same metal, to be placed all about the ramparts ; when these globes were seen to vibrate and tremble at each stroke of the hidden pickaxe, it was easy to guess that the mine was not far off. There was also a body of night watchmen, who carefully noted the enemy's movements, and who rang the alarm-bell at the slightest noise. These Fig. 63. — Machine intended to break the ranks of the enemy and to crush his soldiers. — Vegece, "L'Art Militaire : " 1532. Fig. 64. — Machine to shoot arrows, and to assist in approaching a besieged town. — Robert Valturin, " La Discipline Militaire : " 1555. watchmen were often replaced by dogs, whose barks, in case of a surprise, gave notice to the garrison (Fig. 62). The slow and laborious work of the miner was often advantageously replaced by the more powerful action of certain machines, which may divided into two distinct classes. The first, intended to be used at cl< quarters and to make a breach in the wall, comprised several varieties of the ancient battering-ram ; the second, employed at a distance, were term< pierriers, mangonneaux, espringales, &c. (Figs. 63 and 64). WAR AND ARMIES. 7, The battering- rarn, which was probably well known from the remotest periods, is described, in the documents of the Middle Ages, pretty much as we see it figured on the monuments of Mneveh. " On Easter day," says the anonymous author of the chronicle of the " Albigeois," " the bosson (the southern name of the battering-ram) was placed in position ; it is long, iron- headed, straight, and pointed, and it so hammered, and pierced, and smashed, that the wall was broken through (Fig. 65) ; but they (the besieged) lowered a loop of rope suspended from a machine, and in this noose the bosson was caught and retained." Generally speaking, the battering-ram was a long, heavy beam, suspended Fig. 65. — Battering-ram. — From a Miniature in Manuscript 17,339 in the National Library of Paris. in the centre from a kind of massive trestle. The end which battered the wall was either covered with an iron hood or pointed with brass. The beam was swung backward and forward by the besiegers, and by dint of striking a wall always in the same spot it often succeeded in shattering or overthrowing it. At other times the ram, instead of being suspended in an oscillating manner, was mounted on wheels, and ran forward with great rapidity against the wall to be battered. The chronicle of the " Albigeois," just quoted, alludes to the head of the ram being caught in a noose ; besides this manoeuvre, the garrison would hurl stones and pieces of timber upon it, in order to break it or to put it out of trim ; or else they would strive to deaden its blows by interposing a thick mattress of wool covered with leather between it and the stonework of their stronghold. The m. hines which they employed to hurl their projectiles seem to WAR AND ARMIES. have corresponded in nearly every respect with the catapults of the ancients. It was often merely a species of gigantic sling, worked by several men, and throwing pieces of rock and round masses of stone. The mangonneau, bricolc, or trabuch, was a kind of square wooden platform, made of thick planks laid crosswise ; a long beam, fastened at its lower end by a revolving axis to the platform, was supported at an angle of about 45° by an elevated cross- piece resting on two uprights. The distance between the revolving axis Fig. 66. — Catapult. — When the lever revolves rapidly on its axis, the centrifugal power causes the loop C to slip off the hook D, when the barrel held on the fork E E is liberated and projected to a distance. F represents the end of the lever when held down by the windlass A, and loaded with a barrel of combustible matter or iron. B, rings of stone, iron, or lead. and the point of support was about one-half of the length of the beam. The latter was then secured in this position by long cords fastened to the front of the platform. The men who managed the bricole then lowered the beam backwards by a windlass fixed in the rear, till it (the beam) formed an obtuse instead of an acute angle with the platform, and till the cord securing it in front was stretched to its utmost tension. While it was in this position the projectile they wished to cast was placed in the spoon- shaped extremity of the beam. A spring, termed declic, then released the WAR AND ARMIES. ?3 tension of the windlass and the beam, obeying that of the cord fastened to the front of the platform, swung rapidly forward, and hurled the projectile to great distances and to some considerable height (Fig. 66). These bricoles were sometimes employed to throw into besieged strongholds the dead bodies of horses and other animals, fire-balls, and cases of inflammable matter ; but they were generally used to shatter the roofs of the buildings inside the walls, and to crush the protecting wooden sheds constructed on the ramparts. Their use was still continued long after the invention of gunpowder. In the wars of the fourteenth century, particularly in the sieges of Tarazonia, Barcelona, and Burgos, bricoles were made use of side by side with cannons discharged with gunpowder. It was not until the close of the fifteenth century that the rapid progress of the new artillery, which enabled besiegers to breach a wall from a considerable distance, and with a smaller expenditure both of time and men, caused the whole paraphernalia of the old-fashioned ballistic machines to fall into disuse. Thenceforward a new era commenced in the science of attack and defence — an era of which the immense results clo not belong only to the period of the Renaissance. Fig. 67.— Ballista.— From a Miniature in Manuscript 17,339, in the National Library of Paris. NAVAL MATTEES. Old Traditions : Long Vessels and Broad Vessels. — The Dromon. — The Galeasse. — The Coque. — Caracks and Galleons. — Francis I.'s Great Carack. — Caravelles. — The Importance of a Fleet. — Hired Fleets. — Poop Guards. — Naval Laws.— Seaport Tribunals.— Navigation in the open Seas. — The Boussole. — Armament of Men-of-War. — Towers and Ballistic Engines. — Artillery. — Naval Strategy. — Decorations and Magnificent Appointments of Vessels. — Sails and Flags. — The Galley of Don Juan of Austria. — Sailors' Superstitions. — Discipline and Punishments. | HIPS from the most remote ages have been divided into two classes, namely, long vessels, those propelled by the oar, or by the wind, sometimes by the two combined, and vessels of greater beam, which trusted to their sails alone. The Middle Ages conformed to these traditions ; they possessed galleys which answered to the long vessels of antiquity, and ships which corre- sponded to the larger class. The galleys of the Middle Ages, like the long vessels of antiquity, may be divided into several varieties. The large galley (Fig. 68), strong in build and swift in sailing, had received from the Greeks the significant name of dromon (runner). In the fifth century Theodoric had a thousand dromons constructed for the defence of the Italian coasts and for the transport of corn ; in the ninth, the Emperor Leo the Philosopher, in the military precepts he gave to his son, recommended the construction of dromons with two tiers of oars, five-and-twenty in each tier on each side. For the flag-ship (if we may use the term) of the commander of the fleet, he recommended the construc- tion of a much larger dromon with a hundred oars in each tier, similar to NAVAL MATTERS. ?5 those that used to be built in Pamphylia, and which, for that reason, were known as pamphiles. The fleet was to be accompanied by smaller dromons, with a single tier of oars, for the purpose of carrying despatches, and to act as scouts. These bore more particularly the name of galleys. For more than three hundred years the construction and rigging of ships underwent no change (Fig. 69) ; in the twelfth century the dromon was still the principal type of the class of ships propelled by oars. Next came the galley, smaller than the dromon, but fitted, like it, with two tiers of oars, and lastly, the gallon or galelde (termed later the galiot), a much smaller vessel than the galley. The largest and the best-armed galley which at that period ploughed the Mediterranean was the one encountered by Richard Coeur de Lion, according Fig. 68. — Poop of an Ancient Galley.— From Pompeian Paintings collected in the Bourbon Museum, Naples. to the historian Matthew Paris, on the 3rd of June, 1191, near the coast of Syria, and which was carrying large reinforcements to the camp of the unbelievers, who were besieging at that time the town of Acre. When the sailors of the English fleet first perceived this gigantic vessel, whose vast hull was painted with the most brilliant colours, whose poop was surmounted with a castellated tower, whose three masts unfurled to the wind an immense expanse of canvas, and whose long oars beat the waves with majestic rhythm, they were surprised, and undecided how to act. Richard, however, ordered his men to attack the floating fortress. His lighter galleys sur- rounded it on all sides, in spite of the arrows and glass vases showered on them by the dromon. These vases broke when they came in contact with the galleys, and enveloped them in Greek fire. The captain of the Arab craft 76 NAVAL MATTERS. attempted to sail away from his swarm of assailants, but the wind fell, and half his rowers having been slain by the English arrows, he was forced to accept battle. The galleys skirmished around the dromon, striking it re- peated blows with their brazen prows, and making large holes in its sides. At last, after a desperate resistance, the giant was engulfed in the waters with all its defenders. A companion craft to the dromon, as before mentioned, was the pamphile, which, before disappearing in the fifteenth century, frequently changed its shape and character. Nor must we forget the chelande (Fig. 70), or selandre, which a writer of the eleventh century represents as a ship of extraordinary length, of great speed, possessing two tiers of oars, and a crew of a hundred Fig. 69. — A Norman Vessel (Eleventh Century). — Eestoration from the Bayeux Tapestry. and fifty men, and which, three centuries later, became a large flat sailing vessel, and was termed chaland. The taridet a kind of merchant galley with oars, and the huissier, the name of which was derived from a huis, or large door, which opened in its side in front of the poop to allow of the embarkation of horses, were contemporaneous with the pamphile and with the selandre ; also was the chat or chatte, which William of Tyre mentions in connection with a maritime war which took place in 1121. According to him it was ram-armed vessel larger than a galley, and carried a hundred oars, each of which was handled by two men. Besides all these there were the bucentaures (Fig. 71), large YenetL galleys, and the sagettes, or sdities (arrows), whose names denote their slender shape and speed, and which, with their twelve or fifteen oars on each side, NAVAL MATTERS. 77 played the same part in the twelfth century as the baliner, or barineal, and the brigantin played from the fourteenth to the seventeenth. There were two sorts of vessels used in the fifteenth and the sixteenth centuries also belonging to the numerous and varied family of the galley — Fig. 70. — Turreted Vessel which protected the Port of Venice. — From a Medal struck in honour of the Doge P. Candiano I., who died in 887 (Venetian Museum). the fuste and the fregate, both smaller examples of the galeasse. A galley was termed galeasse (Fig. 72) when it was of large size, powerfully armed, and propelled by such long and heavy oars that it took six or seven men to work one of them. Fig. 71. — The Bucentaure, State Barge used for the Marriage of the Doge of Venice with the Sea. — From the Model preserved in the Arsenal of Venice. We have not by any means exhausted the number of long vessels pro- pelled by oars, but we will now turn to those which only used sails, and which were termed nefs, or round vessels. In the tenth century the Venetians employed these large heavy vessels, which they had adopted from the Saracens, and which were termed cumbaries (from the Latin cymba), or gombaries. To the same class belonged the coque NAVAL MATTERS. (Fig. 73), which, according to an old chronicler, had a round stem and stern, a high freeboard, and drew very little water. This style of vessel, which from its shape was considered insubmersable, was largely used both for war- like and commercial purposes, from the twelfth to the close of the fifteenth century. The coque, so frequently employed in the Middle Ages, doubtless suggested the construction of another large vessel of the same sort, called by the Venetians buzo, by the Genoese panzono, and busse by the Provencaux, three words having a similar signification.* These various names plainly indi- Fig. 72. — Sketch of a Galley of the Sixteenth Century, painted in distemper on the door of a cupboard preserved in the Doria Palace, Genoa. cate the character of this kind of vessel, namely, that it was a broad-beamed, slow -sailing craft, but one capable of carrying large and heavy cargoes. Such names, however, as gombaries, coques, and busses, are nowadays as completely forgotten as the ships to which they were applied, while such terms as carraque and galliot still convey a meaning understood by everybody. Indeed, they immediately call up in the mind the memory of the numerous Spanish galleons which, according to popular tradition, were constantly returning home laden with Peruvian gold, and of those gigantic caracks which, hailing from the French ports on the Atlantic and the Mediterranean, * Large-sided. NAVAL MATTERS. 79 invested the navy of France, in the reigns of Louis XII. and Francis I., with such a splendid and imposing renown. In 1545, Francis I. had a magnificent carack constructed in Normandy, so richly decorated, with such lofty decks and towers, and so capitally appointed, that it was called the Great Carack. It was anchored in the roadstead of Havre-de-Grace. Henry VIII. ordered one equally splendid (Fig. 74), in which he intended to embark when he started to meet his brother sovereign at the famous Field of the Cloth of Gold. The French vessel was about to set sail at the head of a powerful fleet dispatched to meet Fig. 73. — The Coque. — From a Miniature in a Manuscript Virgil of the Fifteenth Century (Kiccardi Library, Florence). the English. The King, desirous of inspecting it, boarded it on the eve of its departure, accompanied by a numerous and brilliant court. A collation had been prepared for him and his suite, the band was playing, salutes were thundering out in his honour, and he himself was in the midst of his inspection of the floating citadel, when suddenly cries of alarm were heard. A fire had broken out between decks ; it burnt with astonishing rapidity, and, before help could be efficiently rendered, the whole of the rigging was in flames. In a few hours all that remained of the Great Carack was an immense hull, half consumed, aground on the beach, upon which the sea was casting up the corpses of those of the crew who were killed by the dis- charge of its cannons during the progress of the conflagration. 8o NAVAL MATTERS. Fig. 74.— Man-of-War in which Henry VIII., King of England, embarked in 1/520 at Dover to come to France. — From a Drawing by Holbein. The galliot occupied an intermediate place between the ship properly so called and the large galley. It was, in fact, a slighter vessel, longer and narrower in the beam than all other kinds of ships. Galliots were sometimes, NAVAL MATTERS. 81 but not often, propelled by oars (Fig. 76). The ordinary build of galliot, whose poop consisted of two rounded quarter circles, separated by the rudder-post, had two decks ; the largest of all had three. Two remarkable galliots are mentioned in history, one of which was an exact model of the celebrated Great Carack. It was built at Venice to carry three hundred guns and five hundred soldiers, besides its own crew of sailors, but while still in the lagoons it was caught in a tremendous hurricane. Being severely tossed by the wind and the waves, its rolls threw the whole of its heavy ordnance to the port-side, and, being unable to right itself, it turned over, and went down in sight of the town. Fig. 75.— Spanish Ship of the End of the Fifteenth Century.— From an Engraving in the " Arte del Navegar," by Peter of Medina. Merely mentioning the palandres, the hotirques, the pataches, and the mahones, which were smaller than the galliot, but which had certain advan- tages of their own, we come to a craft whose diminutive dimensions have not prevented it from acquiring a kind of historical renown, in consequence of the important events at the close of the fifteenth century in which it played a part. The craft we refer to is the caravel (Fig. 77), which had the honour of carrying Columbus to the New World. The design of the caravel was taken from the caravo, a small barque used by the Spaniards. The grace, the lightness, the fine outlines, and the speed of the caravel, recommended it to the hardy mariners who sailed, in search of new continents, across the M 82 NAVAL MATTERS. Atlantic Ocean. Narrow at the poop, wide at the prow, carrying a double tower at its stern, and a single one at its bows, the caravel carried four vertical masts and one inclined one. Two square sails were bent from the foremast, while the three others each bore a single triangular one (Fig. 78). The caravel sailed as well against the wind as before it, and tacked as easily as a row boat ; so, at least, we are told in the log of the first voyage of Columbus. It is, therefore, an undeniable fact that the sailors of the Middle Ages did not lack large and handsome ships, though the boldest mariner did not care to put too much salt water between his craft and the shore, and, as a rule, the longest voyages were made by following the outline of the Fig. 76. — Three-masted Galley, with Square Sails, of the Sixteenth Century.— From a Picture by Raphael in the Cathedral of Sienna. coast. The Middle Ages, moreover, could often boast the possession of considerable fleets. In '1242 the Genoese put to sea with ninety- three galleys, thirty traders, and three large ships, to struggle for the supremacy of the seas with a hundred and ten Pisan and Imperial galleys. At the beginning of the same century the Crusaders, when they set sail to attack Constantinople, had a fleet of three hundred vessels according to one writer, and of four hundred and eighty according to another. Amongst them there was one called The World, of such large size and so beautifully finished that it was the admiration of all the ports along the coasts of the Mediterranean. Joinville, the ingenuous historian of the crusades of Louis IX., tells us that that sainted king sailed from the port of Aigues-Mortes with a fleet of " eighteen hundred vessels, large and small," NAVAL MATTERS. some of which carried as many as a thousand passengers, and some a hundred horses. In 1295, the combined French and Norwegian fleets, intended to act against the English (Figs. 79 and 80) in the wars of Philippe le Bel and Edward I., amounted to upwards of five hundred vessels, two hundred and sixty of which were galleys, and three hundred and thirty ships of different Fig. 77.— Spanish Caravel in which Columbus discovered America.— From a Drawing attributed to Columbus, and placed in the " Epistola Christofori Columbi : " undated edition (1494 ?), 8vo- sizes. Three centuries later fleets were not a whit more numerous or more powerful, though better equipped and organized. In 1570, Sultan Selim sent from Constantinople, against the island of Rhodes, a fleet of a hundred and sixteen galleys, thirty galliots, thirteen fustes, six large ships, one galleon, eight mahones, forty passe-chevaux (horse transports), and a great number of caramoussats, laden with provisions, with artillery, and with stores of all 84 NAVAL MATTERS kinds. The Christians, under Marco- Antonio Colonna, could only oppose to this formidable flotilla one hundred and four galleys, twelve galeasses, one large galleon, and fourteen large ships. But in point of fact, and it was one of the consequences of feudalism, large fleets were never constructed and kept up by the governments under whose authority they put to sea. Kings and republics possessed, it is true, a small number of vessels of their own that carried their flag, but, generally speaking, too few to allow them to attack a formidable enemy, or to enable Fig. 78. — French Caravel.— From "Premieres (Euvres de J. Devaux, Pilot du Havre," Manuscript of the Sixteenth Century, in the National Library of Paris. them to defend themselves against one. Here, again, a complete analogy existed between feudal rights at sea and those on land. Feudalism possessed its ships as well as its castles. The barons who possessed estates near the sea-coast were bound to keep up at their own cost one or more vessels, fitted either for war or commerce. The rich merchants of Venice, of Genoa, of Marseilles, and, in later times, of Havre, of Dieppe, and of Antwerp (Fig. 81), by means of their vast wealth, either individually or by com- bining together, maintained flotillas of galleys and ships. When war was imminent, and it became necessary to prepare a fleet to NAVAL MATTERS. carry the Crusaders, the sovereign directed the nobles who held fiefs and were ship-owners to prepare their vessels for sea, and to equip and arm them — an order which did not require any long time or especial pains to carry into effect, for at that period every sea being infested with pirates, merchant vessels were always forced to keep themselves armed in self-defence. Each sailor of the crew could, at a pinch, be turned into a soldier ; and, besides these, there were always cross-bowmen and regular soldiers, whose duty it was to be the first to board an enemy's ship, or to beat back his Fig. 79.— Seal of the Town of Dover (1281). boarders with handspikes and cross-bow shafts. To embark, therefore, a few catapults and a few extra soldiers was all that was ordinarily required to * transform a peaceable merchant vessel into a ship or galley of war. The admiral appointed to the command of the fleet published the order to arm in every port under his master's rule. In virtue of this order, the first proceeding was to exhibit the cartel — a scroll fastened to the top of a post or the end of a lance — announcing that so many vessels of such and such a kind were to be ready equipped within a given time, to take the seas against such and such an enemy, or to proceed in such and such a direction. Besides the cartel, which was displayed on the shore or in the gateway of 86 NAVAL MATTERS. the town, surrounded with garlands and pennants, floated the standard of the prince, which had previously been blessed at a solemn mass celebrated to pray for the success of the undertaking. The sea trumpets rang out their fanfares, and a herald at arms repeated in a loud voice the purport of the cartel. A clerk stood by, pen in hand, for the purpose of registering the names of the sailors and marines, who, as they gave them, settled the conditions of their engagement. A formal contract binding both sides was then signed and sealed before a notary, and as soon as sufficient hands had volunteered, the cartel was taken down and the trumpets ceased to sound. Fig. 80.— Seal of the Town of Yarmouth (Thirteenth Century). When the ships of the sovereign, and of the nobles and burgesses his feudal vassals, were insufficient in number to form the fleet with which it was desirable to put to sea, recourse was had to allies and to foreign navies in general. Vessels were bought, hired, and chartered, but in the latter case they were usually only employed as transports. The merchants of Genoa and Venice were in this manner the principal charterers for the Crusaders. In l'^46, Saint Louis addressed a demand to them for ships, at the same time making a similar request to the merchants of Marseilles. Emissaries from the king were sent into Provence and Italy to make contracts for the construction and chartering of vessels for the transport of the armed NAVAL MATTERS. pilgrims who were to accompany him to the Holy Land. These envoys, amongst whom was Brother Andrew, " the prior of the holy house of Jerusalem," made the necessary arrangements with the podestate of Genoa, with the Duke of Venice, and with the syndicate of the commune of Marseilles, and settled the size of the ships, the number of their crew, the space reserved for each passenger and each horse, and the different tariffs for the berths in the fore and aft towers, for those in the main saloons Fig. 81. — View of the Port of Antwerp in 1520. — Fac-simile of a Drawing by Albert Diirer, in the Gallery of the Archduke Albert, at Vienna. (termed paradis), for those between decks, and for those under the lower deck. In 1263 the arrangements for St. Louis's second crusade were carried out in a similar manner. Genoese vessels reappear in the "army of the sea prepared in the year of grace 1295" by Philippe le Bel against Edward I. of England; in the fleet equipped in 1337 by Philippe de Yalois against Edward III. ; and in the splendid flotilla lost by Nicholas Behuchet, a French admiral, at 1'Ecluse in 1340. Two centuries later the Genoese again contributed ten caracks to 88 NAVAL MATTERS. the armada prepared by the order of Francis I. on the coast of Normandy, though most of them unfortunately foundered at the mouth of the Seine through the ignorance of their pilots. History also informs us that Andrew Doria (Fig. 82), a Genoese, was one of Francis' admirals, having commanded that sovereign's Mediterranean fleet for several months. The adventurers who served on board vessels chartered by a sovereign or a Fig. 82.— Andrew Doria (1468— 1560).— From a Portrait of the Period in the Collection of the Doges of Genoa. — National Library of Paris. foreign State were usually the sons, brothers, relations, friends, or dependents of the captains who commanded them. Moreover, the chosen band which, under the name of rctenue de poupe* (Fig. 83), was entrusted with the duty of defending the captain's flag, was solely recruited from among these adventurers. Their principal duty being the defence of this flag, which floated on the starboard side close to the entrance to the poop, they were * Poop Guard. NAVAL MATTERS. 89 expected never to leave their post, except at the captain's express order. Even when a galley was boarded at the stern, and its deck, up to the main- mast, was swarming with the enemy, all was by no means lost, for the poop still remained in the hands of its brave defenders, who died at their post rather than yield. Among the splendid feats of arms which have adorned naval history, many instances could be cited when a ship's safety was secured by the desperate resistance of its poop guard. The warriors of the sea (Figs. 84 and 85) were always distinguished for their extreme intrepidity and boldness, and it is easy to believe that from them emanated the system Fig. 83. — Seal of the Town of Sandwich, representing the Poop Guard (Thirteenth Century). of submarine warfare (Figs. 86 and 87), which, in the fifteenth century, gave birth to a series of extraordinary inventions in nautical weapons. It is to the credit of these benighted ages, too often accused of barbarism and social anarchy, that in most of the Mediterranean ports overseers were appointed, whose duty it was to inspect and survey everything connected with voyages beyond the sea — that is to say, voyages to the Holy Land. This friendly tribunal settled all differences between the passengers or pilgrims and the ship-owners or captains, according to the terms of their reciprocal contracts. One part of their duties was to carefully measure the space assigned to each passenger, to see that every individual had his proper allot- NAVAL MATTERS. ment, so as to secure that all were made as comfortable as possible for the voyage, which usually lasted for twenty-five or thirty days. In point of fact, a perfect maritime code was drawn up to regulate during the passage the mutual relations of the different inmates of the same vessel, Fig. 84.— G-alley Soldier (Sixteenth Century). Fig. 85.— Galley Slave (Sixteenth Century). From Cesare Vecellio, "Degli Habiti Antichi : " 8vo, 1590. and to establish a reciprocity between the ships of friendly nations. The merchant, for instance, who spent a great portion of his life at sea, was treated on board ship with greater deference than the soldier who was there for a short time only. When several merchants chartered a vessel in common for the transport of their merchandise, and proceeded to sea in it themselves, the captain was bound to consult them and to follow their advice in all NAVAL MATTERS. perils, whenever storms threatened, or when from a dread of pirates it seemed advisable to put into the nearest port. Before setting sail, the captain and the crew swore upon the Gospel to defend the ship and its passengers against the elements and against man. In the latter case, however, the merchants themselves became soldiers for the nonce, and were prepared to assist in the defence of their floating home. It was usual, in order to give both vessels and merchants the best pos- sible chance, for ships, not strong enough separately to resist pirates, to sail Fig. 86.— The Diver. Fig. 87.— Man-at-Arms. From Woodcuts by Vegece, "L'Art Militaire: " Paris, Christian Wechel, 1532, small 4to. together in twos and threes, or, if possible, in still larger numbers. When a large powerful ship fell in with, a smaller vessel which, claimed its protection, it was bound to throw it a hawser so as to fasten the two vessels together, and enable them to assist one another in case of need. A ship's captain who refused to render this service to a smaller craft than his own, would have run the risk of a very heavy punishment. The maritime code, whose regulations were decided by the overseers, laid down that all merchandise entrusted to a ship's captain should be properly stored away in the hold, and not left on the deck, on which the rigging, the carpenter's and caulker's tools, NAVAL MATTERS. the weapon cases, and the water casks were alone to be placed. Similarly, any damage done to the cargo during the voyage, owing to bad stowage or bad ballasting, was liable to be made good by the ship-owner, who was bound to have his ship in the best possible condition, and who was held responsible for the proper preservation of the cargo. Fig. 88.— Discovery of the Antilles by Columbus. — From a Drawing attributed to him in the " Epistola Christofori Columbi : " undated (1494 ?), 8vo. Longer voyages began to be undertaken in the fifteenth century, naviga- tion having been rendered less dangerous by the improvements in the mariner's compass, in the quadrant, and in other nautical instruments. Ships went as far as to the Azores, and to the Canary Islands, to the coast of Guinea, and to the East Indies ; and one even touched at the new continent discovered by Columbus (Fig. 88), and named by Americus Vespazius. Certain seasons of the year, however, were considered dangerous, during NAVAL MATTERS. 93 which all navigation was absolutely forbidden by law. Already, in the fourth century, the magistrates entrusted with naval matters dosed the sea from the third day of the Ides of November to the sixteenth of the Ides of March ; in the thirteenth century, the season opened in April and closed in October. In the sixteenth, no vessel could legally return to Venice from Constanti- nople, Alexandria, or the coast of Syria, from the 15th of November to the 20th of January. Although this regulation, which had for its object the protection of seafaring men, was often broken, there were others emanating from the same source, and issued in the same spirit, that were more binding. Fig. 89.— Seal of the Town of Poole (Thirteenth Century). For instance, galleys (galleys were frequently used in commercial ventures), as soon as they were launched, underwent a minute inspection by the over- seers, who, after satisfying themselves on the solidity of their construction, gauged their capacity, and marked the water line on their side, beyond which it was illegal to submerge them. But we will leave a subject whose complicated details would lead us too far, and return to the equipment proper of vessels. As far back as the tenth century, the Emperor Leo originated the practice of building towers for attack and defence on the deck of the dromons ; these towers, from the centre of which sprang the mainmast, reached half-way up the mast. This custom was still observed in the thirteenth century, and was no doubt handed down 94 NAVAL MATTERS. from very ancient times when it was usual to build towers and citadels on the decks of triremes. The round class of vessels were also provided with towers, one fore and another aft. In the smaller vessels these towers were simply platforms surrounded with a crenulated parapet and raised upon pillars (Fig. 89) ; in the larger ones, the towers were constructed of several stories added to the normal elevation of the poop and prow. Mangonels, catapults, and other projectile machines were placed on these towers and platforms. The big ships especially carried terrible engines of destruction, sometimes a heavy beam which worked horizontally like an ancient battering-ram against the sides of a hostile vessel, sometimes an Fig-. 90.— Seal of the Town of Boston (1575), on which the hune is depicted at the extremity of the mast. immense balk of timber, which was worked vertically from the top of the mast in order to shatter and sink a smaller craft. Around the masts, too, and nearly at their tops, chatelcts or platforms were suspended, in which were hidden, behind a low parapet, slingers, archers, and stone-throwers. In the sixteenth century, these chatelets on board the vessels of the Mediterranean were called cages or gabies, while in the North sailors designated them by the Icelandic term of hunes (Fig. 90). The introduction of gunpowder on board ship was long subsequent to the invention of fire-arms, and was very slowly adopted by most navies. From the fact that, in the middle of the fifteenth century, a vessel of seven hundred and fifty tons burden had only a single piece of artillery, and one of fifteen hundred only eight guns, and as for a commission of four NAVAL MATTERS. 95 months — the usual length of a ship's commission in the Middle Ages — each piece of artillery was only provided with five-and-twenty to thirty rounds, we see with what difficulty and how slowly the new style of weapons replaced the old one. In the ships' inventories of 1441, side by side with bombardest we find invariably figuring large cross-bows, viretons, darts, long lances, and complete sets of armour for the sailors. Things were not much more advanced than they were in 1379 at the celebrated naval battle of Chioggia, in which the Venetians made use, against the Genoese, of cannon constructed of pieces of metal, welded together and covered with a casing Fig. 91. — Prows of Galleys armed with the Spur. — From Drawings by Breugel the Elder, engraved by Fr. Huys (1550). of wooden staves, bound round with stout iron bands and ropes. Some of these primitive guns exploded at their first discharge ; one alone survives, and is now to be seen in the arsenal at Venice, the solitary specimen of the first attempt at projecting iron and stone shot from a tube by the ignition of saltpetre, sulphur, and charcoal. More than a hundred years passed away before marine artillery attained any importance ; it was not till the close of the sixteenth century that Brantome was able to put on record that he had seen in the Mediterranean a galliot armed with two hundred pieces of artillery, belonging to Cosmo I. of Medici, the Grand-Duke of Tuscany. The galleys of the Middle Ages and of the sixteenth century, armed at NAVAL MATTERS. first with an iron spur and afterwards with four or five cannon placed in the bows, always engaged the enemy prow first, and hore down in order of battle, side by side, in a straight or curved line. The half-moon formation practised by the ancients was reserved for the largest fleets. At Lepanto (Fig. 92), for instance, the Christian fleet was drawn up in the form of a half-moon, and was divided into four squadrons : one in the centre, two at the wings, and one in reserve. In front of each division six galeasses were posted in couples to open the engagement ; they were all one hundred and sixty feet Fig. 92.— Plan of the Naval Battle of Lepanto.— From a Drawing by Don Juan, preserved in the Archives of Simancas, Spain. in length, twenty- seven in breadth, and fifteen above the water-line, and they did a great deal of damage to the Turkish fleet with their powerful artillery. Previous to the construction of these gigantic galleys, a line of round vessels used to be placed in the van to receive the first brunt of the battle. Some- times, besides this vanguard of sailing vessels, ships were placed at the wings, the most powerful in the quarter where it was imagined that the struggle would become the hottest. The smaller craft formed a line in reserve, always prepared to row to the assistance of a hard-pressed galley. NAVAL MATTERS. 97 In the eleventh century, at the battle of Durazzo, the Venetian ships, being hard pressed by the Italo-Norman fleet of Robert Guiscard, Duke of Puglia and Calabria, and unable to make for the land owing to the dropping of the wind, ranged themselves in a line, and bound themselves together, leaving but a small interval between each ship, just sufficient to allow their smaller vessels to row out, harass the enemy, and hasten back again. This style of battle was not a new one, being the reproduction of a manoeuvre invented or employed for the first time by Scipio in the days of ancient Rome. When time had developed the progress of marine artillery, a fleet composed of large ships, in giving battle to one consisting of galleys, always presented their broadsides to their antagonists, since, in this position, the fire from their double row of cannon could do the galleys the most harm. This order of battle, however, was not always observed, particularly when the guns, owing to their great weight, were placed in the prow (Fig. 93). At first, merely to preserve the wood, the ship-builders covered every part of the vessel exposed to the action of the air or water with a coating of pitch, but this sombre and uniform tint soon wearied the eye. A more brilliant colour, prepared with wax, was painted over the pitch ; the costlier class of ships glistened in all the splendour of white, ultramarine, and vermilion, while pirates, and occasionally men-of-war, were covered with a coat of green paint, which, blending with the colour of the sea, prevented them from being distinguished at any distance. Gilding glistened on the vessels of the rich, and the sculptor's chisel added busts and figures to the decoration of their bows and sterns. Even in this respect the Middle Ages still followed the traditions of antiquity. The decorations of ships varied according to the caprice of owners and the fashion of the times. The Saracen dromon boarded and taken by Richard Ccour-de-Lion had one side coloured green and the other yellow. The Genoese at first painted their ships green ; but in 1242, when they were at war with the Pisans, they coloured them white spotted with vermilion crosses, that is, " red crosses on a silver ground," which resembled the arms of " Monsieur Saint-Georges." Eed was the colour generally adopted for ships' hulls in the sixteenth century, though a pattern in black and white was sometimes added, and sometimes the ground was painted black and the pattern only vermilion. In 1525, when Francis I., made prisoner at the battle of Pavia, was taken NAVAL MATTERS. to Barcelona, the six galleys which, carried the captive sovereign and his suite were painted entirely black from the top of the masts to the water-line. This was not, however, the first time that ships had been known to put on mourn- Fig. 93. — Pontifical Galley with. Sails and Oars, and provided with heavy Artillery — Drawn by Breugel the Elder, and engraved by Fr. Huys (1550). ing : for instance, the Knights of St. Stephen, in the fifteenth century, hid the brilliant hues of their Capitane* and painted its sails, pennants, awnings, oars, and hull with black, and swore never to alter the sombre hue till their * The principal galley of the squadron. NAVAL MATTERS. 99 order had recaptured from the Turks a galley lost by the Pisans in an engage- ment which, however, had not been altogether inglorious for the vanquished. Vessels in the Middle Ages, as in ancient times, had frequently gold- coloured and purple sails. The sails of seigniorial ships were generally brilliantly emblazoned with the coat-of-arms of the seignior (Fig. 94) ; the sails of merchant vessels and of fishing boats with the image of a saint, the patron figure of the Virgin, a pious legend, a sacramental word, or a sacred sign, intended to exorcise evil spirits, who played no inconsiderable part in the superstitions of the toilers of the deep. Different kinds of sails were Fig. 94.— Seal of Edward, Count of Rutland (1395). originally employed to make signals at sea, but flags soon began to be used for this purpose. A single flag, having a different meaning according to its position, ordinarily sufficed to transmit all necessary orders in the daytime. At night its place was taken by lighted beacons. These flags, banners, standards, and pennants, most of them embroidered with the arms of a town, a sovereign, or an admiral, were made of some light stuff, taffeta or satin. Sometimes square, sometimes triangular, sometimes forked, each had its own use and signification, either for the embellishment of the vessel's appearance or to assist in its manoeuvring. The galleys were provided with a smaller kind of pennant, which was put up at the prow or fastened to the handle of each oar : these were purely for ornamental purposes, and were often trimmed with golden or silken fringes. ioo NAVAL MATTERS. Amongst the most celebrated flags and standards of the French navy we must not omit to mention the baticenfo, a name that recalls the Bauseant, the banner of the Knights Templars. These flags, made of red taffeta, and some- times " sprinkled with gold," were only employed in the most merciless wars, for, says a document of 1292, " they signified certain death and mortal strife to all sailors everywhere." In 1570, Marco- Antonio Colonna hoisted on his flag galley a pennant of crimson damask, which bore on both sides a Christ on the Cross between St. Peter and St. Paul, with the Emperor Constantine's motto, In hoc signo vinces. The banner which Don Juan of Austria received at Naples, on the 14th of April, 1571, with the staff of supreme command over the Christian league, was made of crimson damask fringed with gold, on which were embroidered, besides the arms of the prince, a crucifix with the arms of the Pope, of the Catholic king, and of the republic of Venice, united by a chain, symbolical of the union of the three powers "against the Turk." The Normans, or the men of the north, were as fond of these brilliant standards as the nations of the Mediterranean. When they sailed on a war- like expedition, or when they celebrated a victory over pirates, they covered their vessels with flags. The poet Benoit de Sainte-More tells us that it was in this fashion, covered with seven hundred banners of different colours, that Eollo brought his fleet back up the Seine to Meulan. The Middle Ages made use of all kinds of fanciful decorations for their vessels ; during the Renaissance, this taste was renewed and was an improvement both upon the customs of antiquity, whence it drew its inspirations, and on those of the thirteenth century, which it seemed anxious to forget (Fig. 95). "A galley," says the learned M. Jal, "was in those days a species of jewel, and was handed over for embellishment to the hands of genius as a piece of metal was given to Benvenuto Cellini." Sculptors, painters, and poets combined their talents to adorn a ship's stern. No more striking example of this artistic refinement in naval ornamentation could be well quoted than that of the Spanish galley which was constructed in 1568 by order of Philip II. for his brother, Don Juan of Austria, to whom he had confided the command of the fleet intended to fight the barbarous Moorish States of Africa. The vessel's cutwater was painted white and emblazoned with the royal arms of Spain, and with the personal ones of Don Juan. The prince being a Knight of the Golden Fleece, and the adventurous expedition on which he was bound being likely to be NAVAL MATTERS. 101 attended with as many perils as that of the Argonauts, the history of Jason and of the good ship Argo was represented in coloured sculpture on the stern Fig. 95. — Man-of-War of the Sixteenth Century. — Drawn by William Barendsz and engraved by Visscher, from the Collection of Engravings in the National Library of Paris. above the rudder. This pictured poem was accompanied with four sym- bolical statues — Prudence, Temperance, Power, and Justice, above which 102 NAVAL MATTERS. floated angels carrying the symbols of the theological virtues. On one side of the poop might be seen Mars the Avenger, Mercury the Eloquent, and Ulysses stopping his ears against the seductions of the Sirens ; on the other, Pallas, Alexander the Great, Argus, and Diana. Between these were inserted pictures, which conveyed either a moral lesson for the benefit of the young admiral, or a delicate eulogium on Charles V., his father, or on Philip II., his brother. All these emblems were chefs-d'oeuvre of drawing and sculpture, which the brilliancy of their gold, azure, and vermilion settings tended to enhance. A noticeable incident in the above description is its incongruous mixture of Christian and Pagan allegories. It bears witness to the anti-religious ten- dency of the school of thought of the Renaissance, and is a faithful reflection of the alteration in custom and belief. In the Middle Ages, sailors, and indeed all classes of society, were imbued with a strong spirit of faith, tinged, however, with a great deal of superstition. As in our day, they had a sincere belief in Providence, and professed great devotion to the Virgin ; in seasons of peril they invoked those saints who were supposed to take special interests in ships and sailors ; but, in spite of their natural reverence for religion, they allowed themselves to be influenced by childish super- stition, and confused the promptings of their orthodox faith with all kinds of vain imaginings. Sailors have ever been superstitious ; their credulous brains are the parents of all the fantastic beings and animals that they persuade themselves they have seen in their wanderings, and with which they have peopled the mysterious depths of the ocean. The sirens of antiquity, the monsters of Scylla and Chary bdis, have been far surpassed by modern legendary creations, such as the kraken, a gigantic mass of pulp, which attacked and dragged down the largest ships ; the bishop fsh, which, mitre on head, blessed and then devoured shipwrecked mariners ; the Uacli handy which, even in the days of Columbus, was depicted on the map as marking the entrance to the sunless ocean; and the numerous troops of hideous demons, one of whom, in the sight of the whole French fleet of Crusaders on their way to attack the island of Mitylene, in the reign of Louis XII., clutched and swallowed up a profligate sailor, who, over his dice, had " blasphemed and defied the Holy Virgin." Blasphemy was by no means uncommon among seamen ; in spite 01 the laws of the Church and the regulations of the Admiralty, they insisted NAVAL MATTERS. 103 on using the most frightful oaths ; they swore continually by bread, by wine, and by salt, meaning thereby the very principles of life itself, and by their soul — an oath which was forbidden on pain of the severest punishment. Yet the mariners of the Middle Ages had strong reasons for avoiding open blasphemy, for, an offence against Heaven being considered far more criminal than any injury to mankind, n/hl^spTiPTrmr \yas liable to fine, to the. cat, and to death itself. Even in the thirteenth century the Danish code " ^ inflicted a comparatively moderate punishment on a thiei ; it sllllV^d PIS head, tarred and feathered him, and made him run the gauntlet of the whole crew, after which it contented itself with dismissing him from his ship. Fig. 96.— Seal of La Kochelle (1437). THE CRUSADES. Arab Conquest of the Holy Land. — Swarm of Pilgrims in the Year 1000. — Turkish Invasion of Judea. — Persecution of the Christians.— Pope Silvester II. — Expedition of the Pisans and the Genoese. — Peter the Hermit. — Letter from Simeon the Patriarch to Pope Urban II. — First Crusade. — Expedition of " Gautier sans Avoir." — Godefroy de Bouillon. — The Kingdom of Jerusalem. — Second Crusade. — St. Bernard. — Third Crusade : Philip Augustus and Richard Coeur de Lion. — Fourth Crusade. — Fifth and Sixth Crusades. — Louis IX. turns Crusader. — Seventh Crusade.— St. Louis taken Prisoner. — Eighth and last Crusade. —Death of St. Louis. — Results of the Crusades. ERUSALEM," says Jacques de Vitry, Bishop of Ptolemais in the thirteenth century, and one of the most eloquent historians of the Crusades, "Jerusalem is the city of cities, the saint of saints, the queen of nations, and the princess of provinces. She is situated in the centre of the world, in the middle of the earth, so that all men may turn their steps towards her; she is the patrimony of the patriarchs, the muse of the prophets, the mistress of the apostles, the cradle of our salvation, the home of our Lord, and ths mother of the faith, as Rome is the mother of the faithful. She is chosen and hallowed by the Almighty, who placed his feet upon her, honoured by the angels, and visited by all the nations of the earth.' ' A poet of the same period declares, in a burst of fervent inspira- tion : " She attracts the faithful as the magnet attracts the steel, as the sheep attracts the lamb with the milk of its teats, as the sea attracts the river to which it has given birth." Under the influence of this belief it is easy to understand the powerful interest which, in the eyes of the whole Christian world, was attached to a THE CRUSADES. ,05 corner of the globe so marked with, the impress of the Almighty, and the object of so much veneration. Since the conversion of Constantine I., which so gloriously signalized the triumph of the cross, and while the ostentatious but feeble successors of that great emperor were preparing the decline of the empire of Byzantium, Jerusalem had frequently been forced to submit to infidel profanations, and the "Western Christians, in their visits to the holy places, had, in consequence, many times encountered painful and almost insurmountable obstacles. In the seventh century, the conquest of Palestine by the Arabs or Saracens, attracted by fanaticism to the banner of Mahomet's immediate successors, had occasioned the most painful, if not the first of these terrible trials to Christendom. Already pilgrims, on their return from the Holy Land, had related to the dismayed West the sacrileges of which they had been the witnesses, and the annoyances of which they themselves had been the victims. Their dismal recitals represented the Christian population of Judea as reduced to a species of slavery, groaning under heavy tribute, clad in a degarding livery, forbidden to use the language of their conquerors, banished from their temples, now transformed into mosques, and obliged to conceal every external emblem of their religion, which they were no longer allowed publicly to practise. But a gentler rule succeeded these hardships, thanks to the internal dis- sensions of the Mussulmans, who, in the midst of their fratricidal struggles, forgot to persecute the Christians ; thanks also to the policy of the famous Haroun-al-Raschid and his children, who, being constantly at war with the emperors of Constantinople, dreaded lest the Eastern Christians should summon the Western to their assistance, and, consequently, were always showering on the latter every possible mark of deference, of kindness, and of consideration. Later, when the empire of Haroun-al-B,aschid had fallen into decay, one of Constantino's successors, John I., surnamed Zimisces (970), attempted to accomplish the freedom of the Holy Land, and had nearly succeeded, when death struck down the leader of the Christian army in a battle with the Arabs, and with him was destroyed the last hope of the faithful, who soon found themselves delivered over to the horrors of a terrible persecution. " It is impossible to put on record all the evils they suffered," says William of Tyre, in his great history of the holy war. TC6 THE CRUSADES. Fig. 97. — Facade of the Church of the ^Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem, founded in 326 by the Emperor Constantine, and restored by the Crusaders in 1099 (present condition, from a Photograph). Towards the close of the tenth century, a false interpretation of a passage in the Gospels, according to which the end of the world and the second coming of Jesus Christ in Judea had been fixed for the year one thousand, THE CRUSADES. 107 had struck all Christendom with stupor and affright. " The end of the world being at hand/' were the opening words of all deeds and contracts ; and the vanities of the world being forgotten in the near approach of the " supreme and inevitable catastrophe/' every one was anxious to start for the Holy Land, in the hope of being present at the coming of the Saviour, and of finding there pardon for their sins, a peaceful death, and the salvation of his soul. The immense crowd of pilgrims, according to another historian of the Crusades, Grlaber the monk, was far greater than religious devotion alone could possibly account for. The first to come were the poor and the working classes, and then counts, barons, and princes, who no longer attached any value to the possessions of this world. And further, as if the miraculous influence of this grand religious manifestation had inspired the infidels themselves with admiration and awe, the cruelties and the persecutions inflicted upon the Christians in Palestine suddenly ceased. When the dreaded epoch had passed away, and no perceptible disturbance had occurred in the laws of the universe, when each successive day had lessened the fears and increased the courage of the Western Church, the Holy Land remained open to pilgrims, who came in swarms to thank the Lord Jesus Christ for having a second time saved the world. But all this was merely a kind of tacit truce granted to the children of Christ by the unbelievers, who had sworn to destroy the religion of the cross, and to establish in its place the creed of Mohamet. The East, moreover, was about to change masters. The Turks, an Asiatic nomadic people, sprung from the countries beyond the Oxus, had conquered Persia, and had thence borne their triumphant arms towards Syria and the banks of the Nile. This rapid conquest included Judea, and was signalized by horrible excesses. No quarter was given either to the followers of Moses, to those of Jesus, or to the disciples of the Prophet. The same blow fell upon the Jewish syna- gogues, the Mussulman mosques, and the Catholic churches. Jerusalem was steeped in blood. Deprived of their property, groaning under a bitter and humiliating yoke, says a contemporary historian, the Christians suffered as they had never suffered before. Asia Minor, the land generally crossed by the pilgrims on their way to Jerusalem, was also in the power of the Turks. In the principal towns; Nicea, Tarsus, Antioch, Edessa, &c., whose names are inseparable from thd glorious memories of the first centuries of the Church, neither the Greek io8 THE CRISADES. nor the Roman Catholic ritual could be publicly celebrated. The precepts of the Koran were the only ones that were rigorously observed ; and Christians everywhere experienced from the Mohammedans the same injus- tice, the same annoyances, and the same hardships. The accounts of these persecutions, which seemed intended to utterly annihilate the faith of the cross, filled the hearts of the faithful with gloom and anger. The day was already fast approaching when the groans and complaints that reached them from the Holy Land were to rouse and arm the nations of the West for the deliverance of Christ's tomb, and the for- midable struggle, soon to take place between the Christian and the Moslem— a struggle fated to last for two hundred years with alternate successes and reverses on either side — was destined to decide the future of European civilisation. So far back as the commencement of the eleventh century, Gerbert, a French monk, one of the most remarkable men of his time, who had suc- ceeded to the papacy as Silvester II., attempted, under the influence of the impressions he had brought back from a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, to make a fresh appeal to Christendom against the persecutions he had witnessed in the East. Eoused by his summons, an expedition of Pisans, of Genoese, and of the subjects of the King of Aries, had put to sea and disembarked on the coasts of Syria, where it inflicted a certain amount of injury on the cruel votaries of Islamism; without, however, being able to penetrate very far inland, but not without influencing to some extent the fate of the inhabitants of Palestine. In fact, persecution for the time ceased, or at any rate was sensibly diminished, and it was not until half a century later that a fresh crusading appeal rang through Christendom. This time the cry of sorrow and indig- nation was uttered by Pope Gregory VII., that illustrious pontiff whose ardent and resolute nature, in the midst of the universal disorder and disorganization of government and society, seemed to have a divine mission to fulfil in settling upon an indestructible basis the supreme authority of the Church. " The miseries suffered by the Eastern Christians/7 he wrote, " have so stirred up my heart that I almost long for death, and I would rather expose my life in delivering the holy places than reign over the universe. Come, sons of Christ, and you will find me at your head ! " Such words as these at such an epoch necessarily rekindled faith and THE CRUSADES. 109 hope in every heart that received them. Fifty thousand Christians bound themselves by an oath to follow the successor of St. Peter to Constantinople, when the Emperor Michael Ducas promised to put an end to the dissensions that had so long separated the Greek from the Latin Church, and to Jeru- Fig 98.— Prester-John, Chief of a Christian Fig. 99.— Prester- John's Page. Tribe in Tartary. From Cesare Yecelli's " Degli HaHti Antichi e Moderni :" 8vo, Venice, 1560. salem, where the standard of Christ, supported by heroic hands and hearts, could not fail soon to replace the standard of the Prophet. Bumours were rife in Europe that a part of Asia was already christianised, and that Prester-John, a powerful sovereign of Tartary (Figs. 98 and 99), had forced his subjects to adopt the precepts of the Gospel. no THE CRUSADES. But the political struggles which Gregory VII. had to sustain against the princes of the West, and the refusal of the King of Germany, Henry IV., to grant him the assistance he had demanded, prevented him from under- taking the sacred expedition which was to have crowned his apostolic work. Victor III., his successor, inspired by his example, continued to preach the Holy "War against the infidels. The latter not only manifested throughout the entire East their implacable hatred to the Christian race, but, having founded large settlements on the shores of Africa, they infested the seas, endangered the security of all maritime trading, ceaselessly pillaged the coasts of Italy, ravaged the greater part of Spain, and seemed to be within very little of making Europe a tributary of Islam. But if Victor III. was unable to give birth to a real crusade, he at least succeeded in persuading the Italians to take up arms. An army of Pisans and Genoese landed in Africa (1087), gave battle to the Saracens, killed more than a hundred thousand of them, took and sacked two of their towns, and returned vic- torious with an immense booty, which they devoted to the embellishment of the churches of Genoa and of Pisa. But this daring enterprise, in spite of its important results, is not mentioned by any of the historians of the Crusades, although in every respect it had the characteristics of a holy war. This appears to prove that its guiding principle was by no means entirely a religious one, but was one bound up with many more material interests, par- ticularly with that of Italian commerce, which had suffered so much from African piracy that it naturally wished at any price to punish the accursed race from which it sprung. The successor of Victor III. was Urban II., a pontiff of French extraction, who, following up the policy of his predecessors, endeavoured with all his influence to stir up the Christians against the infidels. But the Almighty often confides the execution of his most important designs to the hands of the humblest, and the honour of initiating the Crusades was not reserved for the occupant of the chair of St. Peter. It was destined to fall to the lot of a humble pilgrim, who, as the learned historian of these events tells us, was inspired only by his zeal, and whose only influence was the force of his character and his genius. This humble pilgrim was Peter of Acheris, better known as Peter the Hermit. Descended from a noble family of Picardy, but ungainly in body and short of stature, he had vainly sought happiness and peace in the most opposite conditions of society. At first he embraced the THE CRUSADES. ,„ profession of arms, then he gave himself up to literature, then he married, and being soon left a widower, he entered into holy 'orders. Everywhere, however, he met with nothing but bitterness and deception. Having become at last, to use the expression of William of Tyre, " hermit both in deed and in name," he sought in solitude, in fasting, and in prayer to forget the empty vanities of the world, and it was no doubt with a last hope of giving some practical effect to his fervent but barren devotion that he undertook his pious pilgrimage to Jerusalem. His habits of meditation and prayer had infused a burning ardour and an enlightenment into his soul. "When he found himself on the very soil that had been pressed by the Saviour's feet, when he witnessed the hardships and the humiliations inflicted on the worshippers of Christ by the infidels, when, above all, he heard the lamentations of the venerable Simeon, the patriarch of Jerusalem, and had wept with him over the terrible trials of the Eastern Church, indignation, grief, piety, and faith awoke in his heart the feeling that he must at all hazards devote his life to a special voca- tion. He resolved to devote himself to the protection of his brethren in Christ, and to the deliverance of the holy places. One day, as he was secretly praying in front of the Holy Sepulchre, he heard a voice saying, " Peter, arise ! go forth and announce the tribulation of my people ; it is time that my servants be succoured and my holy places delivered." Under the influence of this heavenly command, the poor pilgrim, convinced that he was henceforward chosen by the divine will, determined to allow himself no rest till the holy mission, with which Christ himself had entrusted him, had been fully and faithfully accomplished. He left Palestine with letters from the patriarch Simeon to the Pope; he crossed the sea, hurried to Eome, and threw himself at the feet of Urban II., who, listening to the pathetic and eloquent language of the poor pilgrim, fancied that he was addressed by some inspired prophet, and entrusted him with the mission of summoning the nations to the holy war (Fig. 100). Peter the Hermit, says the historian whose account we are following, left Italy, crossed the Alps, and wandered over France and a great part of Europe, infusing into all the burning zeal with which he was filled. He journeyed on a mule, a crucifix in his hand, his feet bare, his head uncovered, his body girdled with a thick cord, and clad in a long frock and mantle of the com- monest, coarsest stuff. His peculiar garments excited the curiosity of the 12 THE CRUSADES. people, while the austerity of his life, his charity, and the morality he incul- cated, made them reverence him as a saint. He wandered in this guise from town to town, from province to province, stirring up the courage of some and the piety of others ; sometimes he addressed them from church pulpits, some- times in the highways and public places. His eloquence was keen and vigorous, full of vehement appeals that carried away the multitudes who listened to him. He recalled to their memories the profanation of the holy places, and the Christian blood that had poured in rivers down the streets of Fig. 100.— Peter the Hermit delivering the Message of Simeon, Patriarch of Jerusalem, to Pope Urban II. — From a Coloured Drawing by Germain Picavet in the " Histoire des Croisades," a Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century (Burgundian Library, Brussels). Jerusalem ; he called on Heaven, the saints, and the angels, whose testimony he invoked as to the truth of his statements ; he appealed to them by the holy hill of Sion, by the heights of Calvary, and by the mount of Olives, whose slopes he declared were ringing with groans and lamentations. "When words failed him to further depict the miseries of the faithful in the far East, he showed them the crucifix which he always carried about him, and, beating his breast, burst into passionate tears. The populace everywhere crowded around him. The preacher of the holy war was received as the special envoy of the Almighty. To be allowed THE CRISADES. to touch his clothes was considered an inestimable privilege, the hair even of the mule he bestrode was prized and preserved as a relic. The tones of his voice hushed domestic strife, forced the rich to succour the needy, and the profligate to slink ashamed away. His austerities and his miracles, his dis- courses and his exhortations, were repeated to those who had not been fortu- nate enough to witness the former or to hear the latter. As his hearers realised the fact that Jerusalem, Holy Jerusalem, was in the power of the infidel, the emotions of pity and the desire for vengeance were kindled within them. Every voice was lifted up to beseech God to restore to his keeping his once-beloved city. Some proffered their wealth, others their prayers, and all their life, to deliver the holy places. Everything in Europe was ready for the great expedition ; every heart beat high and every voice re-echoed the solemn hope so ardently and so persistently instilled by Peter the Hermit. Nothing now was wanted but to crown the work so far accomplished, and some watchword that would strike home to every heart, and raise, amidst the pious and countless hosts of the Crusaders, some one central banner around which they could all unite and rally. To this end Urban convoked a council on the very spot in that land of the Franks in which he had been born, a land which had always been foremost to set a noble example to surrounding nations. The council assembled in Clermont, a town in Auvergne, scarcely large enough to contain the crowd of illustrious personages that soon flocked thither, "in such numbers," says the French chronicler, William Aubert, "that, towards the middle of November, in the year 1096, the neighbouring towns and villages were so full of strangers that many were obliged to pitch their tents in the midst of the fields and meadows, although the season was extremely cold." The first sittings of this council, about to proclaim war against the enemies of the cross, were employed in, decreeing the truce of God between all Chris- tians. Then came the question of the hour. The apostle of the Crusade, Peter the Hermit, spoke first ; with that tearful voice, with that burning emotion which had won him so many adherents, he depicted the miseries of the Eastern Church. After him the Pope addressed the assembly, and with such a distinguished and aristocratic audience, it may easily be understood that his skilful and learned eloquence hall at least as much influence as the THE CRUSADES. simple and rough, speech of the poor hermit who had such sway over the minds of the masses. The council rose as one man, and one cry burst simultaneously from every breast — " Lieu le veut ! Lieu le veut ! (Diex li volt)."* The pontiff repeated in a stentorian voice these words, Diex li volt, words which for two centuries were destined to be the war-cry of the Crusaders, and showed to the excited crowd the emblem of the Redemption. " Let the cross," he said, "glitter on your arms and on your standards ! Bear it on your shoulders and on your breasts, it will become for you the emblem of victory or the palm of martyrdom ; it will ever remind you that Jesus Christ died for you, and that it is your part to die for Him." At these words, all the princes, barons, knights, prelates and clergy, artisans and labourers, swore to dedicate their lives to avenge the outrages inflicted on Christ and on His followers. The oath was cemented by a declaration of oblivion of all private animosities and quarrels, and every one of the immense audience fastened a red cross to his dress. From this the appellation of Crusaders was derived, a title which was bestowed on the faithful who then enrolled themselves under Christ's banner, and also that of Crusade, the name given to the holy war. The council, before separating, confirmed and allotted the temporal and spiritual pri- vileges which were to be bestowed upon the Crusaders. It is impossible to paint in sufficiently vivid colours the universal and spontaneous movement which took place in Western Christendom, when the faithful who had taken part in the council of Clermont went forth everywhere, as formerly did Christ's apostles, repeating what had taken place, and pro- claiming the decrees which had been promulgated there. Thenceforward all, in spite of age, sex, or social position, were carried away by the same enthu- siasm. Family ties were broken, riches were no longer held of any account. The question was not who had taken up the cross, but who had hesitated to do so. A poet of the time says, " I hold no man a true knight who refuses to go willingly, with his whole heart and with all the means in his power, to the assistance of God, who so greatly needs it." Women of every rank sewed the cross to their clothing, children of every age marked it on their innocent bodies. Monks left the retreat where they had hoped to peacefully end their existence, hermits came out of their caves and forests, and even the very * " G?od wills it." THE CRUSADES. robbers of the highway came forward, confessed their crimes, and swore to expiate them in the ranks of the holy army. The train was laid, the match was lighted, and for two centuries the Crusades were waged continually, with Fig. 101. — Reception of Gautier-sans- Avoir by the King of Hungary, who permits him to pass through his territory with the Crusaders. — From a Miniature in the " Histoire des Empereurs,' ' a Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century (Library of the Arsenal, Paris). a few intervals of rest, caused by the enormous sacrifice of men and money entailed by this gigantic undertaking, which, inspired and controlled by an ardent faith, was persisted in, in spite of every reverse and every disaster. The spring of the year 1096 witnessed the first departure of the n6 THE CRUSADES. Crusaders, in two numerous bodies, under the orders of Peter the Hermit himself, and of a poor but valiant warrior, Gautier-sans-Avoir (Fig. 101). But these undisciplined masses, forced to support themselves on their road by pillage, were dispersed and nearly destroyed by the nations through whose countries they had to pass, and who were ruined by their advent as they might have been by an army of locusts. Only a few thousand ever reached Con- Fig. 102. — Taking of Nicsea by the Crusaders, in 1097 ; from a "Window ordered by the Abbe Suger for the Church of the Abbey of St. Denis, and now destroyed. — From the " Monu- ments de la Monarchie Fran^aise," by Montfaucon (Twelfth Century). stantinople, when the Emperor Alexis I., who had summoned the Western Christians to his aid against the Turks, succoured them, and enabled them to await the arrival of the more regular expeditions, which had started three months later under Godefroy de Bouillon. It was then only that the real Crusade, that is to say, the actual war against the unbelievers, commenced. In March, 1097, the Christian army crossed the Bosphorus from Thrace, seized Nicsea (Fig. 102), penetrated into THE CRUSADES. Syria, and laid siege to the important town of Antioch, which by an act of treachery was forced to surrender in June, 1098. In the spring of the follow- ing year the soldiers of Christ entered Palestine, but it was not till the 15th of July, 1099, that the holy city fell into their hands, and that Godefroy de Bouillon (Figs. 103 and 104), elected king by the principal leaders of the Fig. 103. — Godefroy de Bouillon, crowned with the Instruments of our Lord's Passion. — From a Woodcut of the end of the Fifteenth Century, in the Burgundian Library, Brussels. victorious army, under the modest title of Baron of the Holy Sepulchre, founded the Christian kingdom of Jerusalem. Haifa century passed away, during which Christendom sent forth expedi- tion after expedition to defend the Holy Land and to consolidate its conquest ; but with little success, for the Saracens never desisted from their attacks on THE CRUSADES. the Crusaders, and persistently disputed with them the possession of Palestine. Moreover, the ardour of the pilgrims gradually diminished, the zeal for the Crusades commenced to slacken in Europe, and indifference and apathy Fig. 104. — Tomb of Godefroy de Boiiillon, as it existed in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Jeru- salem, with the inscription : — " Hie jacet inclitus Godfridus de Bulion, qui totam istam terrain acquisivit cultui Christiano, cujus anima cum Christo requiescat. Amen." (" Here lies the illustrious Godefroy de Bouillon, who won all this Holy Land to the worship of Christ. May his soul rest with Jesus.") — Monument of the early part of the Twelfth Century, now de- stroyed, from a Drawing taken on the spot in 1828, now in the possession of M. Amhr. Firmin-Didot. began to take its place. When the throne of Godefroy de Bouillon began to totter upon its insecure foundations, the road to Jerusalem became deserted, and the civilised world, absorbed and distracted by the nearer and keener struggles continually waging between its popes and its sovereigns, THE CRUSADES. soon preserved but a vague remembrance of the glorious enterprises of its fathers. Suddenly, however, it was rumoured in the West that the city of Edessa, the capital of the first Christian principality founded by the Crusaders in the East, and considered as the bulwark of the kingdom of Jerusalem, had been retaken by the Saracens, who had deluged the streets in blood. The painful tidings were received with deep indignation ; but a man of genius was at hand to strike the keynote of distress and vengeance, and the voice of St. Bernard, the Abbot of Clairvaux, rekindled the waning torch of crusading enthusiasm. It was at Vezelai (Fig. 105), where Louis VII. held his court, that the illustrious abbot, " fortified with the apostolical authority and his own sanctity," first addressed the nobles and the populace (1146). "As there was no room in the castle," says an eye-witness, Eudes de Deuil, in his Latin chronicles, " a pulpit had been constructed in the open air upon the plains which lay at the foot of the hill of Vezelai, into which Bernard ascended, accompanied by the king, wearing the cross sent him by the pope." When the heaven-born orator had aroused his hearers with the divine fire of his eloquence, there arose a universal shout of " Crosses ! crosses ! " The crosses which the abbot had prepared beforehand were soon exhausted, and, tearing his clothes into strips, he distributed them amongst the assembly, who fastened them crosswise on their garments. He continued his exhorta- tions during the whole of his stay at Vezelai, giving proof of the sanctity of his mission by the numerous miracles which he performed. The pious and touching appeals of St. Bernard attained the success he desired. King Louis, his wife Eleanor, his principal nobility and clergy, many thousand knights, and a vast number of the lower classes, enrolled themselves under the banner of the cross. " As soon as it was agreed that they should set out at the expiration of a year," says another chronicler, " all joyfully returned home. But the Abbot of Clairvaux went about preaching from place to place, and it soon became impossible to reckon the number of the Crusaders." From France, Bernard crossed over to Germany, where the influence of his inspired words fully revealed itself, for whole populations, unable even to understand the language he addressed them in, carried away by the marvellous charm of his manner, smote their breasts, and cried out, " God be merciful to us ! The saints be with us ! " V THE CRUSADES. The Emperor Conrad, whom the Abbot endeavoured to persuade to join the King of France in the new crusade, at first gave the enterprise Fig. 105. — Facade of the Abbey Church, of the Magdalen, as it now stands at Vezelai, where, in 1146, St. Bernard preached the Second Crusade (Twelfth Century). considerable opposition ; but at last, at a meeting held at Spires, the 28th of December, 1146, Bernard's extraordinary eloquence produced such an effect THE CRUSADES. I2i upon him that he vowed on the spot to assume the cross. His example was immediately followed by several German princes, amongst whom was his own nephew, the youthful Frederick of Suabia, who afterwards became so celebrated under the name of Frederick Barbarossa. A few months later, the French and German armies, each of which contained more than a hundred thousand fighting men, without reckoning the swarm of pilgrims who accompanied them, set out, well armed, well equipped, and full of confidence, for the East. The two armies contained the elite of the chivalry of both countries. " Europe," said St. Bernard in one of his letters, " contained nothing but desert towns and castles, nothing but widows and orphans, whose husbands and fathers were still alive/' But, alas ! this enthusiasm, this zeal, this heroism, displayed by all classes of European society, were destined to end in miserable disaster. The insubordination of the troops, the want of foresight and co-operation of their leaders, and the treachery of the Greek emperor Manuel, prepared a fatal ending for this ill-omened undertaking, which saw its host melt away long before their arrival in the Holy Land. After more than a year of tremendous efforts and sanguinary reverses, its remnants struggled painfully back to the West, leaving the kingdom of Jerusalem in a far more pre- carious position than before the arrival of the combined forces. "And on all sides," relates a chronicler, " were heard complaints and reproaches against the Abbot of Clairvaux, whose promises of victory had been so little realised, who, it was said, had sent so many brave men to a useless death, and who had plunged so many noble families into mourning. The holy man was mortified to the very depths of his soul, but rather than doubt the beneficent wisdom of the Almighty, he exclaimed, ' If they must murmur, it is better that they should murmur against me than against God. I am rejoiced that the Lord has condescended to use me as a shield. I am willing to be humiliated, provided always that His glory be unassailed.' y' .Forty years later, after the terrible battle of Tiberias (1187), where so much generous blood was spilt around Guy de Lusignan, the last King of Jerusalem, the Sultan Saladin, one of the most remarkable characters in Mussulman history, seized the holy city, which henceforth was only destined once, and then but for a short time, to fall again into the hands of the Christians. 122 THE CRUSADES. In 1181 the Third Crusade was undertaken, and Philip Augustus, the King of France, and Richard, the King of England, whose great deeds in this holy war obtained for him the surname of Coeur de Lion, forgetting their own personal quarrels, put themselves at its head. Subsequently, Frederick Barbarossa, the Emperor of Germany, who had previously taken part in the Second Crusade, joined the undertaking, in which he was destined to meet his death. After having shed more blood and displayed more bravery than would have sufficed to conquer the whole of Asia, after the long and memorable siege of the city of Ptolemais, after many signal successes, the Christian armies, discouraged and diminished by more than one half, returned to Europe, bringing with them " moult de gloire,"* says a chronicler, but without having in reality obtained any material or lasting advantage over the unbelievers, who it was true had lost St. Jean d'Acre, but who still retained possession of Jerusalem. The Fourth Crusade (1198—1204), which some historians call the fifth, was authorised by Pope Innocent III., and preached in France by the celebrated Foulques de Neuilly. This crusade was remarkable in one respect. Its efforts at first were directed against the persecutors of Chris- tianity, but events, as they developed themselves, modified its aim, and the question of the holy places having become abandoned, it ended, after the taking of Constantinople (Fig. 106), in the overthrow of the dynasty of the successors of Constantine, and its being replaced by a French dynasty* the founders of the Latin Empire of Byzantium. Following the example of Baudouin, Count of Flanders, the principal nobles of the crusading army divided among themselves the spoils of the Greek Empire, and ceased to think of the holy war. In 1217, Andrew, King of Hungary, in company with several nobles of Germany and France, assumed the cross. This expedition sailed for Egypt, and laid siege to Damietta, which only .capitulated after losing eighty thousand of its inhabitants. From thence it moved on to Cairo, but, being decimated by the plague, it was forced to retreat and return to Europe. This was really the fifth crusade. In 1228, Frederick II., King of Naples and Sicily, having been elected * Much glory. THE CRUSADES. 123 Emperor of Germany, conceived the idea, more from political than religious motives, of reconquering, in the name of Christendom, the Holy City. He embarked, accompanied only by a few hundred soldiers, and, landing in Fig. 106.— Second taking of Constantinople, in 1204.— From a Fresco by Tintoretto, in the Palace of the Doges, Venice (Sixteenth Century). Egypt, had an interview with the Sultan, who was persuaded, under some un- known influence, to sign a treaty, by virtue of which Nazareth, Bethlehem, and Jerusalem were to be restored to the Christians, under the express con- dition that the Mussulmans should be allowed to retain the Temple and to erect a mosque in the city of Jesus Christ. This was at best a sacrilegious 1 24 THE CRUSADES. compact. It was neither approved nor kept by the Christians or by the Saracens, and was soon considered by Frederick himself a worthless compro- mise, although he had entered Jerusalem in person, and had there crowned himself with his own hands. This singular expedition was termed the Sixth Crusade. But the hour was now fast approaching when the vigorous and sincere faith which had inspired the apostles of the First Crusade was once more to revive and to shine forth in all its pristine brilliancy ; and it was again in France that the flame of Christian devotion was to be re- kindled at the cry which still found its echo in every heart, the cry of " Dieu le veut ! " The French nation, the eldest daughter of the Church, had then at its head one of those pure and simple-minded men whom Providence too rarely raises up for the honour and welfare of mankind. Louis IX., the son of Blanche of Castile, and the grandson of King Philip Augustus, united in his pure and magnanimous soul all the gentle virtues of his mother to the generous and chivalrous sentiments of his grandfather. Whilst bestowing an assiduous and intelligent care on the govern- ment, and, it may be said, on the regeneration of his kingdom, whilst devoting the influence of his moral authority to appease the political discord which was agitating and devastating Europe, the sainted king could not forget that his Eastern brethren were groaning under slavery and persecution. The object of his dreams, at some future day when his kingly task should be nearing its accomplishment, when peace should reign in his dominions and in those of his neighbours, was to deliver Jerusalem and to drive the Saracen from the Holy Land. He was forced to postpone this noble undertaking, but it was only to await a more propitious opportunity of carrying it out in a thoroughly efficacious manner. "Or advint," says the Sire de Joinville in his Memoirs, "que le roi cheut en une grande maladie, et tellement fut au bas, qu'une des dames qui le gardoient, cuidant qu'il fut oultre, lui voulut couvrir le visage d'un linceul, et de 1'autre part du lit y eut une autre dame qui ne le voulut souffrir. Or Notre- Seigneur ouvra en lui et lui redonna la parole ; et deinanda le bon roi qu'on lui apportat la croix ; ce qui fut fait. Et quand la bonne dame, sa mere, sut qu'il eut recouvre la parole, elle en eut une si grande joie qui plus THE CRUSADES. 125 ne se pouvoit, mais quand elle le vit croise, elle fut aussi transie que si elle 1'eutvumort (1244)."* Notwithstanding, however, the grief of the queen-mother, who, in spite of her devotion to the holy cause, feared lest the absence of the king might prove disadvantageous to France, Louis IX., having once taken the vow, was determined faithfully to perform it. Moreover, he was encouraged by seeing that his example alone had more influence than the warmest exhorta- tions of his preachers, for, as soon as it was known that their revered sovereign had assumed the cross, zeal revived among all classes, faith re- gained its sway, and an impatience to set forth on the crusade manifested itself on all sides. But the king, sagacious and prudent in spite of his ardour, and fore- warned by the errors of his predecessors, was unwilling to give the signal until he had taken all proper precautions and made all necessary arrange- ments. Three years elapsed, during which Louis IX. continued his pre- parations, and collected provisions of every kind, which were conveyed to Cyprus, the spot chosen for the general rendezvous of the Crusaders ; in the meantime, he busied himself in preparing, in the interests of his kingdom, for the events that might take place in his absence. At length, having appointed his mother regent, he embarked from the port of Aigues- Mortes on the 15th of August, 1248, with his wife, his brother, and his principal adherents. At Cyprus he was joined in turn by all the nobles of France, with their men-at-arms and their vassals. He passed the winter in organizing the expedition, which was first destined for Egypt ; for, of all the Mahometan chiefs who were at that time contending for the possession of Palestine, the Sultan of Cairo, who had already made himself master of Syria, was considered the most powerful, and it was the opinion of the most competent soldiers that the conquest of the Holy Land must commence on the shores of the Nile. Everything seemed to promise a happy result. A considerable fleet, a * " It happened that the king was seized with a serious illness, and was brought so low that one of the ladies who was tending him, thinking that he was dead, wished to cover his face with a cloth ; while at the other side of his bed was another lady who would not permit it. But it fell out that the Lord worked within him and restored him his speech, so that the good king asked for the cross to be brought to him, which was done. And when the good lady, his mother, learned that he had recovered his speech, she was overcome with joy, but when she saw that he had assumed the cross, she was as much grieved as if she had seen him a corpse." 126 THE CRUSADES. numerous and well- disciplined army, an abundant supply of provisions, arms, and military stores, the supreme command concentrated in one hand, and, above all, a real feeling of devotion to the sacred cause — a feeling inspired by the exhortations and the example of the king — such were the elements from which the Seventh Crusade might have hoped to attain success. In the spring, eighteen hundred vessels sailed from Cyprus, where they had been fitted out, and conveyed the crusading army to Damietta. The king, armed from head to foot, was one of the first to spring ashore. Several of his knights and men-at-arms followed him, and, in the midst of a shower of darts, dispersed the Saracens, with whom the shore was covered, and drove them back in disorder into the town (Fig. 107). The attack was so bold and so unforeseen, that the infidels, struck with terror, no longer believed themselves secure behind the walls which thirty years before had sustained a siege of eighteen months, and abandoned Damietta without striking a blow in its defence. The possession of this stronghold, situated on the sea- coast at the mouth of the Nile, would have been of but little importance to the Crusaders, but its conquest had been so rapid and easy that they were led by the intoxica- tion of success to neglect the first elements of prudence and discipline. Their entry into the town was the signal for its pillage, in spite of the orders and entreaties of the king, whose humane and generous character was repugnant to this act of barbarism. The Christian host should have profited by the enemy's discomfiture, and immediately have penetrated into the interior of the country, instead of remaining, as it did, stationary for five months, either on account of the periodic inundations of the river, or in expectation of the reinforcements which were due from Europe. This long delay, which fostered idleness, dis- sipation, and insubordination, was fatal to the expedition. "When the king at last gave the order to advance, he had under his orders none but effeminate, enervated troops, without obedience and without discipline ; and the Saracens, who had had plenty of time to forget their panic and overcome their dis- couragement, found, in the demoralization of their enemies, a still further ground for comfort, and a fresh motive for confidence. Thenceforward the Christian cause proceeded from bad to worse. After several engagements in which they were worsted, after several battles, the THE CRUSADES. 127 effect of which was merely to sacrifice life — particularly after the battle of Mansourah, in which Robert of Artois, the king's brother, was killed, with the flower of the nobility — the Crusaders found themselves surrounded in their camp, a prey to a pestilential epidemic produced by want, which daily made considerable ravages in their ranks. French valour, however, was not to be daunted, and over and over again the soldiers, though exhausted by fatigue and disease and dying of hunger, put forth fresh efforts, and defeated the Saracens ; at a cost to themselves, however, that each victory made them less able to endure. At last they were forced to retreat on Damietta, where the Queen with some reserve troops was awaiting them, and where they hoped to reorganize themselves. After they had been three or four days on the march, during which this weary host of sick and wounded had been ceaselessly harassed by the enemy, the king — who was seriously ill himself, but who always rode and fought in the rear to protect the remnant of his ost, whose safety, he said, he valued far more than his own life — was forced to halt in a village, which the Saracens surrounded and attacked on all sides, while the bravest and most devoted of Louis's knights allowed themselves to be cut to pieces to prevent their good sire from falling into the hands of the infidels. Louis was lying on the field in a dying condition, quite incapable of giving any command, when some traitor cried out in the midst of the fight, " Yield, sir knights, yield all of you, the king orders it ; do not cause him to be slain." The fight immediately ceased, the knights threw down their arms and asked for quarter. The Saracens pitilessly massacred not only the sick, from whom they feared the effects of contagion, but every Christian beneath the rank »of knight. The king was taken prisoner, together with his two brothers (Fig. 108), his principal barons, and the officers of his household. This occurred on the 6th of April, 1250. History records the most touching incidents of the captivity of the pious monarch. Never was Louis IX. so noble, so heroic, as during these thirty days of trial, of suffering, and of danger. Though a captive in the hands of the unbelievers, subjected to the grossest outrages, loaded with chains, and threatened with death, he still displayed in the gentleness of his disposition and the serenity of his soul the high virtues of the Christian faith and the nobility pertaining to his kingly dignity. The Saracens greatly admired 'this magnanimity in misfortune, and their principal leader, the terrible Sultan of 128 THE CRUSADES. Damascus, entered into negotiations with his august prisoner, who was pre- pared to die rather than submit to some of the demands of his conquerors. A million of golden besants (about half a million of French livres) for the ransom of the Franks, the restitution of Damietta for that of their king, and ten years' truce between the Christians and the Mussulmans of Egypt and of Syria, were the conditions that Louis was obliged to accept. Joinville tells us that the emirs of the sultan were content to accept, as their only Fig. 108. — St. Louis and his two brothers, Alphonse, Count of Poitiers, and Charles, Count of Anjou, made prisoners by the Saracens. — Fac-simile of a Woodcut iiA the " Grand Voyage de Hierusalem," printed in Paris by Francois Regnault in 1522; folio. Library of M. Ambr, Firmin-Didot. guarantee, the bare word of this Frankish prince, the noblest Christian, they said, they had ever seen in the East. Some of the Saracens, indeed, accord- ing to the same chronicler, had conceived the intention of offering the throne of Egypt to King Louis (Fig. 109), so much respect and esteem had he inspired them with. Louis having recovered his liberty, would not return to France without having tried every means in his power to alleviate the miseries of Palestine, or at least to deliver the Christian prisoners whom the infidels still detained. THE CRUSADES. 129 He went, with seven hundred knights who still remained under his orders, to the Holy Land, and then, rather by conciliation than by force, and by the exercise of a marvellous sagacity, he was enabled to a certain extent to re- establish the prestige of the defenders of the cross. He devoted four years to this good work, and only consented to return to France on hearing of the death of his beloved mother. He re-entered Paris, after an absence of six years (1254), with a wounded and broken spirit, " because," says the English chronicler, Matthew Paris, " through him disorder had overspread Christendom." Palestine in 1268 had fallen into the deepest misery and desolation ; the few towns and strongholds which remained in the hands of the Eastern Fig. 109.— The Messengers of the Sultan, having at their head a little old man walking with crutches, come to discuss terms of ransom with Ihe Christian prisoners.— Prom a miniature in the " Credo de Joinville," Manuscript of the end of the Thirteenth Century, formerly in the National Library of Paris, but now in England. Christians had been pillaged and sacked by the Mamelukes, who at last took Antioch, where they slew seventeen thousand of the inhabitants, and sold a hundred thousand more into slavery (Fig. 110). These dreadful tidings, which two centuries earlier would have caused a general indignation in Christendom, reached the West without creating much excitement, in the midst of the political troubles which were agitating most of the states of Europe. But since his return to France, St. Louis had worn the cross, if not on his garments, at least in his heart, and had always cherished the hope of realising the dream of his youth. "The cries of the miserable Eastern Christians," says an old chronicle, " deprived him of rest; and s 3o THE CRUSADES. he felt within him a deep anguish of soul and a passionate desire for martyrdom." Accordingly he convened a solemn parliament, when he announced to his assembled nobles his intention of undertaking a new crusade. At first many were greatly surprised and afflicted, thinking, writes the Sire de Joinville, "that those who had counselled the undertaking had committed an evil deed and a mortal sin." Some, indeed, of the king's most faithful Fig. 110.— Plan of Antioch in the Thirteenth Century, with its five gates— of St. Paul, of the Dog, of the Duke, of the Bridge, and of St. George. To the right is Mount Oronte ; in the fore- ground is the sea. — From a Manuscript of the Thirteenth Century, No. 4,939, in the National Library of Paris. servants openly refused to join his crusade, not through fear, but from wisdom, and with the intention perhaps of persuading him to abandon his fatal project • but the majority of the barons and feudal lords found it impossible to gainsay the will of their sovereign, and the example of the king was of still greater power than his orders. His three sons, the Counts of Toulouse, of Champagne, and of Flanders, took up the cross, as well as his brother, Charles of Anjou, who had recently been raised to the throne of Sicily, and many other princes of the royal house of France. The preparations for the crusade required three years, during which St. Louis, in the hope of persuading every Christian state to send its troops THE CRUSADES. against the infidels, did his best, but without success, to put an end to the political quarrels that divided kings from their subjects. He embarked, in 1270, with his sons and his principal nobles, for Sardinia, which had been fixed upon as the rendezvous of the Crusaders. On his arrival there it was decided that Tunis should be attacked first. A French chronicler mentions that the king had been given to understand that " Tunis afforded great assistance to the Sultan of Cairo, which was very injurious to the Holy Land, and the barons believed that if that root of evil, the city of Tuni^, Fig. 111. — Disembarkation of St. Louis at Carthage. — Fac-simile of a "Woodcut in the "Passaiges d'oultremer : " small folio, Paris, 1518. were destroyed, it would be of much advantage to Christendom." Other chroniclers, on the contrary, and amongst them Matthew Paris, give a more plausible motive for the expedition, viz., that the king had heard that the Moorish sovereign of that part of the coast had shown a disposition to embrace Christianity and join the western powers in their attempt to conquer Egypt. However that may have been, the crusading fleet sailed for Tunis, carry- ing an army sadly tried by sickness, and whose ardour had already strangely begun to cool. The Moors permitted the Christians, almost unopposed, to disembark and take possession of Carthage (Fig. Ill), which had dwindled 13* THE CRUSADES. down to a mere village. Some of the Crusaders housed themselves in the ruins of the ancient Carthaginian city, the remainder bivouacked under the burning sun of Africa, surrounded and harassed by the infidels, whose light cavalry kept continuously skirmishing around them. It was not long before the plague broke out in the Ch-ristian army, whilst it was still await- ing the arrival of the King of Sicily and his troops, and Louis IX., already in feeble health, bowed down by pre- mature old age, and heart- broken in consequence of the death of one of his sons, was attacked by it. As soon as this culminating misfortune was known in the camp there was unusual con- sternation and despondency, for every one knew that the king was the life and soul of the expedition. From his sick- bed, where he was undergoing the most cruel sufferings, he still continued to issue his orders with that composure and gentleness which were habitual to him ; but every hour increased his feebleness, every moment brought him nearer to his end. As soon as he perceived that his death was at hand, he tranquilly dictated his last instructions to his son Philip — instructions which have rightly been termed celestial; — then kneeling at the bedside he received extreme unction, after which, stretching himself upcn Fig. 112. — St. John of Oapistran, Franciscan Monk, who defended Belgrade against the Turks. — From a Painting by Bartolommeo Vivarini, in the Louvre. Fifteenth Century. THE CRUSADES a bed of ashes as a sign of repentance and humility, his eyes turned beseech- ingly towards heaven, and the words of the psalmist on his lips, " 0 Lord, I will enter thy temple and glorify thy name," he quietly breathed his last (August 25th, 1270). And with the last beat of this grand and noble heart terminated the eighth crusade, the last on the heroic list of these adventurous expeditions Fiy. 113. — Don Juan of Austria, holding a boardiug-axe in remembrance of the Battle of Lepanto. • — From a painting attributed to Alonso Sanchez Coello, Portuguese painter, in the possession of M. Carderera, of Madrid. End of the Sixteenth Century. in which the power and the influence of the Christian faith had been so signally manifested. It had indeed required all the personal influence of the revered monarch to re-awaken the religious enthusiasm, to quicken into life the zeal and faith of a state of society which had become more sceptical, if not more corrupt, as it had become more civilised, and which occupied itself less with the spiritual consolations of the soul than with the material pleasures of the body. Never again was the sceptre of France to pass into 134 THE CRUSADES. such sainted hands, never again was the martyr's halo of glory to illuminate its crown. It is true that more than once since the death of St. Louis a call to the crusade has resounded from the pontifical chair and from the dais of the council hall, but it never found an echo in the heart of either prince or peasant. Nevertheless on two subsequent occasions have voices as persuasive as those of Peter the Hermit and the Monk of Clairvaux attempted to re- awaken popular enthusiasm. In the middle of the fifteenth century, while Mahomet II., master of Constantinople, was advancing full of confidence to conquer the West, John Corvin, vayvode of Transylvania, better known under the name of Huniades, put himself at the head of the Crusaders who had been assembled by the eloquent appeals of St. John of Capistran (Fig. 112). Carried away with the enthusiasm of this man of God, who, crucifix in hand, was wont to penetrate the ranks in the hottest part of an engagement, the Crusaders showed themselves worthy of their heroic leader, Huniades. At the close of a tremendous struggle, the Turks were put to flight ; Belgrade remained in the hands of the Christians, and the haughty Mahomet II. was wounded and hurried off the field by his followers. Towards the close of the sixteenth century, the King of Spain and the Italian princes concluded arrangements with Pope Pius Y. and the Venetians for a crusade to defend Christian Europe against the Turks. Don Juan of Austria (Fig. 113), who was appointed commander-in-chief of the troops by Pius Y., obtained, on the 7th of October, 1571, that tremendous victory in which the Turks lost thirty thousand men and two hundred and twenty-four vessels, a loss that destroyed their naval supremacy and saved Europe. But in the meantime the Holy Land had again fallen beneath the yoke of the infidel, and there was soon no trace left of those principalities beyond the seas which the crusading nobles had founded in the Archipelago and in Asia Minor, and which for a brief, a very brief, space had seemed so flourishing ; there was soon, indeed, no trace left of even the name of the ephemeral kingdom of Jerusalem, for the creation of which the nations of Europe had lavished, for nearly two centuries, so much blood, so much wealth, and so much heroism. The effect of the Crusades was nevertheless a complete revolution in the manners and customs of the Western nations ; the suppression of servitude, the founding of the free towns, the alienation and the division of the feudal lands, and the development of the communal system, were the immediate consequences of the tremendous emigration of men who went forth to fight THE CRUSADES. i35 and die in Palestine. The nobles ceased to wage their perpetual private quarrels, knighthood assumed a regular and solemn character, judiciary duels diminished, religious orders multiplied, and charitable institutions were esta- blished on every side. Men's minds became more enlightened and their manners softened under the influence of the growing expansion of science, art, and literature. Law, natural history, philosophy, and mathematics came to them in direct descent from the Greeks and the Arabians ; a new literature, abounding in poetic gems, sprang forth all at once from the imagination of troubadours, minstrels, and minnesingers ; art, the fine arts particularly, architecture, painting, sculpture, and embroidery, began to unfold their thousand wonders ; industry and commerce multiplied a hundredfold the public wealth, which at one time had seemed nearly swallowed up in ruinous expeditions ; and the art of war, as well as the art of navigation, made im- mense strides in the direction of progress. Fig. 114. — Assault on a Fortified Place. — From a Miniature in the " Histoire des Croisades" of Guillaume de Tyr, Manuscript of the Thiiteenth Century, in the Library of M. Ambr. Firmin- Didot. CHIVALRY. DUELS AND TOURNAMENTS. Origin of Chivalry.— Its different Characteristics.— Chi valric Gallantry.— Chivalry and Nobility, —Its Relations with the Church.— Education of the Children of the Nobility.— Squires.— Chivalric Exercises.— Pursuivants at Arms.— Courts and Tribunals of Love.— Creation of Knights.— Degradation of Knights — Judicial Duels. —Trials by Ordeal.— Feudal Champions. —Gages of Battle.— The Church forbids Duels.— Tournaments invented by the Sire de Preuilly in the Tenth Century. — Arms used in a*" '1 o1 Ul'imiMul. Tili— Lists.— The part taken by Ladies. — King Eene's Book?* ~ HE word Chivalry, according to M. Philarete Chasles, whose ingenious opinions we often borrow, expresses a mixture of manners, of ideas, and of customs peculiar to the Middle Ages of Europe, and to which no analogy is to be traced in the annals of the human race. The Eddas, Tacitus, and the Dano- Anglo-Saxon poems of Beowulf con- tain the only positive documents con- cerning the origin of chivalry. It reached its apogee rapidly after its birth, and gradually declined towards the close of the thirteenth century. At that period ladies took a very prominent position ; they armed the knights, conferred the order of knighthood, and bestowed the prizes of honour. It was under the influence of the ideas peculiar to this epoch that Dante wrote his great poem, "for the sole purpose," he said, "of glorifying Beatrice Portinari," a child of eleven years of age whom he had accidentally seen in a church. It was at this time that the Suabian knights, invaded by the barbarous Hungarians, who were in the habit of slaying their enemies CHIVALRY. '37 with their enormous bows and arrows, implored them, " in the name of the ladies," to take sword in hand, in order to fight in " a more civilised Fig. 115. — King Artus, protected by the Virgin, is fighting a Giant.— Fac-simile of a Woudcut ia the " Chroniques de Bretagne," of Alain Bouchard ; 4to, Paris, Galliot du Pre, 1514. manner." But chivalry soon began to decline, both as an institution and as a doctrine. Froissart characterizes and describes with picturesque liveliness this tendency to decay, which, as time advanced, gradually resulted in a complete T 138 CHIVALRY. transformation, so that the chivalric ideal became lost, and the independence of the soldier, once the slave only of his God and of his lady, gave way to the obsequiousness of the courtier, and finally became a selfish and pitiful servility. At these different epochs of organic transformation, chivalry was con- stantly modifying itself according to each nation's particular tendency. In Thuringia and Saxony, in Ireland and in Norway, it resisted longer than elsewhere the growing influence of Christianity. It exhibits its semi- paganism in certain passages of the " JSFiebelungen," a German epic poem of the thirteenth century, in which the rude impress of ancient Teutonism is still clear and distinct. Between the seventh and the eleventh centuries the traces of this rudeness of origin still strongly showed themselves among the Franks, whose bravery consisted in spilling their blood, in fearing nothing, and in sparing nobody. This thirst for blood was unknown in the south of Europe ; there men's dispositions were amiable and gentle, and as far back as the eleventh century chivalric gallantry was regulated by fixed laws, and gave birth to a learned and refined school of poetry. From Provence this spirit of gallantry and poetry made its way into Italy and Sicily, where the barbarous Teutonic knights had been so frequently turned into ridicule. Little by little, however, German chivalry was affected by these southern influences. The minnesingers softened to the best of their ability the Teutonic language to permit of its repeating the softer songs of the Provencal muse, and the light but lively imaginations of the troubadours assumed a gentle melancholy and often a metaphysical grace in their German verses. In Great Britain, where the actual has always overshadowed the ideal, chivalry remained cold, feudal, and aristocratic, whilst it was passionately worshipped by the Spaniards, those noble and knightly descendants of the Goths and Iberians, whose struggle with the Arabs was one long tournament that lasted for more tlian seven centuries (Fig. 116). In religious countries chivalry assumed monastic characteristics ; among nations of a gay and lively disposition it verged on the voluptuous and licentious. Alphonso X., King of Leon and Castile, forced his subjects to submit to monkish regulations, and prescribed the shape of their clothes as well as the manner in which they were to spend their time. In Provence, chivalry regarded unlawful love with an indulgent eye, and made a jest of marriage. Chivalry was in fact a fraternal association, or rather an enthusiastic compact between men of feeling arid courage, of delicacy and devotion; CHIVALRY. '39 such at least was the noble aim it had in view, and which it constantly strove to attain (Fig. 117). However praiseworthy its motives and intentions, chivalry was not favourably regarded by everybody. In its feudal aspect it was displeasing Fig. 116.— Sword of Isabella the Catholic. Upon the hilt is the following inscription, partly in Spanish and partly in Latin: — "I am always desiring honour; now I am watching, peace be with me" ("Deseo sienpre onera; nunc caveo, pax con migo"). — From the "Armeria Real of Madrid," a publication of M. Ach. Jubinal's. to sovereigns, who constantly endeavoured to create beside it, and sometimes above it, a nobility of the sword, an individual and personal rank that could not be handed down from father to son (Fig. 118). Thus Philippe le Bel, being in want of soldiers after the Flemings had destroyed his chivalry — that is to say, his nobility- — attempted immediately to replace it by ordering that CHIVALRY. the elder of two sons of a villain, and the two elder of three sons, should bo admitted into the order of knighthood. In this way Frederick Barbarossa Fig. 117.— Chivalry represented by Allegorical Figures. — Fac-simile of a Copperplate in the Spanish translation of the " Chevalier delibere " of Olivier de la Marche : 4to, Salamanca, 1573. knighted peasants who had displayed personal bravery on the field of battle. As for the Church, it contented itself with warning the knights against CHIVALRY. 141 too bellicose a spirit, and with, imbuing them as far as possible with the sentiments of Christian charity ; in fact, knights were frequently considered to be a species of Levite. " There was," says the " Ordene de Chevalerie " * " a great resemblance between the duties of a knight and those of a Fig. 118. — Conferring Knighthood on the Field of Battle. — Romance of "Lancelot du Lac," a Manuscript in the National Library of Paris (Thirteenth Century). priest." Thence the reason that the priest was " the hero of the faith," and the knight " the pontiff of true honour." Thence the name of ordene, or ordination, given to the investiture of knighthood. In the sixteenth century, the Spanish knight Don Ignatio de Loyola, who became so famous as the founder of the Order of the Jesuits, made himself a knight of the Yirgin, and solemnised his entrance into God's service, according to ancient The investiture of knighthood. ,4z CHIVALRY. custom, by keeping the veillee des armes* before the sacred image of the mother of Christ. The Church, although it seeks to maintain peace and has a horror of bloodshed, has never forbidden legitimate wars, and thus good King St. Louis never shrank on the field of battle from driving his sword up to the very hilt into his enemy's heart. And the Church, whilst approving of the noble \character as well as of the enthusiasm of chivalry, always endeavoured to I restrain its more romantic and warlike tendencies. Its pacific and charitable / spirit is expressed in the solemn blessing on the sword of a knight, which we J take from the " pontifical : " — " Most holy Lord," said the officiating prelate, / " omnipotent Father, eternal God, who alone ordainest and disposest all £ things ; who, to restrain the malice of the wicked and to protect justice, hast, by a wise arrangement, permitted the use of the sword to men upon this earth, and willed the institution of the military order for the protection of thy people ; 0 thou who, by the mouth of the thrice-blessed John, didst tell the soldiers who came to seek him in the desert to oppress no one, but to rest content with their wages, — we humbly implore thy mercy, Lord. It is thou who gavedst to thy servant David to overcome Goliath, and to Judas Maccabeus to triumph over the nations who did not worship thee ; in like manner now to this thy servant here, who has come to bend his head beneath the military yoke, grant strength and courage for the defence of the faith and justice ; grant him an increase of faith, hope, and charity ; inspire him with thy fear and love ; give him humility, perseverance, obedience, and patience ; make his disposition in everything such that he may wound no person unjustly either with this sword or with any other, but that he may use it to defend all that is just and all that is right." The bishop gave the naked sword to the new knight, saying, " Receive this blade in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, and use it for your own defence and for that of God's Holy Church, and for the confusion of the enemies of the cross of Christ and of the Christian faith ; and as far as human frailty permits it, wound no one unjustly with it." The new-made knight then rose, brandished the sword, wiped it on his left arm, and replaced it in its scabbard. The prelate then gave him the kiss of * This was the night-watch kept over his armour by the candidate for admission to the order of knighthood. CHIVALRY. '43 peace, saying, " Peace be with thee." Then with the naked sword in his right hand, he struck the knight gently thrice across the shoulders, saying, " Be thou a peaceable, brave, and faithful warrior." After which the other knights present put on his spurs (Fig. 119), whilst the bishop said, "Valiant warrior, thou who surpassest in beauty the children of men, gird thyself with thy sword upon thy thigh." The son of a noble, or even of a commoner, intended for the ranks of knighthood, was at the age of seven taken away from the care of the women ; who, however, never allowed him to reach that age without instilling into him such sentiments of right and valour as should govern his conduct during the Fig. 119. — Arming a Knight ; whilst his spurs are being put on, the prince giids the sword to his side. — From a Manuscript of the Thirteenth Century in the British Museum. rest of his life. He was then entrusted to the men, of whom he became not only the pupil, but the servitor ; for, says the " Ordene de Chevalerie," " it is proper that he should learn to obey before he governs ; for otherwise he would not appreciate the nobility of his rank when he became a knight." Moreover, the chivalric code, which distrusted the prejudices and weaknesses of paternal affection, required "every knight to place his son in the service of some other knight." These youthful novices, particularly if they belonged to a noble and honourable family, always found plenty of princely courts, seignorial households, manors, and castles to receive them, which were, so to speak, the public schools of chivalry. There existed, besides, hospitals founded and maintained by wealthy and generous nobles, in the same manner as are the colleges of the University of Paris ; and these hospitals were governed by i44 CHIVALRY. old knights without family or fortune, who considered it no shame to accept, riot a salary in money, but a retiring pension in the shape of a house with board, in which to hold a kind of school of chivalry for the benefit of the youths, who promised at some future time to prove a credit to the institution. These youths were termed pages, varlets, and damoiseaux, and they performed under their masters and mistresses the most humble and the most domestic functions : they followed them in their travels and to the chase ; they formed part of their suites on occasions of ceremony ; they wrote their letters and carried their messages ; they waited on them at meals, carved their dishes, and poured out their drinks. In the eyes even of those nobles who were most jealous of their birth and of their name, this temporary and casual servitude had nothing in it either of a humiliating or degrading character, and its only effect was to knit still closer the ties of respect, obedience, and sympathy which bound the youth to his adopted parents, the aspirant for knighthood to his master and teacher. The latter by no means neglected the moral and religious education of the neophyte ; the first lessons which were given him taught him not only to love God, but to respect women. As soon as the young page had acquired sufficient experience and discern- ment to direct his own movements in the intricacies of chivalric life, he was bidden to choose an ideal sovereign from among the noble and beautiful ladies of the aristocratic world that he frequented, a sort of terrestrial divinity whom he was to swear to serve, and to whom he was henceforth to recount all his thoughts and actions, treating her at the same time with all the delicacy and devotion which the example of those around him had shown him to be her due. He was taught, above all, to revere the august character of chivalry, and to respect, in the persons of the knights who composed this institution, the dignity to which he himself aspired. It was thus that, led by the instinct of imitation peculiar to the young, the pages habitually played at doing everything they saw done by the knights. They practised wielding the lance and the sword; they played at combats, attacks, and duels between themselves. Excited by emulation, they coveted the honour of being con- sidered brave, hoping if they attained their wish, that it would lead to their being attached to the service of some person of mart, or to their being promoted to the rank of esquire. CHIVALRY. '45 When the young men abandoned the position of pages in order to be made esquires, an event that never took place before their fourteenth year, their change of social condition was celebrated by a religious ceremony, which the Church appointed for the purpose of consecrating their knightly vocation, and of hallowing the use of the arms they were henceforward destined to carry. Standing at the altar and surrounded by his nearest relations, the youthful novice received the consecrated sword from the hands of the priest, Fig. 120. — The Game of Quintain: tilting at a quintain (revolving effigy of a knight). — Fac- simile of a Miniature in the " Chroniques de Charlemagne " (Fifteenth Century). Burgundian Library, Brussels. promising always to wield it in the interests of religion and honour. A higher position in the household of his lord or lady was then assigned to the new esquire. He was admitted to their private gatherings, he took part in all assemblies and state ceremonies, and it was now his duty to superintend the reception, that is to say, to regulate the laws of etiquette relating to the foreign nobles who visited his master's court. A passage from the history of Boucicaut, a marshal of France in the reign of Charles VI., will give an idea of the laborious and arduous existence u i46 CHIVALRY. of the young esquire who aspired to become a worthy knight : " Now cased in armour, he would practise leaping on to the back of a horse ; anon, to accustom himself to become long-winded and enduring, he would walk and run long distances on foot, or he would practise striking numerous and forcible blows with a battle-axe or mallet. In order to accustom himself to the weight of his armour, he wrould turn somersaults whilst clad in a complete suit of mail, with the exception of his helmet, or would dance vigorously in a shirt of steel ; he would place one hand on the saddle-bow of a tall charger, and the other on his neck, and vault over him He would climb up between, two perpendicular walls that stood four or five feet asunder by the niere pressure of his arms and legs, and would thus reach the top, even if it were as high as a tower, without resting either in the ascent or descent When he was at home, he would practise with the other young esquires at lance-throwing and other warlike exercises, and this continually." Besides all this, it was necessary for an esquire who wished to fulfil his duties properly to possess a number of physical qualities, great versatility of talent and capability, and a zeal that never flagged. At court, as in the larger seignorial households, there were various classes or categories of esquires who performed totally distinct duties, which in less important house- holds were all entrusted to the same individual. The first in importance was the body esquire, or the esquire of honour ; then the chamber esquire, or chamberlain ; the carving esquire, the stable esquire, the cup-bearing esquire, &c., all -separate personages, whose names sufficiently indicate their duties. It is scarcely necessary to remark that esquires, besides the domestic services expected from them within their master's house, had especially to give proofs of their vigilance and skill in the duties of the stable — duties which, as an historian aptly observes, were of necessity noble, since the military aristocracy never fought but on horseback. It was the duty of all first esquires to break in their master's chargers, and to teach the younger esquires the routine of the stable. The duty of attending to the arms and armour devolved upon another class of esquires. We may add that, as each seignorial castle was also a species of fortress, most of the esquires, in addition to their other tasks, were required to perform certain military duties analogous to those practised in a regular stronghold, such as rounds, sentry duty, watches, &c. (Fig. 121). When their lord mounted his horse, his esquires shared amongst them CHIVALRY. H7 the honour of assisting him ; some held his stirrup, others carried various parts of his armour, such as the armlets, the helmet, the shield, the gauntlets, &c. When a knight was merely going for a ride or on a journey, he usually bestrode a sober kind of hack that was called a pal- frey, but when he was going to take the field, one of his esquires led at his right hand (whence the name of destrier given to this sort of steed) a charger or high horse, which the knight only mounted at the last moment. Hence the ex- pression, " to ride the high horse," which has become proverbial. As soon as the knight had decided to mount his charger, his squires pro- ceeded to arm him, that is to say, they firmly fastened together all the different pieces of his armour on his body with straps attached to metal buckles for the pur- pose ; and it may be well conceived that no slight care was required to pro- perly adjust such a cum- brous and complicated steel or iron casing ; an esquire's neglect, indeed, frequently caused his master's death. When a single combat took place, the esquires, drawn up behind their Fig. 121. — German Knight, engraved by Burgmayer from designs by Albert Diirer, taken from a collection entitled "Vita Imperatoris Maximiliani" (Fifteenth Century). H8 CHIVALRY. lord, remained for a few moments inactive spectators of the struggle, but as >on as it had once fairly begun their share in the affray commenced. ratching the slightest movement, the smallest signals of their master, they jtood ready to assist him in an indirect but efficacious manner if he attained my advantage, without actually becoming aggressors themselves, in order to issure his victory ; if the knight were hurled from his steed, they helped him remount, they brought him a fresh horse, they warded off the blows that rere aimed at him ; if he were wounded and placed hors de combat, they did their utmost, at the risk of their own life, to carry him off before he was slain [outright. Again, it was to his esquires that a successful knight confided the ;are of the prisoners he had taken on the battle-field. In fine, the esquires, short of actually fighting themselves, a thing forbidden by the code of chivalry, were expected to display the greatest zeal, the greatest skill, and the greatest courage, and consequently had it very materially in their power to contribute to their master's success. A long novitiate and the consciousness of an aptitude for a military career were not always, however, sufficient to enable an esquire to obtain the rank of knight. He was frequently obliged, in the intermediate rank of pursuivant-at-arms, to travel through foreign countries, either as the acknow- ledged envoy of some prince or noble, or merely in the character of an ordinary traveller, and be present at chivalric games and tournaments, without actually taking part in them himself ; he thus acquired, by constant intercourse with distinguished soldiers and high-born ladies, a thorough technical knowledge of the military calling, and an intimate acquaintance with all the elegant refinements of courtesy. In this way pursuivants-at-arms went about everywhere, one day being ceremoniously received at the court of a powerful noble, the next being simply entertained in the lowly manor of a poor gentjeman ; acting, wherever they might be, honourably both in word and in deed, observing scrupulously the precepts both of honour and virtue, showing themselves to be noble, brave, and devoted, and seeking every opportunity of proving themselves worthy of ranking with the noble knights whose deeds and whose names were the theme of constant and universal praise. Chance alone was not allowed to direct their wandering and adventurous steps, they eagerly sought the most renowned princely and seignorial courts, at which they were certain to meet with chivalry's loftiest traditions ; they CHIVALRY. H9 thought themselves fortunate indeed when they were able to make their obeisance to some hero famous for his deeds in arms, or to elicit a smile from some lady celebrated for her beauty and her worth. And while the most perfect respect and courtesy to ladies were the first Fig. 122. — The Count of Artois, who has come from Arras to take part in the tournament at Boulogne, presents himself at the Castle of the Count of Boulogne, and is received by the Countess and her daughter. — Fac-simile of a Miniature in the " Livre du tres-chevalereux Comte d' Artois et de sa Femme," Barrois Manuscript (Fifteenth Century). duties instilled into each youthful aspirant, it must be owned that the education received by the former was one calculated to make them in every way worthy of such homage. To fit ladies for the queenly part they were destined to play in the world of chivalry, they were taught from their child- hood to practise every virtue, to cherish every noble feeling, and generally CHIVALRY. to emulate the dignity demanded by the social privileges of their rank. They were profuse in their acts of kindness and civility to the knights, whether friends or strangers, who entered the gates of their castles (Figs. 122 and 123) ; on a knight's return from tournament or battle, they unbuckled Fig. 123. — Knight setting out for the War. — " II prist le dur congie de sa bonne et belle femme, en si grans pleurs et gemissemens qu'elle demoura toute pasmee " ("He said farewell to his good and beautiful wife with such tears and groans that she was ready to swoon "). — Fac- simile of a Miniature in the " Livre du tres-chevalereux Comte d' Artois et de sa Femme," Barrois Manuscript (Fifteenth Century). his armour with their own hands, they prepared perfumes and spotless linen for his wear, they clothed him in gala dress, in mantle and scarf that they had themselves embroidered, they prepared his bath, and waited on him at table. Destined to become the wives of these same knights who frequented CHIVALRY. 151 their homes, they did their utmost to bring themselves tinder their notice by their modest demeanour, and to make themselves beloved by the courtesy and the attentions which they lavished upon them. It was theirs to respond, with admiration and tenderness, to the boldness and to the bravery of the knights, who sought glory only to lay it at their mistresses' feet, and who asked for nothing better than to be subject to the gentle sway of beauty, grace, and virtue. It was thus, for instance, that in Provence, from the eleventh to the fourteenth century, the most powerful nobles humbly obeyed, in everything that concerned the heart, the decrees issued by the courts or tribunals of love, a kind of feminine areopagus which was held with great ceremony on certain days, and at which the ladies most distinguished by birth, beauty, intelligence, and knowledge, met to deliberate, publicly or with closed doors, with proper gravity and solemnity, on delicate questions of gallantry, which in those days were considered highly important. These courts of love, which appear to have been regular and permanent institutions in the twelfth century, had a special code, in accordance with which the sentences pro- nounced were more or less rigorously in conformity ; but this code has not been handed down to our day, and we only possess its outline conveyed in the commentaries of the legal writers of the fifteenth century. Causes in these courts were sometimes decided on written evidence, sometimes the parties themselves were allowed to appear in person. Among the celebrated women who at different epochs and in different places presided over these romantic assizes, may be cited the beautiful Eleanor of Aquitaine, Queen of France, and afterwards of England ; Sibyl of Anjou, who married Thierry, Count of Flanders ; the Countess of Die, surnamed the Sappho of France ; and the famous Laura or Lauretta of Sade, whom Petrarch, who chose her for the lady of his love, has immortalised in his verse. But to return to the esquire, who was left undergoing his laborious novitiate. When he had at last performed all its numerous requirements, the investiture of knighthood was conferred upon him, a symbolical cere- mony, as indeed were all that went to make up a chivalric ordination, but one of a more serious and solemn character than the rest. We have already said that this word ordination (ordene) implies that tie arming of a knight was a kind of sacred ceremony. A very curious poem entitled " L'Ordene de Chevalerie" is still in existence. Its author, Hugues CHIVALRY. de Tabarie or de Tiberiade, undertook the task of explaining all the forms of the investiture. In order to make his explanations more intelligible, Hugues de Tiberiade supposes himself before an aspirant entirely ignorant of all the usages of chivalry : he pretends that the Sultan Saladin, whose prisoner he is, has forced him to confer upon him the order of knighthood. The first thing Hugues does is to order him to comb his hair and beard, and to care- fully wash his face : — TEXT. Caviaus et barbe, et li viaire Li fist appareiller moult bel ; Ch'est droit a chevalier nouvel. Puis le fist en un baing entrer. Lors li commenche a demander Le soudan, que che senifie. TRANSLATION'. His hair, his beard, and his face He made him carefully arrange ; It is the duty of a new knight. Then he made him enter a bath. Then the sultan began to ask What all this signified. "Sire," answers Hugues, "like the babe that leaves the font cleansed from original sin, — Sire, tout ensement devez Issir, sanz nule vilounie De ce baing, car chevalerie Si doit baingnier en honeste, En courtoisie et en bonte Et fere amer a toutes gens." Sire, it is thus that you must Emerge without any stain From this bath ; for knighthood Must be clothed with honesty, With courtesy, and with goodness, And make itself beloved by all." " By the great God," says Saladin, " this is a wonderful beginning ! " " Now," answers Hugues, " leave the bath and recline on this great bed. It is an emblem of the one you will obtain in paradise, the bed of rest that God grants to his followers, the brave knights." Shortly after, whilst dress- ing him from head to foot, he says : " The snow-white linen shirt with which I am clothing you, and which touches your skin, is to teach you that you must keep your flesh from every stain if you wish to reach heaven. This crimson robe indicates — Que votre sane devez epandre Pour Dieu servir et hounorer ; Et pour def endre Sainte Eglise ; Car tout chou doit chevalier faire, S'il veust a Dieu de noient plaire ; Ch'est entendu par le vermeil. 1 That you must pour out your blood To serve and honour God ; And to defend the holy Church ; For all this must a knight do If he wishes entirely to please Grod ; Such is the meaning of the crimson. CHIVALRY. 153 " These trunk-hose of brown silk by their sombre hue are meant to remind you of — (TEXT.) (TRANSLATION.) " La mort, et la terre ou gisrez, " Death, and the earth where you will rest, Dont venistes, et oil irez. Whence you came and whither you will return ; A chou doivent garder votre ceil ; This is what you must keep before your eyes ; Si n'enkerret pas en orguel, Thus you will not fall into pride, Car orgueus no doit pas regner For pride should never govern En chevalier, ni demorer. A knight nor reign within him. A simpleche doit toujours tcndre. Humility should always be his aim. " This white girdle which I place around your loins is to teach you to keep your body pure and to avoid luxury. These two golden spurs are to urge on your horse ; imitate its ardour and its docility, and as it obeys you, so be you obedient to the Lord. Now I fasten your sword to your side ; strike your enemies with its double edge, prevent the poor from being crushed by the rich, the weak from being oppressed by the strong. I put upon your head a pure white coif to indicate that your soul similarly should be stainless." Every pursuivant was perfectly well acquainted with the meaning of the ordination of knighthood. The vigil of arms, the strict fasts, the three nights spent in prayer in a lonely chapel, the white garments of the neophyte, the consecration of his sword in front of the altar, were sufficient to prove to the novice the gravity of the engagement he was contracting under the auspices of religion. At last a day was fixed for the great ceremony, and the neophyte — after hearing mass on his bended knees, and with his sword, which he had not yet acquired the right to gird to his side, suspended from his neck — received from the hands of some noble or of some noble lady his spurs, his helmet, his cuirass, his gauntlets, and his sword. The ceremony was completed by the colee ; that is to say, the investing knight, before presenting him with the sword, struck him across the shoulder with its flat side, and then gave him the accolade as a sign of brotherly adoption. His shield, his lance, and his charger, were then brought to the new-made knight, and he was thenceforward at liberty to commence the career of glory, of devotion, and of combat, to which for so many years he had aspired, The Christian symbolism, which had accompanied the first steps of the novice, followed and surrounded him in some way or other during the whole x '54- CHIVALRY. of his knightly career. Indeed, it took part in his punishment and degra- dation if he broke his plighted faith or if he forfeited his honour. Exposed on a scaffold in nothing but his shirt, he was stripped of his armour, which Fig. 124. — Degradation of a Knight. — Fragment of a Woodcut attributed to Jost Amman, bearing the date 1565 and the monogram A. J. (Collection of M. Guenebault of Paris). was broken to pieces before his eyes and thrown at his feet, while his spurs were thrown upon a dunghill. His shield was fastened to the croup of a cart- horse and dragged through the dust, and his charger's tail was cut off'. A CHIVALRY. 155 herald-at-arms asked thrice, " Who is there?" Three times an answer was given naming the knight about to be degraded, and three times the herald rejoined, " No, it is not so ; I see no knight here, I see only a coward who has been false to his plighted faith." Carried thence to the church on a litter like a dead body, the culprit was forced to listen while the burial service was read over him, for he had lost his honour, and was now only looked upon as a corpse (Fig. 124). Although the Church was the protectress of chivalry, and even invested it with an almost sacred dignity, she always refused to extend her protection to tournaments, tilts, and assaults of arms, brilliant, but often dangerous manifestations of the chivalric spirit, and particularly to judicial duels, which were of German origin, and which dated from a period long prior to the institution of Christian chivalry. When the Church found itself obliged to show indulgence to these ancient traditions, which custom had interwoven with the habits of the Middle Ages, she did so in as reserved a manner as possible. She was always indignantly protesting against the barbarous custom which compelled or allowed women, children, churches, and convents, to choose from among the knights a special champion (campeador) who should be always ready to sustain against all the patron's cause. The Church, while approving the generous protection which chivalry extended to the weak and to the oppressed, always endeavoured to destroy the savage doctrine of paganism which confounded might with right; but it was in vain that she opposed all her influence and authority to the custom of duelling ; she was obliged to restrict herself to lessening the evil effects of the opinions that generally prevailed, without hoping to destroy the opinions themselves. The point of honour had no existence in the breasts of the warriors of antiquity. They sacrificed themselves to their country and to the common- wealth, and they loved glory — a sentiment which with them was collective and not individual, for with them society, as a whole, was everything, its unit, nothing. The modern duel, whether it be considered a brutal and speedy method of settling private quarrels, or a proper act of submission to the divine will which cannot fail to crown right with success, springs from the strong individuality of barbarism, and from the personal tendency of savage dignity and independence. This strange confusion of ideas relative to victory and innocence, to might 156 CHIVALRY. and right, first gave rise to trial by ordeal, or the judgment of God, which included ordeal by fire, by boiling water, by the cross, and by the sword, to which women, and even princesses, were subjected. Mankind, in the sim- plicity of its belief, appealed to God, the sovereign judge, and implored Him to grant strength and victory to the just cause. J^rial by ordeal fell Jjato discredit about the time of Charlemagne, and was superseded, towards__flie er halt ot the twelfth century, by the judicial duel. The institution of Fig. 125. — Fight between Raymbault de Morueil and Guyon de Losenne. The Abbot of St. Denis at the feet of the Archbishop of Paris, taking oath that his cause, defended by Raymbault, is a just one. — Fac-simile of a Miniature in the "Romance of Charles Martel," enlarged by David Aubert. Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century, in the Burgundian Library, Brussels. chivalry favoured this hasty method of decision, which was in accordance with the manners and ideas of the period. Questions which otherwise would have been difficult to solve were thus abruptly settled, and from these bloody decisions there was no appeal. In some countries, indeed, the judge who had decided between two antagonists had himself to submit to the judgment of God, as represented by the judicial duel, and was forced to come down from his judgment-seat and contend in arms against the criminal he had just CHIVALRY. '57 condemned. On the other hand, however, it must be said that the judge, in his turn, possessed the privilege of challenging a prisoner who refused to bow to his decision. If the principle of this rough combatant justice be once admitted, it must be acknowledged that a spirit of wisdom dictated every possible precaution to render its inconveniences as few as possible. The duel, in fact, only took place when a crime punishable by death had been committed, and then only 1 when there were no witnesses to the crime, but merely grave suspicions Fig. 126. — Duel concerning the Honour of Ladies. — Fac-simile of a Miniature in the "Histoire de Gerard de Nevers," a Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century, in the National Lihrary of Paris. against the supposed criminal. All persons less than twenty-one or more than sixty years of age, priests (Fig. 125), invalids, and women (Fig. 126), were dispensed from taking part in these combats, and were allowed to be represented by champions. If the two parties to a dispute were of a different rank in life, certain regulations were drawn up in favour of the plaintiff. A knight who challenged a serf was forced to fight with a serf's weapons, that is to say, with a shield and a staff, and to wear a leathern jerkin ; if, on the contrary, the challenge came from the serf, the knight 158 CHIVALRY. was allowed to fight as a knight, that is to say, on horseback and in armour. It was customary for the two parties to a judicial duel to appear before their count or lord ; after reciting his wrongs, the plaintiff threw down his gage — generally a glove or gauntlet — which his adversary then exchanged for his own as a sign that he accepted the challenge. Both were then led to the seignorial prison, where they were detained till the day fixed for the combat, unless they could obtain substantial sureties who would make themselves Fig. 127. — "How the plaintiff and the defendant take the nnal oath before the judge." — Fac-simile of a Miniature in " Ceremonies des Gages de Bataille," a Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century in the National Library of Paris. responsible for their safe custody, and bind themselves, in case their bailee failed to appear at the appointed time, to undergo the penalties attached to the committal of the act that had necessitated the appeal to arms. This was termed the vive prison. On the day fixed for the combat, the two adversaries, accompanied by their seconds and by a priest, appeared in the lists mounted and armed at all points, their weapons in their hands, their swords and daggers girded on. They knelt down opposite to one another with their hands clasped, each in his CHIVALRY. '59 turn solemnly swearing upon the cross and upon Holy Writ (Fig. 127) that he alone was in the right, and that his antagonist was false and disloyal ; and he added, moreover, that he carried no charm or talisman about his person. A her aid- at- arms then gave public notice at each of the four corners of the lists to the spectators of the combat to remain perfectly passive, to make no movement, and to utter no cry that could either encourage or annoy the com- Fig. 128. — " How both parties are out of their tents, armed and ready to do their duty at the signa from the marshal, who has thrown the glove."— From a Miniature in^the " Ceremonies des Gages de Bataille," a Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century, in the National Library of Paris. batants, under pain of losing a limb, or even life itself. The seconds then withdrew, and the camp-marshal, after seeing that both antagonists were fairly placed, and had their proper share of the wind and the sun, called out three times, " Laissez-les alter!" and the fight began (Fig. 128). The judicial duel never commenced before noon, and was only allowed to last till the stars appeared in the sky. If the defendant held out till 1 60 CHIVALRY. then he was considered to have gained his cause. The knight who was beaten, whether killed or merely wounded, was dragged off the ground by his feet, the fastenings of his cuirass were cut, his armour was thrown piece by piece into the lists, and his steed and his weapons were divided between the marshal and the judges of the duel. Indeed sometimes, as, for instance, in Normandy and in Scandinavia, according to ancient usage, the vanquished champion was hung or burnt alive, according to the nature of the crime ; while if he had fought as the champion of another person, that person was usually put to death with him. The Church, although she allowed a priest to be present in the lists, never even granted a tacit approval to these judicial duels ; she excommunicated the successful duellist, and refused the rites of burial to his victim ; nor was she alone in condemning this barbarous custom; the lay authorities did all in their power, but without very much success, to restrict the number of these sanguinary appeals. St. Louis, in a celebrated decree of 1260, sub- stituted trial by evidence in place of the judicial duel, but he found himself only able to enforce this reform within the area of his own dominions, and imperfectly even there, for long after his reign it is on record that the Parliament of Paris ordered certain criminal cases to be decided by personal combat. When at last, in the fifteenth century, the custom of the judicial duel fell into disuse, the nobility still retained and practised single combat (Fig. 129). A personal affront, often an extremely slight one, a quarrel, a slight to be avenged, were enough to bring two rivals or two enemies to blows. This combative custom, which made a man's strength and personal "skill the guardians of his honour, was sustained and encouraged by the spirit of chivalry and by that of German feudalism. Sometimes, however, the practice was considered justifiable on other grounds. History, for instance, has honourably recorded the " Battle of the Thirty," which took place in 1351, between thirty knights of Brittany, under the Sire de Beau- manoir, and thirty English knights ; and another equally bloody struggle of the same kind between Bayard and ten other French knights, and eleven Spaniards, before the walls of Tranni. The national honour alone was the motive of these two celebrated duels ; but they were only the exceptions to the rule. It almost seems as if the nobility, in their efforts to cling to the shadow and the memory of the rapidly- expiring traditions of chivalry, CHIVALRY. 161 became more inveterate in their adherence to the cruel system of duelling. In the sixteenth century, under the last monarchs of the house of Valois, the Place Eoyale and the Pre aux Clercs were often watered with the blood of the best families of France. In vain did Henry IY. and Louis XIII. issue Y 162 CHIVALRY. the most stringent edicts against this barbarous custom ; in vain did the decree, called the decree of Blois, render nugatory all letters of pardon granted to duellists, " even if they were signed by the king himself." In spite of everything, the nobles, upon whose privileges the monarchy daily made fresh encroachments, had recourse to duelling as if to assert their connection with a chivalric and adventurous past, and the most trivial, ridiculous, and shameful motives served as pretexts for a renewal of the sanguinary struggles, which had been originally inspired by a generous courage and a loyal sympathy with justice. But we must go back to the time of the zenith of the Middle Ages to see its tournaments, its tilts, and its passages of arms. In the halcyon period of chivalry, its sham fights, its courteous tournaments, and its war- like exhibitions, occasioned many an accident, and brought about many a fatal result. History mentions a tournament in Germany where sixty persons perished in a stru^le waq-ed with weapons deprived of edge and point. No question of mere gallantry, no point of honour, was involved mtKe oldest tournaments on record (the tournament was first alluded to in the chronicles ofthe reign of Charles the Bald) ; no pomp of drapery, brilliancy of banner, adorned them then. No princesses, no noble ladies, no showed themselves in all their pride of beauty and of dress around those ancient lists. The tournament (in old French totimAWHWiit] of LluMi days was merely a violent athletic pastime, in which the iron men of that period measured their strength one against tne other witn sword strokes, with lance thrusts, and witn mace blovVy. Dud as lliy Customs oi'ch i valry gradually softened the manners of the nobility, so the primitive coarse- ness and roughness of these trials of strength became modified and regu- lated. ' Tradition declares that the tournament properly so called was first inaugurated in Brittany in the tenth century by Geoffrey, the Sire de Preuilli. As a rule, tournaments were proclaimed, that is to say published, a cor et a cri (Figs. 130 and 131), either when a promotion of knights, or a royal marriage, or a solemn entry of a sovereign into a town took place ; and the character of these chivalrous festivals changed according to the time and' place at and in which they occurred. The arms used on these occasions varied in a similar manner. In France, the tournament lance was made of the lightest and straightest wood, either fir, aspen, or sycamore, pointed with CHIVALRY. steel, and with a pennant floating from the end ; whilst in Germany and in Scotland they were made of the heaviest and toughest wood, with a long iron pear-shaped point. The tournament must not be confounded with the r Fig. 130. — " Here is shown how the king-at-arms, having on his shoulder the gold cloth with the two leaders painted on parchment, and in the four corners the arms of the said judges, proclaims the tournament, and how the heralds offer the arms of the said judges to whoever will take them." — Fac-simile of a Miniature in the " Tournaments of King Rene," a Manu- script of the Fifteenth Century in the National Library at Paris. tilt or joust (from the Latin juxta), which was a single hand-to-hand combat, nor with the passage of arms, in which several combatants, both on foot and on horseback, were engaged, and imitated the attack and defence of some military position, some pass, or some narrow mountainous defile. Tilts CHIVALRY. usually formed part of a tournament, and marked its close ; but there were also more complicated tilts, open to all comers, which lasted for several days, and were termed joutes plenieres. As the ladies were the life and soul of these tilts, the Jmiffhts always terminated the proceedings by a special passage of arms which was termed the lance des dames ; they were always ready to pay Fig. 131. — " Here is portrayed a herald holding the banners of the four referees." — Fac-simile of a Miniature in the " Tournaments of King Rene " (Fifteenth Century). this homage to the charms of the fair sex, and frequently fought for them dagger. The preparations for a tournament afforded an animated and interesting picture. The lists, which at first were of a round shape like the amphi- theatres of antiquity, were later constructed in a square, and later still in an oblong form ; they were gilded, painted with emblems and heraldic devices, and ornamented with rich hangings and historical tapestries. While the lists were being prepared, the knights who were to take part in the tourna- CHIVALRY. 16; ment, as well as those who were to be only its spectators, had their armorial banners hung up from the windows of the houses in which they were putting up, and affixed their coats of arms to the outer walls of the neighbouring castles, monasteries, and cloisters. When this was done, the nobles and the ladies went round and inspected them (Fig. 132) ; a herald or a pursuivant-at-arms named their owners, and if a lady recognised any knight against whom she had any ground of complaint, she touched his banner or his shield, in order to bring him under the notice of the camp judges, and if, after an inquiry, he was found guilty, he was forbidden to appear in the tournament. Coats of arms, which were striking characteristics of chivalry, and which were adopted by the nobility as one of its most striking attributes, had no doubt a contemporaneous origin with the institution whose emblem it became. It is supposed to have been in the eleventh century, at the time of the First Crusade, that the necessity of distinguishing between the mul- titude of nobles and knights who flocked to the Holy Land led to the invention of the different heraldic colours and devices. Each Crusader chose and kept his own particular emblem ; these emblems became the external marks of nobility, and were to be seen everywhere — on the war tents, on the banners, on the liveries, on the clothes, and on every object belonging to a noble family. Hence the language of heraldry, that figura- tive and hieroglyphic jargon, incomprehensible to everybody at that period except to professional heralds-at-arms. On the eve of the tournament the youthful esquires practised among themselves in the lists with less weighty and less dangerous weapons than those wielded by the knights. These preludes, which were often graced by the presence of the ladies, were termed eprouves (trials), vepres du tournoi (tournament vespers), or escremie (fencing bouts). The esquires who dis- tinguished themselves the most in these trials were frequently immediately admitted to the rank of knighthood, and allowed to take part in the ensuing feats. Like the Olympic games of Greece, tournaments, which were real popular solemnities, excited the ambition and quickened the pulses of all. Stands, usually roofed and closed in, were erected at the ends of the lists to afford shelter to persons of distinction in the event of bad weather. These stands, sometimes built tower-shape, were divided into boxes, and more or less magnificently decorated with tapestry, hangings, pennants, shields of i66 CHIVALRT. arms, and banners. Kings, queens, princes, dames, damoiselles, and the older knights, the natural judges of the combats in which they could no longer take a personal share, stationed themselves there. The camp Fig. 133. — The Champion of the Tournament, from the Collection entitled " Vita Imperatoris Maximiliani," engraved by Burgmayer from drawings by Albert Diirer (Fifteenth Century). marshals and the seconds or counsellors of the knights, whose duty it \vas to enforce the laws of Christian chivalry, and to give their advice and assistance to all who might require it, had also their respective posts. The kings-at-arms, the heralds, and pursuivants-at-arms, stood within the arena or just without it, and were expected to narrowly observe the combatants, CHIVALRY. 167 and to draw up a faithful and minute report of the different incidents of the combat, without forgetting a single blow. Every now and then they lifted up their voices to encourage the younger knights who were making their first appearance in the lists : " Recollect whose son you are ! be worthy of your ancestry ! " they cried, in loud tones. Besides these, varlets and sergeants, who were specially entrusted with the duty of keeping order, of picking up and replacing broken weapons, and of raising unhorsed knights, were posted everywhere in and about the lists ; while musicians on separate stands held themselves ready to celebrate with noisy flourishes every great feat of arms and every fortunate and brilliant stroke. The sound of their clarions announced the entry of the knights into the lists, stepping with slow and solemn cadence, magnificently armed and equipped, and followed by their esquires on horseback. Sometimes the ladies were the first to enter the lists, leading in by golden or silver chains the knights, their slaves, whom they only set at liberty when the signal was given for the combat to commence. The ladies almost always bestowed a favour on their favourite knight or servitor, generally a scarf, a veil, a head-dress, a mantle, a bracelet, or even a plain bow of ribbon, which had formed part of their own dress. This was termed an enseigne or nobloy (distinguishing mark), and was placed on a knight's shield, lance, or helmet, so that his lady might be able to recognise him in the melee, particularly when his weapons were broken, or when he had lost some essential portion of his armour. WhilQ f^Q lasted thr hrnlrt'j nttm*H Iniid nn'pa of encouragement, and the^musicians so4mded loud flourishesf at each dpm'ai'vft blow nf lance or sword ; and between each tilt the nobles and the ladies distributed a quantity of small coins amongst the crowd, who received it with loud and joyous cries of largesse ! and noel ! The combat being uver, and the victor being declared according to the reports of the heralds and pursuivants, the prize was given away with all proper solemnity by the elder knights and sometimes by the ladies (Fig. 134). The latter conducted the conqueror with great pomp and triumph to the splendid banquet which followed the tournament. The place of honour occupied by the successful knight, the resplendent clothes in which he was dressed, the kiss that he had the privilege of giving to the most beautiful ladies, the poems and the songs in which his prowess was celebrated, were the last items in this knightly pageant, which 168 CHIVALRY. was generally accompanied by blood sherf._jrnd fmqnPTif.ly by the death OBMT^oTits actors. As we have already stated, the usages of the tournament often varied ; nothing, for example, could be more unlike the warlike sports of Germany in the thirteenth century, as related in the Fig. 134.— The Prize of the Tournament.— From a Looking- End of the Thirteenth Century. Lid in Carved Ivory. " Niebelungen," nothing could be more unlike those sanguinary and ferocious struggles, than the Provencal and Sicilian tournaments of the fifteenth century, described in such glowing language by good King Rene in the magnificent manuscript which he spent his leisure in illuminating with miniatures. This poet-king, refined in manners, generous in disposition, and cultivated in his tastes, attempted, under the influence of the romantic and CHIVALRY. 169 religious charm which still pervaded the chivalric sports of this epoch, to perpetuate with pen and pencil, in prose and in verse, the memory of a magnificent festival over which he presided, and which may be considered an unsurpassed example of the ceremonies of the time. All who take an interest in the subject should read this curious manuscript, which describes among other things the famous struggle between the Duke of Brittany and the Duke of Bourbon. In this may be found related to its smallest details the whole ceremony of a grand tournament, its forms, its progress, Fig. 135. — King Henri II. wounded by Montgomery in a Tournament (1559).— From an Engraving of the Sixteenth Century in the possession of M. Ambr. Firmin-Didot. and its incidents ; in it appear careful comments upon every trifle that increased the brilliancy or added to the effect of this courtly festival, as well as everything that threw a light upon the spirit in which it was carried out, or the usages that regulated every detail, from the armour of the knights to the smallest incidents of the ceremonial. In its pages illustrations reproduce with exact truthfulness the helmets of the knights with barred vizors and leathern shields, their maces, their swords, and their hourts, intended to protect the croup and the hind legs of their chargers (Fig. 136). Its text, written with great care and in an elegant hand, records the rules z J7° CHIVALRY. to be observed, in accordance with knighthood's truest spirit, at the different stages of the combat and the tournament, and minutely describes all their preliminaries and accessories, the giving and the accepting of a challenge, Fig. 130. — " Designs of armour for the head, the body, and the arms, helmets and streamers (called in Flanders and Brabant hacheures or hachements), coats- of -arms, and swords for tournaments." — From Miniatures in the "Tournaments of King Kene " (Fifteenth Century). the mutual exchange of gages, the presentation of warrants of nobility by the kings-at-arms, the distribution of the coats-of-arms or insignia of the two parties to the strife, the entry of the nobles, and the bestowal of the prizes upon the conquerors by the queen of the tournament. CHIVALRY. 17 j King Rene's book is a document all the more valuable to an historian of the customs of chivalry, in that it was written at an epoch when they still existed in all their splendour ; although signs of their decadence had already showed themselves. That punctilious sovereign, Philippe le Bel, with his court of lawyers and usurers, had already dealt chivalry a crushing blow by the regulations he drew up for the better government of single combats and gages of battle. Between his reign and that of Charles VII. this decadence became more marked. Commerce had made much progress, the wealth of the middle classes had much increased, and the monarchy had acquired a preponderating influence, to the detriment both of feudalism and chivalry, which began simultaneously to decline ; the reign of Louis XI., a reign of espionage and of cunning, was fatal to them — thenceforward their little remaining prestige rapidly waned and soon entirely expired. Francois I. made several fruitless attempts to rekindle the dying embers of chivalry, and, at a later period, Henri IV. and Louis XIV. vainly essayed, with many brilliant pageantries and passages of arms, to quicken once more the phantom of the noble institution which came into existence with the Middle Ages, and with them passed away. MILITAEY OEDERS. Pierre Gerard founds the Order of St. John of Jerusalem. — History of that Order.— The Siege of Rhodes.— History of the Order of the Knights Templars. — Order of the Knights of Calatrava. — Order of the Teuton Knights. — Order of the Knights of the Golden Fleece. — Order of St. Maurice and St. Lazarus. — Orders of the Star, of the Cosse de Geneste, of the Ship, of St. Michael, and of the Holy Ghost. NE of our great modern historians remarks : — " The association of the Church and chivalry, of war and religion, culminated in the founda- tion of an institution hitherto en- tirely unknown, and owing its origin principally to the Crusades, namely, the institution of religious military orders " In nothing does chivalry show itself more worthy of admiration than in its religious military aspect ; in that phase it accepted the sacrifice of all the affections, it abandoned the renown of the soldier and the repose of the cloister, and it exposed its votary to the hardships of both, by devoting him in turn to the perils of the battle-field, and to the labours attendant upon the succouring of the distressed. Other knights courted adventure for the sake of their honour and the lady of their love ; these incurred it in order to help the unfortunate and to assist the poor. The Grand Master of the Knights Hospitallers was proud of the title of Guardian of the Redeemer's poor ; he of the order of St. Lazarus was of necessity always a leper; while the knight-companions termed the poor 'our masters.' Such were the admirable effects of religion, which, at a period when the sword decided every question, knew how to chasten the MILITARY ORDERS. 73 failings of valour, and make it forget the pride that generally accom- panies it." As early as the middle of the eleventh century some merchants of Amalfi had obtained from the Caliph of Egypt permission to build a hospital at Jerusalem, which they dedicated to St. John, and in which were received and sheltered the poor pilgrims who visited the Holy Land. Godefroy de Bouillon and his successors encouraged this charitable institution, and bestowed upon it several large donations. Pierre Gerard, a native of the Fig. 137.— Knight of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre, afterwards called the Order of St. John of Jerusalem. Fig. 138.— Knight of the Order of Khodes. Fac-similes of- Woodcuts by Jost Amman, in a work entitled " Cleri totius Romance ecclesiao . . . habitus : " 4to., Frankfort, 1585. Island of Martigues, in Provence, proposed to the brothers who managed the hospital to renounce the world, to don a regular dress, and to form an uncloistered monastic order under the name of the Hospitallers. Pope Pascal II. appointed Gerard director of the new institution, which he formally authorised, took the Hospitallers under his protection, and granted them many privileges. The regulations of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem not only '74 MILITARY ORDERS. imposed upon the brethren the triple vow of chastity, poverty, and obedience ; they enjoined upon them, besides the duties of hospitality, the exercise of arms, in order that they might defend the kingdom of Jerusalem against the attacks of the unbelievers. The opportunity was soon afforded them of putting aside their purely charitable character, and of becoming men of war (Fig. 139), Fig. 139. — Fortress of the Knights Hospitallers, in Syria, taken from the Kurds by the Franks about the year 1125, and rebuilt in 1202 A representation of it as restored.— Engraving from " Monuments of the Architecture of the Crusaders in Syria," by M. G. liey. Driven out of Jerusalem by the victorious Saladin, who retook that city on the 19th of October, 1191, the Hospitallers were the last to leave the Holy Land, and transferred their hospital to Margat, after ransoming from the Saracens more than a thousand captive Crusaders ; they remained there until the end of the siege of Acre by the Christians, in which . they took an active and glorious share, and they then established themselves in the reconquered city and took the name of Knights of St. John of Acre. Again driven from their new residence by the infidels, the Hospitallers asked the MILITARY ORDERS. 175 King of Cyprus to allow them to settle in his dominion, and to re-establish the central house of their order in the town of Limisso, at which they arrived in small knots, as fast as they were able to escape from the cruisers of the Mussulman fleet. As they disembarked, exhausted with war's fatigues, covered with wounds, and unable to console themselves for having survived the loss of Palestine, they presented a really touching spectacle. The grand master of the knights of St. John of Acre, Jean de Yilliers, assembled a chapter general in Cyprus to deliberate upon the best policy to adopt after the last disasters of the crusade, and to take measures to prevent the complete extinction of the order, which had been decimated in the war against the infidels. The Hospitallers of all nations answered the appeal of Jean de Villiers. Never had a meeting been so numerously attended since the foundation of the order ; the knights present, carried away by the eloquent appeal of their grand master, swore that they would shed their last blood to recover possession of the Holy Sepulchre. In spite of the wise measures recommended by Jean de Yilliers, the Hospitallers were no longer in safety at Limisso. They had to defend them- selves from two equally formidable enemies ; from the Saracens, who were ceaselessly threatening their naval and military organization, and from the King of Cyprus, who seemed to desire the ruin of the order, upon which he had just imposed a heavy tax. Indeed, Villaret, the new grand master, pro- posed to his brothers in arms that they should retire to the island of Rhodes, entrench themselves there, and wait until a more propitious moment should arrive for their return to Palestine. Unfortunately the forces of the order of St. John were not sufficient for such a daring enterprise, and the grand master invited the Western Christians to undertake a new crusade, keeping the real motive of the expedition a secret. The Crusaders assembled in great numbers at the port of Brindisi, in Italy, and the grand master, selecting the noblest and the best equipped, set sail for Rhodes. There he successfully disembarked his little army, with provisions and warlike materials, and laid siege to the capital, which was well fortified and thronged with defenders. After an investment of four years the town was taken by assault ; the other strongholds met with a similar fate, and the whole island passed under the sway of the Hospitallers in 1310. But for more than two centuries they had to defend it against the constant attacks of the infidels. Under the leadership of Joubert or Jacques de Milly, the grand prior of 176 MILITARY ORDERS. Auvergne, the Knights of Rhodes (the Hospitallers had assumed this name in memory of a victory that so redounded to the fame of the Order of St. John) inflicted a first repulse upon the Ottomans in 1455. All danger, however, was not banished. A rupture seemed imminent with the Sultan of Egypt, quite as formidable an adversary as Mahomet II., the Sultan of Constan- tinople ; and the knights were also obliged to bestir themselves against the Venetians, who had effected a landing on the island, and had been guilty of greater cruelty and violence than the Saracens and the Turks. Raymond Zacosta, the successor of Jacques de Milly in the grand mastership, took advantage of an interval of truce to build a new fort intended to defend the town and port of Rhodes. This impregnable fortress, constructed upon a rocky promontory, received the name of St. Nicholas, from a chapel dedicated to that saint standing within its walls (Fig. 140). As, in spite of the truce, the Turkish corsairs made continual descents upon the island, the grand master dispatched his galleys to the Ottoman shores, and inflicted a series of reprisals. These so aroused the anger of Mahomet II., that he swore to drive the knights of Rhodes right out of the island. "With this purpose he organized an expedition, and entrusted its command to Misach Paleologus, a Greek renegade of the imperial household, who had been appointed grand vizier by the sultan, and who was continually urging his master to take possession of Rhodes. A hundred and sixty vessels of war and an army of a hundred thousand men arrived off Rhodes on the 23rd of May, 1480. The Turkish fleet endeavoured, under cover of the fire of their artillery, to effect the disembar- cation of their troops, while the knights of the order, supported by the guns of the town and its forts, waded up to their waists in the sea and attacked the Ottoman boats sword in hand. The infidels at last succeeded in making good their landing, and en- trenched themselves on Mount St. Stephen. After the knights had been vainly summoned to surrender, a German engineer who had accompanied Paleologus, and who was the superintendent of the siege operations, advised the latter to concentrate his attack on the tower of St. Nicholas, the capture of which would be certain to make him master of the place*. After more than three hundred discharges of cannon a breach was effected, and the Turks rushed to the assault. Pierre d'Aubusson, grand prior of Auvergne, recently elected grand master, stood aloft in the breach and set an example MILITARY ORDERS. 177 of the highest courage to his knights : " Here," said he, " is the only post of honour worthy of your grand master." Exasperated by such an energetic resistance, the vizier determined to rid himself by foul means of Pierre d'Aubusson ; but an engineer who had undertaken the treacherous commission was detected, and torn in pieces by the inhabitants of Rhodes on his way to the scaffold. Misach Paleologus proposed to hold a conference to discuss terms of capitulation. To this the grand master gave his consent, his real object being to gain time to construct new defences in place of those the enemy had destroyed ; and the interview, between one of the principal officers of the Turkish army and the castellan of Rhodes, took place at the edge of the moat. The vizier's envoy urged that in the extremity to which the town was reduced, with its walls levelled, its towers shattered, and its ditches filled up, it would be perfectly possible to take it by assault in a couple of hours ; and that it behoved the knights companions to prevent, by an honourable capitulation, a general massacre of the inhabitants. D'Aubusson, concealed hard by, overheard these specious proposals : in pursuance of his orders the castellan made answer to the Ottoman officer that his spies had misinformed him ; that, behind the moat, defences had been constructed, the capture of which would cost many lives ; that the town was defended by Christians all animated with the same spirit and perfectly resigned to sacrifice their lives for their religion ; and that the order would entertain no proposal inimical to its honour or to the interests of its faith. The haughty vizier, irritated by this noble reply, swore to put every knight to the sword ; he even ordered a large number of stakes to be sharpened on which to impale the inhabitants, and, under cover of a still hotter fire from his guns, gave the signal for the assault. The Turks succeeded for a moment in planting their standard on the ramparts, but they were soon beaten off by the defenders, led by their grand master in person : five times wounded, and covered with blood, Pierre d'Aubusson refused to leave the scene of the struggle, which he animated by his example. His lofty heroism infused new energy into his knights, who rushed on the Turks with the courage of despair and put them completely to the rout. But victory as it was, it was not sufficiently definitive or decisive to secure to the order the tranquil possession of the island, and leave them for the future free from Turkish aggression. Ever since the death of A A i78 MILITARY ORDERS. Mahomet II., they had had in their power a precious hostage, Zizim, a brother of Sultan Bajazet, and his most formidable competitor for the throne (Figs. 141 and 142). In 1522, Sultan Soliman II., surnamed the Magnificent, discovered amidst his father's archives an exact account of the island of Rhodes, and resolved to attack it. He put forward, as a pretext, a desire to punish Fig. 141. — Death of Mahomet II. (1481) : the Fig. 142. — Zizim, who had been kept a prisoner devil flying away with his soul. — Hi a two at Ehodes, to which he had fled after his sons, Bajazet and Zizim, disputed the throne, defeat, and had afterwards been transferred and the latter was defeated. to Rome, is handed over to Charles VJIL, King of France. « Description of the Siege of the Island of Rhodes," by G. Caoursin (Ulm, 1496 : Gothic folio).— Library of M. Ambr. Firmin-Didot. the knights of the order for the losses they were daily inflicting on the Turkish navy, and the hope of paralyzing their efforts in favour of the Holy Land. The treachery of Andre Amaral, the chancellor of the order and the grand prior of Castile, who wished to revenge himself on his brother knights for having preferred to himself as their grand master, Philippe de MILITARY ORDERS. 179 Yilliers de Tile- Adam, made Soliman aware of the scanty material resources of the island, and persuaded him to undertake the fatal siege, in which treachery and deceit were his most powerful allies. In vain did he collect a fleet of four hundred sail, an army of one hundred and forty thousand men and sixty thousand pioneers ; in vain he swept the ramparts with the fire of his guns, in vain he dug ditch after ditch, mine upon mine, and endeavoured to wear out the besieged by his harassing and ceaseless attacks. His want of success would have certainly exhausted his patience, and he would probably have raised the siege had not the traitor Amaral revealed to him the weak condition of both the town and its garrison. At last, however, on the 30th of November, the Turks made what was supposed to be their final effort. They pene- trated as far as the inner defences, and the struggle was a terrible one. Roused by the tocsin, the grand master, the knights, and the inhabitants poured on to the ramparts and threw themselves on the enemy, who had already deemed themselves successful, and forced them to retreat. Grieved and discouraged by this final check, Soliman proposed a capitu- lation. He threw letters into the town exhorting the inhabitants to yield, and threatening them with the utmost severities if they persisted in a useless resistance. At first Villiers de Tile- Adam made answer that he only treated with infidels sword in hand ; but he had to give way to the urgent remonstrances of the principal inhabitants, who showed a determination to take at all hazards measures to ensure the honour and the lives of their wives and their children. The sultan having hung out a white flag, the grand master did the same, and demanded a truce of three days to draw up the capitulation. But Soliman, fearing lest assistance might arrive in the interval, rejected this proposal, and ordered a fresh assault. The knights of Rhodes, reduced to a mere handful, and having only the barbican of the Spanish bastion left to protect them, obliged the enemy once more to retire. On the morrow, however, another attack of the Turks drove the defenders of the bastion back into the town, and the terror-stricken inhabitants implored the grand master to resume negotiations. Achmet, Soliman's minister, who knew how impatiently his master desired the end of the war, obtained at last the surrender of Rhodes on terms so honourable and so advantageous to its defenders, that they spoke volumes for the esteem with which the conquered had inspired their conquerors. The knights, to the number of four thousand, abandoned the island under the guidance of their i8o MILITARY ORDERS. grand master, Yilliers; after touching at Candia and Sicily, they finally settled at Malta, which was ceded to them by Charles V., and which became the definitive residence of the order. This was in 1530. Thirty -five years later, at the end of Soliman II/s reign, the Turks once more attacked the order under the pretext of avenging the capture of a galliot laden with costly merchandise, the property of the sultana ; and Mustapha, Pasha of Buda, a brave officer, the general of the Ottoman army, landed on the island on the 18th of May, 1565. After a few skirmishes the Fig. 143. — Barracks of the Knights of Ehodes. State of the Ruins in 1828. — From " Monuments of Rhodes." Turks made a fierce attack on Fort St. Elmo, and captured it in spite of the brave defence of the Knights of Malta (the new title of the members of the Order of Str John of Jerusalem) — a defence which lasted twenty-four days, and cost the lives of four thousand of the assailants, amongst them that of the famous pirate Dragut, the vice -sultan of Tripoli. The fort of St. Michael, and the suburb of that name, were reduced to ashes by the fire of the enemy ; and it was only the invincible courage of the grand master, Jean de la Valette, and of a small number of his knights, all to the last man prepared to die for their faith — even after more than two thousand of them had already perished — that still enabled Malta to hold out. MILITARY ORDERS. 181 Fortunately, Don Garcias de Toledo, the viceroy of Sicily, came with sixty galleys to their assistance. During the four months of the siege the Turkish forces fired seventy- eight thousand rounds of artillery, and lost fifteen thousand soldiers and eight thousand sailors. The knights of the order had on their side to deplore the loss of more than three thousand of their brethren. Their grand master decreed that Fig. 144.— The French Priory at Rhodes (Fifteenth Century).— State of the Ruins in 1828. annually, on the eve of the festival of Our Lady of September, prayers should be offered up in all the churches of the order, thanking God for the providential succours which had delivered the besieged, and that on the preceding day a commemorative service should be celebrated in honour of those who had fallen in defence of the faith. Henceforward neither the town nor the island, which remained the head quarters of the order, was again disturbed by the Turks, and Jean de la Valette built a new city in Malta, which was called Valetta, after him. i8z MILITARY ORDERS. The members of the Order of Malta were divided into three classes : the knights, the chaplains, and the serving brothers. The first comprised those whose noble birth and previous rank in other armies marked them out for military service. The second consisted of priests, and ecclesiastics who performed all the ordinary religious duties, and who acted as almoners in time of war. The last were neither nobles nor ecclesiastics ; and all that was necessary to admit an individual to this class, was for him to prove that he was born of respectable parents, who had never exercised any handicraft. The serving brothers were distinguished at a later period by a coat-of-arms of a different colour to that of the knights. The aspirants were termed douats or demi-croix. The Order of St. John of Jerusalem had merely a nominal existence in the statutes of the Order of Malta, although the knights of the latter, on their reception into the order, were still termed "servants of the sick and needy." For a long time there existed in Spain, Lady Hospi- tallers of St. John of Jerusalem, who devoted themselves to hospital work and deeds of charity (Fig. 145). Every country in Europe furnished its quota to the Order of Malta, which had entirely replaced that of St. John, and Fig. 145.— Tomb of Beatrix Cornel, was divided into eight different tongues or Prioress of the Lady Hospitallers nati0ns, each under the direction of a grand of St. John of Jerusalem, in the Convent of Sigena, in Aragon Prior> Y1Z- Provence, Auvergne, France, Italy, (Fifteenth Century).— From the Aragon, Germany, Castile, and England. " Iconografia Espanola " of M. ry,-, . . •, -, -. These national grand priors were termed piliers, or monastic bailiff's. Each nation was subdivided into a number of lesser commands, to hold one of which was equivalent to holding an ecclesiastical benefice, and which were subordinate to their grand prior alone. The regular dress of the order consisted, in each nation, of a black robe, with a pointed cape of the same colour ; on the left sleeve of each robe was MILITARY ORDERS. 183 a cross of white linen having eight points, typical of the eight beatitudes they were always supposed to possess, and which, according to a MS. preserved in the library of the Arsenal, were : — 1, spiritual contentment ; 2, a life free from malice ; 3, repentance for sins ; 4, meekness under suffering ; 5, a love of justice ; 6, a merciful disposition ; 7, sincerity and frankness of heart ; and 8, a capability of enduring persecution. At a later period the regulations became less austere, and permitted the knights to wear an octagonal golden cross inlaid with white enamel, and suspended from the breast with black ribbon. A candidate for the robe of St. John of Jerusalem was obliged to present himself at the high altar, clad in a long gown without girdle, in order to denote that he was free from all other vows, and with a taper in his hand. The knight assessor then handed him a gilt sword, saying, " In the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost," to remind him that henceforth it would be his duty to devote his life to the defence of religion. A girdle was then fastened round his waist, to signify that he was bound for the future by the vows of the order. The professing knight then brandished the sword round his head, in token of defiance of the unbelievers, and returned it to its scabbard, first passing it under his arm as if to wipe it, as a symbol that he intended to preserve it free from stain. The knight who received his vows then placed his hand on his shoulder, exhorted him to succour the poor of Jesus Christ, to undertake works of charity, and to devote himself to the welfare of the faith. The new knight having promised to observe these exhorta- tions, golden spurs were placed on his heels as emblems that he was bound to fly wherever honour called him, and to trample under his feet the riches of this world. His taper was then lighted and he continued to hold it during the celebration of a mass, and while a preacher passed in review the rules which should bind, and the duties which should sway a true knight. He was then asked if he was in debt, if he was married or betrothed, if he already be- longed to any other religious order, and, finally, if he really and sincerely desired to belong to the Order of St. John. If he answered these questions in a satisfactory manner, he was admitted into the brotherhood, and led up to the high altar. There he pronounced the oath upon the missal, and was declared formally invested with the privileges granted to the order by the pontificate. He was told that henceforward he must daily recite fifty paters, fifty aves, the service of the Yirgin, the burial service, and several prayers for the repose of the souls of departed knights companions. 1 84 MILITARY ORDERS. Whilst lie was donning the dress of the order he was further instructed in his duties. As he put his arms through his sleeves he was reminded of the obedience he owed to his superiors ; as the white cross was being adjusted next his heart, he was told that he must be always ready to shed his blood for Christ, who by his own death had redeemed mankind. All the insignia of the Order of Malta were symbols. The pointed black mantle with its peaked cape, worn only on occasions of solemn ceremony, was typical of the robe of camel's hair worn by John the Baptist, the patron of the order. The cords which fastened the mantle about the neck, and fell over the shoulder, were significant of the passion our Saviour suffered with such calmness and resignation. In time of battle the members of the order wore a red doublet embroidered with the eight-pointed cross. About twenty years after the first establishment of the Hospitallers, Hugues de Payens, and Geoffrey de Saint- Aldemar, having crossed the seas with nine other nobles, all of French birth, obtained from the patriarch Guarimond, and from Baldwin II., King of Jerusalem, permission to form an association, the objects of which were to act in concert with the Hospi- tallers against the infidels, to protect pilgrims, and to defend Solomon's Temple. Baldwin granted them a dwelling within the Temple walls, a circumstance which gave them the name of Templars, or Knights of the Temple. At first they led a simple and regular life, contenting themselves with the humble title of poor soldiers of Jesus Christ. Their charity and their devotion obtained for them the sympathy of the kings of Jerusalem and the Eastern Christians, who made them frequent and considerable donations. In the first nine years of their existence, from 1118 to 1127, the Templars admitted no strangers into their ranks ; but their number having nevertheless considerably increased, they soon preferred a request to the Holy See to ratify the institution of their order. At the Council of Troyes, in 1228, Hugues de Payens, accompanied with five of his companions, presented the letters that the brotherhood had received from the pope and the patriarch of Jerusalem, together with the certificate of the founding of their order. Cardinal Matthew, Bishop of Alba, who presided over the council as the pope's legate, granted them an authentic confirmation of their order, and a special code was drawn up for them under the guidance of St. Bernard. MILITARY ORDERS. 185 The Templars were bound to go to mass three times a week, and to communicate thrice a year ; they wore a white robe symbolical of purity, to which Pope Eugenius III. added a red cross, to remind them of their oath to be always ready to shed their blood in defence of the Christian religion. Their rules were of great austerity ; they prescribed perpetual exile, and war for the holy places to the death. The knights were to accept every combat, however outnumbered they might be, to ask no quarter, and to Fig. 146.— Knight of Malta. Fig. 147.— Templar in Travelling Dress. Fac-similes of Woodcuts by Jost Amman, in his work entitled " Clcri totius Romance ecclcsiao . . . habitus ; " 4to., Frankfort, 1585. give no ransom. However irksome might prove the observance of these regulations, they were not allowed to escape them by entering the ranks of a less austere order. The unbelievers dreaded no enemy so much as these poor soldiers of Christ, of whom it was said that they possessed the gentleness of the lamb and the patience of the hermit, united to the courage of the hero and the strength of the lion. Their standard, termed Beauceant, was half black and half white, and inscribed with these words : Non nobis, Domine, non noUs, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.* * " Not to us, 0 Lord, not to us, but to thy name ascribe the glory." B B 1 86 MILITARY ORDERS. According to the rules of St. Bernard, the Order of the Temple was composed of milites, or knights commanders, of serving brothers, called armigeri, or men bearing arms, and of clientes, or clients, whose duty it was to attend to domestic matters. Their oaths were similar to those of St. John of Jerusalem. They swore to live in chastity, poverty, and obedience. Some of their number obtained permission to marry, but on condition of their no longer wearing the white dress, and of their bequeathing a portion of their property to the order. The distinctive mark of the Templars was, according to some, a broad red patriarchal cross ; according to others, a red Maltese cross embroidered with gold. As they all made public profession of extreme poverty, they were forbidden to use valuable articles of furniture, or gold or silver utensils ; to wear velvet trappings in the field, helmets with armorial bearings, silken sashes, or other superfluous articles of clothing ; and they were only permitted to wear an under doublet of white wool. The Order of the Temple had only been established fifty years when its knights held at Jerusalem its first general chapter, attended by three hundred gentlemen, and as many serving brothers, most of whom were French. The chapter elected a grand master, Gerard de Rederfort, and in so doing freed themselves from the jurisdiction of the patriarch of Jerusalem. The new grand master transferred the seat of the order to St. Jean d'Acre, and manifested the prowess of his knights on several occasions against the troops of Saladin, who attempted shortly afterwards to capture the town, but who was obliged to abandon the task. The resources of the Knights Templars increased, in a very short space, in such a remarkable manner, by donations and legacies, that some historians declare that the revenue of the order amounted to four and a half millions sterling; others merely observe that the Templars possessed enormous wealth in Christendom, one item being nine thousand houses. In 1129 they already had several establishments in the Low Countries ; six years later the King of Navarre and of Aragon, Alphonso I., bequeathed his states to the order ; but it was with great diificulty that the knights obtained possession of even a few of his towns. At that time, however, they possessed seventeen strongholds in the kingdom of Valencia. In their quarters in London were deposited most of the treasures of the English crown, and King Philip Augustus, on the eve of his departure for the Holy Land, entrusted them with the care of his jewels and archives. MILITARY ORDERS. 187 The Templars were magnificent soldiers, and the annals of the Crusades are full of their feats of arms. Few knights acquired the fame they did in their Fig. 148. — The Earthern Vase, on one side of which is seen, between two fleurs-de-lis, the figure of St. Paul bitten by a serpent, bears a Latin inscription signifying, " In the name of St. Paul, and by this stone, thou shalt drive out poison." On the other side is engraved in relief the cross of the Temple, between a sword and a serpent. Another Vase bears the head of a saint and a sword, and is surrounded by venomous animals and herbs. On the Medal is represented a dragon with an Italian legend signifying, " The grace of St. Paul is proof against any poison." These objects were found in 1863 at Florence, on the site of the old Church of the Templars, dedicated to St. Paul.— Collection of M. Gancia. expeditions across the seas ; though always inferior in number to the infidel, who held them in greater fear than the Crusaders, they almost always defeated them. The defence of Gaza, the battle of Tiberias, the capture of ,88 MILITARY ORDERS. Damietta, and the Egyptian Crusade, are all splendid attestations of their courage and prowess. The Templars in time reached the summit of their fortunes, the height of their prosperity and their fame, and nothing was left to them but to decay. Inflated with wealth, laden with privileges which gave them almost sovereign power, the only judges they recognised were the pope and themselves. The order at last became so demoralised by luxury and idleness that it forgot the aim for which it was founded, disdained to obey its own rules, and gave itself up to the love of gain and thirst for pleasure. Its covetousness and pride soon became boundless. The knights pretended that they were above the reach of even crowned heads : they seized and pillaged without concern the property of both infidels and Christians. Their jealousy of the Knights Hospitallers induced them to interfere with a man of position, a vassal of the Order of St. John, and to drive him from a castle he possessed in the neighbourhood of their establishment at Margat. This caused a violent quarrel between the two orders, which soon became a permanent struggle for supremacy. The pope wrote to the grand masters of both orders to exhort them to re-establish peace and good- will, and to forget their mutual rancour, so dangerous for Christendom and so fatal to the interests of the Holy Land. An apparent truce took place between them ; but the Templars had not forgotten their hatred, and they lost no opportunity of showing it to the knights of St. John. Moreover, they no longer cared to support the holy cause that had led to the birth of their order. They signed a treaty of alliance with the Old Man of the Mountain, the leader of the sect of the Assassins or Ishmaelites, the most implacable enemies of the cross ; they allowed him, on condition of paying tribute, to fortify himself in Lebanon ; they made war against the king of Cyprus and the prince of Antioch ; ravaged Thrace and Greece, where the Christian nobles had founded principalities, marquisates, and baronies; took Athens by storm, and massacred Robert de Brienne, its duke. In short, the consciousness of their strength, of their wealth, and of their power, inspired the Templars with an audacity that nothing could restrain. Their pride, which had become proverbial, was particularly offensive. Their belief and their morals were very far from orthodox, and even in 1273, Pope Gregory X. had thought of fusing their order in that of the Hospitallers. In the beginning of the following century, Philippe le Bel, King of France, MILITARY ORDERS. 189 received weighty accusations against them of most serious offences, accusa- tions that were generally believed to be true, and consulted Pope Clement Y. on the subject. Clement at first declared the crimes with which they were accused to be altogether improbable, but the grand master having insisted on a rigorous inquiry, the pope wrote to the king for the details of his informa- tion. Philippe le Bel wished to decide the matter himself, and proceeded to arrest all the Templars within his jurisdiction, amongst them their grand master, Jacques de Molai, who had just returned from Cyprus. One hundred and forty knights were examined in Paris, and all but three confessed that the order practised a secret initiation, in which the aspirants were bound to deny Christ, and spit upon the cross ; and that, moreover, Fig-. 119.— Soul of the Knights of Christ (Thirteenth Century).— Early Device of the Order of Templars, representing two knights on one horse. immoral customs were practised amongst them. Many of them also confessed that they had committed acts of idolatry. A learned contemporary writer, De Wilcke, a German protestant clergyman, has epitomized the researches of two of his co-religionists — Moldenhawer, who discovered in the National Library in Paris the original records of the examination, and Munster, who found in the library of the Vatican the original notes of the proceedings that took place in England. This is De Wilcke's conclusion : " The two facts of the denial of Christ and the spitting on the cross are attested by all the witnesses who were examined, with one or two exceptions." In spite of the scandal caused by these confessions, Pope Clement V. urgently protested against Philippe's course of action, and represented to him that the Templars were a religious body, under the control of the Holy See alone, that the king was consequently wrong to make himself their judge, and that he had no authority over either their possessions or their persons. Philippe unwillingly yielded to the pope's remonstrances, and the pontiff 1 90 MILITARY ORDERS. himself examined seventy-two Templars, whose confessions tallied with the avowals made in the first instance at Paris. An inquiry was instituted in England, in Italy, in Spain, and in Germany. The answers extracted in the course of the different examinations were not exactly coincident, but the confessions of impiety and immorality were very numerous, except in Spain. The Aragonese Templars took up arms and held themselves on the defensive in their fortresses ; they were Fig. 150.— Council of Vienne.— Fresco executed in the Vatican Library by order of Pope Pius V. (Sixteenth Century). however, conquered by King James II., and thrown into prison as rebels. The Templars of Castile were arrested, tried before an ecclesiastical tribunal, and declared innocent. The pope acknowledged the existence of serious irregularities amongst the knights of the order, but persisted in reserving to himself the right to pronounce a final decision. He, however, instructed every bishop in the Christian world to investigate the cases within his own diocese, and to absolve the innocent, and condemn the guilty Templars according to the utmost rigour of the law. MILITARY ORDERS. 191 The provincial council of Paris handed over the contumacious to the secular authorities ; fifty-nine of the guilty knights were burnt in that city at the back of the abbey of St. Antoine. A second council, at Senlis, in a similar manner delivered nine Templars to the mercies of the secular judge, who sentenced them to be burnt at the stake. It is said that the culprits retracted their confession on the scaffold, and died protesting their innocence. As soon as the commissioners appointed by the pope were informed of these executions they suspended their sittings, declaring that the terror inspired by these capital penalties deprived the prisoners of the tranquillity of mind necessary to their defence. They further requested the council of Paris to act with more deliberation. "When Pope Clement Y. had obtained all the necessary information he convoked the council of Vienne (Fig. 150), and there, on the 22nd of March, 1312, pronounced his decision, which rather absolved than condemned the order, and placed their persons and their property at his disposal and at that of the Church. In Spain and in Portugal, this property was applied to the defence of the Christians against the constant attacks of the Saracens and the Moors (Fig. 151) ; but the greater portion of the possessions of the Templars, and particularly those they held in France, was transferred to the keeping of the Hospitallers of St. John of Jerusalem, who continued to devote them- selves to the cause of the holy places, and kept up the good works to perform which the Templars had received so many and such costly donations. The serious abuses and crimes which caused the suppression of the order had not fortunately vitiated the whole of its members : most of the Templars were set at liberty, many of them, preserving their former rank, enrolled themselves in the Order of St. John. In this wise, as is pointed out by Wilcke, Albert de Blacas, prior of Aix, obtained the commandership of Saint-Maurice, as prior of the Hospitallers ; and Frederick, grand prior of Lower Germany, retained the title in the Order of St. John of Jerusalem. The pope had specially reserved his judgment in the case of the grand master, Jacques de Molai, in that of the Visitor of France, and in those of the commanders of Gfuyenne and of Normandy. Several cardinals-legate, with some French bishops and doctors of the University of Paris, constituted the tribunal which was to pass the sentence in the name of the pontiff. After satisfying themselves that these four eminent knights had repeated their avowals before a second commission, the members of the tribunal, MILITARY ORDERS. convinced of their guilt, caused a scaffold to be erected in front of Notre- Dame, and there, on Monday, March 18th, 1314, the four Templars were publicly condemned to imprisonment for life. On the scaffold the grand Fig. 151. — Our Lady of Grace sheltering under the folds of her mantle the first Grand Masters of tho Military Order of Montessa. This order was established in Spain in 1317 by James II., King of Aragon, with the approval of John XXII., as a substitute for the Order of the Temple, with whose possessions it was endowed. — From a Painting on Wood of the Fif- teenth Century, held in veneration in the Church of the Temple, at Valencia ; and from the " Iconografia Espanola " of M. Carderera. master and one of the others recanted their confession of guilt and protested their innocence. The cardinals, surprised at this recantation, committed the prisoners to the care of the provost of Paris, with orders to bring them before them the next day, when the tribunal had had time to deliberate MILITARY ORDERS. i93 on this fresh incident. But Philippe le Bel, learning what was taking place* hurriedly assembled his council, and had the grand master, and the other Templar who had similarly persisted in denying his twice-avowed guilt, hurnt alive the same night. They underwent this horrible torture protesting their innocence to the last. The two remaining knights who had acknow- ledged their guilt were kept for some time in prison, but were afterwards set at liberty. Other orders of knighthood, having more or less of a religious character, Fig. 152. — Surrender of the Town of Montefrio, near Granada, in 1486. The alcids and Moorish chiefs, after the siege, delivering the keys of the town to Ferdinand the Catholic and Queen Isabella.— Bas-relief on the stalls of the choir of the high altar of the cathedral, carved in wood in the Sixteenth Century. were founded in the Middle Ages, or during the Renaissance period : the principal were, in Spain, the Order of the Knights of Calatrava ; in Germany, the Order of the Teuton Knights ; the Order of the Golden Fleece in the Low Countries, in Spain, and in Austria ; that of St. Maurice and St. Lazarus in Savoy ; that of St. Stephen in Tuscany ; and in France, those of St. Michael and of the Holy Ghost, which were merely honorary orders, although the first Order of the Holy Ghost, founded in 1352 by Louis d'Anjou, King of Jerusalem and Sicily, had for its object the re- establishment c c i94 MILITARY ORDERS. of an essentially military knighthood, as a means for bringing about a new crusade. The Knights of Calatrava, on whom their founder, Don Raymond, Abbot of Citeaux, imposed the regulations of his own monastery, distinguished themselves by many brilliant feats of arms, particularly against the Moors of Spain and Africa (Fig. 152) ; and the princes in whose cause they had fought in these wars — termed, like the Crusades in the East, holy — granted them large possessions and considerable privileges. They were bound by a triple vow of poverty, obedience, and chastity, and, like the Templars, wore a red cross embroidered on a white mantle. From the days of Ferdinand the Catholic and Isabella, the sovereigns of Spain have always been the grand masters of this order, which acquired and long retained a considerable amount of importance, even when it had ceased to signify anything but an indication of nobility. The order of Alcantara, which had a similar origin to that of Calatrava, ran a like career and was in like manner doomed to decay. Spain, too, was the only country that possessed a military order for ladies. After the heroic defence of Placentia against the English by the women of that city in 1390, John I., the sovereign of Castile, created in their honour the order of the Ladies of the Sash, which was united at a later period to the Order of the Belt, founded in the fourteenth century to do battle against the Moors. The Teutonic Knights, whose order had been founded in 1128, at Jerusalem, by the German Crusaders, obeyed the rules of St. Augustin. They were subject beside to special statutes somewhat similar to those of the Knights of St. John and of the Temple, whose privileges they also enjoyed. Their first grand master, Henri Walpot, established his residence near St. Jean d'Acre. This order was divided, like that of St. John, into knights, chaplains, and serving brethren. Its members wore a white mantle with a rather broad black cross, picked out with silver, on the left sleeve. To gain admission into the order it was necessary for the candidate to be over fifteen years of age, and to be of a strong, robust build, in order to resist the fatigues of war. Its knights, bound by a vow of chastity, were expected to avoid all intercourse with women ; they were not even allowed to give their own mothers a filial kiss when they saluted them. They possessed no individual property ; they always left their cell doors open, so that everybody might see what they were doing. Their arms were free from both gold and silver ornaments, and for a long period they spent their lives in great humility. Their most celebrated MILITARY ORDERS. '95 grand master, Hermann de Salza, received in 1210, from Pope Honorius III. and the Emperor Frederick II., whom he had reconciled, large possessions and high honours. The Teutonic Knights conquered Prussia, Livonia, and Courland, and in 1283 became masters of the whole territory between the Vistula and the Niemen. In 1309 they abandoned Venice, where, twenty years earlier, their grand master had fixed his ordinary residence, and selected Marienburg as their head-quarters. At that date the order had reached the culminating point of its prosperity, and its sway in Germany had the most fortunate results for Prussia. But luxury soon began to undermine the religious faith of the knights ; and internal struggles, caused by the elections of their grand masters, introduced fresh elements of decay into their organization. Dragged into endless conflicts with Lithuania and Poland, the order lost its banners, its trea- sure, and its principal defenders in the disas- trous battle of Griimwald, in the year 1410, and would have been utterly ruined but for Henry von Plauen. After the death of this illustrious grand master, the knights, to whom the treaty of Thorn had restored their territorial posses- sions, lost them one after the other in the few years that elapsed between 1422 and 1436. For thirteen years Casimir IV., King of Poland, summoned into Prussia by the inhabitants, who had rebelled against the despotic sway of the knights, laid waste the country that he had undertaken to protect. The order, driven out of Marienburg and Konitz, only retained possession of Eastern Prussia, and held even that under Polish rule ; its grand master, whose head- quarters were now at Konigsberg, was, in fact, a prince and a councillor of Poland. As Prussia was a fief of the Church, the grand master of the Teutonic Order was bound by vow to preserve it to the Church and to Fig. 153. — Sancha de Roxas, who died in 1437, wearing the scarf which was the insignia of the military order bearing his name (Fifteenth Century). — From the " Iconografia Espanola " of M. Carderera. i g6 M1L11AR* ORDERS. his own order. Albert of Brandenburg, its last grand master, was bound by this oath, and by the triple vow of poverty, obedience, and chastity, which he had taken on entering the order. To rid himself of the fetters of these oaths he joined the Lutheran Church, and divided the possessions of his order with his uncle, the aged Sigismund, King of Poland, who for these considerations bestowed on him the title of hereditary Duke of Prussia. This was the origin of the royal family of Prussia. After this easy acquisition of title Fig. 154. — Teutonic Knight. — Fac-simile of a Woodcut by Jost Amman, in his work entitled " Cleri totius Romanse ecclesiae .... habitus : " 4to, Frankfort, 1585. and territory, Albert of Brandenburg married the daughter of the King of Denmark. As a matter of course, the Order of the Teutonic Knights became extinct. The Order of the Knights of the Golden Fleece was not founded till 1449. It was then instituted by Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy and Count of Flanders, in order to induce the nobles of his court to join him in making war against the Turks, and to attach his subjects by closer ties to the service of the state. The crusade never took place, but the order survived, and still exists as an heraldic distinction. This order, which was placed under the protection of St. Andrew, was originally composed of twenty-four knights of high rank and stainless MILITARY ORDERS. 197 character ; their number was increased by the Duke of Burgundy to thirty- one, and afterwards by Charles V. to fifty-one. The election of the knights took place in the chapters of the order, and were decided by a majority of votes. The distinguishing sign of the order was a necklet of gold, enamelled with the Fig. 155. — Chapter of the Golden Fleece, held by Charles the Bold.— Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century, in the Burgundian Library, Brussels. duke's device, which was composed of two steels and two flints interlaced, with the motto, Ante ferit quam micat (It strikes before it lights). From the collar was suspended a golden sheep, or sheep's fleece, with the inscription, Pretium non vile laborum (Labour's just reward) (Fig. 155). Since the marriage of Philippe le Beau, son of the Emperor Maximilian and Mary of Burgundy, with 1 98 MILITARY ORDERS. Jane of Aragon, in 1496, the King of Spain and the Emperor of Austria are, in their own countries, the sovereign chiefs of the order of the Golden Fleece. Savoy also possessed an order of military knighthood which has survived till our time. When Amadeus VIII., in whose person Savoy had been raised to the rank of a duchy by the Emperor Sigismund, determined to live as a recluse, he desired to create an order of secular knighthood, with himself as its chief. He accordingly built a retreat at Ripailles, near the Lake of Geneva, as a residence for the new order, and placed it under the protection of St. Maurice, the patron saint of Savoy. The first knights, only six in number, were distinguished by a cross of white taffeta sewn on their dress. The successors of Amadeus VIII., however, so neglected the order that it was on the point of becoming extinct, when Duke Emanuel Philibert, in 1572, obtained from Gregory XIII. a bull to reconstitute it ; and shortly afterwards, by a second bull, the knights of St. Lazarus and those of St. Maurice were united. The knights took the same triple vow as the Templars ; they swore fidelity to the Dukes of Savoy, and undertook to wage war against the heretics who from Geneva' were continually threatening the frontiers of the duchy. The order possessed considerable property, and its head-quarters were at Nice and Turin. The sign of the order was a white cross with flowered points, beneath which was a second cross surrounded with green, with the image of the two patron saints. The Knights of St. Stephen, an order founded in 1562 by Cosmo de Medicis, Grand Duke of Tuscany, played an active part in the sea-fights of the Mediterranean, where, they were constantly chasing the Ottoman galleys or effecting landings on the shores of the surrounding barbarian states. In the middle of the seventeenth century they boasted that they had released, since the creation of the order, upwards of five thousand six hundred Chris- tian captives and fifteen thousand slaves. This order, in its customs and ceremonies, was strikingly like the order of Malta ; and, like it, was divided into military and ecclesiastical knights. Several orders of military knighthood existed in France, created by its sovereigns ; but their honorary character caused them to be looked upon as rewards bestowed for good service rendered to the monarchy, rather than as solemn engagements to take up arms in any definite cause. It MILITARY ORDERS. 199 Fig. 156. — Eeception of a Knight of the Order of St. Michael, which was created on August 1, 1469, by Louis XL, at the Castle of Amboise. — Fac-simile of a Miniature in the " Statuts de 1'Ordre," dated from Plessis-les-Tours. Manuscript of the Sixteenth Century, in the Library of M. Ambr. Firmin-Didot. is hardly worth while to men- tion the 'Order of the Star, which it has been attempted ^jjjT to trace back to King Robert and to the year 1022, but the real origin of which only dates from King John. The oldest royal military orders of knighthood are those that Louis IX. 200 MILITARY ORDERS. founded to encourage his nobles to join him in his expeditions beyond the seas, and to take part in the Crusades. The Order of the Cosse de Geneste, instituted in 1254, was bestowed at a later period on the sergeants of the king, a body-guard of a hundred gentlemen specially entrusted with the duty of protecting the sovereign's person against the assassins sent by the Old Man of the Mountains. The Order of the Ship, instituted in 1269, became extinct shortly after the second crusade of St. Louis, who had con- ferred it, before his departure, on some of his most illustrious followers. The Order of St. Michael was founded in 1469 by Louis XI. to fulfil a vow made by his father, who had a particular veneration for that saint, the tutelar angel and patron of France (Fig. 156). The image of St. Michael was already embroidered in gold upon the banner of the king, who created a new order of military knighthood " in honour," say the statutes, " of the first knight who in God's quarrel fought the ancient enemy of the human race and made him fall from heaven." The order was composed of thirty- six knights of stainless name and arms, with the sovereign who had appointed them at their head. The collar of the order was composed of golden shells inlaid with the figure of St. Michael overthrowing Satan. The knights, besides this collar, wore on occasions of ceremony a white mantle with a hood of crimson velvet. The Order of the Holy Ghost was the last military order that the sovereigns of France themselves conferred towards the close of the six- teenth century. Both this and the Order of St. Michael were termed orders of the king. Henry III., in 1579, created the order in honour of God, and particularly in that of the Holy Ghost, under whose inspiration he had accom- plished " his best and most fortunate exploits," to use the exact words of the statutes of the order. From the day of his ascending the throne he had always intended to found this order, which had been suggested to him in his childhood by the perusal of the statutes of the first Order of the Holy Ghost, instituted at Naples, in 1352, by one of his ancestors, Louis of Anjou, King of Jerusalem and Sicily. These statutes were carefully preserved in a precious manuscript, the miniature of which represented with marvellous art all the ceremonies of the order. The manuscript was a present from the nobility of Yenice to Henry III. on his return from Poland. This prince, how- ever, borrowed but little from these ancient statutes, which had been drawn up in view of the military services which the knights of the order, three rr-l cc ,a If 1 MILITARY ORDERS. 201 hundred in number, might be able to render towards the Crusades in Pales- tine. The new order of the Holy Ghost, although a military one, was destined to gather round the king, who was its supreme head, a body of a hundred knights, selected from among the most eminent and the most illustrious per- sonages of the court, the Church, and the nobility. The insignia of the order were a collar composed of golden fleurs-de-lis, surmounted with enamelled flames, forming the initials of the king and his wife Louise of Lorraine, 158. — State Gloves of embroidered silk, gold, and silver, with the Monogram of Christ, formerly belonging to Louis XIII. — From the originals in the Collection of M. Jubinal. with a cross bearing a silver dove, emblem of the Holy Ghost. At the meetings of their order, the knights were clad in costly round-caped mantles of blue velvet spangled with fleurs-de-lis in gold (Fig. 157). These meet- ings, which at first were held in the Church of the Augustines at Paris, where the solemn receptions of the new members took place, were afterwards transferred to the Louvre, where they were celebrated with extraordinary pomp. It is true that the statutes enjoined on each lay knight the duty of taking arms for his sovereign whenever the latter was preparing to go to D D 202 MILITARY ORDERS. war for the defence of his dominions, or in the interest of his crown ; but they were never scrupulously obeyed on this point, and the Order of the Holy Ghost, while preserving its military and religious character on all ceremonial occasions, never played any other part than one of display and heraldic pretension. The sovereigns, however, at all times showed them- selves extremely jealous of the privilege of appointing its knights, and the latter for more than three centuries composed the actual guard of honour of the royal house of France. Fig. 159.— St. George, the patron of warriors, vanquishing the Dragon. — From the Tonib of Cardinal Georges d'Amboise, at Rouen (Sixteenth Century). LITUEGY AND CEREMONIES. Prayer. — Liturgy of St. James, of St. Basil, and of St. John-Chrysostom. — Apostolical Consti- tutions.— The Sacrifice of the Mass. — Administration of Baptism. — Canonical Penances. — Plan and Arrangement of Churches.— Ecclesiastical Hierarchy.— The Ceremony of Ordination. — Church Bells.— The Tocsin.— The Poetry of Gothic Churches.— Breviary and Missal of Pius V. — Ceremonies used at the Seven Sacraments.— Excommunication.— The Bull In Ccend Domini. — Processions and Mystery Plays at the Easter Solemnities. — Instrument of Peace. — Consecrated Bread.— The Pyx.— The Dove. T was the first Council of Nice, in the year 325, that gave the dignity of canonical law to the custom of prayer on bended knees, and it is a surpris- ing fact that none of the paintings of the Catacombs represent a devotee in the act of kneeling. We, however, know from the Acts of the Apostles that from the very first days of Christianity it was sometimes cus- tomary to kneel at prayer. As for the public prayers of the early Christians, the text of the principal ones has survived unaltered to our own days. As early as the close of the first century, the younger Pliny, writing to Trajan, told him that the Christians were accustomed to assemble at daybreak to sing a hymn in honour of Christ, whom they worshipped as God. This is a valuable piece of evidence, and it is moreover corroborated by the known custom that prevailed at the same epoch in the Church of Antioch, of celebrating the Holy Trinity (Figs. 160 and 161) by singing anthems, and of glorifying Christ, the Word of God, by the intoning of canticles and psalms. St. Irenaeus, who wrote in the middle of the second century, also mentions in his work 204 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. against heresy, a kind of Gloria in excehis, which was chanted in Greek in Christian assemblies at the consecration of the host, and which may be translated thus : "To thee all glory, veneration, and thanksgiving ; honour and worship to the Father, to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, now and ever, and for century upon century of infinite eternity ! " The people responded, " Amen ! " In the dogmatic treatises written by Tertullian, at Fig. 160. — Symbol of the Trinity, arranged ver- tically—the Son at the bottom, the Father at the top, and the Holy Ghost in the centre. The Holy Ghost descends from the mouth of the Father and settles on the head of the Son, and proceeds from both. Copied from a French Miniature by Count Horace de Vielcastel (Fourteenth Century). Fig. 161. — The three faces of the Trinity on one head and body. At first sight is read — " The Father is not the Son ; the Father is not the Holy Ghost ; the Holy Ghost is not the Son." But, from the angles to the centre, is also read — " The Father is God ; the Son is God; the Holy Ghost is God." Printed by Simon Vostre in 1524. the end of the second century, that great pagan philosopher, who had become a convert to Christianity, alludes more than once to the first attempts at a liturgy which the Church used in the administration of the sacraments. He speaks of secret meetings where the psalms were sung, the Scriptures read, and edifying discourses were delivered ; he mentions public prayers on behalf of the reigning sovereign, of his ministers, and of the great functionaries of the State ; he describes ceremonies, forms of LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 205 prayer, and religious chants which were used according to certain rites authorised in the Latin Church, amongst which may be distinguished the Pater of the New Testament, that simple and yet sublime and touching invocation of feeble humanity prostrated before the Almighty. The Church of Neo-Cesarea used from the first the liturgy of St. James, the earliest of the Eastern liturgies, until St. Basil, justly surnamed the great, for he was one of the most illustrious Fathers of the Greek Church in the fourth century, modified and shortened it. A little later it came to be Fig. 162 to 171. — Monograms of Christ, belonging to the first centuries of the Church, except the last two. They are mostly composed of the letters X and P interlaced, letters which begin the word Christ (XPISTOS) ; one is accompanied by an N (Nnzarenus) ; several have on either side the letters a and w, in allusion to the text, " I am the beginning and the end." Two of these monograms, from the Catacombs, recall the labarum of Constantino, especially the one bearing the famous inscription, " In hoc signo vinces ;" but it is not certain whether they are rightly attributed. The last two are from the Churches of St. Martin de Lescas (Gironde) and of St. Exupere d'Arreau (Upper Pyrenees), edifices of the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. known as the liturgy of St. Chrysostom, on account of the important changes introduced into it by that Father of the Church. The canons of the Council of Laodicea, held in 364, contain many regu- lations for the recitation of the psalms and lessons, which, as early as the second century, according to Tertullian, were recited at Tierce, at Sexte, and at None, that is, at the third, sixth, and ninth hour of the day — at vespers or evening prayer, and at the prayers offered up by the bishops, whether at the ceremonies of baptism and the eucharist, or over catechumens and penitents. It was not until after the conversion of Constantine that public prayers became general in Constantinople even amongst the troops. Constantine built an 206 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. oratory in his palace, where his whole court worshipped with him. He desired that his soldiers, whether Christians or pagans, should every Sunday repeat aloud certain prayers belonging to the religion of Jesus Christ. Eusebius is the historian who relates this fact. A record has been handed down of a prayer that the Emperor Maximinius declared he had received from the hands of an angel, and which he read out to his soldiers in 313, before he gave battle to Licinius, his rival for the imperial throne. Fig. 172. — Heathen Caricature drawn on the wall of the Palatinate, in the Third Century, and preserved in the Kircher Museum, at Borne . — The ohject of veneration of the Christians is represented hy a crucified figure with a donkey's head, looking down on a small figure of a man : it is accompanied by a Greek inscription signifying, " Alexamenus worshipping his God." Eeduced to a quarter the size of the original. In the fourth century, it was customary nearly everywhere, in the West as well as in the East, after having sung the praises of God, to put up prayers for the reigning sovereign and the leading potentates of the civilised world. For instance, when St. Athanasius cried out in the presence of the faithful, assembled in the splendid basilica of the Caesars, "Let us pray for the safety of the very pious Emperor Constantine," the whole assembly answered with one resounding voice, "Christe, auxiliare Constantio ! " (" Help Constantine, 0 Christ ! ") LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 207 The preceding examples, and many others that it would be easy to gather from the history of early Christianity, prove that in the fourth century, in France, in Italy, in Spain, as well as in the churches of the East and of Africa, Christian worshippers were accustomed to recite either aloud or in a low tone, a set form of prayers, to chant, or rather slowly to intone psalms, and to sing hymns. Did not St. Pacome order his monks to recite twice a day a psalmody Fig. 173. — Painting symbolical of the Catacombs of Eome : Jesus Christ, represented as Orpheus, fascinating with the sound of his lyre the wild and domestic animals, as also the trees, which are bending towards him to listen.— Fresco of the First or Second Century, from the Cemetery of Domitilla. which was composed of psalms interspersed with prayers? Did not St. Hilary of Poictiers lay the foundations of the Gallican liturgy, as St. Ambrose did those of the Lombard liturgy, at the time that St. Chrysostom and St. Augustine revised the liturgies of the Eastern and African Churches ? It was generally the custom to follow the precepts of the so-called "Apostolical Constitutions/' a primitive work that was supposed to date from the second century. These Constitutions ordered the psalms to be recited to 208 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. the congregation in the morning, at the third, the sixth, and the ninth hours of the day, at vespers, and at cock-crow, that is to say, at dawn. But the faithful, who were long prevented by persecution from openly assembling in sacred buildings, at first offered up their prayers in private, or perhaps surrounded only by their families and a few intimate friends. Tertullian tells us that each strove to show the greatest zeal in singing the praises of God. In the fourth century, the Christians both of the East and of the "West Fig. 174. — Silver-gilt Cruet, showing its different sides ; on one side is depicted the head of Christ, with a nimhus, and on the other that of St. Peter. (First or Second Century.)— Museum of the Vatican. were so zealously attached to their psalmody, that none would have willingly missed saying it at its appointed hour, no matter where he might happen to be. " Instead of the love songs formerly heard at all hours, and in all places," says St. Jerome in a letter to his friend Marcellinus, " the labourer at the plough hums an Alleluia, the reaper, bathed in perspiration, repeats his psalmody as he rests from his toil, and the worker in the vineyard carols David's grateful verse as he plies his curved sickle." Long before any churches were open to the public, the apostles " broke LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 209 Fig, 175. — The Last Supper, symbolically represented as the first eucharistic sacrifice. Jesus, sur- rounded by his disciples, and with John, his favourite disciple, leaning on his bosom, is adminis- tering his body and blood under the form of bread and wine, to another disciple kneeling in front of the table. — From a Miniature of the Eleventh Century in the Burgundian Library, Brussels. bread with the faithful " in the guest chamber of private dwellings ; their disciples followed their example in the subterranean cemeteries, termed Catacombs, where the early Christians used to assemble to celebrate the Lord's Supper (Fig. 175). This sacrament, the primitive form of which E E 210 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. is unknown to us, was not termed a mass (missa) till the middle of the fourth century. " It was on a Sunday/' says St. Ambrose, who was the originator of the Ambrosian rite, " that I first held a mass." The name of mass, about the meaning and origin of which the most learned Christian archaeologists are by no means agreed, appears to have been derived from Fig. 176. — Miraculous Mass of St. Gregory the Great (Sixth Century), depicting the real presence of Jesus Christ in the eucharist. — Miniature from a Missal of the Fifteenth Century, in the Collection of M. Ambr. Firmin-Didot. a Hebrew word denoting an offering or sacrifice ; or perhaps rather from the Latin missa, from mittere, to send away, or to take leave of. Apostolical discipline required that the sacrament should be preceded by a discourse, and that before it was celebrated the catechumens, those who had not yet been baptized, should leave the sanctuary. "After the sermon," says St. Augustine, " the catechumens are sent out" (fit missa). LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. ^ 1 1 There was, however, a mass for the catechumens which comprised the introductory prayers, lessons from the Old and New Testaments, and the bishop's homily. The true mass, celebrated for the faithful alone, was specially called the eucharist. " Those are masses," says St. Cesarius of Aries, " when the body and blood of Christ are offered up in sacrifice " (Fig. 176). At first, mass was celebrated once a week, and always on the Sunday. In the second century, the sacrament or eucharistic offering took place three times a week, on Sunday, on Wednesday, and on Friday. In the following century, the Eastern Church decreed that it should also be celebrated on Saturday. In the West, mass was held only on Sundays, unless in exceptional cases ; while in the days of St. Augustine, in the dioceses of Africa, Spain, and Constantinople, it was celebrated generally every day. It was not till the sixth century that it became usual in the Latin Church to celebrate mass every day. As time passed on, and as the number of worshippers increased, the number of masses was considerably augmented, particularly on great festivals and during Holy Week. The same priest was at liberty to perform several, but after each he was bound to purify his fingers in a chalice, the contents of which were afterwards poured into a fitting vessel and consumed at the final mass, either by the priests themselves, by the deacons and clerks, or by those of the laity who were in a state of grace. At first all masses were sung, or rather chanted ; they were all public, and could only be celebrated in diocesan or parish churches. Necessity, however, soon instituted inferior or private masses, thus named because they were held in one of the lesser shrines or chapels, on an ordinary day, or before a small congregation. The bishops, the apostles' successors, were alone entitled, during the first two centuries, to administer the solemn rites of baptism. The priests, under the authority of the bishop, were the assistant-ministers of this sacrament. The deacons could only confer it when authorised by special episcopal sanc- tion. In cases of urgent necessity, laymen were permitted to baptize, provided they were of irreproachable morals and had been confirmed. In the L atin Church as well as in the East, public baptism was only solemnised during the vigils of Easter and Pentecost ; in the Gallican Church, at Christmas, as in the case of King Clovis. Private baptism might be administered at any period whenever it was deemed necessary. 212 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. On the day set apart for baptism, the chosen catechumens met in the church at noon to undergo a final examination (Fig. 177) ; at midnight they again assembled there, the paschal taper and the water were consecrated, and the officiating priest asked the catechumens if they renounced the devil, the world, and its pomps. They made answer, Yes. The priest then required of them a profession of Christian faith, carefully prepared beforehand, after which they underwent a short examination on the articles of the Creed. When these preliminaries were completed the deacon presented to the priest the catechumens stripped of their clothing, but covered with a veil. Each then stepped into a large vessel of water and was dipped thrice (Fig. 178) ; at each immersion the bishop invoked one of the persons of the Holy Trinity, a Fig. 177. — Exorcism of a catechumen by four of the clergy, who are applying the cross to him to drive the devil out of his body, prior to his baptism. — From abas-relief of the Fourth or Fifth Century, found at Perouse. Paciaudi, " De Sacris Christianorum Balneis : " Venitiis, 1750, 4to. custom that prevailed till the sixth century in the Western Church, and till the eighth in that of the East. After the immersion the assisting deacon anointed the catechumen's forehead with holy oil, and the priest put on him the chrismal, a flowing white robe which he wore for eight days. Thus clad, and holding lighted tapers, the new Christians went in procession from the place of baptism to the basilica. Before mass they received the sacrament of confirmation ; they were then given a mixture of honey and milk, a symbol of their entrance into the promised land, that is to say, into the highway of Gospel privileges. Whatever the age of the newly baptized might be, they were termed children (pucri, infantes). Baptism by sprinkling, as practised now, was not unknown to the primitive church, but it was only adopted in urgent cases, when immersion might be dangerous to the catechumen, or when it was expedient to baptize LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. many at one time. In the ninth century baptism by sprinkling had become customary, and it soon became the only method in use. The dogmas of Christianity would have been a dead letter for most of the neophytes, unless they had been accompanied by a rigorous and constant dis- cipline. The Church foresaw this, and showed its sternness, though at the same time it held out indulgences to the penitent. It established a kind of scale of Fig. 178.— Baptism of the Saxons conquered by Charlemagne. — Miniature in Manuscript No. 9,066 in the Burgundian Library, Brussels (Fifteenth Century). punishments, whose severity were proportionate to the gravity of the crimes committed. The privilege of oblation was taken from the lesser culprits — that is to say, they were neither allowed to place offerings on the altars nor to receive the eucharist; the more hardened and rebellious sinners were excluded from the communion of the faithful, and were not permitted to take part in public worship ; those who had been guilty of actual crime, or who had shown themselves to be incorrigible, were expelled from the sanctuary, and their names were expunged from the list of Christians. 2i4 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. These more rigorous measures, however, might be modified according to the repentance of the offender or at the discretion of the bishop, the sole and sovereign judge in all such matters. Canonical penance was usually only inflicted for great public crimes, such as idolatry, adultery, and homicide ; and, moreover, certain classes of individuals — children, young girls, married women, old men, priests, clerks, and monarchs — were only subject to it under the most careful restrictions ; while in every case it was necessary to give legal and accurate proof of the alleged offence. When the period of canonical penance was over, if the criminal showed signs of repentance, the bishop, or even an ordinary priest in case of absolute necessity, was em- powered to reconcile him with the Church. As public worship in the early Church was slow to exhibit itself as a settled institution, so the more solemn and the more imposing it became from the moment that it took its lofty position under the protectorate of Constantino the Great. Then suddenly sprung up a number of Christian places of worship and imposing churches, amongst which we may mention the basilica of Tyre, restored and inaugurated in 315 ; that of St. John of Lateran, constructed in Borne in 324, with the remains of the temples once raised to the false gods of paganism ; and other sanctuaries in the same city, which were consecrated by the Pope St. Damasius. The rites used at the consecrations of the early churches are unknown to us, but each inauguration had its solemn anniversary. The position, the form, and the arrangement of the early churches were not left to the whims of their founders and architects, even when these churches were small and hidden for the most part in the catacombs, in forests, and in deserts. In the second book of the " Constitutions " of Pope Clement (chaps. 55 and 61), we read the following directions : " Let the church be of a long shape, like a ship, and facing the east." Here, therefore, in the first century of the church, is an authentic proof of the orientation of the early Christian sacred edifices. The method of construction of the primitive churches, however, accord- ing to the liturgical regulations of the period, is still an obscure question, and one surrounded with uncertainty. It has been surmised, with much probability, that the subterranean chapels of the catacombs of Eome were the models of the first churches ; and such is the opinion of the most learned archaeologists. It was from the very depths of these sepulchral caverns LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 215 that Christian art, bursting forth into open day after the long series of persecutions, built its crypts and its churches after the types of its hidden shrines, at first in the transmural cemeteries, and afterwards, towards the end of the third century, in the midst of the Christianized populations and in the very centre of their cities. In 303, the date of the decree of Diocletian closing the Christian places of worship, there were already forty churches and chapels in Eome. The shape of these primitive sanctuaries is not well known ; they were probably in general of one uniform pattern, specially adapted to the liturgical ceremonies of the day, though considerations of safety, the capabilities of the site, and other imperious necessities, no doubt frequently obliged their architects to depart from precedent and to vary the character of their construction. It was not until the reign of Constantino that Christian edifices began to assume the attributes of size, magnificence, and majestic boldness of outline. It was then that the emperor erected basilicas in the interior of his Lateran and Vatican palaces for the first time, and consecrated to the worship of the true God those immense edifices in which art was the humble handmaid of religion and bathed itself in the ineffable splendours of the faith. The crypts or chambers (cuUcula) of the Catacombs were reproduced in the full light of day in the early churches ; they were of a quadrilateral shape, with three arched naves, and three vaulted recesses (arcosolia) which served at once as tombs for the holy confessors and shrines for the celebration of the eucharist. These sanctuaries were generally of greater length than breadth, after the analogy of the ship or vessel (navis), this mysterious symbolism finding favour with the early Christians. Crucial churches, that is to say, churches in the shape of a cross, were, how- ever, not uncommon, as well as round, pentagonal, hexagonal, and octagonal buildings. But whatever their shape, they differed essentially from the pagan temples, as much in their general internal arrangement as in their size, which continued to increase in proportion as Christianity waxed in magnitude and influence. The basilicas were divided into three principal parts : the vestibule, or portico (in Greek, pronaoti), the central area (in Greek, naos- — in Latin, navis, whence the term nave), and the apse or choir (in Greek, ieratriori), reserved for the officiating priests. The portico was supported by two, five, or seven columns, and projected from the front wall. An iron rod furnished with rings ran across the columns, and from it were suspended curtains of 216 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. cloth or hanging tapestries which could be drawn or closed at will. Beneath this portico the penitents, termed strati (prostrated), were accustomed to kneel, and from that position they could hear the psalmody and the sermon without actually witnessing the ceremony. The larger basilicas had frequently three porticos instead of one (Fig. 179), the central one facing the west, and the two side ones the north and south. A large vessel Fig. 179. — Church, of St. Antony, Padua, completed in 1307 ; the seven cupolas were added in the Fifteenth Century. The bronze equestrian statue which stands in front of the church was executed in 1453 by Donatello, and represents the famous captain, Gattemalata. (malluviuni) full of water was placed in the centre of the portico, in which each member of the congregation before entering the church purified his face and hands. The clergy alone entered by the middle entrance (aula) ; the worshippers entered by the two side portals, the men by that to the right and the women by that to the left ; this division of the sexes was maintained within the building also. The internal main area was sub- divided into three or five naves. The central nave was always left open and Fig. 180. — Foot of a large Choir Candelabrum in gilt bronze, with seven branches, nineteen feet high, and known as the " Tree of the Virgin," because one of its ornaments represents the Infant Jesus adored by the Magi, in the arms of the Virgin. — Work of the Thirteenth Century, in Milan Cathedral. LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 217 free, but in the others, partitions six feet high completely divided off the catechumens, the penitents, the virgins consecrated to God, the monks, and the mass of the congregation. At the end of the nave was the choir (in Greek bema), in front of which stood the solea (the cellar or wine- press, in allusion to what was called the vineyard of the Lord), surrounded by a chancel, an open-work partition, in the centre of which one or more gates opened into the interior. One or some- times two stands (called pulpitum, pulpit), in- tended for the public reading of the epistles, the Scriptures, and the holy books, were erected in front of the gates of the choir. In Eome, and pro- bably in Constantinople, Milan, Treves, and in all the larger imperial cities, there was in front of the choir, between the stalls of the secular clergy and those of the holy virgins and monks, a space (sena- torium) reserved for the dignitaries and the noble families of the place. The solea was occupied by the sub-deacons and the minor clerks, whose Fig. 181.— Chandelier, called Chandelier of the Virgin ; the branches are of bronze, and the figure is of carved wood. (Church in Kempen, Rhenish Prussia). — From Weerth's "Monuments of Christian Art." duty it was to intone the psalmody. One or two sacristies (secrctaria) were F F 218 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. placed at the sides of the solea. The sanctuary (Figs. 180 and 181), in which the holy sacrifice took place, was surrounded with iron or wooden railings, and communicated through one or three doors with the naves. The farther end of the choir was semicircular in shape, and is now called the apse (in Greek, Fig. 182. — Altar-piece at Mareuil-en-Brie. kongche, a muscle or cockle-shell; in Latin, absida; in French, chevet) ; around it were placed seats, amongst them that of the bishop, which was raised above the altar, and was visible to the whole congregation. The altar, which was draped and surmounted with the ciborium (a canopy of a cupola shape — Italian, baldacchino), was always placed in the centre of the apse (Figs. 182 and 183). LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 219 Such was the material framework, the normal arrangement of the Greek and Latin liturgy towards the end of the sixth century. No pope was more capable than Gregory the Great (590-604) of uniting the different and scattered elements of which the liturgy was composed. 220 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. To him is due the merit of having been the first to put forth a revised issue of the books of religious service, and who impressed the stamp of his genius on the Roman Catholic ceremonial. Before him, however, Pope Gelasius had collected the prayers used in the administration of the sacra- ments, and had prepared the first missal or book of masses. The latter was remodelled and corrected by Gregory. The same pope gave a more orthodox and popular form to the Antiphonary (Antiphonarium), sometimes called Cantatorium and Graduate, a collection of anthems for every mass in the year; he amended and remodelled in the most skilful and learned manner the anthems that were badly selected and ill scored — endeavouring, after the example set by Solomon, to impart a harmonious and dignified character to sacred music which it did not previously possess. It is tolerably certain that the church chant dates from this period, and that notation by neumes, a method the present age does not understand, of marking the rhythm and the modulations of the voice, cannot be traced farther back than the pontificate of Gregory the Great. John Diacre, who has written the life of this illustrious pope, says that he has seen the school of choristers, founded at Rome by St. Gregory, officiating in full splendour. The founder of this famous school continued to give lessons to the pupils in spite of his old age, his attacks of gout, and his other infirmities, even when he was no longer able to stand or sit upright. Reclining on a narrow and very hard bed, he infused emulation into the minds of the idle and reproved the disobedient. Since the fifth century, the holy duties and the canonical prayers to which the liturgy consecrated the different hours of the day have been known under the name of offices, or canonical hours (Fig. 184), and of breviaries. In Tertullian we already meet with the words Tierce, Sexte, and None. St. Cyprian, St. Clement of Alexandria, St. Jerome, and many other fathers of the Church, assigned certain hours at which to recite the different offices, in such a manner that before the close of the fourth century psalmody seems to have been already regulated in the principal churches of the East. The practice of the Western churches differed, it is true, from that of the churches of the East ; many differences even were to be found in the dioceses of the same country. But, during the earlier centuries, it was everywhere customary to perform the principal offices at night, which was divided into four watches of three hours each : these hours were measured by a water-clock, termed clepsydra. The first watch commenced at sunset LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 221 c (ad vesper as), the second at midnight, the third at cockcrow, the fourth at dawn. To- wards the fifth century the piety of the early Christians having somewhat abated, it soon became customary not to go to church till the fourth watch, when the whole psalmody, that is to say, the twelve psalms, as there were three psalms in each watch, was got through at one repetition. Hence the name of matins (matutiiw). It would seem that the monks themselves, who were more conservative of ancient rites than the secular priests, commenced about this period to chant the Nocturn and the Laud at the morning hours. Rome alone rigorously preserved the distinction between the offices of the day and those of night. The Petites Heures were known as Tierce, Sexte, and None; Prime, the first of the iivtonutfltnf inn mtc; oe. f eftina.Q foxiapatrletfiCio et hmi fanrtq^Mcuf etat itjjrcm Fig. 184. — Ancient Legend of Christmas, with the words of the old French plaint. The engravings represent the Sibyl prophesying the Birth of Christ ; Jesus in the Stable at Bethlehem ; one of the Magi ; and John the Baptist announcing that Christ was born. — Fac-simile from a book of hours, printed with illuminations at Paris by Anthoine Vcrard, towards the close of the Fifteenth Century. 222 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. canonical hours, was not instituted till the twelfth century, but the other three appear to date from the earliest institution of Christianity. St. Cyprian, who lived in the third century, says that prayers were said at Tierce in honour of the descent of the Holy Ghost, at Sexte in memory of the Cruci- fixion, and at None to commemorate the death of Christ. Half a century earlier Tertullian wrote that, independently of the mystic traditions conse- crated by prayer, the Church, in establishing the canonical hours, wished to conform to the secular division of the day. Yespers (Vesper a), so called from the star Vesper, which rises as the sun is setting, also dates from the origin of the liturgy. The hour of vespers was called lucernarum, because it was necessary to light the lamps at the performance of that service. A hymn exists entitled "Ad incensum lucernes," that is, " To the lighting of the lamp." The Latins as well as the Greeks, until the eighth century, celebrated vespers after sunset ; but since that period the usage of Rome, where vespers were said immediately after Nones, prevailed and became universal. Milan, however, still adhered to the primitive form of the rite ; vespers were commenced as soon as the evening star appeared above the horizon, and terminated by torchlight. Until the fifth century vespers were the last prayers of the day, and included the psalms, which were said separately in the following century, as a last service, termed Compline, and which at first only contained three psalms — it was not till the ninth century that the thirtieth psalm was added. The principal libraries of Europe possess several large manuscript volumes written on vellum, as remarkable for their illuminations (Fig. 185) as for the beauty of their calligraphy ; they are termed the Evangeliarium, the Lectionarium, and the Liber Benedictionis, and were frequently bound with great magnificence. They belonged to different churches and dioceses which, while generally following the rules of the dogmatic liturgy established by the councils, used several modifications of their own invention. Some of these modifications were important ones, and were due either to local feeling and the peculiarities of the congregation, or arose during the anniversaries, the commemorative festivals of the diocesan ritual. The use of the Evange- liarium dates from St. Jerome. Before him each of the four Gospels formed a separate book, and the four were of different liturgical importance. St. Jerome collected them, arranged them in their proper order, and added marginal notes of the daily offices. LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 223 Fig. 185. — The Mystic Fountain, from an Evangeliarium of Charlemagne (Eighth Century), in the National Library of Paris. The jet of water represents the Church, the source of truth; the inner birds the souls of the elect ; while those outside seem to personify souls attracted to baptism by divine grace. — From the large work of Count de Bastard. A hierarchical order with defined powers and privileges existed from the date of the first establishment of Christianity. In his sixth epistle to the Magnesians, St. Ignatius, who had been a disciple of St. Peter, says, " I 224 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. exhort you to behave, in all things, with that spirit of concord which comes from God ; and to look upon the bishop as the representative of God himself in your midst, upon the priests as forming the august senate of the apostles, and upon the deacons as those to whom is intrusted the ministry of Jesus Christ." The faithful bowed the head to none but the bishop, to ask his blessing ; and in the church the bishop occupied a seat raised above that of the priests. The bishops wore a tunic and pallium, or long mantle, a chasuble or dalmatic, and a circlet of gold or polished metal upon the head. The latter was subsequently replaced by the mitre, which for some time was made of cloth, and was a circular pointed cap split at the top (Fig. 186). The primitive insignia of office worn by the bishops were the episcopal ring and the pastoral staff, made of wood, ivory, or metal. They are mentioned as wearing sandals for the first time in the ninth century, and gloves in the twelfth. The bishop of Rome, the first among his brethren (primus inter pares), wielded over the whole Church a supremacy formally enunciated by St. Irenaeus, a disciple of St. Polycarp, a contemporary of the apostles. Originally, however, he wore no distinguishing mark of his pre- eminent rank ; but towards the fifth century, the term " pope " began to be exclusively applied to him. After the reformation of his clerks (clerici) by the famous Bishop of Hippona, the former were called canonici, whence the term chanoines, because they led a life in conformity with the canons of the Church. In Africa, in Spain, and in Gaul these canonical clerks lived together and boarded with the bishop, and devoted themselves to science, literature, art, music, and especially to calligraphy. They 'thus formed a sort of religious school, whence their title of scholastics (scholastici) — a title which they well deserved during the reign of Charlemagne, but which they had ceased to merit at the time of Charles the Bold. The priests attached to each church constituted what was termed the assembly of the presbytery (presbyterium), or the ecclesiastical senate of the bishop of the diocese (senatus ecclesicv episcopi). It was permis- sible for the clerks at an early age to enter the minor degrees of their calling, such as those of porter, exorcist, reader, and acolyte ; but they were not allowed to assume the higher grades until they had reached a ripe age. The minimum age for the diaconate was thirty years ; for the priest- hood, thirty-five ; ordination, from the fourth century upwards, took place four times a year. We learn from St. Cyprian, who lived in the third LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 225 century, that from that date it was decreed that this ceremony should only take place in the churches, publicly, at mass. Before choristers were regularly introduced many churches had psalmists, who constituted a distinct minor order. These psalmists were succeeded by Fig. 186.— Chasuble, Mitre, and Stole of St. Thomas a Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury (1117— 1170) ; preserved in the Cathedral of Sens. — Cloth and Embroidery of the Twelfth Century. chanting clerks. In the reign of the Emperor Justinian, the metropolitan church of Constantinople possessed twenty-six choristers and a hundred and ten readers. In the fifteenth canon of the Council of Laodicea we read that " none but the canonical choristers are allowed to sing in the church." The congregation, however, still kept to the custom of joining their voices to those of the choristers. G G 226 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. At first there no doubt existed a special dress worn during the hours of service, but it is supposed that it was only in its colour, which was white, that this dress differed from that worn by the deacons and the priests in everyday life. The maniple (manipulum) and the stole (stola), accessories to the alb, which was the original vestment worn by the priest, were not adopted and consecrated by the liturgy till the third or fourth centuries. The deacons only wore the stole during the sacrament, but the priests wore it continuously, as a mark of their sacerdotal dignity. The use of the chasuble was subsequent to that of the stole, the alb, and the dalmatic. The chasuble is first mentioned in the twenty-seventh canon of the Fourth Council of Toledo (in 527 A.D.). Prior to the fifth century, the clergy were obliged to wear no distinctive dress in private life. As in the days of the Apostles, the bishops, the priests, the clerks, the deacons, and the choristers wore tunics and sandals, as prescribed by the Saviour in the Gospel of St. Mark (vi. 9). They covered themselves with a square piece of black or brown cloth, which was draped around the figure, and was fastened by neither hook nor tie ; beneath it was a plain tunic of a dark colour. In the fifth century Pope Celestinus disapproved of this costume, which caused the followers of Christ to be confounded with the Stoic philosophers. In the sixth century the laity had abandoned the Roman style of costume, and wore short dresses, copied from those of the barbarians who had become the rulers of Gaul ; but the Church, careful of the dignity of its ministers, refused to adopt this expensive alteration. Henceforward a broad distinction was established between the dress of the clergy and that of the laity. The Council of Agde (506 A.D.) ordered all clerks to wear clothes and shoes of a peculiar cut, in conformity with their religious profession. Two later councils forbade them the use of the Roman military cloak (sag urn) and of purple- coloured stuffs. Gregory the Great forbade his household to wear any dress but the long toga, as the one essentially appropriate to the people of the Church. This costume, with scarcely any modification, was worn by all orthodox ecclesiastics, through all the changes of the Middle Ages, until the seventeenth century. The priest, when in the exercise of his holy functions, was not expected to make any change in his dress. Still, from the fourth to the ninth century everything seems to show that his proper costume was always white, or at least that it was so during the celebration of the highest ceremonies. St. Chrysostom, feeling the approach of death, and being anxious to partake of LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 227 the holy sacrament, called for his white vestments, and distributed those he was wearing, even to his shoes, among his assistants. The customs and traditions of the West conformed in this to those of the East. The neophyte was stripped of his worldly garments, he was clad in a white or religious robe (habitus religionis), and was then considered fit to perform his duties. Sometimes, however, the white robes of the sovereign pontiff were adorned with bands of gold or purple. White was not mixed with other tints in the Fig. 187. — Romanesque perforated Handbell, representing the symbols of the Four Evangelists (Twelfth Century). — From the Archaeological Museum at "Rheims. dress of the clergy till towards the ninth century ; the five hues admitted by religious symbolism date only from the twelfth century. Charlemagne, who was proud of his thorough acquaintance with the liturgy, who esteemed it an honour to wear, on high occasions, the green chasuble embroidered with gold, and to chant the epistles before the assembled congregations, took the greatest pains with all the ceremonies of the Church ; and it is an undoubted fact that the pomp with which they were afterwards celebrated was inaugurated by him. Charlemagne and his successors, Louis the Affable and Charles the 228 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. Bald, did not, however, content themselves with merely attending to ceremonial pomp ; they did their best to introduce a principle of imity in conformity with the Roman liturgy. At the commencement of the eighth century Pope Adrian I., having sent to Charlemagne an antiphonary scored by St. Gregory himself, the Emperor ordered all the churches in his dominions to adopt the Gregorian chant. Thenceforward the ancient Gallican liturgy almost disappeared, and when Charles the Bald was desirous of comparing together the Greek, Roman, and Gallican liturgies, he was obliged to summon ecclesiastics from Toledo to officiate in his presence according to the Gallican rite. Charles preferred the Roman ritual ; but notwithstanding this, each diocesan cathedral, each separate abbey, intro- duced into the Gallo-Roman liturgy various accessory forms differing more or less from one another. It is possible to trace back to the sixth century the first use of church bells, but their general introduction into the Western church dates from the eighth century. They were termed seings (in Latin signa) ; they were not rung, but were simply struck with wooden or metal hammers (Fig. 187), as is still done south of the Pyrenees. From this practice comes the word toc-seing or tocsin, applied to the municipal peals of the Middle Ages and of still later times. The organ (organum) also dates from the eighth century. Imperfect as this instrument originally was, it caused tremendous en- thusiasm among its hearers. Indeed, it may be said that organs and church bells had an equal share in raising the prestige of the ceremonial liturgy, which charmed and captivated both the senses and the souls of its hearers, by the display of its numerous officiating clergy, by the solemn gravity of its chants, by the noble simplicity of the vestments, and by the chaste and majestic arrangement of its ritual. Under the last Carlovingians the liturgy gradually deteriorated ; less in the East perhaps than in the West, less at Rome and Milan perhaps than elsewhere, but everywhere the signs of deplorable relaxation and falling away were manifest. The choristers attempted to assume the privileges of the clerks ; the deacons arrogated to themselves impossible rights of inde- pendence ; the priests despised the bishops, and too frequently the bishops, presuming on their power, had the audacity to disobey the pontifical decrees. This change and deterioration principally showed itself in the psalmody, in the chants, in the adornment of the sanctuary, and in the dress of the LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 229 Fig. 188. — The Triumph of the Lamb. — Christ, typified as the spotless lamb, with a glory round his head and holding the cross, is at the feet of God the Father ; around him are the Four Evangelists, represented by their typical attributes, and resting upon wheels of fire. The archangels are bringing him their offerings. The firmament is supported by four angels. Beneath is St. John explaining the Apocalypse to his commentator. — From a Miniature in the " Commentary upon the Apocalypse," by Beatus; a Manuscript of the Twelfth Century, in the Collection of M. Ambroise Firmin-Didot. ecclesiastics. The Byzantine methods of treatment, as applied to architectural monuments and to the various forms of Christian art, did something to pre- serve the traditions of the liturgy, but from the close of the tenth century till 2 3o LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. the twelfth much confusion prevailed in the Latin Church. It was reserved for the Crusades, after a century and a half of adventurous expeditions, to bring back from countries beyond the sea, from Antioch, from Constan- tinople, and from Jerusalem, the elements and the principles of a Neo-Greek liturgy, in which the degenerate Gallo-Roman was as it were saturated, and its whole character remodelled. The Catholic liturgy thus underwent a touching and marvellous trans- formation ; this transformation was inaugurated by the construction of new churches, in which the Romanesque style gave place to that of the Ogive or Gothic ; by the "erection of slender belfries, recalling the minarets of the Mahometan mosques; by the introduction of transparent pictures on painted glass ; by the chaste but splendid appointments of the chapels ; by the dazzling decorations of the altars ; by the melody of the church bells, the sonorous messengers of religion calling the faithful to prayer; and by the harmony of the human voice with the organ and other musical instruments. A complete and ingenious symbolism was contained in this comprehensive allegorical ritual, and rendered the liturgy a veritable sanctuary of Chris- tian instruction and sacred tradition, each mystery (Fig. 188), each precept of which penetrated into the soul, as it were, through the medium of the senses. In the thirteenth century, when the celebrated William Durand, Bishop of Mende, wrote his " Rationale of Divine Service," a complete collection of ihe liturgy of the day, this sort of canonical legislation became settled as much as a matter could be which the bishops and even the mere priests were continually modifying. William Durand, following the example of his pre- decessors, included many innovations which were to be lamented, many eccen- tric rites foreign to the traditions of the primitive church, and lowering to the dignity of divine worship. Enlightened minds felt the truth of this, and the Council of Trent found it necessary to demand a liturgical reform. In con- sequence of this demand Pope Pius Y., in 1568, issued the corrected form of the Roman Breviary, and, in 1570, the new Missal. As the principal object was to reform the errors which had crept in in later times, the dioceses which possessed rituals of at least two hundred years old could either preserve their own customs or adopt the Breviary and the Missal of Pius Y. The Church has deviated as little as possible from its ancient ceremonial, particularly in what concerns the administration of the sacraments. Never- theless, seven sacraments, which we will rapidly notice in the order in which LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 231 they are enu- merated by the Council of Trent, were formerly accompanied by certain ceremo- nies which the change of man- ners and customs has caused to fall into disuse, and which we shall mention merely as a proof of their antiquity. 1. Baptism, which St. Peter had given by aspersion to the three thousand persons whom he converted by his first sermon, was also given in pri- mitive times by immersion; final- ly infusion (from the Latin verb infundere, to sprinkle) was adopted in the manner in which it is practised in our own day (Figs. 189 and 190). Fig 189. — Three Sacraments : Baptism, which inaugurates life ; Confirma- tion, which strengthens childhood; and Penance, which reconciles manhood. Left portion of the triptych painted on panel by Roger Van der Weyden (llogier del Pasturle) .- — From the Antwerp Museum (Fifteenth Century). 232 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 2. Confirmation was administered imme- diately after baptism, when only adults were admitted to the latter sacrament; but when baptism was adminis- tered to new-born in- fants, confirmation had to be postponed till the receivers of the rite were old enough to answer for themselves — that is to say, un- til they were capable of distinguishing be- tween good and evil (Fig. 189). 3. The Eucharist from the earliest times was administered un- der the name of com- munion to those in sound health, and under the name of viaticum to those at the point of death (Figs. 192 and 193). The communion, that is to say the host, was received in the hand, and was admi- Fig. 190.— The Ship of Baptism, a Flemish work of the Sixteenth Century, in chiselled gold and silver ; from the Collection of M. Onghena, at Ghent. — When a child was baptized, it was the custom in the Low Countries to drink the infant's health in a cup of spiced wine. The cup, shaped like a boat, is typical of the voyage of life : an aged knight is at the helm, two others are fencing together, a sailor adjusts the rigging, the wind fills the sail, and at the mast-head the look-out scans the horizon. The Flemish device runs thus : " A fortunate voyage to the new-born." nistered by the communicant himself. After the sixth century women were enjoined to receive it in a white veil, termed dominical, with which they lifted LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 233 it to their mouths without touching it with their hands. In 880 the Council of Rouen decreed that in future the sacrament was only to be received at the hand of the officiating priest. Until the thirteenth century the com- munion was always preceded by the kiss of love ; the men embraced the men, and the women the women. After the distribution of bread the deacons came forward with two-handled cups of large dimensions, containing wine for the communicants, which each tasted through a golden pipe (Fig. 191). 4. Penance, the obligatory practice of which was reduced to once a Fig. 191. — Sacramental Cup; a work of the Twelfth Century, in silver gilt, from the Abbey of the Benedictines of Witten, near Inspruck. year by the fourth Lateran Council, had always for its aim the absolution from sin consequent upon confession. Excommunication, the extreme punishment inflicted upon great sinners, was pronounced by the faint light of a wax taper, which the priest afterwards extinguished and trampled under foot. In some countries the populace used to carry a bier to the door of the excommunicated person; stones were hurled against his dwelling, and all kinds of foul abuse were heaped upon him. Of a still more solemn nature was the excommunication pro- nounced by the pope himself on Holy Thursday, in virtue of the bull termed In Ccena Domini, against all who appealed to the general council against the decrees and the ordinances of the pontiffs ; against the princes H H 234 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. Fig. 192. — The Sacrament of the Eucharist, which keeps youth holy. — Central portion of the triptych, by Roger Van der Weyden, in the Antwerp Museum (Fifteenth Century). who exacted unfair tribute from ecclesiastics ; and against heretics, pirates, £c. A deacon read the bull from, the balcony (loggia, an open tribunal) of LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 235 St. Peter's in the presence of the pope, who, as a symbol of anathema, dashed a lighted torch of yellow wax into the open court of the Vatican, which the assistants hastened to extinguish by trampling upon it. It was also on Holy Thursday that the reconciliation of the penitents took place, that is to say, their general absolution, to enable them to take part in the mysteries of Easter. Fig. 193. — Legend of the passage of the viaticum across a wooden bridge, at Utrecht, in 1277. Some dancers having allowed the host to pass without discontinuing their dances, the bridge suddenly gave way and two hundred persons were drowned in the river. — Fac-simile of an Engraving upon Wood by P. Wolgemuth, in the " Liber Chronicarum Mundi : " Nuremberg, 1493, in folio. 6. Extreme unction has always been given to sick people in danger of death, according to the recommendation of the Apostle St. James. The material of which this sacrament is composed is the oil of the infirm, but we can see from old rituals that the place and number of the unctions have varied at different times in the administration of this sacrament (Fig. 194). 6. Orders. Besides the higher orders, which were conferred as they are in our own day, the Church included from the earliest times the four minor LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. orders, which were bestowed, as now, upon the tonsured clerks ; that is to say, the orders of por- ter, reader , exor- cist, and acolyte. The consecra- tion of abbots and abbesses, although made with a great deal of cere- mony, was not considered as an ordination, but only as a benediction. The bishop, after giving the abbot the com- munion under the form of bread, blessed him, placed a mitre on his head, and gave him his gloves, the symbols of his rank, with Fig. 194. — Three Sacraments: Marriage, at full manhood; Orders, at old age; and Extreme Unction, at death. Eight portion of prayers. The the triptych painted on panel by Eoger Van der abbot's crosier Weyden. — Antwerp Museum. Fifteenth Century. and ring were LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 237 bestowed upon him before the offertory. Alexander II., elected pope in 1061, was the first to confer upon abbots the privilege of wearing the mitre. Abbesses also enjoyed the right of carrying the crosier ; they received it from the hands of the bishop, together with the pastoral cross and ring. In the synods and councils the abbots were only allowed to wear a mitre ornamented with orfroi (a golden fringe), but devoid of pearls and precious stones ; the bishops wore the precious mitre, that is to say, one ornamented with pearls and jewels. 7. The ceremony of marriage has altered but little. In old days, how- ever, it was celebrated at the door and not in the interior of the church. In the ninth century the priest placed jewelled crowns upon the heads of husband and wife ; these crowns were made in the shape of a tower, and were afterwards kept near the altar. Most religious ceremonies were accompanied with processions ; but besides these there were great public processions varying according to the country and the diocese in which they took place. They were regulated by special liturgies, which formed a separate ritual termed processional. The procession of palms or of branches, which takes place the Sunday before Easter, in remembrance of the entry of Christ into Jerusalem, had for a long time been customary in the East, when towards the sixth or seventh century it was adopted by the Latin church, which frequently added scenic accessories, intended to make a still deeper impression on the minds of the spectators. This ancient festival was distinguished by many names ; by some it was termed the Hosanna, in memory of the acclamations with which Jesus was received in Jerusalem ; by others the Sunday of Indulgences, on account of the indulgences distributed by the Church on that holy day. In old times verses from the Gospels, inscribed upon a richly ornamented banner sur- rounded with palm-leaves, were carried in this procession, and it was fre- quently also accompanied by the chalice containing the host, in the midst of consecrated branches. It was, as a rule, customary that the ashes employed for the ceremony of Ash "Wednesday should be those of the branches carried in the procession of the preceding year, and which were carefully preserved from year to year, and burnt when thoroughly desiccated. In 1262 Pope Urban IY. confirmed and extended to the whole of Christendom the statute of Robert, Bishop of Lie*ge ; who, being of opinion that the ceremony of the eucharist ought to be celebrated in a more solemn 238 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. Fig. 195. — Procession of the Host, in Paris : " The procession proceeds from the Maison aux Piliers, the ancient Hotel de Yille, to the Place de Greve. To the left may he seen Jean Juvenal des Ursins, on his knees hefore the host, which is carried on a species of litter by a couple of monks of the Sainte-Chapelle, and surrounded by the clerks of the brotherhood crowned with wreaths of roses and carrying large lighted tapers To the right, and towards the banks of the Seine, and in front of the floating piles of wood, is the great Croix de Greve. On the other side of the Seine may be seen the Cathedral of Notre-Dame." — From a Miniature in the Manuscript of the " Hours of Juvenal des Ursins," presented by M. Ambroise Firmin- Didot to the town of Paris, and burnt in 1871 in the conflagration of the Hotel de Ville. LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 239 manner than it was possible to do upon Holy Thursday, the day set aside for the reconciliation of penitents, had decreed that every year, on the Fig. 196. — Solemn Procession made on the 7th September, 1513, by the clergy and inhabitants of Dijon, to obtain from Our Lady the relief of the town, at that time besieged by the Swiss. The ceremony was afterwards renewed every year at the same epoch; it was termed the "Festival of Our Lady of the Swiss." — Tapestry of the Sixteenth Century, in the Dijon Museum. — From a copy in the possession of M. Ach. Jubinal. first Thursday after Pentecost, the festival of Corpus Christi, or the Fete-Dieu should take place (Fig. 195) ; the office for which, the same as is used in our own day, was composed by St. Thomas d'Aquinas. 240 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. The procession termed Litanies majeures, first instituted in 589 by Pope Pelagius II., owed its origin to a plague that desolated Rome after an inundation of the Tiber. In 474 St. Mamert, Archbishop of Vienne, in Dauphiny, in order to thank God for having delivered his diocese from the scourges which desolated it, and from the wild beasts which ravaged it, founded th< procession of Rogations, which took place during the three days whicl Fig. 197. — Pentecost. — Fac-simile of a Miniature from the " Psalmody of St. Louis." — Manuscript of the Thirteenth Century, in the National Library, Paris. precede the feast of the Ascension. This procession was ordered for the whole of France by the Council of Orleans in 511 ; but it only came into use at Rome towards the close of the eighth century, under Pope Leo III. The procession which precedes the mass of Ascension Thursday is of the highest antiquity ; but nowhere was it carried out with greater ceremony, or attended by a larger number of pilgrims, than at the church built in Palestine by St. Helen, mother of Con stan tine, on the very spot where the ascension took place, and where still might be seen on the stone LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 241 the last footprints of our Saviour, as He left this earth and ascended to heaven. In fact, in the Middle Ages there were an immense number of festivals which gave rise to processions (Fig. 196) and to other religious ceremonies. It must not be forgotten that all great festivals were indifferently termed Fig. 198.— The. Adoration of the Magi.— From a pax attributed to Maso Finiguerra (Fifteenth Century), preserved at Florence. One of the kings is on his knees, and has taken off his crown to present incense and myrrh to the Infant Jesus ; the others are riding towards the manger, escorted by their varlets and pages, and followed by a long caravan ; there are angels on the roof playing the viol and the lute. Easters. The anniversary of the resurrection of Jesus Christ was the great Easter, and in order to prepare worthily for it, the body was purified by baths, and the hair and the beard were cut, as tokens of the care with which the Christian ought to preserve the purity of his soul, and to remove the vices that infect the unregenerated man. The Nativity, Epiphany, Ascension, and Pentecost were also called Easter. In some churches, at Great Easter, i i LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. dramatic representations were given of the mysteries the festival celebrated. A procession was undertaken to a tomb cut in a rock. Three women and two men in Israelitish dress represented the three Marys and the disciples John and Peter, and others dressed in white, with crowns on their heads and wings on their shoulders, played the part of the angels who communed with them. Pentecost (Fig. 197), or the Easter of Roses, was accompanied with the same dramatic and religious accessories. In many churches during mass, at the words Vent, Sanctc Spiritus, a sudden blast of the trumpet was given to recall the great noise in the midst of which the Holy Ghost descended upon the apostles. Sometimes, indeed, to add to the scenic etriSf JDCHC ii Cns &Kxii<3£ -aGninr&Ji Fig. 199. — Knife with which the consecrated bread was cut ; on the blade may be read on one side a prayer for a blessing on the food, on the other a thanksgiving, both with music (Six- teenth Century). — Collection of M. Ach. Jubinal, Paris. imitation of the mystery, tongues of fire fell from the roof, or a shower of red rose-leaves took place ; and doves, emblems of the Holy Ghost, were allowed to flutter about the church. At high festivals the mass was followed by the ceremony of the offering at which all present were expected to deposit a coin in a plate, and kiss tl emblem of goodwill presented to them (Fig. 198). This offering was ii memory of an ancient custom. The offerings, which in the primitii Church the faithful were accustomed to make every day, consisted bread and wine. They were placed before the altar at the commencem< of the second part of the mass, after the reading of the Gospel and of tl Apostles' Creed. The capitularies of the early Frankish kings prescribe that neophytes were to offer bread and wine at least every Sunday. Un1 the eighth or ninth century, some authors assert that for the sacrifice of tl LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. 243 \ Fig. 200.— Altar of kthe ancient Cathedral of Arras (Thirteenth Century), now destroyed; from a picture of the Sixteenth Century preserved in the sacristy of the Cathedral of Arras. — The angels on the top of the columns bear the instruments of the Passion. Along the summit of the screen are placed six reliquaries containing the relics of different saints ; they form a retinue for Jesus, the chief of all martyrs. The tabernacle is not a heavy square case, but a suspended casket borne by an angel, who appears to descend from heaven. Higher up three angels collect in the mysterious cup of the Grail the blood which flows from the feet and hands of the crucified Jesus. mass, either leavened or unleavened bread was used indifferently ; but since that period leavened bread has only been in use in the Eastern Church. From this epoch, also, the offered bread was no longer used except for 244 LITURGY AND CEREMONIES. distribution to the people, as a symbol of the communion, and it then took the name of eulogy or consecrated bread (Fig. 199). These pieces of bread, which the assisting priests and deacons offered successively at the altar upon white t> napkins, were of a round shape. They were termed hoops, crowns, and wheels. The custom of offering bread and wine whilst holding a lighted taper in the hand has been handed down, and still exists at burials in many dioceses. The altar where the offerings were made was surmounted by a cupola (called ciborium) sus- tained by four columns, between which were cur- tains, which were closed during part of the service to hide the sacred mysteries about to take place (Fig. 200). In the middle of the cupola, above the altar, a hollow dove, made of gold or silver, was suspended (Fig. 201) ; in this the eucharist for the sick was kept. This silver dove was re- placed at a later period by the tabernacle. We have thus seen that time has only brought about slight modifications in the liturgy of the Church ; on the other hand, we can satisfy ourselves that nothing is left to conjecture or hypothesis; the most searching criticism only Fig. 201.— Dove suspended above affirms the truths of tradition. M. Paul Allard, the altar, containing the eucha- a distinguished writer, has expressed this in ristic box (Thirteenth Century). , , . , ff ~ , 1 ,. , a very happy manner in his work, "Subter- — " Studies upon the Archaeo- J logy of the Altar," by Laib and ranean Rome." " For two centuries," he says, Schwarz. « fae sojj of Rome has been searched and dug up with indefatigable ardour, in the hope of discovering the source of the first Christian institutions, the very origin of the Church, catacombs have been thrown open to the day, thousands of inscriptions have been laid bare, and rare and precious paintings have been copied, or are still to be seen. From these subterranean labours, which have left nothing, to conjec- ture, the history of the origin of Christianity has emerged, complete and renovated, but differing in nothing from that which tradition has handed down to us, and which, confirmed as to a great number of points, has been shaken in none." THE POPES. Influence of the Papacy in the Reformation of Early Society. — St. Leo the Great.— Origin of the Temporal Power of the Popes.— Gregory the Great. — The Iconoclastic Emperors. — Stephen III. delivered by France. — Charlemagne crowned Emperor of the West. — Photius. — The Diet of Worms. — Gregory VII. ; his Plan for a Christian Republic. — Urban II. — The Crusades. — Calixtus II. ; Termination of the Dispute as to Investiture. — Innocent III. — Struggle of Boniface VIII. against Philippe le Bel. — The great Western Schism. — Council of Florence- — Battle of Lepanto. — Council of Trent. URING the Middle Ages the popes exercised an appreciable influence upon society, personifying as they did the Christian element which was destined to regenerate the old world. " A doctrine emanating from Asia was not to subjugate, but to convert Europe, to associate political and religious truth, and, by the force of conscience against idolatry, and of resignation against tyranny, to restore the human race in all its dignity under the one true God. With the power of the sword sprung up that of opinion, which, independent of its rival, sustained the cause of progress in its struggle against this same power of the sword, and prevented it from being overthrown. The Church, representing the people and opening the way to the emancipation of all who were weighed down by conquest and by force, was unable to destroy servitude, legalised violence, and rapine at one blow, but it encountered them with a reproving doctrine and a condemning God. " Nero and Domitian soon found themselves face to face with Peter and Linus ; — the first, armed masters of the world, having upon their side legality, 246 THE POPES. which is so different from justice, representatives of the old world which cried out in the circus, ' To the lions with the Christians ! ' — the latter, poor, weak, misunderstood, and calum- niated, propagating the kingdom of God by autho- rity, education, ceremonies, and example ; declaring that unto Caesar should be ren- dered the things which are Caesar's, but nothing more, neither worship nor the sacrifice of one's sentiments and convictions." — (Cantu.) This struggle, begun by St. Peter, the first Bishop of Eome, and first pope, and continued by his successor St. Linus, went on for three centuries. Nevertheless the popes, unchecked by per- secutions, had effected th< moral conques t of the Romj world, — even the palace oi the Caesars was full of Chris tians when their legal exisl ence became recognised Constantine. The seat oi the empire was transferrec to Byzantium ; the luxui Fig. 202. — The Jewish Religion assisting at the death of Jesus Christ. The figure has a bandaj over the eyes, the Decalogue is falling from its hands, and its spear is broken to pieces. Sculpture in Strasburg Cathedral (Thirteenth Century).— From a£Photograph by Charles Winter, of Strasburg. THE POPES. 247 and effeminacy of the East enervated the degene- rated race of the Caesars, while under the influence of the Bishops of Rome, officially recognised at that date as the sovereign pontiffs of the Christians, the West continued to ad- vance rapidly in the path of modern civilisation. The emperors, con- verted to Christianity, ere long became the opponents of the popes ; " laying aside the sword of defence for disputa- tions on theology. " Their weakness handed the West over to the Ger- manic races ; primitive so- ciety, whose organization still remained heathen, despite the change in religious belief, was swal- lowed up by the invasion of these Northerners, whose institutions facili- tated the triumph of the ideas of political liberty and equality, the germ of which was deposited in the Gospel. Fig. 203. — The Christian Religion assisting at the death of Jesus Christ. Crowned and triumphant, the figure holds in one hand the standard of the cross, and in the other the chalice of the eucharist.— Sculpture in Strasburg Cathedral (Thirteenth Century).— From a Photograph by Charles de Winter, of Strasburg. THE POPES. The papacy of the Middle Ages was first made illustrious by Leo I., sur- named the Great. Called to be Bishop of Rome by the people and the clergy in 440, when twenty years of age, he rendered the greatest possible services to civilisation during the twenty-two years of his reign. His preachings, his writings, his decrees, aimed chiefly at the education of his clergy and his flock, at the maintenance of the Nicene Creed (Fig. 206), the moral improve- Fig. 204. — The spiritual and the temporal powers dependent upon Jesus Christ, who is handing to St. Peter the keys and to Constantine the standard surmounted by the cross.— Mosaic of the Tenth Century in the Basilica of St. John of Lateran, at Rome. ment of the clergy, and the upholding of discipline. He fought the heretics with equal energy and authority ; he continued the struggle of orthodoxy against the errors which attacked the dogma of the Incarnation, which is the basis of Christianity, and upheld with vigilant perseverance the primitive doctrine of the Church, so clearly defined and proclaimed during the reign of one of his predecessors at the Council of Ephesus in 431. He was, above all things, a skilful diplomatist and a great politician. He firmly maintained the Fig. 205.— St. Peter.— Fac-simile of a Wood Engraving of the Old Masters, by Hans Baldung, otherwise Grum (1470—1550), in the National Library, Paris. [To face page 248. THE POPES. 249 apostolic pre-eminence of Rome over Constantinople — a pre-eminence which was, moreover, recognised by the Council of Chalcedon. The empire, like the Church, needed such a man as St. Leo in its days of cr; adversity. The invasion of the barbarians was triumphant in the West, and nearly all of the conquerors were either Arians, who denied the divinity of Christ, or idolaters. Leo triumphed over all these calamities. Rome had already been ravished by Alaric in 410, but even he respected the churches in K K 2 5o THE POPES. which the population had fled for refuge. Attila, at the head of seven hundred thousand men, marched on Rome for the purpose of devastating it with fire and sword ; resistance seemed out of the question, and the Emperor was preparing to escape. Amidst the universal panic, Pope Leo, accom- panied by a consul, went out to meet the dreaded chieftain, and induced him to turn back. Some years later, Genseric poured his vandals into Italy, and again Leo boldly presented himself before his fierce assailant, and made him renounce his intention of burning the city and slaying the inhabitants. Thus did circumstances lead the way for the temporal power of the popes in Rome, of which they eventually became the sole guardians and defenders. But the genius of Leo served only to defer the downfall of the Western Empire, which was doomed to disappear fifteen years after his death. His successors continued to protect Italy, so far as in them lay, against the horrors of war ; and Pope Agapetus, though weighed down by years, undertook the perilous mission of going to Constantinople to make peace between the Emperor of the East and the King of the Yisigoths. A few years after- wards, Pope Pelagius I. had the courage to seek an interview with Totila, and so preserve Rome from massacre and dishonour. Pelagius II., who kept within bounds the Lombards, at that time masters of Italy, was suc- ceeded by Gregory I., surnamed Gregory the Great, one of the most illus- trious of the Roman pontiffs. Gregory, whose father was a Roman senator, and whose mother was canonised, was praetor or chief magistrate of Rome, and his administration had gained for him great popularity when, by his father's death, he inherited a large fortune. This enabled him to found seven monasteries, and, having distributed the remainder of his money amongst the poor, he became a monk in the Abbey of St. Andrew, which he had founded previous to his entering the priesthood. Chosen as pope on September 3, 590, he, in spite of his resistance to the clergy, the senators, and the people, immediately made his profession of faith in the customary manner. He converted the Lombards, who were professed Arians, and even idolaters. This was no small triumph, for it meant the peaceful subjection, or rather the alliance of a warlike people, whose close neighbourhood to Rome had been a constant cause of alarm. It was especially in his relations with the court of Constantinople tjiat Gregory displayed all the loftiness of his character. While he bridled THE POPES. 251 I the ambition of the Lombards, so as to preserve for the emperors of the East their Italian possessions (Fig. 207), he defended with equal energy and tact the independence of the Church and the in- terests of the Italians against the unjust pre- tensions of the Byzantine Court. He ren- dered more distinct the role of the papacy in the Middle Ages, which was to uphold the purity of dogma as opposed to heresy against the theological pretensions of emperors, to pro- tect also the Catholic population, vanquished and often persecuted by new masters, whether pagan or heretic ; and, lastly, to convey the tidings of the Gospel to the most remote nations of the earth. To this great pope appertains the glory of having converted England by menns of the missionaries whom he sent thither. " There is nothing grander in the history of Europe," said Bossuet, " than the entry of St. Augustine into Kent with forty of his companions, who, preceded by the cross and image of the Great King our Lord Jesus Christ, prayed fervently for the conversion of England. St. Gregory, who had sent them forth, edified them by truly apostolic letters, and constrained St. Augustine to tremble with amazement at the numerous iracles which God wrought through him. Bertha, a French princess, brought her hus- band, King Ethelbert, over to Christianity. The kings of France and Queen Brunehild supported this new mission. The French bishops entered cordially into this good work, and, by order of the pope, they consecrated St. Augustine. The support -which St. Gregory gave to the new bishop bore abundant fruit, and the Anglican Church was thus formed. , offering t( tine Emperor the globe surmounted by the cross, the symbol of the imperial power. — A leaf of an ivory dyptic or tablet of the Sixth Century, preserved in the British Museum. — From a copy by M. J. Labarte. The second leaf of this dyptic being lost, the Greek inscrip- tion, which signifies, " Receive this object, and learning the cause," is incomplete, and its meaning enigmatical. Bossuet' s " Histoire Universelle," p. 101, Firmin-Didot edition. THE POPES. Amidst these important engagements, the activity of Gregory found time to superintend the relief of the poor and the education of the young. He built schools and hospitals in Eome, and increased the splendour of the church services by a judicious and well-conceived reform, of sacred music. M. F. Clement, in his history of religious music, says, "St. Gregory, not content with regulating the antiphon for every service throughout the year, also founded a school of singing at Eome, and personally superintended the teaching there. While other masters were entrusted with the task of giving lessons in one division of the school, at St. Peter's in the Vatican, he directed another section of St. John of Lateran. "We read in the life of this pontiff, written by John the Deacon, that, compelled by his infirmities to lie at full length upon a couch, he still taught the children singing, and that the staff which he used for beating time is still preserved." A century after his death, two popes of the same name who succeeded each other, Gregory II. and Gregory III., recalled to mind the virtues, and above all the firmness of their glorious predecessor. They had to struggle against the extraordinary pretensions of the emperors of the East, who de- clared themselves iconoclasts — that is, breakers of images. Alleging certain abuses, brought about by the ignorance of some unenlightened Christians, Leo the Isaurian published in 726 an edict commanding the destruction of the images — the crucifixes and the statues— throughout the whole empire. Neither the clergy nor their flocks had ever seen any sign of idolatry in the worship of these images, which were venerated as sacred symbols and respected like family portraits. The Patriarch of Constantinople, refusing to obey this edict, was banished. This new heresy was severely rebuked by Gregory II., and after him by Gregory III. The latter replied to the emperor, who had requested him to convoke a council, in these noble words, " You have written asking us to assemble an oecumenical council ; it would be futile, as you alone persecute the images ; cease these evil deeds, and the world will be at peace, and scandals will come to an end. Do you not see that your crusade against the images is an act of revolt against the Church and of presumption ? The churches were enjoying a period of profound tranquillity when you excited this tempest of disputes ; put an end to the schism, and then there will be no need of a council/' This apostolic firmness excited the wrath of Leo, who dispatched against Eome a fleet of vessels carrying a large body of troops, but they were lost in the Adriatic. THE POPES. 253 Trasmund, Duke of Spoleto, and the Duke of Benevento, having risen in revolt against Luitprand, King of the Lombards, took refuge in Rome. Gregory received them very cordially, and refused to deliver them up to their redoubtable suzerain. Luitprand at once marched upon Rome, and Gregory demanded help from Charles Martel — which, however, he declined to give ; and the good pope died just in time to be saved from witnessing the sack of the Eternal City (741). Zachariah, a Greek by birth, accepted the succession left vacant by Gregory III. under such critical circumstances ; but he negotiated so skilfully with Luitprand, that the king not only gave back to the pontifical domain four towns which he had already seized, but f urthe-r added, as an irrevocable gift, the territories of the Sabines, Narnia, Ossimo, and Ancona, and consented to evacuate the exarchy of Ravenna, occupied by his troops. Zacharias enjoyed an equal amount of credit with the Emperor Constantinus Copronymus, who granted him, in the interest of the Roman Church, concessions which were more than could have been expected from an irritated suzerain. All the sovereigns of his time seemed anxious to have recourse to his advice. Charle- magne, son of Charles Martel, and Rachis, King of the Lombards, went to Rome for the purpose of seeing him, and he invited both of them to enter the monastery of Monte-Cassino. Stephen III., elected by acclamation to succeed Zachariah (752), was carried from the public square to the Lateran Church upon the shoulders of his supporters ; and this custom has since been adhered to in cases where the election has been unanimous. He had concluded peace for forty years with Astolfo, King of the Lom- bards, but that ambitious monarch failed to keep his engagements, as, a short time afterwards, he drove the exarch Eutychius out of Ravenna, and then, claiming for himself all the rights of the emperor, he aspired to become master of Rome (753). This unjust warfare was fortunately carried on so slowly that the sovereign-pontiff had time to go to France and intercede with King Pepin for help against Astolfo. The French army was sent over the Alps, and Astolfo had to submit, and to hand over Ravenna to the people, and surrender the hostages. Stephen returned to Rome, accompanied by Prince Jerome, the brother of Pepin ; but in the following year Astolfo again took up arms, and Pepin, who had again crossed the Alps, this time compelled him to abandon definitely the exarchate of twenty- two towns, together with the territories 254 THE POPES. . . — — — attached to them, which he made over absolutely to St. Peter and his su< cessors. This, with the Duchy of Rome, constituted the temporal dominion of the Church. A few years later Adrian I., who had avoided falling into the political snares laid for him by Didier, appealed to Charlemagne for his intervention, and the latter, crossing the Alps, laid siege to Pavia, the capital of the Lom- bard kings, took Didier prisoner, and sent him to the monastery of Corbie. Not content with delivering Eome, Charlemagne, during the two visits which he paid to that city, during and after the war, confirmed the gift solemnly made by his father of the territories which were to be inalienably annexed to the Holy See ; and, at the same time, he added the coast of Genoa, Corsica, Mantua, Yenetia, Istria, the duchies of Spoleto, Benevento, and the entire exarchate over its thirty towns. Adrian had the consolation of seeing the heresies of the iconoclasts condemned by the second Mcene Council ; and the Empress Irene and her son Constantiue submitted to the decision. Adrian died in 795. His successor, Leo III., sent to the great Emperor of the Franks the standard of the city of Rome, and the keys of the Confession of St. Peter, as to the protector of the Eternal City. The emperor responded to this homage by the gift of immense treasure which he had taken from the enemy, and the pope devoted the greater part of it to the decorating of the Lateran Palace, and various churches. A conspiracy, which Leo III. only escaped by climbing the walls of Rome and by taking refuge with the Duke of Spoleto, who had marched to his succour, gave him an opportunity for going to see Charlemagne at Paderborn, who promised to come himself into Italy to confound the enemies of the holy father ; in the meanwhile he dispatched commissioners to Rome, who reinstated the pope in his pontifical city (November 30, 799). Charle- magne came to Rome in the following year, when, convoking an assembly of the people, he declared the object of his visit and summoned the accusers of the pope to appear before his tribunal. As they did not dare to put in an appearance, he declared that the holy father should be allowed to justify himself on oath. Then in the great cathedral of St. Peter, in the presence of a vast concourse of people, Leo, with his hand upon the books of the Evan- gelists, cried out, " I know nothing of the crimes with which the Romans have charged me." His declaration was received with shouts of applause that rung THE POPES. 255 Fig. 208. — Byzantine Dalmatic, said to have belonged to Leo III., but probably dating from the Twelfth Century, preserved in the Treasury of St. Peter's at Rome. Upon this garment, which is of dark-blue silk, are several designs embroidered in gold and colours. The most remark- able is one upon the front representing Christ in his glory. Seated upon a rainbow, with his feet upon two circles of fire and the right hand stretched out, he holds in his left the New Testament, which is open at the following passage: "Come unto me, ye chosen of my Father." Above his head is seen the cross with the crowns of thorns. Around him is a choir of angels, the Virgin, the saints, David and Solomon, the bishops and the religious orders ; below, to the right and to the left, St. John the Baptist, and Abraham receiving the souls of the just ; above, on the two shoulders, Jesus is giving the Holy Communion to the Apostles, the wine being administered on one side and the bread on the other. through, the vaults of the sacred edifice. Charlemagne, who had returned to St. Peter's on Christmas Day, for the service, knelt before the altar. The pope, 256 THE POPES, upstanding before him, placed upon his forehead a golden crown studded with jewels and proclaimed him emperor, thus giving him a real supremacy over all the Christian princes and people of the West. (Figs. 208 and 209.) The popes who were contemporary with the successors of Charlemagne, Fig. 209.— The Coronation of an Emperor by the Pope,' the Sovereign being represented by Maxi- milian I. — From "Des Sainctes Ceremonies," a Manuscript of the Sixteenth Century, in M. Euggieri's Collection. though not of special note, governed the Church with wise moderation ; and as they were all patrons of the Fine Arts, Rome is indebted to them for some of her chief embellishments. Leo IV., in 847, was compelled to make Rome secure from an attack by the Saracens, who were always making incursions up to its very walls. For this purpose he constructed around the church of St. Peter a regular town — the Leonine city — which he fortified with high THE POPES. 257 towers. He also fortified the places near Rome, and founded a new city, called Leopolfs, which he surrounded with ramparts. Rome thus being out of danger, he imitated the example of his predecessors by ornamenting the churches, to which he gave paintings and other works of art of the value of 5,971 silver marks. The fabulous story of Pope Joan — who was said to have been elected pope, and to have concealed her sex, though she was shortly after expelled, after some great scandal — is placed by historians between Leo IY. and Benedict III. ; but the falsity of the story is mani- fest, for there was no interregnum between the death of Leo, upon July 17th, 855, and the election of Benedict. Nicholas I. (858 — 867), anathematized Photius, the usurping Patriarch of Constantinople. The empire having fallen to Michael III., a child of three years old, his mother Theodora, assisted by his uncle Bardas, carried on the government in his name. "When this prince grew up, Bardas ousted Theodora, and, in order to maintain himself in power, pandered to the passions of his nephew. Michael gave himself up to such scandalous excesses that the Patriarch Ignatius excluded him from the church, and excommunicated Bardas. In six days, Photius, a layman who could be depended upon to do as he was told, \vas made patriarch in the room of Ignatius. This was the prelude to the separation of the Greek Church. Photius added heresy to his revolt against the pope, by asserting that the Holy Ghost proceeded from the Father only, and not from the Son. Nicholas' successor, Adrian II., appointed his legates to preside at the council which deposed the Patriarch Photius. He also upheld the sentence of his predecessor against Lothair, whom he compelled to renounce his adulterous union with Yaldrade. When that prince came before him to partake of the sacrament, the pope said in a loud tone of voice, as he presented the host, "If thou hast given up thy adultery, if thou hast broken off all connection with Yaldrade, may this sacrament comfort thee ! But if thy heart is still perverse, it will be for thy punishment." This lofty firmness of speech was all the more praiseworthy because the pope, in thus maintaining the rights of morality, had to defy and admonish a prince who had delivered Rome from the Saracens. No one can tell whether the doubt expressed by Adrian, as to the sincerity of Lothair's conversion, was well grounded or not ; but it is at least certain that the latter died forty days afterwards, and that his death appeared to be a judgment from Heaven. The legates of John YIIL, the successor of Adrian, allowed themselves L L 258 THE POPES. to be intimidated and corrupted by Photius. Deceived by their false representations, John VIII. at first approved of what they had done ; but when he learnt the truth he publicly excommunicated at Rome both Photius and the cowardly legates who had betrayed their trust in order to curry favour with this impostor (880). John VIII. was the first pope, since the fall of the Roman Empire, who had to decide between two competitors for the Imperial crown. He declared, that as the empire had been conferred upon Charlemagne by the grace of God and the authority of the pope, he trans- ferred it to the King of the Franks, Charles the Bald. For a century and a half the factions of powerful Italian families and the arbitrary will of the emperors interfered with the free election of the popes, whence arose great scandals, and many unworthy persons were elevated to the pontificate. On several occasions the rivalry of parties led to the creation of anti-popes, and at one time there were as many as three claimants to the Holy See. It is little short of miraculous that the papacy should have kept its place against so many causes tending to its ruin. At last, in 1049, the Romans having sent to the Emperor Henry III., asking him to appoint a successor to the pope who had j ust died, that monarch assembled the bishops and grandees of the empire at "Worms, and upon their advice selected Bruno, Bishop of Toul. Before repairing to Rome, Bruno went to consult Hildebrand, the monk of Cluny, whose reputation for virtue and ability stood very high. The latter received him very cordially, but pointed out to him the impropriety of a lay election, and persuaded him to exchange the pontifical gown for that of the pilgrim, until the people and clergy of Rome should have freely elected hi] Bruno entered Rome barefooted, and thus replied to the applause those who had gone to meet him : " The choice of the people and the clerg; supported as they are by the authority of the canons, overrides all oth< nominations ; I am therefore ready to return to my country if my electic is not approved by all your suffrages." By Hildebrand's advice, the anciei customs were observed. Bruno took the name of Leo IX. ; he was cons crated on the 2nd of February, and enthroned ten days later. Thus did Roman Court proclaim that the emperors and princes did not possess absolul power over the election of the pontiffs, and the right of election, after having been thus restored to the people and the clergy, was subsequently vested in the cardinals. THE POPES. 259 With a view to reforming the morals of the ecclesiastics, to re-establishing discipline and the liturgy, and to combat false doctrines and heresies, Leo IX. held a vast number of councils, some at Rome, some at Yercelli, and others at Paris ; he travelled all through France, Germany, and Italy, taking note of all the abuses which he discovered, and showing himself determined to correct them. Thanks to imperial munificence, he had increased very considerably the pontifical power. Carried away by his zeal, he accompanied the troops sent him by the emperor against the Normans who were devastating Italy. His soldiers were defeated, and he himself was taken prisoner ; but the Normans did homage to their captive, and begged him to accept the homage of all their possessions in Italy, so that Leo IX. actually obtained advantages greater than ever he could have expected. The nomina- tion of his successor no longer came within the province of the emperor, and the illustrious Hildebrand, who was at that time almost supreme in the Roman Church, directed the election under the canonical form of four successive popes, who required neither the approbation nor the support of the holy empire. The last of them, Alexander II., died in 1072, after having reigned nine years, and the bishops were deliberating on the choice of a new pontiff, when a voice was suddenly raised from amongst the people, " Hildebrand for pope, St. Peter has chosen him." This was as the voice of God, and Hildebrand, who had been pope de facto for so many years, was enthroned under the title of Gregory VII. His first care was to arrange at a council the affairs of Italy and of France, and to contract alliances with Spain, Hungary, and various German principalities. He judged himself strong enough to undertake this severe and unwearied struggle, which he kept up throughout the whole of his reign, in the interests of the Church, against the sovereigns of Europe. He wished to obtain recognition of the independence of the Holy See, to dis- possess the abbots and prelates who had been guilty of simony, reprimanding at the same time the emperors and kings who had trafficked in ecclesiastical dignities. He desired also to reform the loose morality of the clerks, at the same time that he condemned the careless indifference of the episcopate. He first attacked the Emperor Henry IY., he then threatened Philip I. with ex- communication if he did not mend his ways; he launched an anathema against five of the principal members of the imperial household, and afterwards summoned the monarch himself to appear in person before a synod, to render account of what he had done. Henry IV., victorious over the Saxons, and z6o THE POPES. irritated at the pope's audacity, convoked a diet at Worms for the purpose of deposing him, and dismissed the legates whom he had sent. During this time a conspiracy was being hatched at Rome against the pope, the promoters of which were Cencius, prefect of the city, and Guibert, Archbishop of Havenna. It was brought to issue upon the night of Christmas, 1075. Fig. 210. — Portrait of the great Countess Matilda. — From a Miniature in a contemporary poem which she was the heroine (Manuscript No. 4,922 in the Vatican Library). Gregory, wounded in the forehead while he was celebrating mass in th< basilica of St. Peter, was carried prisoner from the altar into one of th< towers ; from which he was almost at once delivered by the people, an< brought back to the altar to terminate the service. The pope showed great clemency towards the conspirators. Six weeks afterwards the Diet of Won pronounced his deposition, and the bishops gave in their solemn adherence THE POPES. 261 the decree. Gregory VII., nowise cast down or discouraged, anathematized the emperor at a council held in Rome ; and, then addressing himself to the whole Christian world, he entreated it to join him in the defence of their outraged religion. The most distinguished women of Europe — at the head of whom was Matilda, princess of Tuscany (Fig. 210), widow of Godfrey the Humpbacked — declared themselves openly for the pope, in whose favour a sudden reaction took place. Feudal Germany deserted the cause of the emperor, who was compelled to withdraw to Spires until a diet, convoked to meet at Augsburg, should decide as to the respective complaints of the two sovereigns. But the emperor, impatient to get rid of the sentence of excommunication which had been passed against him, went to meet the pope on his way to Augsburg with the Countess Matilda. This illustrious lady interposed to effect a reconciliation between the two rivals, who had an interview in the fortress of Canossa, near Reggio, when the emperor, in order to obtain his pardon, submitted to the humiliation of going on his knees to the pope to ask for it (1077). It was then that the Countess Matilda bequeathed, all her patrimonial domains and all her personal property to the Church and to the Court of Rome. The unhappy Henry, ashamed of the penance which he had been made to undergo, peremptorily separated himself from the papal communion. Council after council was convoked, and in the space of two years Gregory had convoked no less than seven for discussing the general affairs of the Church. He had not omitted to secure for himself allies, while the emperor was confronted in Germany by enemies who were attempting to wrest from him the imperial crown. Henry IV. succeeded in defeating them, and then turned to encounter Gregory, against whom he had set up an anti-pope. After the victories of Fladeheim and Marburg he crossed the Alps, crushed the papal army, and threatened Rome, where Gregory, inflexible as ever, had assembled an eighth council, which excommunicated the emperor afresh. The invest- ment of the city had lasted three years when the emperor, by the sacrifice of a vast sum of money, caused the gates of the town to be opened to him ; and though Gregory attempted a last effort to assemble a fresh council, Henry was already inside with his anti-pope, whom he had crowned under the title of Clement III. The intrepid Gregory, immured in the Castle of St. Angelo, held out until the old Norman knight Robert Guiscard, Duke of Apulia, came to his deliverance. He then convoked a tenth council, which once 262 THE POPES. more excommunicated the emperor, the anti-pope, and their numerous adherents. Before the emperor could return to Rome for the fifth time, Duke Robert Guiscard deemed it prudent to return to Apulia with the pope, whose death occurred at Salerno shortly afterwards (May 25th, 1085). Gregory possessed too much foresight not to have thought of naming an heir capable of pursuing his vast designs. Amongst those whom he had named, Danfier, Abbot of Monte-Cassino, was ultimately selected, and, though it was not without hesitation that he accepted so heavy a burden, he was made pope with the title of Victor III. The new pontiff came to Rome, and occupied with his troops the Faubourg of Transtevere and the Castle of St. Angelo, while the anti-pope Clement III. held the other bank of the Tiber. This state of things could not, however, be of long duration. Victor, overcome with grief, died soon after at Monte-Cassino, and was succeeded by Eudes de Chatillon, who took the name of Urban II. (1087). Of French origin, and brought up in the Metropolitan Cathedral of Rheims, he had for twenty- eight years been prior of the famous abbey of Cluny. It was there that Gregory, whose unbounded confidence he had enjoyed, first knew him, and, under these circumstances, he naturally wished to continue the policy of that pontiff. But the Emperor Henry IV. frustrated this project by suddenly invading Italy, capturing Rome, and setting up a new anti-pope, Guibert, to rule in the Holy City, under the protection of the German soldiery. Urban, forced to abandon the Castle of St. Angelo, which was besieged by the imperial troops, transported his seat of government to Benevento, where he displayed more resolution than before, crowning Conrad, son of the emperor, King of the Romans, after getting him to abjure the schism, and excom- municated Philip I., who had sent away his wife in order to marry his concubine. After this, he returned to Rome in time to celebrate the Christmas services. He expelled the anti-pope, Guibert, and his followers, recovered the independence of the tiara, and assembled at Placentia, amidst the schismatical Lombards, a council which was attended by two hundre( prelates, four thousand clerks, and thirty thousand laymen. This was ai imposing protest on behalf of the peace of the Church, to which the presence of delegates from the Empires of Germany and the East, and from th( Kings of France and England, lent additional significance. Urban went, in the course of the same year, to Clermont, in Auvergne (Fig. 211), to preside, under the auspices of Philip L, over another council, at which the THE POPES. 263 first crusade (1095), preached by him throughout France, was decided upon; he afterwards returned in triumph to Rome (1096), happy in the thought that he had realised the wishes of Gregory, who first conceived the idea of the Holy War. The Council of Rome, at which the sovereign right of the Church to confer the investiture of ecclesiastical dignities was proclaimed, marked the close of his reign. He died in 1099, upon the eve of that century of strife and confusion over which his spirit and that of Gregory VII., as well as of several other popes and learned doctors who had come from Cluny, were destined, as it were, to hover, for the investiture quarrel was far from being settled. Pascal II. imitated the firmness of his predecessors, and the King of France gave way ; but the Emperor Henry V., in spite of the formal engagements entered into by his father, revived his claim to appoint the bishops and the abbots, and to induct them into their charge. After entering Rome with his troops, and after having given the pope the kiss of peace, he had him arrested, together with several of his cardinals, and, by means of a long captivity, by threats, and by violence, he induced Tiim to issue a bull, in which the pontiff acknowledged the emperor's right to annul the canonical elections of bishops and abbots, and likewise promised not to excommunicate him for the future. Pascal II. had no sooner regained his liberty than he convoked a council at Rome, at which he confessed that he had failed in his duty, whereupon the council, with his consent, condemned afresh the ecclesiastical investitures conferred by the civil power. Another council, held in France, excommunicated the emperor, who succeeded in taking Rome. Pascal being dead, Gelasius II. had to take refuge at Cluny, and Henry V. appointed an anti-pope, who assumed the title of Gregory VIII. At the death of Gelasius II., the cardinals who had followed him into France elected as his successor a Frenchman — Calixtus II., to whom belongs the renown of having put an end to the quarrel as to investiture. The emperor, finding that the irritation of the Germans, weary of his despotism, was growing perilous to his throne, convoked a diet at Wiirtz- burg, when it was decided by him and the princes of the empire that ambassadors should be sent to negotiate with the pope, who had returned to Home amidst the acclamations of the inhabitants. According to the Concordat drawn up and adopted by Henry V. at the 264 THE POPES. Fig. 212. — Public and Solemn Functions of the Sovereign-Pontiff. — From a Roman Engraving of the Seventeenth Century. 1. Solemn mass celebrated in St. Peter's by the Pope. — 2. Celebration of the sacred services in which the Pope takes part, especially those of the Sundays in Advent and Lent. — 3. Coronation of the Sovereign-Pontiff at St. John of Lateran. — 4. The newly-elected Pope seated upon the altar of the Clementine Chapel and receiving the homage of the cardinals. — o. Solemn benedic- tion which the Pope gives to the people. — 6. Tribute of the white horse, formerly paid to the Pope each year, on St. Peter's day by the King of Naples in token of his vassalship. — 7. Solemn cavalcade of the Pope upon his first journey from St. Peter's to the Lateran Church. — 8. Public consistory for the reception of the ambassadors. — 9. The Pope carrying the Holy Sacrament in the procession of the Fete-Dieu. — 10. Opening of the holy gate by the Pope; for the twenty-five years' jubilee. — 11. Solemn procession on the days when the Pope, clad ii the sacred decorations, goes to the Basilica of St. Peter to celebrate mass. THE POPES. 265 Diet of Worms, the emperor finally renounced his claim to investiture by the ring and the crozier, which were symbols of ecclesiastical dignity ; he acknowledged the right of the dioceses and abbeys to elect their bishops and abbots, and the investiture of the elected dignitaries into their domains was to be conferred by the emperor, in Germany, before their consecra- tion, and in the kingdoms of Italy and Burgundy after it. This Concordat was confirmed at the oecumenical council which Calixtus II. assembled at Rome in 1125. We have dwelt at some length upon these matters, but it was necessary in order to show what was the action of the popes in the Middle Ages, and it was at this point that their influence reached its apogee. The two conceptions of Gregory VII. had been realised: in accordance with the idea generally received at that time, the kings or emperors, in the eyes of the people, only possessed authority as long as they were orthodox, and obstinacy, under the ban of excommunication, amounted to heresy ; hence the pope was regarded as the supreme chief of the Christian republic, and was entrusted with the duty of making princes respect morality, the faith, the rights of the Church, and the rights of the people. The election of the head of the Church had, therefore, to be free from the influence of the temporal power, since that head would be called upon to be its judge. This was the point which Hildebrand caused to be recognised in respect to the election of the popes, beginning with Leo IX. ; and the perseverance of his successors got the principle extended to that of the bishops, during the reign of Calixtus II. The second object which Gregory VII. had in view, was the preservation of Christian civilisation from the Mussulman yoke, by carrying the war into the East ; and the Crusades realised this great design. We may now sketch in a few lines the part played by the popes during the last centuries of the Middle Ages. The great Roman families, anxious to obtain power, elected an anti-pope. By means of these agitations, Arnold of Brescia, under the pretext of creating a Roman republic, established a kind of dictatorship in the city. The emperor overthrew this usurper, who was burnt alive ; but he set up anti -popes, and Alexander III., when besieged in Rome, declared himself the ally of the Lombard cities, the chief of the Guelfs against the Ghibelins, and the champion of Italian liberty. Under his pontificate, it was ordained M M z66 THE POPES. (at the third Council of the Lateran, in 1179, that for the future, the cardinals alone should take part in the election for the pontiff, without Fig. 213.— Gregory IX. (1227—1241) handing the Decretals, which he had embodied in one AVOI to an advocate of the Consistory. — Fresco by Raphael (1515), in the Stanzas at the Vatican. the intervention of the clergy or the people. The Crusades occupied mei minds during the last twenty years of the twelfth century. The thirteenl began with one of the most celebrated of the popes, Innocent III., who, THE POPES. 267 following in the footsteps of Gregory VII., made emperors and kings to tremble by his threats of excommunication, and preached the crusade against the infidels and the Albigenses. His two successors, Honorius III. and Gregory IX., imitated his zeal and resolution. Gregory IX., amidst the multifarious cares of his holy office, found time to draw up a new collection of his own letters and constitutions, and those of his predecessors. He confided this heavy task, which was carried out with remarkable skill and order, to Eaymundus de Pennaforti, his chaplain. This collection, which was received with respectful gratitude, has since been called the Decretals (Fig. 213). After these three eminent popes, sedition broke out afresh inside Eome. The Holy See was vacant for a long period more than once during the latter part of this century, as the cardinals could not agree in their choice ; and in consequence it was decided that the election should take place in con- clave. After a numerous series of popes, who occupied the chair for only a short time, Boniface VIII. (Fig. 218) endeavoured to march in the footsteps of Gregory VII. and Innocent III. Philippe le Bel, anxious to destroy all traces of the feudal regime in order to obtain absolute power, would not submit to the reprimands and menaces of the pope, and it is well known how he caused the pontiff to be seized at Anagni by Nogaret. The aged pontiff, whom nothing could move, was set free by the people, who expelled Nogaret and his soldiers ; but the rough treatment he had received hastened his death. Philippe le Bel, who saw how seriously he had compromised himself, profited by the dissensions which arose between the Guelfs and the Ghibelins at the conclave to ensure the election of a Frenchman, Bertrand de Got, Archbishop of Bordeaux, who took the title of Clement V., and immediately came to reside in France. The prestige of the papacy was diminished by this selection of Avignon as a place of residence, for the Italians came to look upon themselves as being enfeoffed to the French kingdom. Eome and the Pontifical States fell into a condition of complete anarchy, and a man of enterprise, Bienzi, endeavoured to re-establish the ancient republic. The cardinals, nearly all of whom were Frenchmen, always nominated popes of their own nationality. One of them — Gregory XL— who had come to Eome for a short visit, died there in 1377. The people then induced the cardinals by threats to select a pope of Italian birth, and their choice fell upon the Archbishop of Bari, who took the title of Urban VI. 268 THE POPES. The cardinals who were at Avignon when the election took place, at first recognised it as valid, but when he manifested his intention of remaining at Rome, they declared it to be irregular, and chose Cardinal Robert of Geneva, formerly bishop of Cambrai, who took the title of Clement VII., and the Christian world was divided between the two popes. Each had several suc- cessors, and this long schism proved the termination of the Christian republic which had been the work of the Middle Ages. At last, the General Council of Constance, convoked by one of the anti-popes, but confirmed by Gregory XII., Fig. 214. — Solemn entry of the Emperor Charles Y. and Pope Clement VII. into Bologna, Novem- ber 5th, 1529. The persons at the head of the cortege are the great dignitaries of the Church, the first bearing the pastoral staff, the second the pontifical tiara, and the two others golden candelabra. The taper-bearers precede the Holy Sacrament. (See next engraving.) received that pontiff's resignation, and Cardinal Otho Colonna, a man of great piety and zeal, elected by a unanimous vote, assumed the government of the Church under the name of Martin V. He shortly afterwards repaired to Rome, where he was received with enthusiasm ; and his presence brought back the prosperity and prestige of the Holy City. Notwithstanding, one of the anti-popes, with a following of two cardinals, still had a successor who was recognised by the kingdoms of Aragon, Valentia, and Sicily ; but he finally complied with the wishes of Christendom, and his abdication in 1429 put an end to the schism which had lasted for half a century. Ten years after this, during the reign of the same pontiff (Martin V. THE POPES. 269 another and an older schism seemed to all appearance extinguished at the Council of Florence, in which the Emperor of the East and the patriarchs of his Church were present. After grave deliberation, the Greeks drew up an orthodox profession of faith, and, by the complete submission of the Eastern Church to her Roman sister, union was restored in 1439. But the emperor and his patriarchs found upon their return that this was so deeply resented by the Greek people, that they gave way to popular clamour and withdrew (Ixcmuinder of Fig. 214.)— The Holy Sacrament, borne upon the back of a white horse, is escorted by the patricians and doctors of Bologna. The Pope's sacristan marches alone in the rear of the dais, and this part of the cortege is brought up by a group of princes, dukes, and counts. — Drawn and engraved on brass by John Hogenberg: in the Collection of M. lluggieri, Paris. from their formal engagements, the schism thus becoming wider than ever. The ruin of the Eastern empire followed very closely upon this decision. The fall of Constantinople into the hands of the Turks indicated only too plainly the danger with which Europe was menaced, and the popes endeavoured to impress it upon the kings and their subjects. Pius II., who had distinguished himself by his erudition and his writings, was considered to be the most talented man of his day, and in a council held at Mantua in 1459 did his utmost to hurry on the preparations for the crusade. After five years' hard work, he collected a fleet at Ancona, and was about to THE POPES. p.rm- set sail, when lie was struck down by a mortal illness. His successors con- tinued the work which he had begun ; but, though the Christians obtained successes over the Turks which promised well for the undertaking, their compatriots failed to respond to the appeals of the pope, who saw that Italy was seriously threatened with invasion. It was under these critical circum- stances that the choice of the cardinals fell upon a man of extraordinary energy, Roderick Borgia, who took the name of Alexander VI. He was charged with crimes which ought to have been laid at the door of members of his family, and he struggled against the oppressive spoliation to which the great Roman families had subjected the city, setting courageously to work in order to reconstitute the temporal power of the Holy See. Pius III., chosen as his successor, died a month after he was elected. The Cardinal of Eovero was then nominated unanimously, and took the title of Julius II. In pursuance of the idea of Italian independence, this warlike pontiff carried on an obstinate struggle against Louis XII., with the view of retaking several towns of Italy which had once belonged to the States of the Church. Unintimidated either by the armies of Louis XII., or by the threats of the councils convoked under the protectorate of the King of France and the Emperor of Germany, he himself assembled a council at Rome, and this inflexible old man, after having brought about wise measures of reform which all Europe applauded, cited the king and the members of his parliament to come and answer for their revolt against the Holy See. But Julius II., worn out by his exertions, died in 1513. His successor, Leo X., who had effected a reconciliation with Louis XII., was obliged to head the Italian league against Francis I. An understanding had been brought about after the battle of Marignano, and the Pragmatic Sanction, which had been the pretext of so many disputes since the days of Philippe le Bel, was given up and replaced by a concordat concluded in 1516 between France and the Holy See. Leo X., continuing the Italian policy of his predecessor, also kept in view the idea of a crusade against Turks ; but this great work of the papacy was only realised half-a-centi later under the pontificate of Pius V. The faithful were aroused by voice ; Cyprus had fallen into the hands of the Mussulmans, and the wh( of Europe was in imminent peril. The cost of the expedition was divide between the King of Spain, Venice, and the pope ; fifty thousand infantry ai four thousand cavalry were got together, and the command of the fleet WJ THE POPES. 271 given to Don John of Austria. It encountered the Turkish fleet, which con- sisted of two hundred and twenty-four vessels, in the Gulf of Lepanto, on October 7th, 1571. The infidels were annihilated, losing twenty-five thou- sand men and ten thousand prisoners, while fifteen thousand Christians whom they had chained to their galleys were set at liberty (Fig. 215). Catholic H:?. 21.5. — Iron shield presented to Don John of Austria by Pius V., in recognition of his services to Christendom by the victory at Lepanto (1571), with an inscription signifying, " Christ has won the victory ; it is He who reigns and governs." — From the " Armeria Keal " (Madrid), published by M. Ach. Jubinal. Europe breathed once more, and in its gratitude attributed this prodigious victory to the protection of the Virgin, to whom the faithful told their beads at the hour at which the battle took place, and the memory of this event was perpetuated by a yearly fete on the first Sunday in October. Led away from our subject in order to relate an account of the struggle against the then indomitable Islam power, we omitted to mention another THE POPES. >y ^ :^? Fig. 217. — The Triumph of Christ. — From an engraving of the early part of the Seventeenth Century, reproduced from a composition attributed to Titian. THE POPES. 273 event which was the second greatest achievement of the popes in the sixteenth century, namely, the Council of Trent (Fig. 216). The progress made by Protestantism led to the convocation of a general council, which was to pro- nounce as to all the disputed points of doctrine, and to effect the indispensable and long-looked-for reforms in ecclesiastical discipline. The town of Trent was selected as the place of meeting, because its situation between Italy and Germany made it so easy of access for those who were expected to attend. Although the holding of this council was mutually agreed on by Pope Paul III. and the Emperor Charles V., in concert with the other Christian princes, the opening was deferred until 1545, and it lasted with frequent adjournments until 1563, when Pius IY. was pope. No council ever dealt with so many topics, both of dogma and of discipline. The abuses which had been pointed out by many Catholic divines were abolished even before the Protestants could draw attention to them. The catalogue of holy books which were received as canonical was inserted in one of the first decrees of the council ; and it was there declared, that the interpretation of these sacred works should be given by the Church, to whom alone it belonged to decide what was the true meaning of Scripture. The questions at issue were then gone into minutely ; original sin, the justification of the sinner, the seven sacraments, the mass, purgatory, indulgences, the worship of saints, &c. The twenty-fifth and last session was held on the 3rd of December, 1563. But the hopes of conciliation to which this assembly gave rise were not realised, and the Protestant Churches rejected the decisions of the Fathers of the Council of Trent, whose authority they refused to recognise. The unity of the Chris- tian republic, which had been the work of the Middle Ages, was destroyed, and a new era brought with it new duties for the head of the Catholic Church. Fig. 213. — Leaden Bull with which Pope Boniface VIII. sealed his letters; on it are seen the names of Boniface VIII., and of St. Peter and St. Paul, with their effigies (Thirteenth Centnry). — French National Archives. N N THE SECULAR CLERGY. The Minor and the Major Orders in the Early Centuries of the Church.— Establishment of Tithes originally voluntary, and afterwards obligatory. — Influence of the Bishops. — Supremacy of the See of Rome.— Form of Episcopal Oath in the Early Centuries.— Reform of Abuses by the Councils.— Remarkable sayings of Charlemagne and Hincmar.— Public Education created by the Church. — The Establishment of the Communes favoured by the Bishops.^— The Beau- mont Law. — Struggle with the Bourgeoisie in the Fifteenth Century. — The Council of Trent —Institution of Seminaries. EAR the close of the ninth century, Anastasius the Librarian wrote, al Rome, an Ecclesiastical History, froi which we learn that the hierarchical order of the functionaries in the primi- tive Church was composed as follows : the doorkeeper (Fig. 220), the reader, the exorcist (Fig. 221), the acolyte, the sub-deacon, the keeper of the con- fessions of the martyrs, the deacon, the priest, the bishop. To these were afterwards added the chanters 01 psalmists, entitled confessors, becai their function was to confess th< name of God by celebrating His praises. The interpreter-linguists, the copyists, and the notaries, whc figure in the Greek as well as in the Roman Church down to the fourth 01 fifth century, ranked with the order of confessors and that of clerks. In the early days of Christianity the bishop in each diocese consecrate( to the service of religion, after the manner of St. Paul, those who wei represented to him as being the most worthy, or whom he himself deeim fitting. The aspirant to the major orders sometimes rose very slowly, howevei Fig. 219.— The Chanter or Psalmist, Minor Order.— Gr. Durand's "Rationale." THE SECULAR CLERGY. 275 meritorious lie might be; thus Latinus, Bishop of Brescia, who died towards the close of the third century, had been, as his epitaph recorded, simple exorcist for twelve years, priest for fifteen, and bishop for three years and seven months. There were, however, some rapid and almost immediate promotions, called per salt-urn, because they jumped, as it were, from one grade to another ; but these were made under exceptional circumstances. At first the Christians had not any clergymen, properly so called; priests, however, ministered in each locality, for we read that St. Paul appointed Titus "to ordain elders in every city" (Titus i. 5). But in Fig. 220. — The Doorkeeper, Minor Order. Fig. 221. — The Exorcist, Minor Order. Miniature from the " Rationale Divinornm Officiorum" of William Durand (Manuscript of the Fourteenth Century), in the Library of M. Ambroise Firmin-Didot. most cases, during the first centuries, the bishop alone ministered in his episcopal city, particularly in the East (Fig. 222). After the fourth century we find that, in the East as at Rome, there were other churches in the large towns besides the cathedral ; the functions of the clergymen, or cardinals, who ministered in them were confined to giving the people religious instruction, and to keep the bishop informed of everything relating to the government of the church. Down to the fifth century, the administration of the sacraments and the celebration of the holy communion took place in the cathedral only. Pope St. Marcellus founded, in the fourth century, twenty- five titles or parishes in Rome, in order to afford greater 276 THE SECULAR CLERGY. facilities for the preparatory instruction by which the sacraments of baptism and penance were preceded. But in the fifth century, when the cathedrals Fig. 222.— The Good Shepherd, whose head appears as if crowned with seven stars, carrying the lost sheep upon his shoulders ; around him are collected the seven faithful sheep. On one side Jonah is being vomited out by the great fish ; on the other he is lying beneath the gourd ; above him are the dove and Noah's Ark. The old man with a crown, with his hand raised above the cloud?, and the woman with a crescent on the forehead, personify the sun and the moon. — Funereal lamp in baked clay of the Third Century, found in the Catacombs. In the Christian Museum of the Vatican. were found too small to hold all the congregation, it became the custom to distribute, in the titles, or parishes of the city, the holy eucharist THE SECULAR CLERGY. 277 which the bishop sent by the hands of deacons to the titulary clergy. The bishops also delegated to their clergy the power of receiving the reconciliation of the penitents in cases of necessity, of admitting heretics in danger of death (but only in the bishop's absence), and of pronouncing excommunications in their parishes, by virtue of a sentence delivered by the bishop. The clergyman also visited the sick, administered the sacrament of extreme unction, blessed the private dwelling-places, and himself selected the staff for his church. At last, in the sixth century, Fig. 223. — The celebration of Mass in an Oratory. — Fac-simile of a Miniature in a Manuscript of the Ninth Century, from an Engraving belonging to M. Ambroise Firmin-Didot. clergymen celebrated, in the quarters or ^Yfes-wherein they ministered, the entire liturgy of the holy communion, and from the seventh century they were empowered to diminish or to increase, as they thought proper, in accord- ance with the revenues of the parish, the number of the clerks, choristers, and the various subordinate officers. In compliance with the wishes of the faithful, the bishop would often authorise the clergy to celebrate two masses upon the same day, one to take place of necessity in the parish church, the other perhaps in some oratory attached to the parish (Fig. 223). Independently of the offerings made by the faithful, the churches, which already possessed landed property, after the conversion of Constantine found their domains increasing in value. The barbarian chiefs who became converts 278 THE SECULAR CLERGY. to Christianity outrivalled each other in their liberality towards the clergy. Tithes, the regular payment of which was only proposed towards the close of the fifth century, were soon made compulsory, more especially in the countries subject to the Franks. It is incorrect that tithes were not made obligatory until the time of Charlemagne ; all he did was to ensure their collection, and to impose them upon the newly-converted under threat of excommunication. In conformity with a decree issued by Pope Gelasius, he ordained that the produce of .the tithe should be equally divided amongst the bishop, the priests, the fabrics in each diocese, and the poor — that is to say, the hospitals. These establishments were administered and provided with religious services by the charity of the clergy ; thus the increase of ecclesiastical wealth turned to the profit of the needy. By the name of presbyters (from a Greek word equivalent to the Latin words seniores, sages, and sacerdotcs, sacred men) were designated the functionaries who stood in the second rank of the ecclesiastical hierarchy. From this term was afterwards derived that of priest. At first there was no fixed age for admission to the priesthood ; but at the end of the fourth century Pope St. Syricius decided that a clerk, promoted to be a deacon at thirty, should not become a priest for at least five years. The Emperor Justinian prohibited a deacon from being promoted to the priesthood until he had attained the age of thirty-five ; but in Gaul, Spain, and Germany the minimum age was thirty, and as soon as the people had given their sanction to the ordination of a deacon, the election took place. The functions of deacons are from the first clearly indicated by what they did, for in the first century Philip, one of the seven deacon-cardinals chosen by the Apostles, preached the Gospel and baptized. At the end of the third century we find in Spain that St. Vincent, only a deacon, took Bishop Valerian's place when he felt himself unable to minister the word. Moreover, St. Stephen, the first of the deacons and martyrs, was also preaching, within a few months of the death of Jesus Christ, when he was dragged from the sanctuary to be stoned. The deacons, therefore, performed liturgical func- tions, but their ordinary duty was to preside at the tables of the Christian communion. The tumular epigraph on the catacombs of Eome exhibits a curious list of the various special duties allotted to the priests, as well as to the deacons, besides the service of the altar: here we find a priest doctor ; THE SECULAR CLERGY. a priest guardian, overseer, possibly our inn or lodging-keeper (niansiotianus) ; again, we find a deacon archivist, or keeper of the archives (scrinarius), a priest schoolmaster (mayister ludi), &c. In the first three centuries of the Church, holy orders were conferred not only in the basilicas and in the cata- combs, but also in private oratories ; some few recluses were even ordained in their own cells. From the reign of Con- stantine, it was decided by the councils that the laying on of hands upon the clerks to raise them to deacons, or upon dea- cons to raise them to the priesthood, should always take place in public (co- ram populo) and at fixed periods. The epoch chosen was at firet the calends of December, afterwards ex- tended to each of the four seasons. The iconography of the Fig. 224.— The Ecclesiastical Tonsure.— Miniature from the "Rationale Divi- norum Officiorum" Of William Durand officers of the sanctuary (Manuscript of the Fourteenth Century), j always represents Library of M. Ambroise Firmin-Didot. Nd™ the bishop as seated upon an elevated chair, laying hands upon clerks of a gradually descending order ; the priest raising his arms and spreading them out to give the benediction; the deacon, bearing a cross or a book of the Gospels, or perhaps both, as he is portrayed in an ancient mosaic in St. Lawrence-without- the-walls, at Rome. It must also be noted that the deacons and the priests, as well as the clerks of a lower order, are represented as beardless and with short-cut hair. In the sixth century, the tonsure or clerical crown, was universally adopted by the Church. It was a mark of dignity which distinguished the clerks from the monks and the rest of the faithful ; laymen wore their z8o THE SECULAR CLERGY. hair more or less long with a proportionate amount of beard, and the monks cut their hair almost as close as if shorn. The primitive Church had created the office of acolyte, whose duty consisted in accompanying the bishops, the priests, and even the deacons. Under the pontificate of Cornelius (251), there were forty-two of the^e assistants. The Eastern Church also had its acolytes, but did not accord them the importance which they had in the city of the popes, where they formed three classes : the palatines, who assisted the sovereign pontiff in the basilica of the Lateran ; the stationaries, who aided him in the churches where the stations took place ; the regionaries, who assisted the deacons in each of the regions or parishes. The political power of the bishops was founded in Gaul at the beginning of the sixth century (Fig. 225), and down to the end of the first dynasty they were the real organizers of the French monarchy. Converted to Christianity after the battle of Tolbiac, and baptized by St. Remigius, Clovis became the protector of the Gallo-Roman Church. The Clergy then enjoyed a legitimate influence, as is justly remarked by a grave historian : " The barbarians, accustomed to carry all before them by the weight of arms, could not be subdued by a force or civilised by a literature which they despised or failed to understand ; but the clergy, surrounded by that pomp which has- so great an influence over uncultivated imaginations, combated them with simple and plain doctrines, with a vigorous and united hierarchy, and with a faith which, needing no subtle reasonings, imposes only the duty of belief, and leans for support upon a morality the sanctity of which they could not but feel, even while violating it. Was it not most fortunate that there should have been an order capable of arresting the universal disorder ? Unarmed priests mingled with these savage hordes and inspired them, by means of baptism, with some notions of humanity ; they taught them to hold their hands, showing them that they whom they were about to strike was a brother. " The bishops carried out, with as much dignity as benevolence, their sublime mission of sympathizing with the people and those who were oppressed ; having a paternal solicitude for their flock, they placed them- selves face to face with conquerors, whom they knew how to pacify and to conciliate. The veneration with which they were surrounded and the holiness of their lives earned them the respect even of Attila and Genseric. THE SECULAR CLERGY. 281 They were entrusted with the embassies, and they administered in the room of magistrates, whose power had been crushed. Epiphanius, Bishop of Pavia, was sent to the Burgundian kings Gundibald and Godegesil, to procure the release of a number of Italian prisoners, whom he brought back with Fig. 225. — The Legend of St. Martin. — From a piece of tapestry of the Thirteenth Century, in the Louvre (No. 1117). — 1. St. Martin sharing his cloak with a poor man. — 2. He sees in a dream Jesus Christ clad with this half of his cloak. — 3. The saint's baptism, the priest sprinkling him with water, and God blessing him. — 4. He brings to life a catechumen, who had died without being baptized, in his monastery at Liguge, near Poitiers. — 5. At the same place he recalls to life a slave, who is first represented as hung from a gibbet, and afterwards standing on the ground and giving him thanks. — 6. St. Martin consecrated Bishop of Tours in 371. — 7. He evokes the spectre of a pretended martyr, held in veneration about Tours, and when it appears and avows that it had been executed for its crimes, the chapel is demolished. — 8. He gives his tunic to a poor man. — 9. He brings to life the son of a peasant in a heathen village near Chartres. — 10. He drives out the evil spirit from the body of a mad cow. — 11. Seeing on the banks of a river some birds watching to catch fish, he bids them fly away, saying, " Here we see the type of the enemies of our salvation, always on the watch to seize our souls." — 12. Death of St. Martin. His soul, in the form of a child, is being borne off to heaven by two angels. him in triumph. When the Ligurians were ravaged by the incursions of the Transalpines, the king remitted, at the prayer of the bishop, one-third of the indemnity. St. Caesarius, Bishop of Aries, sold the patens and chalices o o 282 THE SECULAR CLERGY. to ransom the prisoners. Euspicius, Bishop of Sergiopolis, upon the Euphrates, paid Chosroes for the ransom of twelve thousand prisoners. St. Germain, Bishop of Paris, gave away even his own tunic by way of charity ; ' so that/ to use the language of an artless chronicler, ' he was often shivering with cold, while those upon whom he had bestowed his favours were warm.' '; The bishops were sometimes obliged to exercise the duties of royalty. Honorius, of Novara, when Theodoric and Odoacer were at war, fortified, in order to give shelter to his flock, a certain number of places similar to those in which the military were garrisoned. Nicetius, Bishop of Treves, "an apostolic man, in his progress through the country, constructed, like a good shepherd that he was, a fold to protect his flock ; he surrounded the hill with thirty towers, which shut it in on all sides, and an edifice rose where hitherto a forest had cast its shadow." During the reigns of the last of the Merovingians and the first of the Carlovingians, the jurisconsults and the magistrates were generally bishops or plain priests, whose venerable character, in addition to their knowledge and wisdom, had caused them to be designated to fulfil these high functions. Dagobert, when about to draw up the Capitularies which were to govern the Germans, the Thuringians, the Burgundians, the Neustrians, the Eipuairians, and the Romans, entrusted the work to four ecclesiastical doctors, and consequently the disposition of this new code was remarkably tolerant, — " for," said these pious legislators, " there is no sin so grave, but that the culprit's life may be spared, if he will but hold God in fear and the saints in respect, seeing that the Lord hath said, 'He who pardons shall himself be forgiven, but he who pardoneth not shall obtain no mercy.' " In cases where the crime seemed of a nature to deserve no clemency, the law remitted the culprit to be judged by the bishop or a priest delegated by him, whose tribunal, standing in the midst of a church, was from that very fact inviolable, and placed under the tutelary protection of religion. The royal decree added, " When the culprit shall take refuge in a church, let no one dare to drag him out with violence ; if he has already crossed the threshold of the sanctuary, let the bishop or curate of that church be sent for, and if they refuse to deliver him up, it is to them that the pursuers shall look for his punishment." For more than a century before, the spiritual and temporal constitution THE SECULAR CLERGY. 283 of the Church was regularly organized throughout France. The diocese comprised the territorial boundaries which the Roman administration had established in the provinces for the civil government of the vicars and the counts, and most of these dioceses were kept, within about the same limits, Fig. 226. — Consecration of St. Remigius, Bishop of Kheims. — Fac-simile of an Engraving of the " Eheims Tapestry," in the cathedral of that city, published by M. Ach. Jubinal. (Sixteenth Century.) down to 1789. The ecclesiastical province, of which the metropolitan or the archbishop was head, was made up of several dioceses or suffragan bishoprics, and when a provincial council took place, it assembled in the metropolis under the presidency of the archbishop. Above the metro- politans there were the patriarchs and the primates, dignitaries occupying 284 THE SECULAR CLERGY. the principal apostolic sees, such as Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, Cesarea, and Heraclea in the East, and in the West, Milan, Lyons, Rheims, Treves, and Mayence — which latter city became, under Pope Zacharias (741 — 752), the metropolis of all Germany. The supremacy of Rome was acknowledged by the universal Church from the days of the Apostles, as is attested by all the Fathers, and especially by St. Irenaeus, whose spiritual father was Polycarp, a disciple of St. John. History has handed down to us the form of oath of allegiance to the pope taken by the apostle of Germany in the eighth century, Wilfred, better known by the name of Boniface, who, in the course of a few years, made more than a hundred thousand converts. So far from being exalted with pride at the success of his mission, he continued to go for advice to Pope Gregory II., and to submit to his decision any intricate matters which might occur in the course of his ministry. The following translation of the form which he signed when raised to the dignity of bishop, will give an idea of his deference and spirit of submissiveness ; it forcibly exhibits the power of the hierarchy at this epoch : — " In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, who has saved us, Leo the Great being Emperor, the seventh year of his consulate, and the fourth of his son Constantine the Great, Emperor, — I, Boniface, by the grace of God bishop, promise to thee, blessed St. Peter, Prince of the Apostles, and to thy vicar, the blessed Gregory, as well as to his successors, in the name of the indivisible Trinity, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, and by his most holy body here present, to observe in purity and fidelity the Catholic Faith, and, with God's assistance, to persevere in the unity of this same Faith upon which indubitably depends the salvation of all Christians. I also promise never to yield to any instigation contrary to the unity of the common and universal Church, but faithfully and sincerely to devote all my strength to thee and to the interests of thy Church, which has received from the Lord the power of binding and loosing, and also to thy Vicar and his successors. If I find any prelate living in disobedience to the ordinances of the holy Fathers, I undertake not to hold any kind of communion with him, but to win him back if I can ; if not, to send a faithful report of his conduct to my lord the successor of the Apostle. And if (which may God forfend !) I should attempt to infringe the terms of this declaration, at any time or in any manner whatsoever, I acknow- ledge myself guilty of eternal punishment, and deserving the fate of Ananias THE SECULAR CLERGY. 285 cotunammfivnb efc* fljin agswnwg Aoncmo^ cttmuctWto ammmstt Fig. 227. — Ceremony of robing a Bishop for his consecration. — From the" Rationale Divinorum Officiorum" of William Durand (Manuscript of the Fourteenth Century), Library of M. Ambroise Firmin-Didot. 286 THE SECULAR CLERGY. and Sapphira, who were guilty of fraud in the declaration of their goods. I, Boniface, a humble bishop, have written with my own hand the text of this oath, which I lay upon the most holy body of St. Peter, in the presence of God who is my witness and judge ; I have taken, as is herein stated, the Fig. 228. — Solemn Reception of a Bishop. Arrival of St. Gery at Cambrai, where he was appointe bishop, in 589. View of the city, the ramparts, and 'the chureh dedicated to St. Medard, and founded by St. Gery. — Miniature from the "Chroniques du Hainaut" (Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century), Burgundian Library, Brussels. - oath which I undertake to observe." It is worthy of notice that this formula was already in use in the time of Pope Gelasius, in the fifth century. From the sixth century, the influence which the bishops enjoy under the Roman empire went on increasing. Chilperic I. was alarmed at its progress, declaring that " the bishops alone were supreme in the cities/' Each one administered the affairs of his diocese with sovereign authority (Fig. 228), and, by means of the councils convoked by the kings, they THE SECULAR CLERGY. 287 governed the whole of the kingdom. In Gaul, there were twenty-five councils during the fifth century, fifty-four in the sixth, and twenty in the seventh, all of which were composed of bishops, supplemented by a few abbots and priests who were either well-known masters of ecclesiastical law, or eligible upon other grounds. From the diminution in the number of § A, Cf ADOT1S DHl^VlfBjCHHl lHkocc0J)J<£ COHTiH fTy R VlTjL CV1